All Samples

TOEFL TPO 19 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on human resource management. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Real user submissions with AI-powered evaluation and feedback

193 user-submitted samples available

Start Free Practice

Task Overview

Doctor Achebe

In our discussion on the importance of workplace mentoring, we learned that mentoring (training or guiding someone) is typically associated with senior employees―that is, workers who have been at a company for a long time and mentor younger colleagues. However, at some companies, especially those that use innovative technology, younger employees sometimes train or guide senior colleagues. Do you think that it is a good idea for companies to encourage younger employees to mentor senior coworkers? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of having younger employees mentor senior ones. Technology is developing so rapidly these days, and young people are much more skilled in dealing with technology than older employees are. It’s the ideal way for senior employees to learn new digital skills.

Kelly

Claire makes a good point, but technology aside, I do not think that younger employees make good mentors right away. When younger employees join companies, they often lack the experience needed to be fully effective in their roles. They should be mentored by senior coworkers who have achieved a high level of expertise in their work.

User Samples & Evaluation Results

User Sample

In my perspective, I wholeheartedly side with the notion that companies are supposed to allow younger employees to guide the senior colleagues in certain fields, as technology update every day in which young employees do much better. To elaborate, the use of advanced technology really assist us to improve work efficiency. As large percent of younger employees learned those skills and knowledge concerning, they could taught those skills to those senior ones, which could lead to collaborative progress in working efficiency. For instance, with a younger employees help, a senior one might be able to draw charts with computers instead of by hand, which helps to save the time of calculation . While some, like Kelly might claim that young employees are not suitable for being a mentor. However, I would argue that young employees could also get trained to clarify some concepts and be a mentor through this process of teaching, leading to mutual progress. To sum up, I firmly believe the proposal that the young employees are supposed to train the senior ones should be take into consideration by companies.

Evaluation Result

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • 26

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,表达了作者的观点,并对讨论做出了贡献。但是,有一些地方可以改进。首先,在引用其他人的观点时,可以更详细地解释为什么你同意或不同意他们的看法。其次,可以在文章中提供更多具体的例子来支持你的观点。

示例1(改进):例如,在提到年轻员工教授技能时,可以具体说明他们可能教授哪些技能,如编程、数据分析等。 示例2(改进):在反驳Kelly的观点时,可以给出一个实际案例来证明年轻员工在某些情况下确实能成为优秀的导师。

4. 文章结构与组织

文章整体结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落组织和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落之间使用更明确的过渡词或短语来连接不同观点,并确保每个段落都集中讨论一个特定的观点。

示例1(改进):在讨论年轻员工教授技能的好处之后,可以使用过渡词如“然而”或“尽管如此”来引入对Kelly观点的反驳。 示例2(改进):在总结段落中,可以使用短语如“综上所述”或“总之”来更清晰地表明你将对文章进行总结。

5. 语法批改

In my perspective, I wholeheartedly side with the notion that companies are supposed to allow younger employees to guide the senior colleagues in certain fields, as technology update every day in which young employees do much better. To elaborate, the use of advanced technology really assist us to improve work efficiency. As large percent of younger employees learned those skills and knowledge concerning, they could taughtteach(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) those skills to those senior ones, which could lead to collaborative progress in working efficiency. For instance, with a younger employees help, a senior one might be able to draw charts with computers instead of by hand, which helps to save the time of calculation ..(Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses) While some, like Kelly might claim that young employees are not suitable for being a mentor. However, I would argue that young employees could also get trained to clarify some concepts and be a mentor through this process of teaching, leading to mutual progress. To sum up, I firmly believe the proposal that the young employees are supposed to train the senior ones should be taketaken(should be do (done)) into consideration by companies.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, I wholeheartedly support the idea that companies should encourage younger employees to mentor senior colleagues in specific areas, particularly where technological advancements are concerned.

To elaborate, the integration of advanced technology greatly enhances work efficiency. A significant percentage of younger employees possess the skills and knowledge required to navigate these innovations. By imparting this expertise to their senior counterparts, they can foster collaborative progress in overall efficiency. For example, with the assistance of a younger employee, a senior colleague may learn to create computer-generated charts instead of manually drawing them, thereby saving valuable time.

While some individuals like Kelly may argue that young employees are not suitable mentors due to their lack of experience, I contend that these individuals can also benefit from the mentoring process. By training and clarifying concepts for their senior colleagues, young employees can refine their own understanding and skills, leading to mutual progress.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that companies should take into account the potential benefits of allowing young employees to mentor senior colleagues in areas where they possess greater expertise. This approach not only promotes intergenerational collaboration but also contributes to overall company growth and success. (199 words)

In my perspective, opinion, I wholeheartedly side with the notion support the idea that companies are supposed to allow should encourage younger employees to guide the mentor senior colleagues in certain fields, as technology update every day in which young employees do much better. specific areas, particularly where technological advancements are concerned (revised for clarity and natural tone).

To elaborate, the use integration of advanced technology really assist us to improve greatly enhances work efficiency. As large percent efficiency (revised for clarity). A significant percentage of younger employees learned those possess the skills and knowledge concerning, required to navigate these innovations (revised for natural tone). By imparting this expertise to their senior counterparts, they could taught those skills to those senior ones, which could lead to can foster collaborative progress in working efficiency. overall efficiency (revised for clarity). For instance, example, with the assistance of a younger employees help, employee, a senior one might be able to draw colleague may learn to create computer-generated charts with computers instead of by hand, which helps to save the manually drawing them, thereby saving valuable time of calculation (revised for clarity and natural tone).

While some, some individuals like Kelly might claim may argue that young employees are not suitable for being a mentor. However, mentors due to their lack of experience (revised for clarity), I would argue that contend that these individuals can also benefit from the mentoring process (revised for natural tone). By training and clarifying concepts for their senior colleagues, young employees could also get trained to clarify some concepts and be a mentor through this process of teaching, can refine their own understanding and skills, leading to mutual progress. progress (revised for clarity).

To sum up, In conclusion, I firmly believe the proposal that the young employees are supposed to train the senior ones that companies should be take into consideration by companies.account the potential benefits of allowing young employees to mentor senior colleagues in areas where they possess greater expertise (revised for clarity and natural tone). This approach not only promotes intergenerational collaboration but also contributes to overall company growth and success (added a summary statement).

Display title: 8 思维导图

Mindmap:

1. Introduction
   - Support for younger employees mentoring senior colleagues
   - Focus on technological advancements

2. Benefits of mentoring
   a. Enhanced work efficiency
      - Younger employees' expertise in technology
      - Foster collaborative progress
      - Example: computer-generated charts vs. manual drawing
   b. Mutual progress for both parties
      - Young employees refine understanding and skills through teaching

3. Counterargument: Lack of experience in young employees
   - Addressed by mutual progress through mentoring process

4. Conclusion
   - Encourage intergenerational collaboration for company growth and success 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
wholeheartedly/ˌhoʊlˈhɑr.tɪd.li/adverbwith complete commitment and enthusiasm全心全意地I wholeheartedly support the idea that companies should encourage mentorship.
integration/ˌɪn.təˈɡreɪ.ʃən/nounthe act of combining different things集成,整合The integration of advanced technology greatly enhances work efficiency.
counterparts/ˈkaʊn.tər.pɑrts/nounrequired to navigate these innovations对应的人或物They can impart this expertise to their senior counterparts.
collaborative/kəˈlæb.ər.eɪ.t̬ɪv/adjectiveinvolving two or more people working together合作的They can foster collaborative progress in overall efficiency.
manually/ˈmæn.ju.ə.li/adverbdone by hand rather than by machine手动地A senior colleague may learn to create charts instead of manually drawing them.
contend/kənˈtend/verbto argue or state something声称,主张I contend that these individuals can also benefit from the mentoring process.
refining/rɪˈfaɪn.ɪŋ/verbimproving something by making small changes改进,提炼Young employees can refine their own understanding and skills through teaching.
intergenerational/ˌɪn.tərˌdʒen.əˈreɪ.ʃəl/adjectiveinvolving different generations跨代的This approach promotes intergenerational collaboration in the workplace.
expertise/ˌek.spərˈtiːz/nounspecial skills or knowledge in a particular field专业知识Younger employees possess the expertise required to navigate technological advancements.

How Academic Discussion Is Scored

The TOEFL Academic Discussion task is evaluated based on the official ETS scoring rubric. AI evaluation analyzes each response across multiple dimensions.

Relevance & Contribution

Does the response address the question and contribute meaningfully to the discussion?

Language Use

Grammar accuracy, vocabulary range, and sentence structure quality.

Development & Support

Are ideas well-developed with specific examples and clear reasoning?

Common Patterns Across Responses

Based on analysis of user submissions for this task, here are common patterns observed in student responses.

Many students provide clear opinions but lack specific supporting examples.

Strong responses directly reference the reading passage and other speakers' viewpoints.

Higher-scoring responses use varied sentence structures and academic vocabulary.

Time management is a key factor — responses that feel rushed tend to score lower on development.

Learning Tips

1

Read the prompt carefully and identify all parts of the question before writing.

2

Reference the reading passage and the other students' opinions in your response.

3

Use specific examples to support your main point — avoid generic statements.

4

Aim for 120-150 words. Longer responses are not always better; clarity and focus matter more.

5

Practice timed responses (10 minutes) to build fluency under exam conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
The TOEFL Academic Discussion task requires you to contribute to an online classroom discussion. You'll read a professor's question and other students' responses, then write your own post expressing and supporting your opinion in about 10 minutes.
How is the Academic Discussion task scored?
The task is scored on a scale of 0-5 based on relevance to the discussion, quality of language use (grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure), and how well you develop and support your ideas with specific examples and reasoning.
What are the user samples on this page?
These are real responses submitted by TOEFL test-takers who practiced this question on LingoLeap. Each sample has been evaluated by our AI scoring engine, which provides a score and detailed feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.
How accurate is the AI evaluation?
LingoLeap's AI evaluation engine is trained on official ETS scoring rubrics and calibrated against human rater scores. While no automated system is perfect, it provides reliable feedback for practice purposes and helps identify specific areas for improvement.
How can I practice this Academic Discussion task?
You can practice by signing up for a free LingoLeap account. Write your own response to this exact question, submit it, and receive instant AI evaluation with detailed feedback on your writing.
How long should my Academic Discussion response be?
Aim for 120-150 words. The task gives you 10 minutes to write your response. Focus on clarity, supporting your opinion with specific examples, and referencing the discussion context rather than writing a longer response.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now