TOEFLIELTS
繁體中文
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on urban planning. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

真實考生作答範例,搭配 AI 評分與回饋

目前有 1 篇考生投稿範例

開始免費練習

題型概述

Doctor Achebe

In the next few weeks, we'll be talking about urban traffic management. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea:creating car-free central zones. Some cities around the world have recently designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicle are not allowed to enter the city centers. Do you think that more cities should make their central zones car-free? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents, it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere, people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.

Paul

It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My main concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because the customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they can't drive, they won't goat all not.

考生範例與評分結果

1

考生範例 #1

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy ...

分數
27

考生範例

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizens physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehicle in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.

評分結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在表达观点时,可以尝试提供更具体的例子来支持观点。此外,尽管文章提到了禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响,但可以更深入地讨论这些问题。

改进建议:

  1. 在支持观点时给出具体实例。

  2. 更深入地讨论禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响。

示例:

  1. "For instance, cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have successfully implemented car-free zones, resulting in increased physical activity among residents and improved air quality."

  2. "Moreover, studies have shown that car-free zones can lead to a decrease in air pollution levels, which is beneficial for the overall health of the population."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面基本合理,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间的过渡和连接方面还有待加强。为了使文章更加流畅,可以使用一些过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

改进建议:

  1. 使用过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

  2. 确保每个段落都有明确的主题句和支持细节。

示例:

  1. "On the other hand, it is important to consider the potential negative impact on businesses, as Paul mentioned."

  2. "In addition to the health benefits, car-free zones can also contribute to a more sustainable urban environment by promoting the use of public transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

5. 语法批改

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizenscitizen's(This rule identifies whether there is a missing apostrophe before an 's'.) physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the resultresult,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehiclevehicles(Possible agreement error 'there're' + singular noun) in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps citythe city(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) to reduce traffic stress.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While I acknowledge Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones, I firmly believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars in city centers will significantly improve residents' physical health. Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities, which might not be the case if they were able to drive their cars. Furthermore, car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. With fewer private vehicles in city centers and an increased reliance on public transportation, traffic jams will be less frequent, particularly during peak hours. Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city centers not only enhances citizens' well-being but also aids in mitigating traffic-related stress. (145 words)

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding acknowledge Paul's apprehension (revised for clarity and natural tone) about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones (rephrased for clarity), I firmly believe that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints Claire's assertion (revised for a more natural tone) that banned prohibiting cars in the city center centers will benefit for citizens significantly improve residents' physical health. health (rephrased for clarity). Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation (rephrased for a more natural tone), such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities (revised for a more natural tone), which might not allowed to drive in that area, be the case if they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could were able to drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, cars. Furthermore, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of zones contribute to alleviating traffic jam. When there were few congestion (rephrased for clarity). With fewer private vehicle in the vehicles in city center, also people choosing to taking centers and an increased reliance on public transportation more. Definitely, there transportation, traffic jams will be fewer traffic jam in the less frequent, particularly during peak hours (revised for a more natural tone). Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center centers not only benefits citizens’ health enhances citizens' well-being but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.aids in mitigating traffic-related stress (rephrased for clarity and a more natural tone).

8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Acknowledge Paul's apprehension
   - Benefits outweigh drawbacks

2. Physical Health Improvement
   - Claire's assertion
   - Prohibiting cars in city centers

3. Alternative Modes of Transportation
   - Walking or cycling
   - Increased physical activities

4. Alleviating Traffic Congestion
   - Fewer private vehicles in city centers
   - Increased reliance on public transportation

5. Reduced Traffic Jams 
   - Less frequent traffic jams 
   - Particularly during peak hours 

6. Conclusion 
   - Enhancing citizens' well-being 
   - Mitigating traffic-related stress 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
apprehension/ˌæprɪˈhɛnʃən/nounanxiety or fear that something bad will happen担忧Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses is understandable.
outweigh/ˌaʊtˈweɪ/verbto be greater or more important than something else超过,胜过The benefits of car-free zones outweigh the drawbacks.
assertion/əˈsɜrʃən/nouna confident and forceful statement of fact or belief主张,断言I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars will improve residents' physical health.
alternative/ɔlˈtɝnətɪv/adjectiveavailable as another possibility可供选择的,替代的People must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling.
alleviate/əˈli:vieɪt/verbto make something less severe减轻,缓和Car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion.
congestion/kənˈdʒɛstʃən/nounthe state of being overcrowded, especially with traffic拥堵,拥挤Traffic congestion will be less frequent with fewer private vehicles in city centers.
reliance/rɪˈlaɪəns/noundependence on or trust in someone or something依赖,信赖There will be an increased reliance on public transportation in car-free zones.
peak hours/pik ˈaʊrz/nounthe busiest hours, usually during morning and evening高峰时段Traffic jams will be less frequent during peak hours.
well-being/wɛlˈbi:ɪŋ/_noun_the state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy幸福,福祉
mitigate/ˈmɪtɪgeɪt/verbto make something less severe, serious, or painful减轻,缓和Car-free zones aid in mitigating traffic-related stress.

學術討論如何評分

TOEFL學術討論題型依據官方 ETS 評分標準進行評分,AI 評分系統會從多個面向分析每篇回答。

切題度與貢獻度

回答是否切合題目,並對討論做出有意義的貢獻?

語言運用

文法準確度、詞彙廣度,以及句子結構的品質。

論述發展與支持

論點是否透過具體例子和清楚的推理獲得充分發展?

回答中的常見模式

根據對本題考生投稿的分析,以下是考生回答中常見的模式。

許多考生提出了明確的觀點,卻缺乏具體的佐證例子。

高分回答通常會直接引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他發言者的觀點。

得分較高的回答會運用多樣的句型結構與學術詞彙。

時間管理是關鍵因素——顯得倉促完成的回答,在論述發展方面通常得分較低。

學習訣竅

1

動筆前仔細閱讀題目,確認問題的每個部分都已理解。

2

在回答中引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他考生的觀點。

3

用具體例子支持你的主要論點——避免空泛籠統的說法。

4

字數以 120-150 字為目標。篇幅較長不代表較好,清晰與聚焦更為重要。

5

練習限時作答(10 分鐘),培養在考試情境下的流暢度。

常見問題

什麼是TOEFL學術討論任務?
TOEFL學術討論任務要求你參與線上課堂討論。你需要閱讀教授的問題和其他學生的回覆,然後在約10分鐘內寫出自己的貼文,表達並支持你的觀點。
學術討論任務如何評分?
此任務依0-5分評分,評分依據包括與討論的相關性、語言運用品質(文法、詞彙、句子結構),以及你如何用具體例子和推理來發展並支持自己的觀點。
此頁面上的用戶範例是什麼?
這些是TOEFL考生在LingoLeap上練習這道題目時提交的真實回答。每個範例都經過我們的AI評分引擎評估,提供分數以及關於優勢與待加強領域的詳細回饋。
AI評估的準確度如何?
LingoLeap的AI評估引擎以ETS官方評分標準訓練而成,並與人工評分員的評分校準。雖然沒有自動化系統是完美的,但它能為練習提供可靠的回饋,並協助找出具體的加強方向。
我要如何練習這道學術討論題目?
你可以註冊免費的LingoLeap帳號來練習。針對這道確切的題目寫出你自己的回答,送出後即可立即獲得附有詳細回饋的AI評估。
我的學術討論回答應該多長?
目標字數為120-150字。此任務給你10分鐘的時間撰寫回答。請專注於表達清晰、用具體例子支持你的觀點,並引用討論脈絡,而非一味追求更長的篇幅。

今天就為您的目標分數加油!

與 LingoLeap,英語考試專家一起

更快達到您的理想分數

立即免費試用