TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: nstructions Your professor is teaching a class on human resource management. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

Professor

In our discussion on the importance of workplace mentoring, we learned that mentoring (training or guiding someone) is typically associated with senior employees--that is, workers who have been at a company for a long time and mentor younger colleagues. However, at some companies, especially those that use innovative technology, younger employees sometimes train or guide senior colleagues. Do you think that it is a good idea for companies to encourage younger employees to mentor senior coworkers? Why or why not?

Claire

I support the idea of having younger employees mentor senior ones. Technology is developing so rapidly these days, and young people are much more skilled in dealing with technology than older employees are. It's the ideal way for senior employees to learn new digital skills.

Kelly

Claire makes a good point, but technology aside, I do not think that younger employees make good mentors right away. When younger employees join companies, they often lack the experience needed to be fully effective in their roles. They should be mentored by senior coworkers who have achieved a high level of expertise in their work.

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in ...

Score
22

Exemple d'Utilisateur

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in a avtive atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a company which the essential work is creating the post for software application.It really requires the innovative considerations.In the begining of this year, we work were determined by the senior colleagues but consequntely, their ideas were always outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely, now we younger people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover, our company also stay in a active ambidience. Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the work

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.0

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在回答问题方面做得不错,但还有一些需要改进的地方。首先,你需要更清晰地表达你的观点,并给出更具体的例子来支持你的看法。此外,尽量避免使用过于口语化的表达,以提高文章的正式程度。最后,请注意检查语法错误和词汇用法。

示例1: 原文:I totally believe with Claire that young people mentorting the senior colleague is benefit with company. 修改:I completely agree with Claire that having young people mentor senior colleagues can be beneficial for the company.

示例2: 原文:Moreover, our company also stay in a active ambidience. 修改:Moreover, this approach has created a more dynamic atmosphere within our company.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构方面还有待加强。首先,应该有一个简短的引言来引出主题和你的观点。然后,在正文部分详细阐述你的观点,并使用恰当的过渡词来连接各个段落。最后,以一个总结性段落结束全文。

示例1: 添加引言:In response to the professor's question about whether younger employees should mentor senior coworkers, I would like to express my agreement with Claire's viewpoint for the following reasons.

示例2: 过渡词使用:On the one hand, young employees can bring innovative ideas to the company. On the other hand, senior colleagues can still benefit from their experience and expertise in other areas.

5. 语法批改

I totally believe with Claire that young people mentortingmentoring(misspelling) the senior colleague is benefit with company.Becasuse Becasuse(Missing space between sentences) in this way, the company can keep in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') avtiveactive(misspelling) atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a company which the essential work is creating the post for software application.It It(Missing space between sentences) really requires the innovative considerations.In In(Missing space between sentences) the beginingbeginning(misspelling) of this year, we work were determined by the senior colleagues but consequntelyconsequently(misspelling), their ideas were always outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely Oppositely(Missing space between sentences), now we younger people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover Moreover(Missing space between sentences), our company also staystays(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) in aan(Use of 'a' vs. 'an') active ambidienceambience(misspelling). Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the work

Title: 6 文章修订

I concur with Claire's assertion that younger employees mentoring senior colleagues can be advantageous for companies. By fostering such a dynamic, organizations can maintain an energetic atmosphere and promote proactive engagement among employees. For instance, my current workplace primarily focuses on developing content for software applications, which necessitates innovative thinking. Initially, our projects were overseen by senior colleagues; however, their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction. In contrast, when younger employees began making decisions regarding suitable content for various clients, our company experienced increased profits and cultivated a more vibrant environment.

Nevertheless, I question Kelly's perspective that young individuals may lack the necessary experience to excel in innovative companies. In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are often better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends and technologies. Consequently, they may possess more relevant experience in certain aspects of their work than their senior counterparts. (151 words)

I totally believe concur with Claire Claire's assertion (revised for clarity and formality) that younger employees mentoring senior colleagues can be advantageous (revised for clarity) for companies. By fostering such a dynamic (revised for coherence), organizations can maintain an energetic atmosphere and promote proactive engagement among employees. For instance, my current workplace primarily focuses on developing content for software applications, which necessitates innovative thinking. Initially, our projects were overseen by senior colleagues; however, their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction. In contrast, when younger employees began making decisions regarding suitable content for various clients, our company experienced increased profits and cultivated a more vibrant environment (revised for coherence).

Nevertheless, I question Kelly's perspective (revised for clarity) that young people mentorting individuals may lack the necessary experience to excel in innovative companies. In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are often better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends and technologies. Consequently, they may possess more relevant experience in certain aspects of their work than their senior colleague is ¶ benefit with company.Becasuse in this way, the company can keep in a avtive ¶ atmosphere and the employees also can work actively. For example, I am working in a ¶ company which the essential work is creating the post counterparts (revised for software application.It really ¶ requires the innovative considerations.In the begining of this year, we work were ¶ determined by the senior colleagues but consequntely, their ideas were always ¶ outmoded so that our clients often complained about that.Oppositely, now we younger ¶ people make the decision about what kind of post is suit for what type of ¶ customers. Eventually, we make more profits by this method.Moreover, our company ¶ also stay in a active ambidience. ¶ Still, I cast doubt with Kelly's idea that in the innovative company, the young people are ¶ often can trace the rapidly changing world, so they might have more experiences with the ¶ workcoherence).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Claire's assertion
   - Younger employees mentoring senior colleagues
   - Advantages for companies

2. Maintaining an energetic atmosphere
   - Promote proactive engagement among employees
   - Example: content development for software applications

3. Outdated ideas from senior colleagues
   - Client dissatisfaction

4. Younger employees making decisions
   - Increased profits
   - Vibrant environment

5. Questioning Kelly's perspective
   - Lack of experience in innovative companies

6. Rapidly evolving world
   - Younger employees better equipped to adapt and stay current

7. Relevant experience in certain aspects of work
   - More than senior counterparts

8. Conclusion 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree同意I concur with Claire's assertion that younger employees can mentor senior colleagues.
dynamic/daɪˈnæmɪk/adjectivecharacterized by constant change or activity动态的Fostering such a dynamic can maintain an energetic atmosphere in the company.
proactive/proʊˈæktɪv/adjectivetaking action to control a situation积极主动的The company promotes proactive engagement among employees.
outdated/aʊtˈdeɪtɪd/adjective_no longer useful or acceptable过时的Their outdated ideas often led to client dissatisfaction.
innovative/ˈɪnəˌveɪtɪv/adjective_introducing new ideas or methods创新的Younger employees excel in innovative companies.
evolving/ɪˈvɒlvɪŋ/adjectivegradually developing不断发展的In today's rapidly evolving world, younger employees are better equipped to adapt.
counterparts/ˈkaʊntərˌpɑrts/nouna person or thing that has the same function as another对应物They may possess more relevant experience than their senior counterparts.
vibrant/ˈvaɪbrənt/adjective_full of energy and enthusiasm充满活力的The company cultivated a more vibrant environment.
perspective/pərˈspɛktɪv/noun_a particular way of considering something观点I question Kelly's perspective on young individuals' experience.
adapt/əˈdæpt/verbto adjust oneself to different conditions适应Younger employees are better equipped to adapt and stay current with emerging trends.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant