TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on career readiness. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Doctor Gupta

When students are preparing to graduate from university, they need to make decisions about what kind of company they want to work for. They might consider large, older companies with an established reputation, or possibly new start-up companies, which tend to be small but very focused on the future. Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

Kelly

I think in general, the established company is the better choice. Because they’re already well-known, these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your résumé. That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

Andrew

I see your point, Kelly, but taking a position at a start-up company would offer so much excitement. They often have an energy that older companies can’t match—everyone can be focused on new, innovative business practices and they would be more aggressive about getting new clients. That would be a much better experience for someone fresh out of university!

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

From my perspective, I would prefer the older and well-known company to be the begining of my career. I agree with Kelly that the established company ...

スコア
27

ユーザーサンプル

From my perspective, I would prefer the older and well-known company to be the begining of my career. I agree with Kelly that the established company will proviede better working experience and also conducive to your future career. The acception from an famous company that has a high status in the field is another kind of evidence to prove your stand-out ability. Additionally, as there are lot of experienced co-workers working together with you, great access is provided there to take you truely get into this job. For example, you can learn the strategies to dealing with real customers or how to communicate more efficiently. Although Andrew makes a valid point that the new company may have more passions and fresh ideas, it is deniable that you need to take more risk at the same time. Since the company just started, it do not have steady basis. Once some accidents, such as economic crisis, happens, the current chain will broke and you will lose your job consequently. At that time, it would be difficult to get another good position.

評価結果

1.子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

  • 27

3.任务完成度 整体来说,这篇文章较好地回答了问题,并表达了对大公司和创业公司的看法。但是,为了更好地完成任务,可以在论述中加入更多具体的例子和细节。此外,在表达观点时尽量使用自己的话,而不是直接引用原文中的观点。

示例1:

  • 在讨论大公司的优势时,可以提到更多具体的例子,如员工福利、培训机会等。 示例2:

  • 在讨论创业公司的风险时,可以举一些具体的案例来说明经济危机对新兴公司造成的影响。

4.文章结构与组织 文章结构方面,有明确的开头、主体和结尾。然而,在组织上还有改进空间。建议在段落之间加入过渡句子以增强连贯性,并确保每个段落都集中讨论一个特定观点及其支持细节。

示例1:

  • 在第二段和第三段之间加入过渡句子:“虽然在大公司工作有诸多优势,但创业公司也有其吸引力。” 示例2:

  • 在讨论大公司优势的段落中,可以先列出几个优点,然后逐一详细论述。例如:“首先,大公司往往提供更好的员工福利;其次,大公司通常有更完善的培训体系……”

  1. 语法批改

From my perspective, I would prefer the older and well-known company to be the beginingbeginning(misspelling) of my career. I agree with Kelly that the established company will proviedeprovide(misspelling) better working experience and also conducive to your future career. The acception[No Replacement Word Found](misspelling) from ana(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') famous company that has a high status in the field is another kind of evidence to prove your stand-out ability. Additionally, as there are lot ofa lot of((a) bunch of) experienced co-workers working together with you, great access is provided there to take you truelytruly(misspelling) get into this job. For example, you can learn the strategies to dealing with real customers or how to communicate more efficiently. Although Andrew makes a valid point that the new company may have more passions and fresh ideas, it is deniable that you need to take more risk at the same time. Since the company just started, it dodoes('it' + non-3rd person verb) not have steady basis. Once some accidents, such as economic crisis, happens, the current chain will brokebreak(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) and, and(comma between independent clauses) you will lose your job consequently. At that time, it would be difficult to get another good position.

6.文章修订

In my opinion, beginning a career at an older and well-established company would be more advantageous for recent university graduates. I concur with Kelly's viewpoint that working for a reputable organization not only provides valuable experience but also enhances one's resume. Being employed by a prestigious company serves as evidence of one's exceptional abilities. Furthermore, the opportunity to collaborate with experienced colleagues allows for a smoother transition into the workforce, as they can impart essential skills such as effective communication and customer relations strategies.

While Andrew raises a valid point regarding the excitement and innovation often found in start-up companies, it is important to consider the inherent risks associated with such ventures. As these organizations lack a stable foundation, they are more susceptible to disruptions caused by unforeseen events like economic crises. Consequently, employees may face job loss and difficulty securing another suitable position.

To strike a balance between these perspectives, it is crucial for recent graduates to weigh the benefits of stability and reputation offered by established companies against the dynamic environment and potential growth opportunities presented by start-ups before making their decision. (185 words)

From 7.文章批改

In my perspective, opinion, beginning a career at an older and well-established company would be more advantageous for recent university graduates. (Changed "From my perspective" to "In my opinion" for a more formal tone) I would prefer the older and well-known concur with Kelly's viewpoint that working for a reputable organization not only provides valuable experience but also enhances one's resume. (Reworded to make the sentence flow better) Being employed by a prestigious company to be the begining serves as evidence of my career. one's exceptional abilities. Furthermore, the opportunity to collaborate with experienced colleagues allows for a smoother transition into the workforce, as they can impart essential skills such as effective communication and customer relations strategies. (Improved sentence structure and added details)

I agree with Kelly that the established company will proviede better working experience and also conducive to your future career. The acception from an famous company that has a high status in the field is another kind of evidence to prove your stand-out ability. Additionally, as there are lot of experienced co-workers working together with you, great access is provided there to take you truely get into this job. For example, you can learn the strategies to dealing with real customers or how to communicate more efficiently. ¶ Although While Andrew makes raises a valid point that the new company may have more passions and fresh ideas, regarding the excitement and innovation often found in start-up companies, it is deniable that you need to take important to consider the inherent risks associated with such ventures. (Reworded for clarity) As these organizations lack a stable foundation, they are more risk at the same time. Since the company just started, susceptible to disruptions caused by unforeseen events like economic crises. Consequently, employees may face job loss and difficulty securing another suitable position. (Improved sentence structure)

To strike a balance between these perspectives, it do not have steady basis. Once some accidents, such as economic crisis, happens, the current chain will broke and you will lose your job consequently. At that time, it would be difficult to get another good position.is crucial for recent graduates to weigh the benefits of stability and reputation offered by established companies against the dynamic environment and potential growth opportunities presented by start-ups before making their decision. (Rephrased for better flow and clarity)

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Opinion: older and well-established company
  • Advantages of established companies

    • Reputable organization
    • Valuable experience
    • Enhanced resume
    • Collaboration with experienced colleagues
    • Essential skills development
  • Risks of start-up companies

    • Inherent risks
    • Lack of stable foundation
    • Susceptible to disruptions (e.g., economic crises)
    • Job loss and difficulty securing a new position
  • Balancing perspectives

    • Weighing benefits and risks before making a decision

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
advantageous/ˌæd.vənˈteɪ.dʒəs/adjectiveproviding an advantage; favorable or useful有利的Working for an established company can be advantageous for recent graduates.
reputable/ˈrep.jə.tə.bəl/adjectivehaving a good reputation声誉良好的She found a job at a reputable organization in her field.
prestigious/preˈsti.dʒi.əs/adjectivehaving high status or respect赫赫有名的Being employed by a prestigious company serves as evidence of one's exceptional abilities.
collaborate/kəˈlæb.ə.reɪt/verbto work together with someone or some group合作The opportunity to collaborate with experienced colleagues allows for a smoother transition.
susceptible/səˈsep.tə.bəl/adjectivelikely to be influenced or harmed by something易受影响的Start-up companies are more susceptible to disruptions caused by unforeseen events.
disruptions/dɪsˈrʌp.ʃən/nounan interruption in the usual way that a system, process, or event works中断,干扰Economic crises can cause significant disruptions in the job market.
inherent/ɪnˈher.ənt/adjectiveexisting as a natural or basic part of something固有的It is important to consider the inherent risks associated with start-up companies.
weigh/weɪ/verbto carefully consider something, especially by comparing facts or possibilities权衡Recent graduates should weigh the benefits and risks before making their decision.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now