TOEFLIELTS
日本語
☰

TOEFL · ライティング · 例文

TOEFLライティング例文集(2026年版)

TOEFLのEメールライティングと学術ディスカッションの模範解答例を収録。各例文にはプロンプト・サンプル回答・なぜ高得点につながるかの解説を掲載しています。

LingoLeap Research Team 監修 · 2026年 4月更新 · 2026年版 TOEFL フォーマット準拠

出典: ETS 公式 TOEFL iBT 試験内容.

優れた TOEFL Writing Examples(ライティング例文)とは?

高得点が取れるTOEFLライティング回答は、 プロンプトのすべての要素に対応し、曖昧な主張ではなく 具体的な根拠を使い、 適切なトーンを保ちながら、 安定した英語表現力を示しています。洗練されすぎず、構成が明確でわかりやすい「リアルな下書き」のように読めることが重要です。

良いTOEFLライティング例文から学べること

TOEFL の採点官は、明確な評価基準に沿って採点します。この基準を正しく理解する最も効果的な方法は、質の高い TOEFL Writing の例文を公式の採点ルーブリックと合わせて読み解くことです。良い例文は、ルーブリックが実際の解答にどう反映されるかを示してくれます——理論だけの説明ではありません。

TOEFLライティング ルーブリック →

関連情報: ETS 公式 TOEFL iBT Writing 対策ページ.

  • 冗長にならずにプロンプトのすべての要素に答える方法
  • 短い回答の中で、具体的なサポートがどのように見えるか
  • 読み手とタスクの種類に合ったトーンの使い方
  • 過剰に磨きをかけずに明確に書く方法(あくまで下書きとして)
  • 時間的プレッシャーの中で自然な構成を実現する方法

TOEFLライティング:Eメール例文

プロンプト

あなたは大学生です。キャンパスのジムが平日の朝に無料ヨガクラスを始めました。あなたはいくつかのクラスに参加し、効果を感じています。友人にヨガクラスを勧めるEメールを書いてください。どのように役立ったかを説明し、友人に参加を促してください。

サンプル回答

Hi Alex,

I wanted to tell you about the free yoga classes the campus gym started offering — I think you'd really enjoy them.

I've been going to the Tuesday and Thursday morning sessions for the past three weeks, and they've made a noticeable difference in how I feel during the day. The classes are about 45 minutes, and they focus on stretching and breathing, which has actually helped me concentrate better in my afternoon lectures. I also find that starting the day with exercise puts me in a better mood for studying.

You mentioned last week that you've been feeling stressed about midterms, so I thought this could be a good way to take a break without losing study time — the classes are early enough that they don't conflict with most course schedules.

You can sign up through the gym's website under "Group Fitness." Let me know if you want to go together sometime!

Best,
Jordan

LingoLeap Research Team が作成した参考例文です。ETS 公式の解答ではありません。

この回答が効果的な理由

目的が明確: 最初の段落でEメールを書いた理由が明確に述べられています。
具体的な根拠: 曜日・時間・個人的なメリット(集中力向上、気分改善)など具体的な情報を挙げており、曖昧な表現がありません。
適切なトーン: 友人へのEメールとして自然なカジュアルさがあり、過度にフォーマルではありません。
行動を促す内容: ウェブサイトでの申し込み方法を具体的に案内し、一緒に参加しようという誘いも添えています。
タスクの完全な網羅: クラスの推薦・役立った理由の説明・参加への働きかけという3つの要素をすべてカバーしています。
下書きとしての自然さ: 磨きすぎず、流れが自然です。フォーマルなエッセイではなく、本物のEメールらしい文体です。

TOEFLライティング:学術ディスカッション例文

プロンプト

教授: 一部の教育者は、大学は従来の試験をプロジェクト型評価に完全に置き換えるべきだと主張しています。一方で、試験は学生の知識を測る最も信頼できる方法だという意見もあります。あなたはどう思いますか?

学生A: プロジェクト型評価を支持します。実際にキャリアで活かせる実践的なスキルを測れるからです。試験のために暗記するだけでは、現実の課題に対応できません。

学生B: 試験は重要だと思います。すべての学生が同じ内容を同じ条件で評価されるからです。プロジェクトは、利用できるリソースやグループメンバーの質によって不公平が生じる可能性があります。

サンプル回答

私の意見では、どちらか一方に依存するのではなく、両方の評価方法を組み合わせることが学生にとって最も効果的だと考えます。

学生Aの実践的スキルに関する指摘は的を射ていますが、試験を完全に廃止すると問題が生じると思います。生物学を専攻していた私の経験では、試験を通じて細胞構造や代謝経路などの基礎知識を定着させることができました。その知識があったからこそ、後の実験研究プロジェクトを成功させることができたのです。基礎知識なしでは、プロジェクト自体の達成がはるかに困難だったでしょう。

同時に、学生Bのプロジェクト型評価における公平性への懸念は理解できますが、個人プロジェクトの導入、明確なルーブリックの設定、範囲の適切な管理によって、不公平さを大幅に軽減できます。

大学は、試験で基礎知識を確認し、プロジェクトで応用力を伸ばすという役割分担をするべきです。両者は異なる目的を持っており、学習に必要なすべての側面を反映した評価によって、学生は最大限に成長できます。

文字数:約170語

LingoLeap Research Team が作成した参考例文です。ETS 公式の解答ではありません。

この回答が効果的な理由

明確な立場: 冒頭の一文で「両方の組み合わせ」という立場を明示しており、主張に曖昧さがありません。
具体的な根拠: 抽象的な主張ではなく、生物学の授業・細胞構造・実験プロジェクトという具体的な個人体験を用いています。
ディスカッションへの参加: 学生Aと学生Bの両者に名前で言及し、それぞれの具体的な主張に対して応答しています。
オリジナルの表現: 他の学生の投稿から表現をコピーせず、その考えを自分の言葉で発展させています。
文構造の多様性: 単純な文と複雑な文を組み合わせ、従属節・対比・列挙を効果的に使用しています。
力強い結論: 主張を明確に再確認する締めくくりで、全体をまとめています。
適切な文量: 約170語で最低100語を大きく上回り、十分な展開ができています。

効果的な回答例の共通点

両方の例文には、TOEFLライティングのルーブリックに対応する共通の特徴があります。

TOEFLライティング ルーブリック →

評価ポイントEメール例文ディスカッション例文
タスクの充足推薦・理由の説明・参加促進の3点を網羅立場の表明・根拠の提示・両学生への言及
具体的な根拠曜日・時間・個人的なメリットを明記生物学の授業と実験プロジェクトの具体例
適切なトーン友人へのEメールらしいカジュアルで自然な文体学術ディスカッションにふさわしい分析的で落ち着いたトーン
構成書き出し → 目的 → 根拠 → 行動提案 → 締め立場 → 根拠 → ディスカッション参加 → 結論
英語表現力自然な語彙と流れのある文多様な文構造と正確な語選択

TOEFL Email Sample Answers at Scores 5, 4 and 3

The fastest way to see what the rubric rewards is to read the same prompt answered at different levels. Each prompt below has a score 5, 4 and 3 response, with a note on every rubric criterion and what would move the response up a level. All responses were written by LingoLeap for this page, and the score levels are our annotated estimates against the published 2026 criteria, not ETS scores.

These three email prompts are also in our free checker, so you can write your own answer to the same task and get it scored. Try these prompts in the free TOEFL writing checker →

Asking a professor for a meeting before the midterm

Write an email to Professor Chen

You are taking an introductory biology course and have been struggling with the material covered in the last two lectures. You have an upcoming midterm exam next week and would like to meet with your professor to clarify some concepts.

  • Describe which topics you are finding difficult and why.
  • Explain why meeting before the midterm would be helpful for you.
  • Request a specific time to meet during office hours or suggest an alternative.
Score 5 response (141 words)

Dear Professor Chen, I hope you are well. I am writing because I have been struggling with the material from our last two lectures on cellular respiration. In particular, I cannot see how the electron transport chain connects to ATP production, and my notes on the Krebs cycle do not match the diagrams in the textbook. Since the midterm is next Thursday and these topics make up a large part of it, I would really benefit from going through a few practice questions with you. Even fifteen minutes would help me identify where my reasoning goes wrong before I review on my own. Would it be possible to meet during your office hours on Tuesday at 2:00 p.m.? If that time is already taken, I am free on Wednesday morning as well. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Alex Kim

Content
All three points are covered, each with a concrete detail: the two topics named, why before the midterm, and a specific time plus an alternative.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Varied sentence shapes ("Since the midterm…", "Even fifteen minutes would help…") and precise word choice ("identify where my reasoning goes wrong").
Social conventions
A polite, appropriately formal register for a professor, a clear purpose in the first lines, and a request phrased as a question.
Accuracy
No errors that affect meaning.
Score 4 response (101 words)

Dear Professor Chen, I am a student in your introduction to biology class. I am writing because I have difficulty with the last two lectures. The topics about cell energy are confusing for me, especially the electron transport chain. I think meeting you before the midterm would be very helpful, because the midterm is next week and I want to understand the concepts clearly. I studied the textbook but I still have some questions. Could I meet you in your office hours on Tuesday? If it is not possible, please let me know another time. Thank you very much. Best, Alex

Content
All three points are addressed, but the second is thin: "I want to understand the concepts clearly" says little about why a meeting, rather than more reading, would help.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Clear but repetitive: several sentences begin "I…", and "helpful" and "confusing" do most of the work.
Social conventions
Polite and appropriate throughout.
Accuracy
Small slips ("difficulty with the last two lectures") that do not get in the way of meaning.

To reach the next level: Name exactly what you will ask about and why it matters for the exam, and offer a specific time rather than "Tuesday".

Score 3 response (52 words)

Hi Professor, I have problem in biology class. The last lectures was very hard and I dont understand many things. Midterm is next week so I am worried about it. Can I meet you? I want to ask some questions about the lecture. Please tell me when you are free. Thanks, Alex

Content
The topics are never named, the reason for meeting before the midterm is only implied, and no time is proposed. The third point is handed back to the professor.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Short, simple sentences with basic vocabulary.
Social conventions
"Hi Professor" and "Thanks" are too casual for this recipient, and the request is abrupt.
Accuracy
Noticeable errors ("I have problem", "lectures was", "dont"), although the meaning stays clear.

To reach the next level: Answer each bullet explicitly, with one detail per bullet, and adjust the greeting and sign-off to a professor.

Complaining to the housing office about noise

Write an email to the Housing Office

Your dormitory neighbor in the room next to yours plays loud music every night past midnight. You have spoken to them twice, but the noise has not stopped. You are losing sleep and your academic performance is suffering.

  • Describe the noise problem and how long it has been happening
  • Explain how the situation is affecting your sleep and studies
  • Request a specific action the housing office can take to resolve the issue
Score 5 response (135 words)

Dear Housing Office, I am writing about an ongoing noise problem in Hartley Hall. For about three weeks, the resident of room 214, next to mine, has played loud music almost every night until 1:00 or 2:00 a.m. I have spoken to him politely twice, and although he apologized both times, the noise continued the following night. As a result, I am averaging about five hours of sleep a night. I fell asleep during a statistics lecture last week, and my score on Friday's quiz was the lowest I have had this semester. Could a resident advisor speak with him and remind him of the 11:00 p.m. quiet hours? If the problem continues after that, I would be grateful to discuss moving to another room. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Maya Patel (room 216)

Content
Duration, times and the two earlier conversations are specific; the effects are concrete (sleep, a lecture, a quiz); the request is a precise action with a fallback.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Subordinate clauses and transitions used naturally ("although he apologized both times", "As a result").
Social conventions
Firm but courteous, which suits a complaint to an office, and the writer identifies herself by room number.
Accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (84 words)

Dear Housing Office, I would like to complain about my neighbor in the dormitory. He plays loud music every night after midnight, and this has been happening for a few weeks. I already talked to him two times but nothing changed. Because of the noise, I cannot sleep well and I feel tired in my classes. My grades are also getting worse. I hope you can talk to my neighbor or do something to stop the noise. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, Maya

Content
Every point is there, but the effects are general ("grades are getting worse") and the request is vague ("or do something").
Syntactic and lexical variety
Adequate, with limited range.
Social conventions
Appropriately polite; the sign-off would be stronger with a room number so the office can act.
Accuracy
Minor informality ("two times") but no real errors.

To reach the next level: Turn "do something" into one action the office can actually take, and give one specific consequence instead of a general one.

Score 3 response (40 words)

Dear Sir, My neighbor is very noisy, he play music every night and I cant sleep. This is very bad for me and I am angry. I talked to him but he dont stop. Please solve this problem quickly. Maya

Content
How long it has been happening is missing, the effect on studies is never mentioned, and "solve this problem" is not a specific action.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Very limited: a comma splice and short, repeated structures.
Social conventions
"I am angry" and "quickly" sound demanding, and there is no closing courtesy.
Accuracy
Agreement errors ("he play", "he dont") and missing apostrophes, but the meaning is clear.

To reach the next level: Cover all three bullets with a detail each, and replace emotion with facts: when it started, what happened, what you want done.

Proposing a plan to a classmate

Write an email to your classmate Jordan

Your group project for sociology class is falling behind because tasks have not been divided clearly.

  • Suggest a way to divide the remaining work between group members
  • Propose a deadline for each section so the project stays on track
  • Ask if the arrangement works or if they prefer a different split
Score 5 response (121 words)

Hi Jordan, I've been looking at our sociology project, and I think we're behind mainly because nobody is sure who is doing what. Here's an idea for splitting the rest: you take the literature review, since you already found most of the sources; Sam handles the survey analysis; and I'll write the introduction and pull everything into one document. To stay on track, how about the literature review and the analysis by next Friday, the introduction by Sunday, and a full draft we all read on Tuesday, two days before it's due? Does that work for you? If you'd rather take the analysis instead, I'm happy to swap — I just want us all working from the same plan. Thanks, Riley

Content
A clear division with a reason, a deadline for each section and a buffer before the due date, and a genuine question that offers an alternative.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Natural, varied structures ("since you already found…", "If you'd rather…").
Social conventions
A friendly register that suits a classmate, with no stiffness and no bossiness.
Accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (64 words)

Hi Jordan, Our project is behind, so I think we should divide the work. You can do the literature review, Sam can do the analysis and I will do the introduction. I think we should finish our parts by next Friday, and then we can put everything together. Is this OK for you? Let me know if you want to change anything. Thanks, Riley

Content
The work is divided, but there is one shared deadline rather than one per section, and no time is left to combine and review.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Simple and clear, with little range.
Social conventions
An appropriate tone for a classmate.
Accuracy
Accurate.

To reach the next level: Give each section its own deadline, as the prompt asks, and say why the split makes sense.

Score 3 response (35 words)

Dear Jordan, We need to finish the project. Everyone should do some parts. I think it is better if we work hard and finish soon because the deadline is coming. What do you think? Riley

Content
No actual division of work and no deadlines: the first two bullets are only gestured at.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Generic statements ("work hard and finish soon").
Social conventions
Polite enough, but "Dear Jordan" is stiff for a classmate.
Accuracy
Few errors, but there is very little content to judge.

To reach the next level: Accuracy is not the problem here; content is. Name who does what and by when.

TOEFL Academic Discussion Sample Answers at Scores 5, 4 and 3

The difference between a 4 and a 5 is rarely grammar. It is usually how specifically the post supports its position and how directly it engages with the other students. More practice prompts by topic →

Should universities require an internship to graduate?

Dr. Ramos (education)

Dr. Ramos: Some universities now require every student to complete an internship before graduating. Supporters say it prepares students for work; critics say it is an unfair burden. Should internships be required? Why or why not?

Mina: Yes. I learned more in one summer at a marketing firm than in two years of classes. Employers expect experience, and a requirement makes sure everyone gets some.

Tomas: I disagree. Many students already work part-time jobs to pay tuition, and many internships are unpaid. A requirement would hurt exactly the students who can least afford it.

Score 5 response (133 words)

I think universities should require some form of work experience, but Tomas is right that an unpaid internship cannot be the only way to meet it. Mina's point stands: experience teaches things a classroom cannot, such as how to manage a deadline that affects other people. Making it a requirement also matters, because the students who skip optional internships are often the ones without family connections to find one. However, the requirement should count paid part-time jobs, research assistantships and campus work, as long as students reflect on what they learned. For example, a student working twenty hours a week at a café is already practicing teamwork and handling difficult customers. A flexible requirement like this would give every student work experience without forcing those who need an income to work for free.

Content and elaboration
A clear, qualified position, developed with a reason (who misses out when it is optional), a proposal and a concrete example.
Response to the discussion
Engages both students: it builds on Mina's point and adapts Tomas's objection into a solution, in its own words.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Complex sentences used precisely ("as long as…", "without forcing…").
Language accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (83 words)

In my opinion, universities should require internships. I agree with Mina that internships give students practical experience. When students do an internship, they can use what they learned in class in a real situation, and this helps them find a job after graduation. Tomas says some students cannot work for free, which is true. But universities can help these students by finding paid internships for them. Overall, I believe the benefits of internships are bigger than the problems, so they should be required.

Content and elaboration
A clear position with a reason, but the support stays general: no specific example of what an internship teaches.
Response to the discussion
Responds to both students, though "universities can help…" answers Tomas's objection only briefly.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Competent but plain.
Language accuracy
Minor slips ("bigger than the problems") only.

To reach the next level: Replace the general benefit with one concrete case, and explain how your answer to Tomas would actually work.

Score 3 response (44 words)

I agree with Mina. Internship is very important for students because they can get experience. Experience is important for find a job. If students have experience, company will like them. So university should require internship for all students. It is good for the future.

Content and elaboration
A position, but the reasoning goes in a circle (experience is important because it is important), with no example.
Response to the discussion
Agrees with Mina and largely repeats her point; Tomas is ignored.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Short, repetitive sentences; "important" appears twice in two sentences.
Language accuracy
Frequent article and form errors ("for find a job", "company will like them").

To reach the next level: Add your own reason or example rather than restating Mina, and answer Tomas's objection in one sentence.

Digital resources or physical books for public libraries?

Professor Lee (public policy)

Professor Lee: City libraries have limited budgets. Some people think libraries should now spend most of their money on digital resources like e-books and online databases. Others think physical books and library spaces should remain the priority. Which do you support, and why?

Ravi: Digital resources. People can borrow an e-book at midnight from home, and they never run out of copies.

Elena: Physical books and spaces. For many people the library is the only quiet place to study, and not everyone has a good device or internet at home.

Score 5 response (129 words)

I would side with Elena, mainly because of who actually depends on the library. Ravi's point about convenience is real, but it mostly benefits people who already own a laptop and reliable internet, and they have plenty of other ways to find information. The residents who rely on the library most, such as students in crowded apartments or older people without devices, need something an e-book cannot provide: a quiet, free place to be. In my own neighborhood, the library is full every afternoon with high school students doing homework because they have no space at home. Cutting books and space to fund databases would shift the budget away from them. Libraries should keep buying some digital resources, but not at the cost of the building and the shelves.

Content and elaboration
The position is argued through a clear principle (who depends on the library) and supported with a specific observation.
Response to the discussion
Takes Ravi's point seriously and explains its limit, rather than simply agreeing with Elena.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Varied and precise ("shift the budget away from them", "not at the cost of").
Language accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (88 words)

I support Elena's opinion that physical books and spaces should be the priority. Many people do not have computers or fast internet at home, so they need to go to the library to study and read. Also, reading a physical book is better for the eyes than reading on a screen for a long time. Although Ravi is right that e-books are convenient, I think libraries should first help the people who need them most. Digital resources are useful, but they should not take most of the budget.

Content and elaboration
Two reasons, but the second (eye strain) is asserted, not developed, and neither has a concrete example.
Response to the discussion
Acknowledges Ravi, though only in one clause.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Good control with a modest range.
Language accuracy
Accurate.

To reach the next level: Develop one reason fully with an example rather than listing two, and say why Ravi's point does not change your view.

Score 3 response (37 words)

I think digital resources is better. Because now everyone use phone and computer. Book is old and expensive. E-book is cheap and easy, people can read anywhere. So library should buy more e-book and less paper book.

Content and elaboration
A clear choice, but the claims are broad ("everyone use phone") and unsupported.
Response to the discussion
Neither student is mentioned, and Elena's point about access is ignored even though it challenges this answer directly.
Syntactic and lexical variety
A fragment ("Because now…") and very simple sentences.
Language accuracy
Agreement and plural errors throughout ("resources is", "everyone use", "more e-book").

To reach the next level: Answer the strongest point against you (Elena's), and support your claim with one realistic example.

Government bans or individual choices to cut plastic waste?

Dr. Okafor (environmental science)

Dr. Okafor: Plastic waste keeps growing. Some argue that only government bans, for example on single-use bags and straws, can make a real difference. Others think individual choices and education are more effective in the long run. Which approach do you find more convincing?

Lucas: Bans. People know plastic is bad, but most will not change unless they have to. When my city banned plastic bags, everyone started bringing their own within a month.

Aisha: Education. Bans only cover a few items, but if people understand the problem, they will reduce plastic in every part of their lives.

Score 5 response (123 words)

Lucas's example convinces me that bans should come first, although Aisha describes a better long-term goal. The problem with relying on education is the gap between knowing and doing: most people already know plastic harms the ocean, yet they still accept a bag at the checkout because it is the easiest option. A ban removes that choice, and, as Lucas's city shows, a new habit forms quickly once the old option disappears. That said, bans can only target a few obvious products, so Aisha is right that education matters for everything else. The most effective approach is probably to ban the worst items and use the publicity around each ban to teach people why, so that the rule and the understanding grow together.

Content and elaboration
Explains the mechanism (the gap between knowing and doing) and proposes how the two approaches combine.
Response to the discussion
Uses Lucas's evidence and concedes Aisha's point precisely, without just splitting the difference.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Sophisticated structures handled cleanly.
Language accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (76 words)

I agree with Lucas that government bans are more effective. People usually do not change their behavior if there is no rule. For example, many people know that plastic is bad for the environment, but they still use plastic bags because it is convenient. When there is a ban, people have to change. Aisha's idea is good, but education takes a long time and not everyone will listen. So I think bans are the better choice.

Content and elaboration
A relevant example and a sound reason, though the example is a general observation rather than something specific.
Response to the discussion
Responds to both students, but dismisses Aisha quickly.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Clear, with limited range.
Language accuracy
Accurate.

To reach the next level: Engage with what Aisha's approach does better before explaining why bans still win.

Score 3 response (41 words)

Plastic is very bad for environment and animals. Many animal die because of plastic in the sea. I think government and people both should do something. Government can make law and people can stop use plastic. Everybody should protect the earth.

Content and elaboration
Never really answers the question of which approach is more convincing; the general statements about plastic are off-target.
Response to the discussion
Does not engage with either student's argument.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Simple, repetitive structures.
Language accuracy
Frequent errors ("many animal die", "stop use plastic").

To reach the next level: Choose a side in the first sentence, then use one of the students' points to explain why.

Real Student Answers, AI-Scored

For range beyond the annotated samples, LingoLeap publishes more than 16,000 Academic Discussion answers written by students in the app, each with the AI score and feedback it received, organised by the class subject of the prompt.

Many of these answers were scored before the 2026 format change, so their scores use the old 0-30 scale rather than the 0-5 task scale, and some feedback is in Chinese. Read them for the variety of real arguments and mistakes, and use the annotated samples above to calibrate what each level looks like.

Browse all Academic Discussion subjects with student answers →

例文を正しく活用してスコアを上げる方法

まず自分で書いてから例文を見る

サンプルを見る前に、自分でプロンプトに答えてみましょう。その後で例文と比較することで、構成・展開・トーンのどこに改善点があるかを把握できます。

単語ではなく構成を分析する

立場をどこで述べているか、根拠をどう展開しているか、締めくくりがどう機能しているかに注目しましょう。同じ構成ロジックを自分の内容で応用することが重要です。

具体的な根拠の示し方を学ぶ

「火曜・木曜の朝」「細胞構造と代謝経路」など、例文がどれだけ具体的かに注目してください。異なるプロンプトで自分ならではの具体例を生み出す練習をしましょう。

タスク別のトーンの違いを意識する

Eメールは個人的で会話的なトーン、ディスカッションは分析的で落ち着いたトーンです。タスクの種類に応じてこれらのスタイルを切り替える練習をしましょう。

例文を基準として活用する

練習のたびに自分の回答と優れた例文を見比べましょう。「プロンプトのすべての要素に答えられているか」「根拠は十分に具体的か」「トーンは適切か」を確認してください。

サンプル回答を読んだ後にありがちなミス

サンプル回答のフレーズを丸暗記する

採点官は暗記した表現を見抜きます。大切なのは戦略(具体的な根拠・明確な構成)を理解し、自分の言葉で応用することです。

サンプルと同じ文体を再現しようとする

あなたの文体がサンプルと一致する必要はありません。重要なのは、プロンプトに明確に答え、具体的な根拠を示し、適切なトーンを維持することです。

例文を読むだけで実際に書く練習をしない

読むのは受動的な行為です。書くことは能動的な行為です。時間制限の中で実際に回答を書くことで、例文が示すスピードと流暢さを身につけられます。

回答は長ければ長いほど良いと思い込む

Eメールの例文は比較的短いですが、十分に展開されています。文量は内容に合わせるべきで、不要な言葉で水増ししてはいけません。

例文を学ぶ際にルーブリックを無視する

例文は常に採点基準に結びつけて考えましょう。なぜその回答が高得点につながるかを理解することが、文章を眺めるだけよりはるかに有益です。

例文を使った効果的な練習方法

1

プロンプトを選んでタイマーをセットする

Eメールは7分、学術ディスカッションは10分。本番と同じ時間プレッシャーの中で回答を書きましょう。

2

自分の回答と例文を比較する

構成・根拠の具体性・トーン・タスクの網羅度の違いを探しましょう。改善すべき点を1〜2つ具体的に特定してください。

3

ルーブリックで自己採点する

TOEFLライティングのルーブリックを使ってスコアを予測しましょう。どの評価軸が強く、どこに課題があるかを正直に把握してください。

4

最も弱い箇所を書き直す

回答全体を書き直す必要はありません。最も改善が必要な部分に絞って再挑戦しましょう。

5

外部からのフィードバックを得る

自己評価には限界があります。AIツールや講師を活用して、自分では気づけないライティングの弱点を把握しましょう。

Read these after you have written your own answer, not before. For the routine that makes that work — timing, self-scoring against the rubric, and the one task you can drill free — see the TOEFL writing practice guide.

TOEFLライティングを自分で練習しよう

本番に近いプロンプトで練習し、具体的な改善点がわかるAIルーブリック採点フィードバックを受け取りましょう。

TOEFLライティング練習を始める

よくある質問

TOEFLライティングの例文はどこで見られますか?
ETS公式のTOEFL練習教材にはサンプル回答が含まれています。また、このページではEメールライティングと学術ディスカッションの例文を、効果的な理由の解説付きで掲載しています。
TOEFLライティングのサンプル回答を丸暗記すべきですか?
いいえ。サンプル回答の丸暗記はスコアに悪影響を与えます。採点官はオリジナルの表現を求めているからです。代わりに、例文の何が効果的なのか(構成・根拠の具体性・トーン)を理解し、それらの原則を自分の言葉で応用することが大切です。
TOEFLライティングの良い例文とはどんなものですか?
良い例文はプロンプトのすべての要素に答え、明確な構成を持ち、具体的な根拠を示し、適切なトーンを保ちながら安定した英語表現を維持しています。洗練されすぎたエッセイではなく、自然な「下書き」として読めることが重要です。
これらの例文は実際のTOEFLテストから取ったものですか?
いいえ。このページの例文は、効果的なライティング戦略を示すために作成した模範解答です。2026年版TOEFLの形式と評価基準に基づいて作られていますが、実際の試験問題からの引用ではありません。
例文を使ってライティング力を上げるにはどうすればよいですか?
まず例文を読んでから、採点基準を使ってなぜ効果的かを分析しましょう。例文を見る前に同じプロンプトで自分の回答を書いてみることをおすすめします。その後、構成・展開・表現のどこに差があるかを比較してください。
高得点の回答は完璧な英語でなければなりませんか?
いいえ。ETS公式の資料では、EメールライティングとAcademic Discussionの回答は「下書き」として扱われています。文法や語選択の細かいミスは想定内であり、許容されます。重要なのは、明確なコミュニケーション・適切な内容・効果的な構成です。

TOEFLライティング関連ガイド

TOEFLライティングのガイドをもっと見る