TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on career readiness. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response you should: Express and support your personal opinion. Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words. When students are preparing to graduate from university, they need to make decisions about what kind of company they want to work for. They might consider large, older companies with an established reputation, or possibly new start-up companies, which tend to be small but very focused on the future. Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

When students are preparing to graduate from university, they need to make decisions about what kind of company they want to work for. They might consider large, older companies with an established reputation, or possibly new start-up companies, which tend to be small but very focused on the future. Consider the advantages of each. Would it generally be better for a new university graduate to begin working for a large, established company, or for a small start-up company? Why?

Student A

I think in general, the established company is the better choice. Because they’re already well-known, these companies have a certain amount of respect in the business community, so it would look good to have that job experience on your résumé. That advantage alone would be a great start for a recent graduate.

Student B

I see your point, Kelly, but taking a position at a start-up company would offer so much excitement. They often have an energy that older companies can’t match—everyone can be focused on new, innovative business practices and they would be more aggressive about getting new clients. That would be a much better experience for someone fresh out of university!

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

It is certain that large, well-known companies would bring more valuable experience to someone fresh out of the university. To be more specific, those...

スコア
26

ユーザーサンプル

It is certain that large, well-known companies would bring more valuable experience to someone fresh out of the university. To be more specific, those large companies usually have more highly professional job training for new employees, which will equip them with competitive technical skills and help them to best adapt themselves to a new environment. For example, the first company I worked for was an old, well-known internet company, which occasionally organize training on how to use the UI design applications. These experience are really beneficial to my career life and has became an advantage for me to apply for other companies. Nevertheless, some might claim that working for a start-up company is more exciting and innovative. However, new university graduates who work on these challenging jobs might make mistakes and potentially cause significant business losses, which will bring negative influence on their future career.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了问题并提供了观点。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:首先,在论述观点时可以提供更多具体的例子和细节,以增强说服力。其次,尝试使用更丰富的词汇和语法结构,使文章更具表现力。

示例1(英文): Instead of "These experience are really beneficial to my career life", you could write "These experiences have significantly contributed to my professional growth and have given me a competitive edge when applying for other positions."

示例2(英文): Instead of "which will bring negative influence on their future career", you could write "which may adversely impact their professional reputation and future career prospects."

4. 文章结构与组织

你的文章结构基本清晰,但仍有改进空间。首先,可以在开头部分加入引言句子,简要介绍文章主题。其次,在正文段落中使用过渡词或短语来连接不同观点。最后,在结尾部分总结论点,并呼应开头引言。

示例1(英文): Introduction: "Choosing the right company to work for after graduating from university is a crucial decision, as it can greatly impact one's career trajectory."

示例2(英文): Transition: "On the other hand, proponents of working for start-up companies argue that the dynamic environment and innovative culture can be more rewarding for recent graduates."

5. 语法批改

It is certain that large, well-known companies would bring more valuable experience to someone fresh out of the university. To be more specific, those large companies usually have more highly professional job training for new employees, which will equip them with competitive technical skills and help them to best adapt themselves to a new environment. For example, the first company I worked for was an old, well-known internet company, which occasionally organize training on how to use the UI design applications. These experienceThis experience('this' vs. 'these') are really beneficial to my career life and has becamebecome(Agreement: 'have' + past/present tense) an advantage for me to apply for other companies. Nevertheless, some might claim that working for a start-up company is more exciting and innovative. However, new university graduates who work on these challenging jobs might make mistakes and potentially cause significant business losses, which will bring negative influence on their future career.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In determining the ideal workplace for recent university graduates, it is crucial to weigh the benefits of both large, established companies and small start-ups. While established companies offer valuable experience and comprehensive training programs, working for a start-up can provide an exhilarating environment with a focus on innovation. For instance, my first job at a renowned internet company included regular training sessions on UI design applications, which significantly contributed to my professional growth and subsequent career opportunities. However, some may argue that the dynamic nature of start-ups fosters creativity and adaptability in new graduates. Despite this potential advantage, inexperienced employees at start-ups may be more prone to making costly mistakes that could negatively impact their future career prospects. (123 words)

It In determining the ideal workplace for recent university graduates (clarification: specifying the subject), it is certain that crucial to weigh the benefits of both large, well-known established companies would bring more and small start-ups. While established companies offer valuable experience (word choice: "valuable" instead of "more valuable" to someone fresh out avoid comparison) and comprehensive training programs, working for a start-up can provide an exhilarating environment with a focus on innovation. For instance, my first job at a renowned internet company (word choice: "renowned" instead of the university. To be more specific, those large companies usually have more highly professional job "old, well-known" for clarity) included regular training for new employees, which will equip them with competitive technical skills and help them to best adapt themselves to a new environment. For example, the first company I worked for was an old, well-known internet company, which sessions on UI design applications (rephrasing: "which occasionally organize training on how to use the UI design applications. These experience are really beneficial applications" to make it more concise), which significantly contributed to my professional growth and subsequent career life opportunities. However, some may argue that the dynamic nature of start-ups fosters creativity and has became an advantage for me adaptability in new graduates (addressing counterargument). Despite this potential advantage, inexperienced employees at start-ups may be more prone to apply for other companies. Nevertheless, some might claim making costly mistakes that working for a start-up company is more exciting and innovative. However, new university graduates who work on these challenging jobs might make mistakes and potentially cause significant business losses, which will bring negative influence on could negatively impact their future career.career prospects (providing reasons for the potential drawbacks of working at a start-up).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Ideal workplace
   a. Large established companies
      i. Valuable experience
     ii. Comprehensive training programs
   b. Small start-ups
      i. Exhilarating environment
     ii. Focus on innovation

2. Example: Renowned internet company
   a. Regular training sessions on UI design applications
   b. Professional growth and career opportunities

3. Start-ups advantages
   a. Fosters creativity and adaptability in new graduates

4. Potential disadvantages of start-ups for inexperienced employees
   a. Prone to making costly mistakes 
   b. Negative impact on future career prospects

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
ideal/aɪˈdiːəl/adjectiveperfect; most suitable理想的The ideal workplace for recent graduates depends on various factors
comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/adjectiveincluding all or nearly all elements or aspects全面的The company offers comprehensive training programs
exhilarating/ɪgˈzɪləreɪtɪŋ/adjectivemaking one feel very happy, animated, or elated令人兴奋的Working for a start-up can provide an exhilarating environment
innovation/ˌinəˈveɪʃn/nounthe action or process of innovating创新Start-ups often have a focus on innovation
adaptability/əˌdæptəˈbɪlɪti/nounthe quality of being able to adjust to new conditions适应性Start-ups foster creativity and adaptability in new graduates
prone/proʊn/adjectivelikely to suffer from, do, or experience something易于…的Inexperienced employees at start-ups may be prone to making mistakes
costly/ˈkɔːstli/adjectiveexpensive; high-priced昂贵的Costly mistakes could negatively impact their future career
prospects/ˈprɒspekts/nounthe possibility or likelihood of some future event前景These mistakes could affect their career prospects
professional/prəˈfeʃənl/adjective_relating to or connected with a profession_专业的_The training sessions contributed to my professional growth
dynamic/daɪˈnæmɪk/_adjective_characterized by constant change, activity, or progress_充满活力的_The dynamic nature of start-ups fosters creativity and adaptability

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In determining the ideal workplace for recent university graduates, it is crucial to weigh the benefits of both large, established companies and small start-ups. While established companies offer valuable experience and comprehensive training programs, working for a start-up can provide an exhilarating environment with a focus on innovation. For instance, my first job at a renowned internet company included regular training sessions on UI design applications, which significantly contributed to my professional growth and subsequent career opportunities. However, some may argue that the dynamic nature of start-ups fosters creativity and adaptability in new graduates. Despite this potential advantage, inexperienced employees at start-ups may be more prone to making costly mistakes that could negatively impact their future career prospects.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now