TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: nstructions Your professor is teaching a class on human resource management. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

In our discussion on the importance of workplace mentoring, we learned that mentoring (training or guiding someone) is typically associated with senior employees--that is, workers who have been at a company for a long time and mentor younger colleagues. However, at some companies, especially those that use innovative technology, younger employees sometimes train or guide senior colleagues. Do you think that it is a good idea for companies to encourage younger employees to mentor senior coworkers? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of having younger employees mentor senior ones. Technology is developing so rapidly these days, and young people are much more skilled in dealing with technology than older employees are. It's the ideal way for senior employees to learn new digital skills.

Kelly

Claire makes a good point, but technology aside, I do not think that younger employees make good mentors right away. When younger employees join companies, they often lack the experience needed to be fully effective in their roles. They should be mentored by senior coworkers who have achieved a high level of expertise in their work.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in ...

スコア
22

ユーザーサンプル

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in a avtive atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a company which the essential work is creating the post for software application.It really requires the innovative considerations.In the begining of this year, we work were determined by the senior colleagues but consequntely, their ideas were always outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely, now we younger people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover, our company also stay in a active ambidience. Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the work

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.0

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得不错,但还有一些需要改进的地方。首先,你需要更清晰地表达你的观点,并给出更具体的例子来支持你的看法。此外,尽量避免使用过于口语化的表达,以提高文章的正式程度。最后,请注意检查语法错误和词汇用法。

示例1: 原文:I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company. 修改:I completely agree with Claire that having young people mentor senior colleagues can be beneficial for the company.

示例2: 原文:Moreover, our company also stay in a active ambidience. 修改:Moreover, this approach has created a more dynamic atmosphere within our company.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面还有待加强。首先,应该有一个简短的引言来引出主题和你的观点。然后,在正文部分详细阐述你的观点,并使用恰当的过渡词来连接各个段落。最后,以一个总结性段落结束全文。

示例1: 添加引言:In response to the professor's question about whether younger employees should mentor senior coworkers, I would like to express my agreement with Claire's viewpoint for the following reasons.

示例2: 过渡词使用:On the one hand, young employees can bring innovative ideas to the company. On the other hand, senior colleagues can still benefit from their experience and expertise in other areas.

5. 语法批改

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentortingmentoring(misspelling) the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse Becasuse(Missing space between sentences) in this way, the company can keep in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') avtiveactive(misspelling) atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a company which the essential work is creating the post for software application.It It(Missing space between sentences) really requires the innovative considerations.In In(Missing space between sentences) the beginingbeginning(misspelling) of this year, we work were determined by the senior colleagues but consequntelyconsequently(misspelling), their ideas were always outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely Oppositely(Missing space between sentences), now we younger people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover Moreover(Missing space between sentences), our company also staystays(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') active ambidienceambience(misspelling). Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the work

Title: 6 文章修订

I concur with Claire's assertion that younger employees mentoring senior colleagues can be advantageous for companies. By fostering such a dynamic, organizations can maintain an energetic atmosphere and promote proactive engagement among employees. For instance, my current workplace primarily focuses on developing content for software applications, which necessitates innovative thinking. Initially, our projects were overseen by senior colleagues; however, their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction. In contrast, when younger employees began making decisions regarding suitable content for various clients, our company experienced increased profits and cultivated a more vibrant environment.

Nevertheless, I question Kelly's perspective that young individuals may lack the necessary experience to excel in innovative companies. In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are often better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends and technologies. Consequently, they may possess more relevant experience in certain aspects of their work than their senior counterparts. (151 words)

I totally believe concur with Claire Claire's assertion (revised for clarity and formality) that younger employees mentoring senior colleagues can be advantageous (revised for clarity) for companies. By fostering such a dynamic (revised for coherence), organizations can maintain an energetic atmosphere and promote proactive engagement among employees. For instance, my current workplace primarily focuses on developing content for software applications, which necessitates innovative thinking. Initially, our projects were overseen by senior colleagues; however, their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction. In contrast, when younger employees began making decisions regarding suitable content for various clients, our company experienced increased profits and cultivated a more vibrant environment (revised for coherence).

Nevertheless, I question Kelly's perspective (revised for clarity) that young people mentorting individuals may lack the necessary experience to excel in innovative companies. In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are often better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends and technologies. Consequently, they may possess more relevant experience in certain aspects of their work than their senior colleague is ¶ benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in a avtive ¶ atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a ¶ company which the essential work is creating the post counterparts (revised for software application.It really ¶ requires the innovative considerations.In the begining of this year, we work were ¶ determined by the senior colleagues but consequntely, their ideas were always ¶ outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely, now we younger ¶ people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of ¶ customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover, our company ¶ also stay in a active ambidience. ¶ Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are ¶ often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the ¶ workcoherence).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Claire's assertion
   - Younger employees mentoring senior colleagues
   - Advantages for companies

2. Maintaining an energetic atmosphere
   - Promote proactive engagement among employees
   - Example: content development for software applications

3. Outdated ideas from senior colleagues
   - Client dissatisfaction

4. Younger employees making decisions
   - Increased profits
   - Vibrant environment

5. Questioning Kelly's perspective
   - Lack of experience in innovative companies

6. Rapidly evolving world
   - Younger employees better equipped to adapt and stay current

7. Relevant experience in certain aspects of work
   - More than senior counterparts

8. Conclusion 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree同意I concur with Claire's assertion that younger employees can mentor senior colleagues.
dynamic/daɪˈnæmɪk/adjectivecharacterized by constant change or activity动态的Fostering such a dynamic can maintain an energetic atmosphere in the company.
proactive/proʊˈæktɪv/adjectivetaking action to control a situation积极主动的The company promotes proactive engagement among employees.
outdated/aʊtˈdeɪtɪd/adjective_no longer useful or acceptable过时的Their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction.
innovative/ˈɪnəˌveɪtɪv/adjective_introducing new ideas or methods创新的Younger employees excel in innovative companies.
evolving/ɪˈvɒlvɪŋ/adjectivegradually developing不断发展的In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are better equipped to adapt.
counterparts/ˈkaʊntərˌpɑrts/nouna person or thing that has the same function as another对应物They may possess more relevant experience than their senior counterparts.
vibrant/ˈvaɪbrənt/adjective_full of energy and enthusiasm充满活力的The company cultivated a more vibrant environment.
perspective/pərˈspɛktɪv/noun_a particular way of considering something观点I question Kelly's perspective on young individuals' experience.
adapt/əˈdæpt/verbto adjust oneself to different conditions适应Younger employees are better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now