TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on urban planning. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Doctor Achebe

In the next few weeks, we'll be talking about urban traffic management. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea:creating car-free central zones. Some cities around the world have recently designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicle are not allowed to enter the city centers. Do you think that more cities should make their central zones car-free? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents, it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere, people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.

Paul

It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My main concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because the customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they can't drive, they won't goat all not.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy ...

スコア
27

ユーザーサンプル

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizens physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehicle in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在表达观点时,可以尝试提供更具体的例子来支持观点。此外,尽管文章提到了禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响,但可以更深入地讨论这些问题。

改进建议:

  1. 在支持观点时给出具体实例。

  2. 更深入地讨论禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响。

示例:

  1. "For instance, cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have successfully implemented car-free zones, resulting in increased physical activity among residents and improved air quality."

  2. "Moreover, studies have shown that car-free zones can lead to a decrease in air pollution levels, which is beneficial for the overall health of the population."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面基本合理,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间的过渡和连接方面还有待加强。为了使文章更加流畅,可以使用一些过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

改进建议:

  1. 使用过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

  2. 确保每个段落都有明确的主题句和支持细节。

示例:

  1. "On the other hand, it is important to consider the potential negative impact on businesses, as Paul mentioned."

  2. "In addition to the health benefits, car-free zones can also contribute to a more sustainable urban environment by promoting the use of public transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

5. 语法批改

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizenscitizen's(This rule identifies whether there is a missing apostrophe before an 's'.) physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the resultresult,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehiclevehicles(Possible agreement error 'there're' + singular noun) in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps citythe city(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) to reduce traffic stress.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While I acknowledge Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones, I firmly believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars in city centers will significantly improve residents' physical health. Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities, which might not be the case if they were able to drive their cars. Furthermore, car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. With fewer private vehicles in city centers and an increased reliance on public transportation, traffic jams will be less frequent, particularly during peak hours. Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city centers not only enhances citizens' well-being but also aids in mitigating traffic-related stress. (145 words)

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding acknowledge Paul's apprehension (revised for clarity and natural tone) about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones (rephrased for clarity), I firmly believe that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints Claire's assertion (revised for a more natural tone) that banned prohibiting cars in the city center centers will benefit for citizens significantly improve residents' physical health. health (rephrased for clarity). Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation (rephrased for a more natural tone), such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities (revised for a more natural tone), which might not allowed to drive in that area, be the case if they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could were able to drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, cars. Furthermore, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of zones contribute to alleviating traffic jam. When there were few congestion (rephrased for clarity). With fewer private vehicle in the vehicles in city center, also people choosing to taking centers and an increased reliance on public transportation more. Definitely, there transportation, traffic jams will be fewer traffic jam in the less frequent, particularly during peak hours (revised for a more natural tone). Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center centers not only benefits citizens’ health enhances citizens' well-being but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.aids in mitigating traffic-related stress (rephrased for clarity and a more natural tone).

8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Acknowledge Paul's apprehension
   - Benefits outweigh drawbacks

2. Physical Health Improvement
   - Claire's assertion
   - Prohibiting cars in city centers

3. Alternative Modes of Transportation
   - Walking or cycling
   - Increased physical activities

4. Alleviating Traffic Congestion
   - Fewer private vehicles in city centers
   - Increased reliance on public transportation

5. Reduced Traffic Jams 
   - Less frequent traffic jams 
   - Particularly during peak hours 

6. Conclusion 
   - Enhancing citizens' well-being 
   - Mitigating traffic-related stress 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
apprehension/ˌæprɪˈhɛnʃən/nounanxiety or fear that something bad will happen担忧Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses is understandable.
outweigh/ˌaʊtˈweɪ/verbto be greater or more important than something else超过,胜过The benefits of car-free zones outweigh the drawbacks.
assertion/əˈsɜrʃən/nouna confident and forceful statement of fact or belief主张,断言I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars will improve residents' physical health.
alternative/ɔlˈtɝnətɪv/adjectiveavailable as another possibility可供选择的,替代的People must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling.
alleviate/əˈli:vieɪt/verbto make something less severe减轻,缓和Car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion.
congestion/kənˈdʒɛstʃən/nounthe state of being overcrowded, especially with traffic拥堵,拥挤Traffic congestion will be less frequent with fewer private vehicles in city centers.
reliance/rɪˈlaɪəns/noundependence on or trust in someone or something依赖,信赖There will be an increased reliance on public transportation in car-free zones.
peak hours/pik ˈaʊrz/nounthe busiest hours, usually during morning and evening高峰时段Traffic jams will be less frequent during peak hours.
well-being/wɛlˈbi:ɪŋ/_noun_the state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy幸福,福祉
mitigate/ˈmɪtɪgeɪt/verbto make something less severe, serious, or painful减轻,缓和Car-free zones aid in mitigating traffic-related stress.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now