TOEFL 라이팅 템플릿 예시: 실제 적용 방법을 확인하세요

인사말Dear Professor Chen,

맥락I'm writing about the study group requirement for the final project.

세부사항 1Unfortunately, my work schedule this semester conflicts with the meeting times that most groups have chosen. I work evening shifts three days a week, which is when most students are available to meet.

세부사항 2Would it be possible for me to complete the project individually, or is there a group that meets during daytime hours?

세부사항 3 + 마무리If neither option works, I could also propose a virtual collaboration arrangement where I contribute asynchronously through shared documents. I'm committed to doing the same amount of work regardless of the format. Thank you for understanding my situation.

끝맺음Best regards, Yuki

인사말Dear Library Administration,

맥락I'm reaching out regarding the recent change to library hours.

세부사항 1As a graduate student who works during the day, the library's new 8 PM closing time has seriously affected my study routine. I used to rely on the library from 8 PM to midnight for quiet research time.

세부사항 2The previous hours were essential for students like me who can't study during regular business hours. The late-night availability was one of the reasons I chose this university.

세부사항 3 + 마무리Would the library consider keeping at least the main reading room open until 10 PM on weeknights? Even a partial extension would help students with non-traditional schedules. I'd be happy to help gather signatures from other students who feel the same way. Thank you for considering this.

끝맺음Sincerely, David

인사말Hi Tomoko,

맥락I wanted to reach out because I missed yesterday's psychology class.

세부사항 1I had a doctor's appointment that ran longer than expected — I tried to make it back for the second half of class but couldn't get there in time.

세부사항 2I heard Professor Martinez announced some changes to the final exam format. Could you fill me in on what was discussed? I want to make sure I'm studying the right material.

세부사항 3 + 마무리In return, I'm happy to share my notes from last week's lecture, which I noticed you missed. I also have the study guide from the TA's review session. Let me know if you'd like those! Thanks so much.

끝맺음— Jamie

입장 표명While I understand Chris's concern about accountability, I mostly agree with Lin that mandatory identity verification creates more problems than it solves.

인정As the professor's question suggests, there's a real tension between accountability and privacy online.

근거 제시In my country, a social media platform briefly required government ID verification, and the result was troubling. Political activists faced harassment after their identities were exposed, and many people simply stopped participating in public discussions. Meanwhile, bad actors found ways around the verification system using fake IDs. The policy was reversed within a year.

결론This example shows that verification doesn't necessarily improve behavior — it just silences legitimate voices while determined trolls find workarounds. A better approach might be stronger content moderation without compromising user privacy.

입장 표명I think Maya and James are both partially right — online degrees will gain more respect, but the timeline and acceptance will vary dramatically by field.

인정James makes an important point about hands-on experience. Fields like medicine, engineering, and laboratory sciences genuinely require physical presence.

근거 제시However, for fields like business, education, and many humanities subjects, online programs have already proven effective. My cousin completed an MBA entirely online from a well-known university, and she received multiple job offers from companies that didn't distinguish between her degree and an on-campus one. Her employers cared about her skills and portfolio, not where she sat during lectures.

결론So rather than a blanket answer, I believe the question depends on the field. Some disciplines will embrace online degrees much faster than others.

입장 표명I strongly agree with Raj that public transportation investment is worthwhile, even when most people drive.

인정Elena's point about respecting individual choice is fair, but I think it overlooks the broader picture.

근거 제시In my hometown, the city invested heavily in a new metro system despite strong car culture. Initially, many residents criticized the expense. But within two years, commute times dropped for everyone — including drivers — because enough people switched to the metro to reduce highway congestion. Property values near metro stations also increased, which broadened the tax base and helped fund further improvements.

결론This shows that public transportation benefits drivers too, even if they never set foot on a train. Sometimes the best investments are the ones that people don't initially want.