TOEFLIELTS
Bahasa Indonesia
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on urban planning. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Kiriman pengguna asli dengan evaluasi dan umpan balik bertenaga AI

1 contoh kiriman pengguna tersedia

Mulai Latihan Gratis

Ringkasan Tugas

Doctor Achebe

In the next few weeks, we'll be talking about urban traffic management. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea:creating car-free central zones. Some cities around the world have recently designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicle are not allowed to enter the city centers. Do you think that more cities should make their central zones car-free? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents, it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere, people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.

Paul

It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My main concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because the customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they can't drive, they won't goat all not.

Contoh Pengguna & Hasil Evaluasi

1

Contoh Pengguna #1

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy ...

Nilai
27

Contoh Pengguna

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizens physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehicle in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.

Hasil Evaluasi

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在表达观点时,可以尝试提供更具体的例子来支持观点。此外,尽管文章提到了禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响,但可以更深入地讨论这些问题。

改进建议:

  1. 在支持观点时给出具体实例。

  2. 更深入地讨论禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响。

示例:

  1. "For instance, cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have successfully implemented car-free zones, resulting in increased physical activity among residents and improved air quality."

  2. "Moreover, studies have shown that car-free zones can lead to a decrease in air pollution levels, which is beneficial for the overall health of the population."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面基本合理,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间的过渡和连接方面还有待加强。为了使文章更加流畅,可以使用一些过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

改进建议:

  1. 使用过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

  2. 确保每个段落都有明确的主题句和支持细节。

示例:

  1. "On the other hand, it is important to consider the potential negative impact on businesses, as Paul mentioned."

  2. "In addition to the health benefits, car-free zones can also contribute to a more sustainable urban environment by promoting the use of public transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

5. 语法批改

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizenscitizen's(This rule identifies whether there is a missing apostrophe before an 's'.) physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the resultresult,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehiclevehicles(Possible agreement error 'there're' + singular noun) in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps citythe city(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) to reduce traffic stress.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While I acknowledge Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones, I firmly believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars in city centers will significantly improve residents' physical health. Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities, which might not be the case if they were able to drive their cars. Furthermore, car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. With fewer private vehicles in city centers and an increased reliance on public transportation, traffic jams will be less frequent, particularly during peak hours. Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city centers not only enhances citizens' well-being but also aids in mitigating traffic-related stress. (145 words)

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding acknowledge Paul's apprehension (revised for clarity and natural tone) about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones (rephrased for clarity), I firmly believe that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints Claire's assertion (revised for a more natural tone) that banned prohibiting cars in the city center centers will benefit for citizens significantly improve residents' physical health. health (rephrased for clarity). Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation (rephrased for a more natural tone), such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities (revised for a more natural tone), which might not allowed to drive in that area, be the case if they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could were able to drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, cars. Furthermore, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of zones contribute to alleviating traffic jam. When there were few congestion (rephrased for clarity). With fewer private vehicle in the vehicles in city center, also people choosing to taking centers and an increased reliance on public transportation more. Definitely, there transportation, traffic jams will be fewer traffic jam in the less frequent, particularly during peak hours (revised for a more natural tone). Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center centers not only benefits citizens’ health enhances citizens' well-being but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.aids in mitigating traffic-related stress (rephrased for clarity and a more natural tone).

8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Acknowledge Paul's apprehension
   - Benefits outweigh drawbacks

2. Physical Health Improvement
   - Claire's assertion
   - Prohibiting cars in city centers

3. Alternative Modes of Transportation
   - Walking or cycling
   - Increased physical activities

4. Alleviating Traffic Congestion
   - Fewer private vehicles in city centers
   - Increased reliance on public transportation

5. Reduced Traffic Jams 
   - Less frequent traffic jams 
   - Particularly during peak hours 

6. Conclusion 
   - Enhancing citizens' well-being 
   - Mitigating traffic-related stress 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
apprehension/ˌæprɪˈhɛnʃən/nounanxiety or fear that something bad will happen担忧Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses is understandable.
outweigh/ˌaʊtˈweɪ/verbto be greater or more important than something else超过,胜过The benefits of car-free zones outweigh the drawbacks.
assertion/əˈsɜrʃən/nouna confident and forceful statement of fact or belief主张,断言I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars will improve residents' physical health.
alternative/ɔlˈtɝnətɪv/adjectiveavailable as another possibility可供选择的,替代的People must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling.
alleviate/əˈli:vieɪt/verbto make something less severe减轻,缓和Car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion.
congestion/kənˈdʒɛstʃən/nounthe state of being overcrowded, especially with traffic拥堵,拥挤Traffic congestion will be less frequent with fewer private vehicles in city centers.
reliance/rɪˈlaɪəns/noundependence on or trust in someone or something依赖,信赖There will be an increased reliance on public transportation in car-free zones.
peak hours/pik ˈaʊrz/nounthe busiest hours, usually during morning and evening高峰时段Traffic jams will be less frequent during peak hours.
well-being/wɛlˈbi:ɪŋ/_noun_the state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy幸福,福祉
mitigate/ˈmɪtɪgeɪt/verbto make something less severe, serious, or painful减轻,缓和Car-free zones aid in mitigating traffic-related stress.

Cara Penilaian Academic Discussion

Tugas TOEFL Academic Discussion dinilai berdasarkan rubrik penilaian resmi ETS. Evaluasi AI menganalisis setiap jawaban dari berbagai dimensi.

Relevansi & Kontribusi

Apakah jawaban menjawab pertanyaan dan memberikan kontribusi yang bermakna terhadap diskusi?

Penggunaan Bahasa

Ketepatan tata bahasa, keragaman kosakata, dan kualitas struktur kalimat.

Pengembangan & Dukungan

Apakah ide-ide dikembangkan dengan baik menggunakan contoh spesifik dan penalaran yang jelas?

Pola Umum pada Jawaban

Berdasarkan analisis kiriman pengguna untuk tugas ini, berikut pola umum yang ditemukan dalam jawaban siswa.

Banyak siswa memberikan opini yang jelas tetapi kurang contoh pendukung yang spesifik.

Jawaban yang kuat secara langsung merujuk pada reading passage dan sudut pandang peserta lain.

Jawaban dengan nilai lebih tinggi menggunakan struktur kalimat yang bervariasi dan kosakata akademik.

Manajemen waktu adalah faktor penting — jawaban yang terasa terburu-buru cenderung mendapat nilai lebih rendah pada aspek pengembangan.

Tips Belajar

1

Baca prompt dengan saksama dan identifikasi semua bagian pertanyaan sebelum menulis.

2

Rujuk reading passage dan pendapat siswa lain dalam jawaban kamu.

3

Gunakan contoh spesifik untuk mendukung poin utama kamu — hindari pernyataan yang terlalu umum.

4

Usahakan sekitar 120-150 kata. Jawaban yang lebih panjang tidak selalu lebih baik; kejelasan dan fokus lebih penting.

5

Latih jawaban dengan waktu terbatas (10 menit) untuk membangun kelancaran dalam kondisi ujian sesungguhnya.

Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan

Apa itu tugas TOEFL Academic Discussion?
Tugas TOEFL Academic Discussion mengharuskan kamu untuk berkontribusi dalam diskusi kelas daring. Kamu akan membaca pertanyaan dari seorang profesor dan tanggapan siswa lain, lalu menulis postinganmu sendiri yang menyampaikan dan mendukung pendapatmu dalam waktu sekitar 10 menit.
Bagaimana tugas Academic Discussion dinilai?
Tugas ini dinilai dengan skala 0-5 berdasarkan relevansi terhadap diskusi, kualitas penggunaan bahasa (tata bahasa, kosakata, struktur kalimat), dan seberapa baik kamu mengembangkan serta mendukung idemu dengan contoh spesifik dan penalaran.
Apa itu contoh jawaban pengguna di halaman ini?
Ini adalah jawaban asli yang dikirimkan oleh peserta tes TOEFL yang berlatih soal ini di LingoLeap. Setiap contoh telah dinilai oleh mesin penilaian AI kami, yang memberikan skor dan umpan balik terperinci tentang kekuatan dan area yang perlu ditingkatkan.
Seberapa akurat penilaian AI ini?
Mesin penilaian AI LingoLeap dilatih berdasarkan rubrik penilaian resmi ETS dan dikalibrasi terhadap skor penilai manusia. Meskipun tidak ada sistem otomatis yang sempurna, sistem ini memberikan umpan balik yang andal untuk keperluan latihan dan membantu mengidentifikasi area spesifik yang perlu ditingkatkan.
Bagaimana cara saya berlatih tugas Academic Discussion ini?
Kamu bisa berlatih dengan mendaftar akun LingoLeap gratis. Tulis jawabanmu sendiri untuk pertanyaan yang sama persis ini, kirimkan, dan terima penilaian AI instan dengan umpan balik terperinci tentang tulisanmu.
Seberapa panjang jawaban Academic Discussion saya sebaiknya?
Targetkan 120-150 kata. Tugas ini memberimu waktu 10 menit untuk menulis jawaban. Fokuslah pada kejelasan, dukung pendapatmu dengan contoh spesifik, dan rujuk konteks diskusi daripada menulis jawaban yang lebih panjang.

Raih Skor TOEFL Impianmu Sekarang!

Bersama LingoLeap, ahlinya persiapan ujian bahasa Inggris

Capai Skor Targetmu Lebih Cepat

Coba Gratis Sekarang