TOEFLIELTS
Filipino
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on financial. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Aktwal na mga isinumite ng user na may ebalwasyon at feedback gamit ang AI

1 isinumiteng sample ng user ang available

Simulan ang Libreng Practice

Pangkalahatang-ideya ng Gawain

Professor

In group projects, is it better to let people work on their own and then combine their works, or is it better to collaborate in every step?

Student A

independent work and then combine

Student B

collaborate every step

Mga Sample ng User at Resulta ng Ebalwasyon

1

Sample ng User #1

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its co...

Puntos
28

Sample ng User

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Resulta ng Ebalwasyon

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • Estimated Score: 28

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章在完成任务方面做得相当不错,有效地表达了作者的观点,并为讨论作出了贡献。然而,有一些方面仍有改进的空间。首先,可以提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。其次,在引入对立观点时,可以稍微展开讨论,以使文章更加全面。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Instead of only mentioning Google and Amazon, provide specific examples of how their employees work independently on different aspects of a project, leading to increased efficiency.

  2. Briefly discuss the potential drawbacks of collaborating at every step, such as increased time spent on communication or potential conflicts between team members.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本上是清晰的,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落划分和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落中专注于一个主要观点,并使用明确的过渡词或短语来连接不同的想法。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Divide the essay into separate paragraphs for introduction, main argument, supporting examples, counterargument (if applicable), and conclusion.

  2. Use transition words or phrases such as "Firstly," "In addition," "On the other hand," and "In conclusion" to guide the reader through the essay and signal shifts in focus.

5. 语法批改

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software developdevelops(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmesprograms(misspelling). In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I firmly believe that allowing individuals to work independently before combining their efforts leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is common for various specialized tasks to be present. By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved.

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers. Some may focus on computer networking, while others dedicate their time to testing programs. This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing errors and increasing productivity.

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions. This approach not only promotes efficiency but also allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product. (178 words)

As far as In response to the professor's question (clarifies the context of the discussion), I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument firmly believe that employees should allowing individuals to work independently and then combine before combining their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, efforts (rephrased for clarity) leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, common for various specialized tasks to be present (rephrased for natural tone). By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved (rephrased for clarity and conciseness).

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers (provides concrete examples). Some may focus on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, networking, while others spend all the dedicate their time to testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who programs (clarifies roles within the example). This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is responsible for, handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, errors and increasing productivity (explains benefits).

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions (summarizes main point). This approach not only by separating work could promotes efficiency but also allows for a firm increase working efficiency.more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product (highlights additional benefits).

8 思维导图


- 主题:独立工作与团队协作相结合提高效率
  - 大型项目中的专业任务分配
    - 个人专长与知识
    - 提高整体效率
  - 具体实例:谷歌和亚马逊软件开发工程师
    - 计算机网络专家
    - 软件测试专家
  - 独立工作后的团队协作
    - 利用每个成员的优势
    - 增强团队凝聚力
  - 结论:提高效率并整合多样性观点和想法

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounThe ability to do something well or achieve a desired result效率Allowing individuals to work independently leads to greater efficiency in group projects.
specialize/ˈspeʃəlaɪz/verbTo focus on and become an expert in a particular subject or skill专门从事By assigning tasks to individuals who specialize in those areas, the project's efficiency is improved.
delegate/ˈdelɪɡeɪt/verbTo give a task or responsibility to someone else委派Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers.
division of labor/dɪˈvɪʒən əv ˈleɪbər/nounThe assignment of different tasks to different people劳动分工This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with expertise.
productivity/ˌprɒdʌkˈtɪvɪti/nounThe rate at which goods or services are produced生产力Division of labor reduces errors and increases productivity.
collaboration/kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃən/nounThe act of working together with others to achieve a common goal合作Independent work followed by collaboration can capitalize on the strengths of each team member.
unity/ˈjuːnɪti/nounThe state of being united or joined as a whole团结Fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions is important.
integration/ˌɪntɪˈɡreɪʃən/nounThe act of combining different elements into a unified whole整合This approach allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas.
perspective/pərˈspektiv/nounA particular attitude or way of viewing something观点Integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product is beneficial.

Paano Sinusukat ang Academic Discussion

Sinusukat ang gawaing TOEFL Academic Discussion batay sa opisyal na scoring rubric ng ETS. Sinusuri ng AI evaluation ang bawat sagot sa maraming dimensyon.

Kaugnayan at Kontribusyon

Tinutugunan ba ng sagot ang tanong at nagbibigay ba ito ng makabuluhang kontribusyon sa diskusyon?

Paggamit ng Wika

Kawastuhan ng gramatika, saklaw ng bokabularyo, at kalidad ng istruktura ng pangungusap.

Pagpapalawak at Suporta

Malinaw bang naipaliwanag ang mga ideya gamit ang tiyak na halimbawa at malinaw na pangangatwiran?

Karaniwang Pattern sa mga Sagot

Batay sa pagsusuri ng mga isinumiteng sagot ng user para sa gawaing ito, narito ang mga karaniwang pattern na napansin sa mga sagot ng estudyante.

Maraming estudyante ang naglalahad ng malinaw na opinyon ngunit kulang sa tiyak na sumusuportang halimbawa.

Ang mga matitibay na sagot ay direktang tumutukoy sa reading passage at sa pananaw ng ibang kalahok.

Ang mga sagot na mas mataas ang iskor ay gumagamit ng iba't ibang istruktura ng pangungusap at akademikong bokabularyo.

Mahalaga ang pamamahala ng oras — ang mga sagot na parang nagmamadali ay may posibilidad na mababa ang iskor sa pagpapalawak.

Mga Tip sa Pag-aaral

1

Basahing mabuti ang prompt at tukuyin ang lahat ng bahagi ng tanong bago sumulat.

2

Isangguni ang reading passage at ang opinyon ng ibang estudyante sa iyong sagot.

3

Gumamit ng tiyak na halimbawa para suportahan ang iyong pangunahing punto — iwasan ang mga heneral na pahayag.

4

Layunin ang 120-150 salita. Hindi laging mas maganda ang mas mahabang sagot; mas mahalaga ang linaw at focus.

5

Mag-practice ng mga sagot na may takdang oras (10 minuto) para makabuo ng fluency sa ilalim ng kondisyon ng eksam.

Mga Madalas Itanong

Ano ang TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
Hinihiling sa TOEFL Academic Discussion task na mag-ambag ka sa isang online na talakayan sa klase. Babasahin mo ang tanong ng propesor at ang mga sagot ng ibang estudyante, pagkatapos ay isusulat mo ang sarili mong post na nagpapahayag at sumusuporta sa iyong opinyon sa loob ng humigit-kumulang 10 minuto.
Paano sinusukat ang marka sa Academic Discussion task?
Ang gawain ay minamarkahan sa iskala na 0-5 batay sa kaugnayan sa talakayan, kalidad ng paggamit ng wika (gramatika, bokabularyo, istruktura ng pangungusap), at kung gaano kahusay mong nabubuo at sinusuportahan ang iyong mga ideya gamit ang tiyak na halimbawa at pangangatwiran.
Ano ang mga user sample sa pahinang ito?
Ito ay mga tunay na sagot na isinumite ng mga TOEFL test-taker na nagsanay sa tanong na ito sa LingoLeap. Sinuri ang bawat sample ng aming AI scoring engine, na nagbibigay ng marka at detalyadong feedback tungkol sa mga lakas at mga bahaging dapat pagbutihin.
Gaano kawasto ang pagsusuri ng AI?
Ang AI evaluation engine ng LingoLeap ay sinanay gamit ang opisyal na scoring rubric ng ETS at kinalibrate laban sa mga marka ng human rater. Bagama't walang automated system na perpekto, nagbibigay ito ng maaasahang feedback para sa layuning pagsasanay at tumutulong tukuyin ang mga tiyak na bahaging dapat pagbutihin.
Paano ko masasanay ang Academic Discussion task na ito?
Maaari kang magsanay sa pamamagitan ng pagpaparehistro para sa isang libreng LingoLeap account. Isulat ang iyong sariling sagot sa eksaktong tanong na ito, isumite ito, at tumanggap ng agarang AI evaluation na may detalyadong feedback tungkol sa iyong pagsusulat.
Gaano dapat kahaba ang aking sagot sa Academic Discussion?
Layunin ang 120-150 na salita. Binibigyan ka ng gawain ng 10 minuto para isulat ang iyong sagot. Tumuon sa kalinawan, suportahan ang iyong opinyon gamit ang tiyak na halimbawa, at mag-reference sa konteksto ng talakayan sa halip na sumulat ng mas mahabang sagot.

Abutin ang Iyong Target na Score Ngayon!

Kasama ang LingoLeap, eksperto sa mga pagsusulit sa Ingles

Maabot ang Iyong Pangarap na Score nang Mas Mabilis

Subukan nang libre ngayon