TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on financial. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

In group projects, is it better to let people work on their own and then combine their works, or is it better to collaborate in every step?

Student A

independent work and then combine

Student B

collaborate every step

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its co...

スコア
28

ユーザーサンプル

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • Estimated Score: 28

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章在完成任务方面做得相当不错,有效地表达了作者的观点,并为讨论作出了贡献。然而,有一些方面仍有改进的空间。首先,可以提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。其次,在引入对立观点时,可以稍微展开讨论,以使文章更加全面。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Instead of only mentioning Google and Amazon, provide specific examples of how their employees work independently on different aspects of a project, leading to increased efficiency.

  2. Briefly discuss the potential drawbacks of collaborating at every step, such as increased time spent on communication or potential conflicts between team members.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本上是清晰的,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落划分和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落中专注于一个主要观点,并使用明确的过渡词或短语来连接不同的想法。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Divide the essay into separate paragraphs for introduction, main argument, supporting examples, counterargument (if applicable), and conclusion.

  2. Use transition words or phrases such as "Firstly," "In addition," "On the other hand," and "In conclusion" to guide the reader through the essay and signal shifts in focus.

5. 语法批改

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software developdevelops(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmesprograms(misspelling). In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I firmly believe that allowing individuals to work independently before combining their efforts leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is common for various specialized tasks to be present. By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved.

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers. Some may focus on computer networking, while others dedicate their time to testing programs. This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing errors and increasing productivity.

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions. This approach not only promotes efficiency but also allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product. (178 words)

As far as In response to the professor's question (clarifies the context of the discussion), I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument firmly believe that employees should allowing individuals to work independently and then combine before combining their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, efforts (rephrased for clarity) leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, common for various specialized tasks to be present (rephrased for natural tone). By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved (rephrased for clarity and conciseness).

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers (provides concrete examples). Some may focus on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, networking, while others spend all the dedicate their time to testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who programs (clarifies roles within the example). This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is responsible for, handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, errors and increasing productivity (explains benefits).

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions (summarizes main point). This approach not only by separating work could promotes efficiency but also allows for a firm increase working efficiency.more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product (highlights additional benefits).

8 思维导图


- 主题:独立工作与团队协作相结合提高效率
  - 大型项目中的专业任务分配
    - 个人专长与知识
    - 提高整体效率
  - 具体实例:谷歌和亚马逊软件开发工程师
    - 计算机网络专家
    - 软件测试专家
  - 独立工作后的团队协作
    - 利用每个成员的优势
    - 增强团队凝聚力
  - 结论:提高效率并整合多样性观点和想法

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounThe ability to do something well or achieve a desired result效率Allowing individuals to work independently leads to greater efficiency in group projects.
specialize/ˈspeʃəlaɪz/verbTo focus on and become an expert in a particular subject or skill专门从事By assigning tasks to individuals who specialize in those areas, the project's efficiency is improved.
delegate/ˈdelɪɡeɪt/verbTo give a task or responsibility to someone else委派Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers.
division of labor/dɪˈvɪʒən əv ˈleɪbər/nounThe assignment of different tasks to different people劳动分工This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with expertise.
productivity/ˌprɒdʌkˈtɪvɪti/nounThe rate at which goods or services are produced生产力Division of labor reduces errors and increases productivity.
collaboration/kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃən/nounThe act of working together with others to achieve a common goal合作Independent work followed by collaboration can capitalize on the strengths of each team member.
unity/ˈjuːnɪti/nounThe state of being united or joined as a whole团结Fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions is important.
integration/ˌɪntɪˈɡreɪʃən/nounThe act of combining different elements into a unified whole整合This approach allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas.
perspective/pərˈspektiv/nounA particular attitude or way of viewing something观点Integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product is beneficial.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now