TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on financial. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

In group projects, is it better to let people work on their own and then combine their works, or is it better to collaborate in every step?

Student A

independent work and then combine

Student B

collaborate every step

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its co...

점수
28

사용자 예시

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • Estimated Score: 28

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章在完成任务方面做得相当不错,有效地表达了作者的观点,并为讨论作出了贡献。然而,有一些方面仍有改进的空间。首先,可以提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。其次,在引入对立观点时,可以稍微展开讨论,以使文章更加全面。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Instead of only mentioning Google and Amazon, provide specific examples of how their employees work independently on different aspects of a project, leading to increased efficiency.

  2. Briefly discuss the potential drawbacks of collaborating at every step, such as increased time spent on communication or potential conflicts between team members.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本上是清晰的,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落划分和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落中专注于一个主要观点,并使用明确的过渡词或短语来连接不同的想法。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Divide the essay into separate paragraphs for introduction, main argument, supporting examples, counterargument (if applicable), and conclusion.

  2. Use transition words or phrases such as "Firstly," "In addition," "On the other hand," and "In conclusion" to guide the reader through the essay and signal shifts in focus.

5. 语法批改

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software developdevelops(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmesprograms(misspelling). In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I firmly believe that allowing individuals to work independently before combining their efforts leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is common for various specialized tasks to be present. By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved.

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers. Some may focus on computer networking, while others dedicate their time to testing programs. This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing errors and increasing productivity.

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions. This approach not only promotes efficiency but also allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product. (178 words)

As far as In response to the professor's question (clarifies the context of the discussion), I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument firmly believe that employees should allowing individuals to work independently and then combine before combining their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, efforts (rephrased for clarity) leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, common for various specialized tasks to be present (rephrased for natural tone). By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved (rephrased for clarity and conciseness).

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers (provides concrete examples). Some may focus on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, networking, while others spend all the dedicate their time to testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who programs (clarifies roles within the example). This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is responsible for, handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, errors and increasing productivity (explains benefits).

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions (summarizes main point). This approach not only by separating work could promotes efficiency but also allows for a firm increase working efficiency.more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product (highlights additional benefits).

8 思维导图


- 主题:独立工作与团队协作相结合提高效率
  - 大型项目中的专业任务分配
    - 个人专长与知识
    - 提高整体效率
  - 具体实例:谷歌和亚马逊软件开发工程师
    - 计算机网络专家
    - 软件测试专家
  - 独立工作后的团队协作
    - 利用每个成员的优势
    - 增强团队凝聚力
  - 结论:提高效率并整合多样性观点和想法

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounThe ability to do something well or achieve a desired result效率Allowing individuals to work independently leads to greater efficiency in group projects.
specialize/ˈspeʃəlaɪz/verbTo focus on and become an expert in a particular subject or skill专门从事By assigning tasks to individuals who specialize in those areas, the project's efficiency is improved.
delegate/ˈdelɪɡeɪt/verbTo give a task or responsibility to someone else委派Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers.
division of labor/dɪˈvɪʒən əv ˈleɪbər/nounThe assignment of different tasks to different people劳动分工This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with expertise.
productivity/ˌprɒdʌkˈtɪvɪti/nounThe rate at which goods or services are produced生产力Division of labor reduces errors and increases productivity.
collaboration/kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃən/nounThe act of working together with others to achieve a common goal合作Independent work followed by collaboration can capitalize on the strengths of each team member.
unity/ˈjuːnɪti/nounThe state of being united or joined as a whole团结Fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions is important.
integration/ˌɪntɪˈɡreɪʃən/nounThe act of combining different elements into a unified whole整合This approach allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas.
perspective/pərˈspektiv/nounA particular attitude or way of viewing something观点Integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product is beneficial.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now