TOEFLIELTS
Türkçe
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on urban planning. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Yapay zeka destekli değerlendirme ve geri bildirimle gerçek kullanıcı gönderileri

1 kullanıcı tarafından gönderilmiş örnek mevcut

Ücretsiz Pratiğe Başla

Görev Genel Bakışı

Doctor Achebe

In the next few weeks, we'll be talking about urban traffic management. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea:creating car-free central zones. Some cities around the world have recently designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicle are not allowed to enter the city centers. Do you think that more cities should make their central zones car-free? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents, it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere, people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.

Paul

It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My main concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because the customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they can't drive, they won't goat all not.

Kullanıcı Örnekleri ve Değerlendirme Sonuçları

1

Kullanıcı Örneği #1

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy ...

Puan
27

Kullanıcı Örneği

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizens physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehicle in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.

Değerlendirme Sonucu

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在表达观点时,可以尝试提供更具体的例子来支持观点。此外,尽管文章提到了禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响,但可以更深入地讨论这些问题。

改进建议:

  1. 在支持观点时给出具体实例。

  2. 更深入地讨论禁止汽车对市民健康和交通拥堵的影响。

示例:

  1. "For instance, cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have successfully implemented car-free zones, resulting in increased physical activity among residents and improved air quality."

  2. "Moreover, studies have shown that car-free zones can lead to a decrease in air pollution levels, which is beneficial for the overall health of the population."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面基本合理,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在段落之间的过渡和连接方面还有待加强。为了使文章更加流畅,可以使用一些过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

改进建议:

  1. 使用过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。

  2. 确保每个段落都有明确的主题句和支持细节。

示例:

  1. "On the other hand, it is important to consider the potential negative impact on businesses, as Paul mentioned."

  2. "In addition to the health benefits, car-free zones can also contribute to a more sustainable urban environment by promoting the use of public transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

5. 语法批改

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints that banned cars in the city center will benefit for citizenscitizen's(This rule identifies whether there is a missing apostrophe before an 's'.) physical health. Since individuals are not allowed to drive in that area, they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the resultresult,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of traffic jam. When there were few private vehiclevehicles(Possible agreement error 'there're' + singular noun) in the city center, also people choosing to taking public transportation more. Definitely, there will be fewer traffic jam in the city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center not only benefits citizens’ health but also helps citythe city(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) to reduce traffic stress.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

While I acknowledge Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones, I firmly believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars in city centers will significantly improve residents' physical health. Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities, which might not be the case if they were able to drive their cars. Furthermore, car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. With fewer private vehicles in city centers and an increased reliance on public transportation, traffic jams will be less frequent, particularly during peak hours. Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city centers not only enhances citizens' well-being but also aids in mitigating traffic-related stress. (145 words)

While I understand Paul’s concern regarding acknowledge Paul's apprehension (revised for clarity and natural tone) about the potential impact on businesses due to the implementation of car-free zones (rephrased for clarity), I firmly believe that many businesses may be effected by the car-free policy, it is my belief that this policy is a worthy trade-off. the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I concur with Claire’s viewpoints Claire's assertion (revised for a more natural tone) that banned prohibiting cars in the city center centers will benefit for citizens significantly improve residents' physical health. health (rephrased for clarity). Since driving is not permitted in these areas, people must resort to alternative modes of transportation (rephrased for a more natural tone), such as walking or cycling. Consequently, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activities (revised for a more natural tone), which might not allowed to drive in that area, be the case if they have to choose other transportation as a substitute, such as, on foot or bicycle. As the result people have more chances to do some physical activities. If they could were able to drive their car, somebody even cannot walk 3000 steps. Additionally, cars. Furthermore, car-free zone contributes to the reduction of zones contribute to alleviating traffic jam. When there were few congestion (rephrased for clarity). With fewer private vehicle in the vehicles in city center, also people choosing to taking centers and an increased reliance on public transportation more. Definitely, there transportation, traffic jams will be fewer traffic jam in the less frequent, particularly during peak hours (revised for a more natural tone). Ultimately, establishing car-free zones in city center, reducing the traffic stress especially during the rush hours. In conclusion, car-free zone in the city center centers not only benefits citizens’ health enhances citizens' well-being but also helps city to reduce traffic stress.aids in mitigating traffic-related stress (rephrased for clarity and a more natural tone).

8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Acknowledge Paul's apprehension
   - Benefits outweigh drawbacks

2. Physical Health Improvement
   - Claire's assertion
   - Prohibiting cars in city centers

3. Alternative Modes of Transportation
   - Walking or cycling
   - Increased physical activities

4. Alleviating Traffic Congestion
   - Fewer private vehicles in city centers
   - Increased reliance on public transportation

5. Reduced Traffic Jams 
   - Less frequent traffic jams 
   - Particularly during peak hours 

6. Conclusion 
   - Enhancing citizens' well-being 
   - Mitigating traffic-related stress 

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
apprehension/ˌæprɪˈhɛnʃən/nounanxiety or fear that something bad will happen担忧Paul's apprehension about the potential impact on businesses is understandable.
outweigh/ˌaʊtˈweɪ/verbto be greater or more important than something else超过,胜过The benefits of car-free zones outweigh the drawbacks.
assertion/əˈsɜrʃən/nouna confident and forceful statement of fact or belief主张,断言I concur with Claire's assertion that prohibiting cars will improve residents' physical health.
alternative/ɔlˈtɝnətɪv/adjectiveavailable as another possibility可供选择的,替代的People must resort to alternative modes of transportation, such as walking or cycling.
alleviate/əˈli:vieɪt/verbto make something less severe减轻,缓和Car-free zones contribute to alleviating traffic congestion.
congestion/kənˈdʒɛstʃən/nounthe state of being overcrowded, especially with traffic拥堵,拥挤Traffic congestion will be less frequent with fewer private vehicles in city centers.
reliance/rɪˈlaɪəns/noundependence on or trust in someone or something依赖,信赖There will be an increased reliance on public transportation in car-free zones.
peak hours/pik ˈaʊrz/nounthe busiest hours, usually during morning and evening高峰时段Traffic jams will be less frequent during peak hours.
well-being/wɛlˈbi:ɪŋ/_noun_the state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy幸福,福祉
mitigate/ˈmɪtɪgeɪt/verbto make something less severe, serious, or painful减轻,缓和Car-free zones aid in mitigating traffic-related stress.

Akademik Tartışma Nasıl Puanlanır

TOEFL Akademik Tartışma görevi, resmi ETS puanlama rubriğine göre değerlendirilir. Yapay zeka değerlendirmesi her yanıtı birden fazla boyutta analiz eder.

İlgi ve Katkı

Yanıt soruyu ele alıyor mu ve tartışmaya anlamlı bir katkı sağlıyor mu?

Dil Kullanımı

Dil bilgisi doğruluğu, kelime dağarcığı çeşitliliği ve cümle yapısı kalitesi.

Geliştirme ve Destekleme

Fikirler belirli örnekler ve net bir mantıkla iyi geliştirilmiş mi?

Yanıtlardaki Ortak Örüntüler

Bu görev için kullanıcı gönderilerinin analizine dayanarak, öğrenci yanıtlarında gözlemlenen ortak örüntüler şunlardır.

Birçok öğrenci net görüşler sunar ancak belirli destekleyici örneklerden yoksundur.

Güçlü yanıtlar, okuma parçasına ve diğer katılımcıların bakış açılarına doğrudan atıfta bulunur.

Daha yüksek puan alan yanıtlar, çeşitli cümle yapıları ve akademik kelime dağarcığı kullanır.

Zaman yönetimi önemli bir faktördür — aceleye getirilmiş görünen yanıtlar genellikle geliştirme açısından daha düşük puan alır.

Öğrenme İpuçları

1

Yazmaya başlamadan önce soruyu dikkatlice okuyun ve sorunun tüm bölümlerini belirleyin.

2

Yanıtınızda okuma parçasına ve diğer öğrencilerin görüşlerine atıfta bulunun.

3

Ana fikrinizi desteklemek için belirli örnekler kullanın — genel ifadelerden kaçının.

4

120-150 kelimeyi hedefleyin. Daha uzun yanıtlar her zaman daha iyi değildir; açıklık ve odak daha önemlidir.

5

Sınav koşullarında akıcılık kazanmak için süreli yanıtlar (10 dakika) üzerinde pratik yapın.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular

TOEFL Academic Discussion görevi nedir?
TOEFL Academic Discussion görevi, çevrimiçi bir sınıf tartışmasına katkıda bulunmanızı gerektirir. Bir profesörün sorusunu ve diğer öğrencilerin yanıtlarını okuduktan sonra, yaklaşık 10 dakika içinde kendi görüşünüzü ifade eden ve destekleyen bir gönderi yazarsınız.
Academic Discussion görevi nasıl puanlanır?
Görev, tartışmayla ilgililik, dil kullanım kalitesi (dilbilgisi, kelime dağarcığı, cümle yapısı) ve fikirlerinizi somut örnekler ve akıl yürütmeyle ne kadar iyi geliştirip desteklediğinize bağlı olarak 0-5 ölçeğinde puanlanır.
Bu sayfadaki kullanıcı örnekleri nedir?
Bunlar, LingoLeap üzerinde bu soruyu çalışan gerçek TOEFL adaylarının gönderdiği yanıtlardır. Her örnek, güçlü yönler ve geliştirilmesi gereken alanlar hakkında ayrıntılı geri bildirim ile bir puan sağlayan yapay zeka puanlama motorumuz tarafından değerlendirilmiştir.
Yapay zeka değerlendirmesi ne kadar doğru?
LingoLeap'in yapay zeka değerlendirme motoru, resmi ETS puanlama kriterleri üzerinde eğitilmiş ve insan değerlendiricilerin puanlarına göre kalibre edilmiştir. Hiçbir otomatik sistem mükemmel olmasa da, pratik amaçlar için güvenilir geri bildirim sağlar ve geliştirilmesi gereken belirli alanları belirlemeye yardımcı olur.
Bu Academic Discussion görevini nasıl pratik edebilirim?
Ücretsiz bir LingoLeap hesabına kaydolarak pratik yapabilirsiniz. Tam olarak bu soruya kendi yanıtınızı yazın, gönderin ve yazınız hakkında ayrıntılı geri bildirim içeren anında yapay zeka değerlendirmesi alın.
Academic Discussion yanıtım ne kadar uzun olmalı?
120-150 kelime hedefleyin. Görev, yanıtınızı yazmanız için size 10 dakika verir. Daha uzun bir yanıt yazmak yerine açıklığa, fikrinizi somut örneklerle desteklemeye ve tartışma bağlamına atıfta bulunmaya odaklanın.

Hedef Puanına Ulaşmak İçin Yanındayız!

İngilizce sınavları konusunda uzman LingoLeap ile

Hayalindeki Puana Daha Hızlı Ulaş

Şimdi ücretsiz dene