TOEFLIELTS
Português
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on financial. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Envios reais de usuários com avaliação e feedback baseados em IA

1 exemplos enviados por usuários disponíveis

Iniciar Prática Gratuita

Visão Geral da Tarefa

Professor

In group projects, is it better to let people work on their own and then combine their works, or is it better to collaborate in every step?

Student A

independent work and then combine

Student B

collaborate every step

Exemplos de Usuários e Resultados da Avaliação

1

Exemplo de Usuário #1

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its co...

Pontuação
28

Exemplo de Usuário

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Resultado da Avaliação

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • Estimated Score: 28

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章在完成任务方面做得相当不错,有效地表达了作者的观点,并为讨论作出了贡献。然而,有一些方面仍有改进的空间。首先,可以提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。其次,在引入对立观点时,可以稍微展开讨论,以使文章更加全面。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Instead of only mentioning Google and Amazon, provide specific examples of how their employees work independently on different aspects of a project, leading to increased efficiency.

  2. Briefly discuss the potential drawbacks of collaborating at every step, such as increased time spent on communication or potential conflicts between team members.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本上是清晰的,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落划分和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落中专注于一个主要观点,并使用明确的过渡词或短语来连接不同的想法。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Divide the essay into separate paragraphs for introduction, main argument, supporting examples, counterargument (if applicable), and conclusion.

  2. Use transition words or phrases such as "Firstly," "In addition," "On the other hand," and "In conclusion" to guide the reader through the essay and signal shifts in focus.

5. 语法批改

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software developdevelops(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmesprograms(misspelling). In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I firmly believe that allowing individuals to work independently before combining their efforts leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is common for various specialized tasks to be present. By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved.

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers. Some may focus on computer networking, while others dedicate their time to testing programs. This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing errors and increasing productivity.

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions. This approach not only promotes efficiency but also allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product. (178 words)

As far as In response to the professor's question (clarifies the context of the discussion), I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument firmly believe that employees should allowing individuals to work independently and then combine before combining their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, efforts (rephrased for clarity) leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, common for various specialized tasks to be present (rephrased for natural tone). By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved (rephrased for clarity and conciseness).

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers (provides concrete examples). Some may focus on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, networking, while others spend all the dedicate their time to testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who programs (clarifies roles within the example). This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is responsible for, handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, errors and increasing productivity (explains benefits).

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions (summarizes main point). This approach not only by separating work could promotes efficiency but also allows for a firm increase working efficiency.more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product (highlights additional benefits).

8 思维导图


- 主题:独立工作与团队协作相结合提高效率
  - 大型项目中的专业任务分配
    - 个人专长与知识
    - 提高整体效率
  - 具体实例:谷歌和亚马逊软件开发工程师
    - 计算机网络专家
    - 软件测试专家
  - 独立工作后的团队协作
    - 利用每个成员的优势
    - 增强团队凝聚力
  - 结论:提高效率并整合多样性观点和想法

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounThe ability to do something well or achieve a desired result效率Allowing individuals to work independently leads to greater efficiency in group projects.
specialize/ˈspeʃəlaɪz/verbTo focus on and become an expert in a particular subject or skill专门从事By assigning tasks to individuals who specialize in those areas, the project's efficiency is improved.
delegate/ˈdelɪɡeɪt/verbTo give a task or responsibility to someone else委派Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers.
division of labor/dɪˈvɪʒən əv ˈleɪbər/nounThe assignment of different tasks to different people劳动分工This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with expertise.
productivity/ˌprɒdʌkˈtɪvɪti/nounThe rate at which goods or services are produced生产力Division of labor reduces errors and increases productivity.
collaboration/kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃən/nounThe act of working together with others to achieve a common goal合作Independent work followed by collaboration can capitalize on the strengths of each team member.
unity/ˈjuːnɪti/nounThe state of being united or joined as a whole团结Fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions is important.
integration/ˌɪntɪˈɡreɪʃən/nounThe act of combining different elements into a unified whole整合This approach allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas.
perspective/pərˈspektiv/nounA particular attitude or way of viewing something观点Integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product is beneficial.

Como a Academic Discussion É Avaliada

A tarefa TOEFL Academic Discussion é avaliada com base na rubrica oficial de avaliação da ETS. A avaliação por IA analisa cada resposta em várias dimensões.

Relevância e Contribuição

A resposta aborda a questão e contribui de forma significativa para a discussão?

Uso da Língua

Precisão gramatical, variedade de vocabulário e qualidade da estrutura das frases.

Desenvolvimento e Fundamentação

As ideias estão bem desenvolvidas com exemplos específicos e raciocínio claro?

Padrões Comuns nas Respostas

Com base na análise de envios de usuários para esta tarefa, aqui estão os padrões comuns observados nas respostas dos estudantes.

Muitos estudantes apresentam opiniões claras, mas carecem de exemplos específicos de apoio.

Respostas fortes fazem referência direta ao texto de leitura e aos pontos de vista de outros participantes.

Respostas com pontuações mais altas usam estruturas de frases variadas e vocabulário acadêmico.

O gerenciamento do tempo é um fator-chave — respostas que parecem apressadas tendem a pontuar mais baixo em desenvolvimento.

Dicas de Aprendizado

1

Leia o enunciado com atenção e identifique todas as partes da questão antes de escrever.

2

Faça referência ao texto de leitura e às opiniões dos outros estudantes em sua resposta.

3

Use exemplos específicos para apoiar seu ponto principal — evite afirmações genéricas.

4

Busque entre 120 e 150 palavras. Respostas mais longas nem sempre são melhores; clareza e foco importam mais.

5

Pratique respostas cronometradas (10 minutos) para desenvolver fluência nas condições de prova.

Perguntas frequentes

O que é a tarefa TOEFL Academic Discussion?
A tarefa TOEFL Academic Discussion exige que você contribua para uma discussão online em sala de aula. Você lerá a pergunta de um professor e as respostas de outros alunos, e depois escreverá sua própria postagem expressando e defendendo sua opinião em cerca de 10 minutos.
Como a tarefa Academic Discussion é avaliada?
A tarefa é avaliada em uma escala de 0 a 5 com base na relevância em relação à discussão, na qualidade do uso da língua (gramática, vocabulário, estrutura das frases) e em quão bem você desenvolve e sustenta suas ideias com exemplos específicos e raciocínio.
O que são as amostras de usuários nesta página?
Essas são respostas reais enviadas por candidatos do TOEFL que praticaram esta pergunta no LingoLeap. Cada amostra foi avaliada pelo nosso mecanismo de pontuação por IA, que fornece uma nota e feedback detalhado sobre pontos fortes e áreas de melhoria.
Quão precisa é a avaliação por IA?
O mecanismo de avaliação por IA da LingoLeap é treinado com base nas rubricas oficiais de pontuação do ETS e calibrado em relação às notas de avaliadores humanos. Embora nenhum sistema automatizado seja perfeito, ele fornece feedback confiável para fins de prática e ajuda a identificar áreas específicas de melhoria.
Como posso praticar esta tarefa Academic Discussion?
Você pode praticar criando uma conta gratuita no LingoLeap. Escreva sua própria resposta a esta pergunta exata, envie-a e receba uma avaliação instantânea por IA com feedback detalhado sobre sua redação.
Qual deve ser o tamanho da minha resposta Academic Discussion?
Busque entre 120 e 150 palavras. A tarefa dá a você 10 minutos para escrever sua resposta. Concentre-se na clareza, sustente sua opinião com exemplos específicos e faça referência ao contexto da discussão em vez de escrever uma resposta mais longa.

Conquiste sua nota ideal no TOEFL hoje!

Com a LingoLeap, especialista em exames de inglês

Alcance sua pontuação dos sonhos mais rápido

Experimente grátis agora