All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: nstructions Your professor is teaching a class on human resource management. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Real user submissions with AI-powered evaluation and feedback

1 user-submitted samples available

Start Free Practice

Task Overview

Professor

In our discussion on the importance of workplace mentoring, we learned that mentoring (training or guiding someone) is typically associated with senior employees--that is, workers who have been at a company for a long time and mentor younger colleagues. However, at some companies, especially those that use innovative technology, younger employees sometimes train or guide senior colleagues. Do you think that it is a good idea for companies to encourage younger employees to mentor senior coworkers? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of having younger employees mentor senior ones. Technology is developing so rapidly these days, and young people are much more skilled in dealing with technology than older employees are. It's the ideal way for senior employees to learn new digital skills.

Kelly

Claire makes a good point, but technology aside, I do not think that younger employees make good mentors right away. When younger employees join companies, they often lack the experience needed to be fully effective in their roles. They should be mentored by senior coworkers who have achieved a high level of expertise in their work.

User Samples & Evaluation Results

User Sample

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in a avtive atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a company which the essential work is creating the post for software application.It really requires the innovative considerations.In the begining of this year, we work were determined by the senior colleagues but consequntely, their ideas were always outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely, now we younger people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover, our company also stay in a active ambidience. Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the work

Evaluation Result

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.0

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得不错,但还有一些需要改进的地方。首先,你需要更清晰地表达你的观点,并给出更具体的例子来支持你的看法。此外,尽量避免使用过于口语化的表达,以提高文章的正式程度。最后,请注意检查语法错误和词汇用法。

示例1: 原文:I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company. 修改:I completely agree with Claire that having young people mentor senior colleagues can be beneficial for the company.

示例2: 原文:Moreover, our company also stay in a active ambidience. 修改:Moreover, this approach has created a more dynamic atmosphere within our company.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面还有待加强。首先,应该有一个简短的引言来引出主题和你的观点。然后,在正文部分详细阐述你的观点,并使用恰当的过渡词来连接各个段落。最后,以一个总结性段落结束全文。

示例1: 添加引言:In response to the professor's question about whether younger employees should mentor senior coworkers, I would like to express my agreement with Claire's viewpoint for the following reasons.

示例2: 过渡词使用:On the one hand, young employees can bring innovative ideas to the company. On the other hand, senior colleagues can still benefit from their experience and expertise in other areas.

5. 语法批改

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentortingmentoring(misspelling) the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse Becasuse(Missing space between sentences) in this way, the company can keep in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') avtiveactive(misspelling) atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a company which the essential work is creating the post for software application.It It(Missing space between sentences) really requires the innovative considerations.In In(Missing space between sentences) the beginingbeginning(misspelling) of this year, we work were determined by the senior colleagues but consequntelyconsequently(misspelling), their ideas were always outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely Oppositely(Missing space between sentences), now we younger people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover Moreover(Missing space between sentences), our company also staystays(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') active ambidienceambience(misspelling). Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the work

Title: 6 文章修订

I concur with Claire's assertion that younger employees mentoring senior colleagues can be advantageous for companies. By fostering such a dynamic, organizations can maintain an energetic atmosphere and promote proactive engagement among employees. For instance, my current workplace primarily focuses on developing content for software applications, which necessitates innovative thinking. Initially, our projects were overseen by senior colleagues; however, their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction. In contrast, when younger employees began making decisions regarding suitable content for various clients, our company experienced increased profits and cultivated a more vibrant environment.

Nevertheless, I question Kelly's perspective that young individuals may lack the necessary experience to excel in innovative companies. In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are often better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends and technologies. Consequently, they may possess more relevant experience in certain aspects of their work than their senior counterparts. (151 words)

I totally believe concur with Claire Claire's assertion (revised for clarity and formality) that younger employees mentoring senior colleagues can be advantageous (revised for clarity) for companies. By fostering such a dynamic (revised for coherence), organizations can maintain an energetic atmosphere and promote proactive engagement among employees. For instance, my current workplace primarily focuses on developing content for software applications, which necessitates innovative thinking. Initially, our projects were overseen by senior colleagues; however, their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction. In contrast, when younger employees began making decisions regarding suitable content for various clients, our company experienced increased profits and cultivated a more vibrant environment (revised for coherence).

Nevertheless, I question Kelly's perspective (revised for clarity) that young people mentorting individuals may lack the necessary experience to excel in innovative companies. In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are often better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends and technologies. Consequently, they may possess more relevant experience in certain aspects of their work than their senior colleague is ¶ benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in a avtive ¶ atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a ¶ company which the essential work is creating the post counterparts (revised for software application.It really ¶ requires the innovative considerations.In the begining of this year, we work were ¶ determined by the senior colleagues but consequntely, their ideas were always ¶ outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely, now we younger ¶ people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of ¶ customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover, our company ¶ also stay in a active ambidience. ¶ Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are ¶ often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the ¶ workcoherence).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Claire's assertion
   - Younger employees mentoring senior colleagues
   - Advantages for companies

2. Maintaining an energetic atmosphere
   - Promote proactive engagement among employees
   - Example: content development for software applications

3. Outdated ideas from senior colleagues
   - Client dissatisfaction

4. Younger employees making decisions
   - Increased profits
   - Vibrant environment

5. Questioning Kelly's perspective
   - Lack of experience in innovative companies

6. Rapidly evolving world
   - Younger employees better equipped to adapt and stay current

7. Relevant experience in certain aspects of work
   - More than senior counterparts

8. Conclusion 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree同意I concur with Claire's assertion that younger employees can mentor senior colleagues.
dynamic/daɪˈnæmɪk/adjectivecharacterized by constant change or activity动态的Fostering such a dynamic can maintain an energetic atmosphere in the company.
proactive/proʊˈæktɪv/adjectivetaking action to control a situation积极主动的The company promotes proactive engagement among employees.
outdated/aʊtˈdeɪtɪd/adjective_no longer useful or acceptable过时的Their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction.
innovative/ˈɪnəˌveɪtɪv/adjective_introducing new ideas or methods创新的Younger employees excel in innovative companies.
evolving/ɪˈvɒlvɪŋ/adjectivegradually developing不断发展的In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are better equipped to adapt.
counterparts/ˈkaʊntərˌpɑrts/nouna person or thing that has the same function as another对应物They may possess more relevant experience than their senior counterparts.
vibrant/ˈvaɪbrənt/adjective_full of energy and enthusiasm充满活力的The company cultivated a more vibrant environment.
perspective/pərˈspɛktɪv/noun_a particular way of considering something观点I question Kelly's perspective on young individuals' experience.
adapt/əˈdæpt/verbto adjust oneself to different conditions适应Younger employees are better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends.

How Academic Discussion Is Scored

The TOEFL Academic Discussion task is evaluated based on the official ETS scoring rubric. AI evaluation analyzes each response across multiple dimensions.

Relevance & Contribution

Does the response address the question and contribute meaningfully to the discussion?

Language Use

Grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, and sentence structure quality.

Development & Support

Are ideas well-developed with specific examples and clear reasoning?

Common Patterns Across Responses

Based on analysis of user submissions for this task, here are common patterns observed in student responses.

Many students provide clear opinions but lack specific supporting examples.

Strong responses directly reference the reading passage and other speakers' viewpoints.

Higher-scoring responses use varied sentence structures and academic vocabulary.

Time management is a key factor — responses that feel rushed tend to score lower on development.

Learning Tips

1

Read the prompt carefully and identify all parts of the question before writing.

2

Reference the reading passage and the other students' opinions in your response.

3

Use specific examples to support your main point — avoid generic statements.

4

Aim for 120-150 words. Longer responses are not always better; clarity and focus matter more.

5

Practice timed responses (10 minutes) to build fluency under exam conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
The TOEFL Academic Discussion task requires you to contribute to an online classroom discussion. You'll read a professor's question and other students' responses, then write your own post expressing and supporting your opinion in about 10 minutes.
How is the Academic Discussion task scored?
The task is scored on a scale of 0-5 based on relevance to the discussion, quality of language use (grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure), and how well you develop and support your ideas with specific examples and reasoning.
What are the user samples on this page?
These are real responses submitted by TOEFL test-takers who practiced this question on LingoLeap. Each sample has been evaluated by our AI scoring engine, which provides a score and detailed feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.
How accurate is the AI evaluation?
LingoLeap's AI evaluation engine is trained on official ETS scoring rubrics and calibrated against human rater scores. While no automated system is perfect, it provides reliable feedback for practice purposes and helps identify specific areas for improvement.
How can I practice this Academic Discussion task?
You can practice by signing up for a free LingoLeap account. Write your own response to this exact question, submit it, and receive instant AI evaluation with detailed feedback on your writing.
How long should my Academic Discussion response be?
Aim for 120-150 words. The task gives you 10 minutes to write your response. Focus on clarity, supporting your opinion with specific examples, and referencing the discussion context rather than writing a longer response.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now