TOEFL · 寫作 · 範文
TOEFL 寫作範文(2026)
深入研讀 TOEFL Email 寫作與學術討論的高分範文。每篇範文均附完整題目、示範回答,以及分析該回答有效之處的詳細說明。
由 LingoLeap Research Team 審校 · 2026 年 4 月更新 · 依據 2026 年 TOEFL 題型
資料來源: ETS 官方 TOEFL iBT 內容說明.
優秀的 TOEFL Writing Examples(寫作範文)長什麼樣?
高分的 TOEFL 寫作回答必須 完整回應題目的每個要求,以 具體的例子或理由支撐論點,而非流於空泛,同時保持 符合情境的語氣,並展現 穩定的語言掌控能力。整體讀起來像一篇紮實的初稿——結構清晰、條理分明,但不過度雕琢。
優秀 TOEFL 寫作範文能告訴你什麼
TOEFL 評分官會依照具體的評分規準打分。要真正掌握這些規準,最有效的方式就是把高分 TOEFL Writing 範文與官方評分細則一起研讀。好的範文能讓你看見規準如何落實在實際作答——而不只是停留在理論層面。
延伸閱讀: ETS 官方 TOEFL iBT 寫作備考頁面.
- 如何完整回應題目的所有要求,而不偏離主題
- 在篇幅有限的情況下,具體、有力的支持論據實際呈現的樣貌
- 如何根據讀者與題型調整適當的寫作語氣
- 如何寫出自然流暢的初稿,而不是過度修飾的文章
- 在時間壓力下,自然的段落組織邏輯是什麼樣子
TOEFL Email 寫作範文
題目
你是一名大學生。學校健身中心最近開始在平日早上提供免費瑜伽課程。你已經上了幾堂課,覺得收穫很大。請寫一封電子郵件給朋友,推薦他們嘗試這個瑜伽課程,說明這些課程對你有哪些幫助,並鼓勵朋友報名參加。
範文回答
嗨 Alex,
我想跟你說一件事——學校健身中心最近開了免費瑜伽課,我覺得你一定也會喜歡!
我過去三週每週二和週四早上都去上課,明顯感覺到整天的狀態都變好了。課程大約45分鐘,主要練習伸展和呼吸,意外地讓我在下午的課上更能集中注意力。另外,用運動開啟一天也讓我在讀書的時候心情更好。
你上週說期中考讓你壓力很大,我想這個課程剛好可以讓你喘口氣,而且因為課程時間很早,不太會跟你的課程衝突,所以完全不用擔心影響讀書時間。
報名可以上健身中心的官網,找「團體健身課程」就可以了。如果你想一起去的話,跟我說一聲!
祝好,
Jordan
由 LingoLeap Research Team 撰寫的示範答案,僅供參考,並非 ETS 官方範文。
為什麼這篇範文有效
TOEFL 學術討論範文
題目
教授: 有些教育學者認為,大學應該完全以專題式評量取代傳統考試;另一些人則認為考試仍然是衡量學生知識最可靠的方式。你的看法是什麼?
學生 A: 我支持專題式評量,因為這類評量能測試學生在職場上實際會用到的能力。單純為了考試背誦知識,並無法讓你應對真實世界的挑戰。
學生 B: 我認為考試很重要,因為它確保每位學生都在相同條件下接受同樣內容的測試。專題作業反而可能不公平,因為有些學生擁有更多資源,或碰到比較優秀的組員。
範文回答
我認為,結合兩種評量方式對學生來說效果最好,而不是偏重任何一方。
學生 A 關於實踐能力的觀點有其道理,但我認為完全取消考試會衍生問題。以我修讀生物學的經驗為例,考試幫助我紮實地建立基礎知識——像是細胞結構與代謝途徑——而這些知識在我後來執行實驗室研究專題時都是不可缺少的基礎。沒有這些知識底蘊,要順利完成專題會困難許多。
另一方面,學生 B 對專題式評量公平性的疑慮確實值得正視,但這個問題可以透過更好的設計來解決——例如採用個人專題、制定明確的評分規準,以及限定範疇,都能有效降低資源不平等所造成的差異。
大學應該以考試驗證核心知識,以專題培養應用能力。兩者各有其目的,當評量方式能反映學習的整體需求時,學生才能獲益最大。
字數:約 170 字(英文原文計算)
由 LingoLeap Research Team 撰寫的示範答案,僅供參考,並非 ETS 官方範文。
為什麼這篇範文有效
這些範文有效的共同原因
兩篇範文都具備與 TOEFL 寫作評分規準高度吻合的核心特質。
| 評分重點 | Email 寫作範文 | 學術討論範文 |
|---|---|---|
| 完整回應題目 | 推薦課程、說明幫助、鼓勵報名 | 表明立場、提出支持論據、回應兩位學生 |
| 具體支持 | 具體提及上課日期、時長與個人效益 | 以生物課為例,連結實驗室專題的實際需求 |
| 語氣恰當 | 輕鬆親切,符合寫信給朋友的語氣 | 分析性強、措辭穩健,符合學術討論語境 |
| 段落結構 | 稱呼 → 目的 → 說明 → 行動建議 → 結語 | 立場 → 支持論據 → 回應討論 → 結論 |
| 語言掌控 | 用詞自然,句子流暢 | 句型多樣,用字精準 |
TOEFL Email Sample Answers at Scores 5, 4 and 3
The fastest way to see what the rubric rewards is to read the same prompt answered at different levels. Each prompt below has a score 5, 4 and 3 response, with a note on every rubric criterion and what would move the response up a level. All responses were written by LingoLeap for this page, and the score levels are our annotated estimates against the published 2026 criteria, not ETS scores.
These three email prompts are also in our free checker, so you can write your own answer to the same task and get it scored. Try these prompts in the free TOEFL writing checker →
Asking a professor for a meeting before the midterm
Write an email to Professor Chen
You are taking an introductory biology course and have been struggling with the material covered in the last two lectures. You have an upcoming midterm exam next week and would like to meet with your professor to clarify some concepts.
- Describe which topics you are finding difficult and why.
- Explain why meeting before the midterm would be helpful for you.
- Request a specific time to meet during office hours or suggest an alternative.
Score 5 response (141 words)
Dear Professor Chen, I hope you are well. I am writing because I have been struggling with the material from our last two lectures on cellular respiration. In particular, I cannot see how the electron transport chain connects to ATP production, and my notes on the Krebs cycle do not match the diagrams in the textbook. Since the midterm is next Thursday and these topics make up a large part of it, I would really benefit from going through a few practice questions with you. Even fifteen minutes would help me identify where my reasoning goes wrong before I review on my own. Would it be possible to meet during your office hours on Tuesday at 2:00 p.m.? If that time is already taken, I am free on Wednesday morning as well. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Alex Kim
- Content
- All three points are covered, each with a concrete detail: the two topics named, why before the midterm, and a specific time plus an alternative.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Varied sentence shapes ("Since the midterm…", "Even fifteen minutes would help…") and precise word choice ("identify where my reasoning goes wrong").
- Social conventions
- A polite, appropriately formal register for a professor, a clear purpose in the first lines, and a request phrased as a question.
- Accuracy
- No errors that affect meaning.
Score 4 response (101 words)
Dear Professor Chen, I am a student in your introduction to biology class. I am writing because I have difficulty with the last two lectures. The topics about cell energy are confusing for me, especially the electron transport chain. I think meeting you before the midterm would be very helpful, because the midterm is next week and I want to understand the concepts clearly. I studied the textbook but I still have some questions. Could I meet you in your office hours on Tuesday? If it is not possible, please let me know another time. Thank you very much. Best, Alex
- Content
- All three points are addressed, but the second is thin: "I want to understand the concepts clearly" says little about why a meeting, rather than more reading, would help.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Clear but repetitive: several sentences begin "I…", and "helpful" and "confusing" do most of the work.
- Social conventions
- Polite and appropriate throughout.
- Accuracy
- Small slips ("difficulty with the last two lectures") that do not get in the way of meaning.
To reach the next level: Name exactly what you will ask about and why it matters for the exam, and offer a specific time rather than "Tuesday".
Score 3 response (52 words)
Hi Professor, I have problem in biology class. The last lectures was very hard and I dont understand many things. Midterm is next week so I am worried about it. Can I meet you? I want to ask some questions about the lecture. Please tell me when you are free. Thanks, Alex
- Content
- The topics are never named, the reason for meeting before the midterm is only implied, and no time is proposed. The third point is handed back to the professor.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Short, simple sentences with basic vocabulary.
- Social conventions
- "Hi Professor" and "Thanks" are too casual for this recipient, and the request is abrupt.
- Accuracy
- Noticeable errors ("I have problem", "lectures was", "dont"), although the meaning stays clear.
To reach the next level: Answer each bullet explicitly, with one detail per bullet, and adjust the greeting and sign-off to a professor.
Complaining to the housing office about noise
Write an email to the Housing Office
Your dormitory neighbor in the room next to yours plays loud music every night past midnight. You have spoken to them twice, but the noise has not stopped. You are losing sleep and your academic performance is suffering.
- Describe the noise problem and how long it has been happening
- Explain how the situation is affecting your sleep and studies
- Request a specific action the housing office can take to resolve the issue
Score 5 response (135 words)
Dear Housing Office, I am writing about an ongoing noise problem in Hartley Hall. For about three weeks, the resident of room 214, next to mine, has played loud music almost every night until 1:00 or 2:00 a.m. I have spoken to him politely twice, and although he apologized both times, the noise continued the following night. As a result, I am averaging about five hours of sleep a night. I fell asleep during a statistics lecture last week, and my score on Friday's quiz was the lowest I have had this semester. Could a resident advisor speak with him and remind him of the 11:00 p.m. quiet hours? If the problem continues after that, I would be grateful to discuss moving to another room. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Maya Patel (room 216)
- Content
- Duration, times and the two earlier conversations are specific; the effects are concrete (sleep, a lecture, a quiz); the request is a precise action with a fallback.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Subordinate clauses and transitions used naturally ("although he apologized both times", "As a result").
- Social conventions
- Firm but courteous, which suits a complaint to an office, and the writer identifies herself by room number.
- Accuracy
- Error-free.
Score 4 response (84 words)
Dear Housing Office, I would like to complain about my neighbor in the dormitory. He plays loud music every night after midnight, and this has been happening for a few weeks. I already talked to him two times but nothing changed. Because of the noise, I cannot sleep well and I feel tired in my classes. My grades are also getting worse. I hope you can talk to my neighbor or do something to stop the noise. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, Maya
- Content
- Every point is there, but the effects are general ("grades are getting worse") and the request is vague ("or do something").
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Adequate, with limited range.
- Social conventions
- Appropriately polite; the sign-off would be stronger with a room number so the office can act.
- Accuracy
- Minor informality ("two times") but no real errors.
To reach the next level: Turn "do something" into one action the office can actually take, and give one specific consequence instead of a general one.
Score 3 response (40 words)
Dear Sir, My neighbor is very noisy, he play music every night and I cant sleep. This is very bad for me and I am angry. I talked to him but he dont stop. Please solve this problem quickly. Maya
- Content
- How long it has been happening is missing, the effect on studies is never mentioned, and "solve this problem" is not a specific action.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Very limited: a comma splice and short, repeated structures.
- Social conventions
- "I am angry" and "quickly" sound demanding, and there is no closing courtesy.
- Accuracy
- Agreement errors ("he play", "he dont") and missing apostrophes, but the meaning is clear.
To reach the next level: Cover all three bullets with a detail each, and replace emotion with facts: when it started, what happened, what you want done.
Proposing a plan to a classmate
Write an email to your classmate Jordan
Your group project for sociology class is falling behind because tasks have not been divided clearly.
- Suggest a way to divide the remaining work between group members
- Propose a deadline for each section so the project stays on track
- Ask if the arrangement works or if they prefer a different split
Score 5 response (121 words)
Hi Jordan, I've been looking at our sociology project, and I think we're behind mainly because nobody is sure who is doing what. Here's an idea for splitting the rest: you take the literature review, since you already found most of the sources; Sam handles the survey analysis; and I'll write the introduction and pull everything into one document. To stay on track, how about the literature review and the analysis by next Friday, the introduction by Sunday, and a full draft we all read on Tuesday, two days before it's due? Does that work for you? If you'd rather take the analysis instead, I'm happy to swap — I just want us all working from the same plan. Thanks, Riley
- Content
- A clear division with a reason, a deadline for each section and a buffer before the due date, and a genuine question that offers an alternative.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Natural, varied structures ("since you already found…", "If you'd rather…").
- Social conventions
- A friendly register that suits a classmate, with no stiffness and no bossiness.
- Accuracy
- Error-free.
Score 4 response (64 words)
Hi Jordan, Our project is behind, so I think we should divide the work. You can do the literature review, Sam can do the analysis and I will do the introduction. I think we should finish our parts by next Friday, and then we can put everything together. Is this OK for you? Let me know if you want to change anything. Thanks, Riley
- Content
- The work is divided, but there is one shared deadline rather than one per section, and no time is left to combine and review.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Simple and clear, with little range.
- Social conventions
- An appropriate tone for a classmate.
- Accuracy
- Accurate.
To reach the next level: Give each section its own deadline, as the prompt asks, and say why the split makes sense.
Score 3 response (35 words)
Dear Jordan, We need to finish the project. Everyone should do some parts. I think it is better if we work hard and finish soon because the deadline is coming. What do you think? Riley
- Content
- No actual division of work and no deadlines: the first two bullets are only gestured at.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Generic statements ("work hard and finish soon").
- Social conventions
- Polite enough, but "Dear Jordan" is stiff for a classmate.
- Accuracy
- Few errors, but there is very little content to judge.
To reach the next level: Accuracy is not the problem here; content is. Name who does what and by when.
TOEFL Academic Discussion Sample Answers at Scores 5, 4 and 3
The difference between a 4 and a 5 is rarely grammar. It is usually how specifically the post supports its position and how directly it engages with the other students. More practice prompts by topic →
Should universities require an internship to graduate?
Dr. Ramos (education)
Dr. Ramos: Some universities now require every student to complete an internship before graduating. Supporters say it prepares students for work; critics say it is an unfair burden. Should internships be required? Why or why not?
Mina: Yes. I learned more in one summer at a marketing firm than in two years of classes. Employers expect experience, and a requirement makes sure everyone gets some.
Tomas: I disagree. Many students already work part-time jobs to pay tuition, and many internships are unpaid. A requirement would hurt exactly the students who can least afford it.
Score 5 response (133 words)
I think universities should require some form of work experience, but Tomas is right that an unpaid internship cannot be the only way to meet it. Mina's point stands: experience teaches things a classroom cannot, such as how to manage a deadline that affects other people. Making it a requirement also matters, because the students who skip optional internships are often the ones without family connections to find one. However, the requirement should count paid part-time jobs, research assistantships and campus work, as long as students reflect on what they learned. For example, a student working twenty hours a week at a café is already practicing teamwork and handling difficult customers. A flexible requirement like this would give every student work experience without forcing those who need an income to work for free.
- Content and elaboration
- A clear, qualified position, developed with a reason (who misses out when it is optional), a proposal and a concrete example.
- Response to the discussion
- Engages both students: it builds on Mina's point and adapts Tomas's objection into a solution, in its own words.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Complex sentences used precisely ("as long as…", "without forcing…").
- Language accuracy
- Error-free.
Score 4 response (83 words)
In my opinion, universities should require internships. I agree with Mina that internships give students practical experience. When students do an internship, they can use what they learned in class in a real situation, and this helps them find a job after graduation. Tomas says some students cannot work for free, which is true. But universities can help these students by finding paid internships for them. Overall, I believe the benefits of internships are bigger than the problems, so they should be required.
- Content and elaboration
- A clear position with a reason, but the support stays general: no specific example of what an internship teaches.
- Response to the discussion
- Responds to both students, though "universities can help…" answers Tomas's objection only briefly.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Competent but plain.
- Language accuracy
- Minor slips ("bigger than the problems") only.
To reach the next level: Replace the general benefit with one concrete case, and explain how your answer to Tomas would actually work.
Score 3 response (44 words)
I agree with Mina. Internship is very important for students because they can get experience. Experience is important for find a job. If students have experience, company will like them. So university should require internship for all students. It is good for the future.
- Content and elaboration
- A position, but the reasoning goes in a circle (experience is important because it is important), with no example.
- Response to the discussion
- Agrees with Mina and largely repeats her point; Tomas is ignored.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Short, repetitive sentences; "important" appears twice in two sentences.
- Language accuracy
- Frequent article and form errors ("for find a job", "company will like them").
To reach the next level: Add your own reason or example rather than restating Mina, and answer Tomas's objection in one sentence.
Digital resources or physical books for public libraries?
Professor Lee (public policy)
Professor Lee: City libraries have limited budgets. Some people think libraries should now spend most of their money on digital resources like e-books and online databases. Others think physical books and library spaces should remain the priority. Which do you support, and why?
Ravi: Digital resources. People can borrow an e-book at midnight from home, and they never run out of copies.
Elena: Physical books and spaces. For many people the library is the only quiet place to study, and not everyone has a good device or internet at home.
Score 5 response (129 words)
I would side with Elena, mainly because of who actually depends on the library. Ravi's point about convenience is real, but it mostly benefits people who already own a laptop and reliable internet, and they have plenty of other ways to find information. The residents who rely on the library most, such as students in crowded apartments or older people without devices, need something an e-book cannot provide: a quiet, free place to be. In my own neighborhood, the library is full every afternoon with high school students doing homework because they have no space at home. Cutting books and space to fund databases would shift the budget away from them. Libraries should keep buying some digital resources, but not at the cost of the building and the shelves.
- Content and elaboration
- The position is argued through a clear principle (who depends on the library) and supported with a specific observation.
- Response to the discussion
- Takes Ravi's point seriously and explains its limit, rather than simply agreeing with Elena.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Varied and precise ("shift the budget away from them", "not at the cost of").
- Language accuracy
- Error-free.
Score 4 response (88 words)
I support Elena's opinion that physical books and spaces should be the priority. Many people do not have computers or fast internet at home, so they need to go to the library to study and read. Also, reading a physical book is better for the eyes than reading on a screen for a long time. Although Ravi is right that e-books are convenient, I think libraries should first help the people who need them most. Digital resources are useful, but they should not take most of the budget.
- Content and elaboration
- Two reasons, but the second (eye strain) is asserted, not developed, and neither has a concrete example.
- Response to the discussion
- Acknowledges Ravi, though only in one clause.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Good control with a modest range.
- Language accuracy
- Accurate.
To reach the next level: Develop one reason fully with an example rather than listing two, and say why Ravi's point does not change your view.
Score 3 response (37 words)
I think digital resources is better. Because now everyone use phone and computer. Book is old and expensive. E-book is cheap and easy, people can read anywhere. So library should buy more e-book and less paper book.
- Content and elaboration
- A clear choice, but the claims are broad ("everyone use phone") and unsupported.
- Response to the discussion
- Neither student is mentioned, and Elena's point about access is ignored even though it challenges this answer directly.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- A fragment ("Because now…") and very simple sentences.
- Language accuracy
- Agreement and plural errors throughout ("resources is", "everyone use", "more e-book").
To reach the next level: Answer the strongest point against you (Elena's), and support your claim with one realistic example.
Government bans or individual choices to cut plastic waste?
Dr. Okafor (environmental science)
Dr. Okafor: Plastic waste keeps growing. Some argue that only government bans, for example on single-use bags and straws, can make a real difference. Others think individual choices and education are more effective in the long run. Which approach do you find more convincing?
Lucas: Bans. People know plastic is bad, but most will not change unless they have to. When my city banned plastic bags, everyone started bringing their own within a month.
Aisha: Education. Bans only cover a few items, but if people understand the problem, they will reduce plastic in every part of their lives.
Score 5 response (123 words)
Lucas's example convinces me that bans should come first, although Aisha describes a better long-term goal. The problem with relying on education is the gap between knowing and doing: most people already know plastic harms the ocean, yet they still accept a bag at the checkout because it is the easiest option. A ban removes that choice, and, as Lucas's city shows, a new habit forms quickly once the old option disappears. That said, bans can only target a few obvious products, so Aisha is right that education matters for everything else. The most effective approach is probably to ban the worst items and use the publicity around each ban to teach people why, so that the rule and the understanding grow together.
- Content and elaboration
- Explains the mechanism (the gap between knowing and doing) and proposes how the two approaches combine.
- Response to the discussion
- Uses Lucas's evidence and concedes Aisha's point precisely, without just splitting the difference.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Sophisticated structures handled cleanly.
- Language accuracy
- Error-free.
Score 4 response (76 words)
I agree with Lucas that government bans are more effective. People usually do not change their behavior if there is no rule. For example, many people know that plastic is bad for the environment, but they still use plastic bags because it is convenient. When there is a ban, people have to change. Aisha's idea is good, but education takes a long time and not everyone will listen. So I think bans are the better choice.
- Content and elaboration
- A relevant example and a sound reason, though the example is a general observation rather than something specific.
- Response to the discussion
- Responds to both students, but dismisses Aisha quickly.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Clear, with limited range.
- Language accuracy
- Accurate.
To reach the next level: Engage with what Aisha's approach does better before explaining why bans still win.
Score 3 response (41 words)
Plastic is very bad for environment and animals. Many animal die because of plastic in the sea. I think government and people both should do something. Government can make law and people can stop use plastic. Everybody should protect the earth.
- Content and elaboration
- Never really answers the question of which approach is more convincing; the general statements about plastic are off-target.
- Response to the discussion
- Does not engage with either student's argument.
- Syntactic and lexical variety
- Simple, repetitive structures.
- Language accuracy
- Frequent errors ("many animal die", "stop use plastic").
To reach the next level: Choose a side in the first sentence, then use one of the students' points to explain why.
Real Student Answers, AI-Scored
For range beyond the annotated samples, LingoLeap publishes more than 16,000 Academic Discussion answers written by students in the app, each with the AI score and feedback it received, organised by the class subject of the prompt.
Many of these answers were scored before the 2026 format change, so their scores use the old 0-30 scale rather than the 0-5 task scale, and some feedback is in Chinese. Read them for the variety of real arguments and mistakes, and use the annotated samples above to calibrate what each level looks like.
Browse all Academic Discussion subjects with student answers →如何正確運用範文學習,而不是照抄
先自己寫,再看範文
看範文之前,先自己嘗試回應題目。完成後再對照範文,找出自己在結構、論點發展或語氣上的不足之處。
分析結構邏輯,而非字句本身
重點放在文章的組織方式——立場在哪裡提出、論據如何展開、結語如何收尾。掌握結構邏輯後,用自己的內容套用相同的框架。
研究「具體支持」是如何做到的
注意兩篇範文如何運用具體細節(「週二和週四早上」、「細胞結構與代謝途徑」)。練習針對不同題目,自己生成具體的支持內容。
留意不同題型之間的語氣差異
Email 範文語氣親切、口語化;學術討論範文則偏向分析性、客觀冷靜。練習根據題型靈活切換這兩種不同的寫作語氣。
把範文當作自我評量的標準
每次練習後,對照高分範文檢視自己的作答。問問自己:我有完整回應題目的所有要求嗎?支持論據夠具體嗎?語氣是否恰當?
讀完範文後學生常犯的錯誤
背誦範文中的句子或片語
評分者能辨識出背誦的語言。應學習範文背後的寫作策略(具體支持、清晰結構),然後用自己的話呈現。
試圖複製範文的寫作風格
你的寫作風格不需要和範文一樣。重要的是清楚回應題目、提供具體支持,並維持適當的語氣。
只看範文,沒有實際動筆練習
閱讀是被動的,寫作才是主動的。你需要在計時的條件下實際寫作,才能培養出範文所展現的速度與流暢度。
誤以為篇幅越長越好
Email 範文篇幅相對簡短,但內容完整。篇幅應服務於內容——不要用多餘的話填充字數。
研讀範文時忽略評分規準
學習範文時,務必結合評分規準一起理解。搞清楚一篇回答為何能得高分,比單純欣賞文章寫得好更有幫助。
如何用範文進行有效練習
選題後立刻計時作答
Email 寫作設定 7 分鐘,學術討論設定 10 分鐘。在真實的時間壓力下完成回答。
對照範文檢視自己的回答
比較結構、論據的具體程度、語氣與題目覆蓋率的差異,找出 1 至 2 個具體可改進的方向。
用評分規準為自己評分
參照 TOEFL 寫作評分規準估算自己的分數,誠實評估哪些面向較強、哪些需要加強。
針對最弱的部分重新練習
不必整篇重寫,只針對最需要改進的段落重新作答即可。
尋求外部回饋
自我評量有其盲點。善用 AI 輔助工具或請教師提供回饋,找出自己在寫作上看不到的問題。
Read these after you have written your own answer, not before. For the routine that makes that work — timing, self-scoring against the rubric, and the one task you can drill free — see the TOEFL writing practice guide.