TOEFLIELTS
한국어
☰

TOEFL · 라이팅 · 예시

TOEFL 라이팅 예시 (2026)

TOEFL 이메일 작성과 학문적 토론 유형의 실전 샘플 답변을 학습하세요. 각 예시에는 프롬프트, 샘플 답변, 그리고 무엇이 효과적인지에 대한 분석이 포함되어 있습니다.

LingoLeap 연구팀 검토 · 2026년 4월 업데이트 · 2026 TOEFL 형식 기준

출처: ETS 공식 TOEFL iBT 시험 안내.

훌륭한 TOEFL Writing Examples(라이팅 예시)는 어떤 모습일까요?

높은 점수를 받는 TOEFL 라이팅 답변은 프롬프트의 모든 요소를 빠짐없이 다루고, 구체적인 근거를 제시하며 막연한 주장을 피하고, 상황에 맞는 어조를 유지하며, 일관된 언어 구사력을 보여줍니다. 지나치게 다듬어진 글이 아니라 체계적이고 명확한 초안처럼 읽혀야 합니다.

좋은 TOEFL 라이팅 예시가 보여주는 것

TOEFL 채점관은 명확한 기준에 따라 점수를 매깁니다. 이 기준을 제대로 이해하는 가장 효과적인 방법은 우수한 TOEFL Writing 예시를 공식 채점 기준과 함께 읽는 것입니다. 좋은 예시는 채점 기준이 실제 답변에 어떻게 적용되는지 보여줍니다——단순한 이론 설명이 아니라요.

TOEFL 라이팅 채점 기준 →

참고: ETS 공식 TOEFL iBT Writing 준비 페이지.

  • 장황하게 쓰지 않으면서 프롬프트의 모든 요소를 다루는 방법
  • 짧은 답변 안에서 구체적이고 실질적인 근거가 어떻게 표현되는지
  • 독자와 과제 유형에 맞게 어조를 조절하는 방법
  • 과도하게 다듬지 않고도 명확하게 쓰는 방법 — 초안임을 기억할 것
  • 시간 압박 속에서도 자연스러운 구성을 갖추는 방법

TOEFL 이메일 작성 예시

프롬프트

당신은 대학교 학생입니다. 학교 체육관에서 최근 평일 아침에 무료 요가 수업을 시작했습니다. 당신은 수업에 몇 차례 참가해 도움이 된다고 느꼈습니다. 친구에게 요가 수업을 추천하는 이메일을 써보세요. 수업이 어떤 점에서 도움이 되었는지 설명하고 친구가 등록하도록 권유하세요.

샘플 답변

안녕 Alex,

학교 체육관에서 무료 요가 수업을 시작했는데, 네가 정말 좋아할 것 같아서 알려주려고.

지난 3주 동안 화요일이랑 목요일 아침 수업에 나가고 있는데, 하루하루 컨디션이 눈에 띄게 달라졌어. 수업은 약 45분 정도이고, 스트레칭이랑 호흡법 위주로 진행되거든. 그 덕분에 오후 수업 때 집중력이 확실히 좋아진 것 같아. 아침에 운동으로 하루를 시작하니까 공부할 때도 기분이 더 나아지더라.

지난주에 중간고사 때문에 스트레스 받는다고 했잖아, 그래서 떠올렸어. 수업이 일찍 끝나서 대부분의 수업 일정이랑 겹치지 않으니까, 공부 시간을 빼앗기지 않고 잠깐 쉬어가는 느낌으로 딱이야.

체육관 홈페이지에서 '그룹 피트니스' 메뉴로 들어가면 신청할 수 있어. 같이 가고 싶으면 언제든 말해줘!

잘 지내,
Jordan

LingoLeap 연구팀이 작성한 참고용 예시입니다. ETS 공식 답변이 아닙니다.

이 답변이 효과적인 이유

명확한 목적: 첫 문단에서 이메일을 쓰는 이유를 바로 밝히고 있습니다.
구체적인 근거: 막연한 표현 대신 구체적인 요일, 수업 시간, 그리고 직접 경험한 효과(집중력 향상, 기분 개선)를 언급합니다.
적절한 어조: 친구에게 보내는 이메일답게 편안하면서도 명확합니다. 자연스러운 표현으로 지나치게 격식을 차리지 않습니다.
행동 유도: 웹사이트 신청 방법이라는 구체적인 안내와 함께 가겠냐는 제안도 포함되어 있습니다.
과제 완성도: 수업 추천, 도움이 된 이유 설명, 친구에게 권유 — 프롬프트의 세 가지 요소를 모두 충족합니다.
초안 수준의 자연스러움: 지나치게 다듬지 않고도 자연스럽고 유연합니다. 격식 있는 에세이가 아닌 실제 이메일처럼 읽힙니다.

TOEFL 학문적 토론 예시

프롬프트

교수: 일부 교육자들은 대학이 기존의 시험을 프로젝트 기반 평가로 전면 대체해야 한다고 주장합니다. 반면 시험이 학생의 지식을 측정하는 가장 신뢰할 수 있는 방법이라고 보는 시각도 있습니다. 여러분의 의견은 무엇인가요?

학생 A: 저는 프로젝트 기반 평가를 지지합니다. 실제 직업 현장에서 필요한 실용적인 능력을 평가하기 때문입니다. 시험을 위해 내용을 암기하는 것만으로는 현실적인 문제에 대비하기 어렵습니다.

학생 B: 저는 시험이 중요하다고 생각합니다. 모든 학생이 동일한 내용을 동일한 방식으로 평가받을 수 있기 때문입니다. 프로젝트는 가정 환경이나 팀원의 역량 차이로 인해 불공평할 수 있습니다.

샘플 답변

제 생각에는 두 가지 평가 방식을 병행하는 것이 어느 하나에만 의존하는 것보다 학생에게 더 도움이 될 것 같습니다.

학생 A의 실용적 역량에 대한 주장은 타당하지만, 시험을 완전히 폐지하면 문제가 생길 수 있다고 생각합니다. 제가 생물학을 공부하면서 경험한 바로는, 시험을 통해 세포 구조나 대사 경로처럼 핵심적인 기초 지식을 확실하게 다질 수 있었고, 이 지식은 이후 실험실 연구 프로젝트를 수행할 때 반드시 필요했습니다. 그 기반이 없었다면 프로젝트를 성공적으로 완수하기 훨씬 어려웠을 것입니다.

한편, 프로젝트 기반 평가의 불공평성에 대한 학생 B의 우려도 충분히 고려할 만합니다. 하지만 이는 개인 프로젝트 과제 도입, 명확한 채점 기준 마련, 범위 조정 등 평가 설계를 개선함으로써 상당 부분 해결할 수 있습니다.

대학은 시험으로 핵심 지식을 검증하고, 프로젝트로 응용 능력을 키울 수 있습니다. 두 방식은 서로 다른 목적을 지니며, 학생들은 배워야 할 것의 전 범위를 아우르는 평가 체계에서 가장 많은 것을 얻습니다.

단어 수: 약 170단어

LingoLeap 연구팀이 작성한 참고용 예시입니다. ETS 공식 답변이 아닙니다.

이 답변이 효과적인 이유

명확한 입장: 첫 문장에서 병행 방식을 지지한다는 의견을 명확히 제시합니다. 필자의 입장에 모호함이 없습니다.
구체적인 근거: 추상적인 주장 대신 생물학 수업, 세포 구조, 실험실 프로젝트라는 구체적인 개인 경험을 사용합니다.
토론 참여: 학생 A와 학생 B를 이름으로 언급하며 각자의 구체적인 주장에 직접 반응합니다.
독창적인 표현: 다른 학생들의 표현을 그대로 옮기지 않고, 그 아이디어를 바탕으로 자신만의 언어로 발전시킵니다.
문장 구조의 다양성: 단순 문장과 복잡 문장을 혼합하여 사용합니다. 종속절, 대조 표현, 나열 구조를 효과적으로 활용합니다.
강력한 마무리: 전체 내용을 아우르는 주요 입장 재확인으로 답변을 명확하게 마무리합니다.
적절한 길이: 약 170단어로 최소 기준인 100단어를 훨씬 넘으며 충분한 내용 전개가 이루어졌습니다.

두 예시가 효과적인 공통 요인

두 예시는 모두 TOEFL 라이팅 채점 기준에 부합하는 핵심적인 특징을 공유합니다.

TOEFL 라이팅 채점 기준 →

평가 요소이메일 예시학문적 토론 예시
과제 완성도수업 추천, 이유 설명, 등록 권유입장 제시, 근거 뒷받침, 두 학생 모두에 반응
구체적인 근거요일, 수업 시간, 직접 경험한 효과 명시생물학 수업 예시, 실험실 연구와의 연결
적절한 어조친구에게 어울리는 편안하고 자연스러운 어조학문적 토론에 맞는 분석적이고 절제된 어조
구성인사 → 목적 → 근거 → 행동 유도 → 마무리입장 → 근거 → 토론 참여 → 결론
언어 구사력자연스러운 어휘, 유연한 문장다양한 문장 구조, 정확한 단어 선택

TOEFL Email Sample Answers at Scores 5, 4 and 3

The fastest way to see what the rubric rewards is to read the same prompt answered at different levels. Each prompt below has a score 5, 4 and 3 response, with a note on every rubric criterion and what would move the response up a level. All responses were written by LingoLeap for this page, and the score levels are our annotated estimates against the published 2026 criteria, not ETS scores.

These three email prompts are also in our free checker, so you can write your own answer to the same task and get it scored. Try these prompts in the free TOEFL writing checker →

Asking a professor for a meeting before the midterm

Write an email to Professor Chen

You are taking an introductory biology course and have been struggling with the material covered in the last two lectures. You have an upcoming midterm exam next week and would like to meet with your professor to clarify some concepts.

  • Describe which topics you are finding difficult and why.
  • Explain why meeting before the midterm would be helpful for you.
  • Request a specific time to meet during office hours or suggest an alternative.
Score 5 response (141 words)

Dear Professor Chen, I hope you are well. I am writing because I have been struggling with the material from our last two lectures on cellular respiration. In particular, I cannot see how the electron transport chain connects to ATP production, and my notes on the Krebs cycle do not match the diagrams in the textbook. Since the midterm is next Thursday and these topics make up a large part of it, I would really benefit from going through a few practice questions with you. Even fifteen minutes would help me identify where my reasoning goes wrong before I review on my own. Would it be possible to meet during your office hours on Tuesday at 2:00 p.m.? If that time is already taken, I am free on Wednesday morning as well. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Alex Kim

Content
All three points are covered, each with a concrete detail: the two topics named, why before the midterm, and a specific time plus an alternative.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Varied sentence shapes ("Since the midterm…", "Even fifteen minutes would help…") and precise word choice ("identify where my reasoning goes wrong").
Social conventions
A polite, appropriately formal register for a professor, a clear purpose in the first lines, and a request phrased as a question.
Accuracy
No errors that affect meaning.
Score 4 response (101 words)

Dear Professor Chen, I am a student in your introduction to biology class. I am writing because I have difficulty with the last two lectures. The topics about cell energy are confusing for me, especially the electron transport chain. I think meeting you before the midterm would be very helpful, because the midterm is next week and I want to understand the concepts clearly. I studied the textbook but I still have some questions. Could I meet you in your office hours on Tuesday? If it is not possible, please let me know another time. Thank you very much. Best, Alex

Content
All three points are addressed, but the second is thin: "I want to understand the concepts clearly" says little about why a meeting, rather than more reading, would help.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Clear but repetitive: several sentences begin "I…", and "helpful" and "confusing" do most of the work.
Social conventions
Polite and appropriate throughout.
Accuracy
Small slips ("difficulty with the last two lectures") that do not get in the way of meaning.

To reach the next level: Name exactly what you will ask about and why it matters for the exam, and offer a specific time rather than "Tuesday".

Score 3 response (52 words)

Hi Professor, I have problem in biology class. The last lectures was very hard and I dont understand many things. Midterm is next week so I am worried about it. Can I meet you? I want to ask some questions about the lecture. Please tell me when you are free. Thanks, Alex

Content
The topics are never named, the reason for meeting before the midterm is only implied, and no time is proposed. The third point is handed back to the professor.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Short, simple sentences with basic vocabulary.
Social conventions
"Hi Professor" and "Thanks" are too casual for this recipient, and the request is abrupt.
Accuracy
Noticeable errors ("I have problem", "lectures was", "dont"), although the meaning stays clear.

To reach the next level: Answer each bullet explicitly, with one detail per bullet, and adjust the greeting and sign-off to a professor.

Complaining to the housing office about noise

Write an email to the Housing Office

Your dormitory neighbor in the room next to yours plays loud music every night past midnight. You have spoken to them twice, but the noise has not stopped. You are losing sleep and your academic performance is suffering.

  • Describe the noise problem and how long it has been happening
  • Explain how the situation is affecting your sleep and studies
  • Request a specific action the housing office can take to resolve the issue
Score 5 response (135 words)

Dear Housing Office, I am writing about an ongoing noise problem in Hartley Hall. For about three weeks, the resident of room 214, next to mine, has played loud music almost every night until 1:00 or 2:00 a.m. I have spoken to him politely twice, and although he apologized both times, the noise continued the following night. As a result, I am averaging about five hours of sleep a night. I fell asleep during a statistics lecture last week, and my score on Friday's quiz was the lowest I have had this semester. Could a resident advisor speak with him and remind him of the 11:00 p.m. quiet hours? If the problem continues after that, I would be grateful to discuss moving to another room. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Maya Patel (room 216)

Content
Duration, times and the two earlier conversations are specific; the effects are concrete (sleep, a lecture, a quiz); the request is a precise action with a fallback.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Subordinate clauses and transitions used naturally ("although he apologized both times", "As a result").
Social conventions
Firm but courteous, which suits a complaint to an office, and the writer identifies herself by room number.
Accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (84 words)

Dear Housing Office, I would like to complain about my neighbor in the dormitory. He plays loud music every night after midnight, and this has been happening for a few weeks. I already talked to him two times but nothing changed. Because of the noise, I cannot sleep well and I feel tired in my classes. My grades are also getting worse. I hope you can talk to my neighbor or do something to stop the noise. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, Maya

Content
Every point is there, but the effects are general ("grades are getting worse") and the request is vague ("or do something").
Syntactic and lexical variety
Adequate, with limited range.
Social conventions
Appropriately polite; the sign-off would be stronger with a room number so the office can act.
Accuracy
Minor informality ("two times") but no real errors.

To reach the next level: Turn "do something" into one action the office can actually take, and give one specific consequence instead of a general one.

Score 3 response (40 words)

Dear Sir, My neighbor is very noisy, he play music every night and I cant sleep. This is very bad for me and I am angry. I talked to him but he dont stop. Please solve this problem quickly. Maya

Content
How long it has been happening is missing, the effect on studies is never mentioned, and "solve this problem" is not a specific action.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Very limited: a comma splice and short, repeated structures.
Social conventions
"I am angry" and "quickly" sound demanding, and there is no closing courtesy.
Accuracy
Agreement errors ("he play", "he dont") and missing apostrophes, but the meaning is clear.

To reach the next level: Cover all three bullets with a detail each, and replace emotion with facts: when it started, what happened, what you want done.

Proposing a plan to a classmate

Write an email to your classmate Jordan

Your group project for sociology class is falling behind because tasks have not been divided clearly.

  • Suggest a way to divide the remaining work between group members
  • Propose a deadline for each section so the project stays on track
  • Ask if the arrangement works or if they prefer a different split
Score 5 response (121 words)

Hi Jordan, I've been looking at our sociology project, and I think we're behind mainly because nobody is sure who is doing what. Here's an idea for splitting the rest: you take the literature review, since you already found most of the sources; Sam handles the survey analysis; and I'll write the introduction and pull everything into one document. To stay on track, how about the literature review and the analysis by next Friday, the introduction by Sunday, and a full draft we all read on Tuesday, two days before it's due? Does that work for you? If you'd rather take the analysis instead, I'm happy to swap — I just want us all working from the same plan. Thanks, Riley

Content
A clear division with a reason, a deadline for each section and a buffer before the due date, and a genuine question that offers an alternative.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Natural, varied structures ("since you already found…", "If you'd rather…").
Social conventions
A friendly register that suits a classmate, with no stiffness and no bossiness.
Accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (64 words)

Hi Jordan, Our project is behind, so I think we should divide the work. You can do the literature review, Sam can do the analysis and I will do the introduction. I think we should finish our parts by next Friday, and then we can put everything together. Is this OK for you? Let me know if you want to change anything. Thanks, Riley

Content
The work is divided, but there is one shared deadline rather than one per section, and no time is left to combine and review.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Simple and clear, with little range.
Social conventions
An appropriate tone for a classmate.
Accuracy
Accurate.

To reach the next level: Give each section its own deadline, as the prompt asks, and say why the split makes sense.

Score 3 response (35 words)

Dear Jordan, We need to finish the project. Everyone should do some parts. I think it is better if we work hard and finish soon because the deadline is coming. What do you think? Riley

Content
No actual division of work and no deadlines: the first two bullets are only gestured at.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Generic statements ("work hard and finish soon").
Social conventions
Polite enough, but "Dear Jordan" is stiff for a classmate.
Accuracy
Few errors, but there is very little content to judge.

To reach the next level: Accuracy is not the problem here; content is. Name who does what and by when.

TOEFL Academic Discussion Sample Answers at Scores 5, 4 and 3

The difference between a 4 and a 5 is rarely grammar. It is usually how specifically the post supports its position and how directly it engages with the other students. More practice prompts by topic →

Should universities require an internship to graduate?

Dr. Ramos (education)

Dr. Ramos: Some universities now require every student to complete an internship before graduating. Supporters say it prepares students for work; critics say it is an unfair burden. Should internships be required? Why or why not?

Mina: Yes. I learned more in one summer at a marketing firm than in two years of classes. Employers expect experience, and a requirement makes sure everyone gets some.

Tomas: I disagree. Many students already work part-time jobs to pay tuition, and many internships are unpaid. A requirement would hurt exactly the students who can least afford it.

Score 5 response (133 words)

I think universities should require some form of work experience, but Tomas is right that an unpaid internship cannot be the only way to meet it. Mina's point stands: experience teaches things a classroom cannot, such as how to manage a deadline that affects other people. Making it a requirement also matters, because the students who skip optional internships are often the ones without family connections to find one. However, the requirement should count paid part-time jobs, research assistantships and campus work, as long as students reflect on what they learned. For example, a student working twenty hours a week at a café is already practicing teamwork and handling difficult customers. A flexible requirement like this would give every student work experience without forcing those who need an income to work for free.

Content and elaboration
A clear, qualified position, developed with a reason (who misses out when it is optional), a proposal and a concrete example.
Response to the discussion
Engages both students: it builds on Mina's point and adapts Tomas's objection into a solution, in its own words.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Complex sentences used precisely ("as long as…", "without forcing…").
Language accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (83 words)

In my opinion, universities should require internships. I agree with Mina that internships give students practical experience. When students do an internship, they can use what they learned in class in a real situation, and this helps them find a job after graduation. Tomas says some students cannot work for free, which is true. But universities can help these students by finding paid internships for them. Overall, I believe the benefits of internships are bigger than the problems, so they should be required.

Content and elaboration
A clear position with a reason, but the support stays general: no specific example of what an internship teaches.
Response to the discussion
Responds to both students, though "universities can help…" answers Tomas's objection only briefly.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Competent but plain.
Language accuracy
Minor slips ("bigger than the problems") only.

To reach the next level: Replace the general benefit with one concrete case, and explain how your answer to Tomas would actually work.

Score 3 response (44 words)

I agree with Mina. Internship is very important for students because they can get experience. Experience is important for find a job. If students have experience, company will like them. So university should require internship for all students. It is good for the future.

Content and elaboration
A position, but the reasoning goes in a circle (experience is important because it is important), with no example.
Response to the discussion
Agrees with Mina and largely repeats her point; Tomas is ignored.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Short, repetitive sentences; "important" appears twice in two sentences.
Language accuracy
Frequent article and form errors ("for find a job", "company will like them").

To reach the next level: Add your own reason or example rather than restating Mina, and answer Tomas's objection in one sentence.

Digital resources or physical books for public libraries?

Professor Lee (public policy)

Professor Lee: City libraries have limited budgets. Some people think libraries should now spend most of their money on digital resources like e-books and online databases. Others think physical books and library spaces should remain the priority. Which do you support, and why?

Ravi: Digital resources. People can borrow an e-book at midnight from home, and they never run out of copies.

Elena: Physical books and spaces. For many people the library is the only quiet place to study, and not everyone has a good device or internet at home.

Score 5 response (129 words)

I would side with Elena, mainly because of who actually depends on the library. Ravi's point about convenience is real, but it mostly benefits people who already own a laptop and reliable internet, and they have plenty of other ways to find information. The residents who rely on the library most, such as students in crowded apartments or older people without devices, need something an e-book cannot provide: a quiet, free place to be. In my own neighborhood, the library is full every afternoon with high school students doing homework because they have no space at home. Cutting books and space to fund databases would shift the budget away from them. Libraries should keep buying some digital resources, but not at the cost of the building and the shelves.

Content and elaboration
The position is argued through a clear principle (who depends on the library) and supported with a specific observation.
Response to the discussion
Takes Ravi's point seriously and explains its limit, rather than simply agreeing with Elena.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Varied and precise ("shift the budget away from them", "not at the cost of").
Language accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (88 words)

I support Elena's opinion that physical books and spaces should be the priority. Many people do not have computers or fast internet at home, so they need to go to the library to study and read. Also, reading a physical book is better for the eyes than reading on a screen for a long time. Although Ravi is right that e-books are convenient, I think libraries should first help the people who need them most. Digital resources are useful, but they should not take most of the budget.

Content and elaboration
Two reasons, but the second (eye strain) is asserted, not developed, and neither has a concrete example.
Response to the discussion
Acknowledges Ravi, though only in one clause.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Good control with a modest range.
Language accuracy
Accurate.

To reach the next level: Develop one reason fully with an example rather than listing two, and say why Ravi's point does not change your view.

Score 3 response (37 words)

I think digital resources is better. Because now everyone use phone and computer. Book is old and expensive. E-book is cheap and easy, people can read anywhere. So library should buy more e-book and less paper book.

Content and elaboration
A clear choice, but the claims are broad ("everyone use phone") and unsupported.
Response to the discussion
Neither student is mentioned, and Elena's point about access is ignored even though it challenges this answer directly.
Syntactic and lexical variety
A fragment ("Because now…") and very simple sentences.
Language accuracy
Agreement and plural errors throughout ("resources is", "everyone use", "more e-book").

To reach the next level: Answer the strongest point against you (Elena's), and support your claim with one realistic example.

Government bans or individual choices to cut plastic waste?

Dr. Okafor (environmental science)

Dr. Okafor: Plastic waste keeps growing. Some argue that only government bans, for example on single-use bags and straws, can make a real difference. Others think individual choices and education are more effective in the long run. Which approach do you find more convincing?

Lucas: Bans. People know plastic is bad, but most will not change unless they have to. When my city banned plastic bags, everyone started bringing their own within a month.

Aisha: Education. Bans only cover a few items, but if people understand the problem, they will reduce plastic in every part of their lives.

Score 5 response (123 words)

Lucas's example convinces me that bans should come first, although Aisha describes a better long-term goal. The problem with relying on education is the gap between knowing and doing: most people already know plastic harms the ocean, yet they still accept a bag at the checkout because it is the easiest option. A ban removes that choice, and, as Lucas's city shows, a new habit forms quickly once the old option disappears. That said, bans can only target a few obvious products, so Aisha is right that education matters for everything else. The most effective approach is probably to ban the worst items and use the publicity around each ban to teach people why, so that the rule and the understanding grow together.

Content and elaboration
Explains the mechanism (the gap between knowing and doing) and proposes how the two approaches combine.
Response to the discussion
Uses Lucas's evidence and concedes Aisha's point precisely, without just splitting the difference.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Sophisticated structures handled cleanly.
Language accuracy
Error-free.
Score 4 response (76 words)

I agree with Lucas that government bans are more effective. People usually do not change their behavior if there is no rule. For example, many people know that plastic is bad for the environment, but they still use plastic bags because it is convenient. When there is a ban, people have to change. Aisha's idea is good, but education takes a long time and not everyone will listen. So I think bans are the better choice.

Content and elaboration
A relevant example and a sound reason, though the example is a general observation rather than something specific.
Response to the discussion
Responds to both students, but dismisses Aisha quickly.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Clear, with limited range.
Language accuracy
Accurate.

To reach the next level: Engage with what Aisha's approach does better before explaining why bans still win.

Score 3 response (41 words)

Plastic is very bad for environment and animals. Many animal die because of plastic in the sea. I think government and people both should do something. Government can make law and people can stop use plastic. Everybody should protect the earth.

Content and elaboration
Never really answers the question of which approach is more convincing; the general statements about plastic are off-target.
Response to the discussion
Does not engage with either student's argument.
Syntactic and lexical variety
Simple, repetitive structures.
Language accuracy
Frequent errors ("many animal die", "stop use plastic").

To reach the next level: Choose a side in the first sentence, then use one of the students' points to explain why.

Real Student Answers, AI-Scored

For range beyond the annotated samples, LingoLeap publishes more than 16,000 Academic Discussion answers written by students in the app, each with the AI score and feedback it received, organised by the class subject of the prompt.

Many of these answers were scored before the 2026 format change, so their scores use the old 0-30 scale rather than the 0-5 task scale, and some feedback is in Chinese. Read them for the variety of real arguments and mistakes, and use the annotated samples above to calibrate what each level looks like.

Browse all Academic Discussion subjects with student answers →

예시를 복사하지 않고 제대로 활용하는 방법

먼저 써보고, 그 다음에 예시 보기

샘플 답변을 보기 전에 먼저 직접 써보세요. 그런 다음 내 답변과 비교하여 구성, 내용 전개, 어조에서 부족한 부분을 파악하세요.

단어가 아닌 구조를 분석하기

답변이 어떻게 구성되어 있는지에 집중하세요 — 입장이 어디서 제시되는지, 근거가 어떻게 발전되는지, 마무리가 어떻게 작동하는지. 동일한 구조적 논리를 자신의 내용에 적용하세요.

구체성이 무엇인지 파악하기

두 예시 모두 '화요일·목요일 아침', '세포 구조와 대사 경로'처럼 구체적인 세부 사항을 사용한다는 점을 주목하세요. 다양한 프롬프트에서 나만의 구체적인 세부 내용을 생성하는 연습을 하세요.

과제 유형에 따른 어조 차이 익히기

이메일은 개인적이고 대화체입니다. 토론은 분석적이고 절제되어 있습니다. 과제 유형에 따라 어조를 자연스럽게 전환하는 연습을 하세요.

예시를 기준점으로 활용하기

연습 후 자신의 답변을 우수한 예시와 비교하세요. 프롬프트의 모든 요소를 다루었는가? 근거가 충분히 구체적인가? 어조가 적절한가? 스스로 확인하세요.

샘플 답변을 읽고 나서 흔히 저지르는 실수

샘플 답변의 표현을 암기하려 하는 것

채점관은 암기한 표현을 알아챌 수 있습니다. 구체적 근거, 명확한 구조 같은 핵심 전략을 이해하고 자신의 언어로 적용하세요.

샘플과 똑같은 문체를 재현하려 하는 것

내 글쓰기 스타일이 샘플과 일치할 필요는 없습니다. 중요한 것은 프롬프트를 명확히 다루고, 구체적인 근거를 제시하며, 어조를 적절히 유지하는 것입니다.

예시를 읽기만 하고 직접 쓰지 않는 것

읽기는 수동적입니다. 쓰기는 능동적입니다. 예시가 보여주는 속도와 유창함을 키우려면 시간을 재고 직접 답변을 써봐야 합니다.

모든 답변이 길어야 한다고 생각하는 것

이메일 예시는 비교적 짧지만 충분히 발전된 내용을 담고 있습니다. 길이는 내용을 위한 것이지, 불필요한 말을 늘어놓아서는 안 됩니다.

예시를 공부할 때 채점 기준을 무시하는 것

항상 예시를 채점 기준과 연결하여 분석하세요. 글 자체를 감탄하며 읽는 것보다, 왜 이 답변이 높은 점수를 받는지 이해하는 것이 훨씬 더 유용합니다.

샘플 답변을 활용한 효과적인 연습법

1

프롬프트를 고르고 타이머 맞추기

이메일은 7분, 학문적 토론은 10분. 실제 시험과 동일한 시간 압박 속에서 답변을 작성하세요.

2

예시와 내 답변 비교하기

구성, 근거의 구체성, 어조, 과제 완성도에서 차이를 찾아보세요. 개선할 구체적인 영역 1~2가지를 파악하세요.

3

채점 기준으로 자기 채점하기

TOEFL 라이팅 채점 기준을 활용해 예상 점수를 매겨보세요. 강한 부분과 보완이 필요한 부분을 솔직하게 파악하세요.

4

가장 약한 부분 다시 쓰기

답변 전체를 다시 쓰지 마세요. 가장 개선이 필요한 부분에 집중해서 다시 써보세요.

5

외부 피드백 받기

자기 평가에는 한계가 있습니다. AI 도구나 튜터를 활용해 스스로 알아채지 못한 취약점을 발견하세요.

Read these after you have written your own answer, not before. For the routine that makes that work — timing, self-scoring against the rubric, and the one task you can drill free — see the TOEFL writing practice guide.

TOEFL 라이팅 직접 연습하기

실전 프롬프트로 연습하고, 글쓰기를 어떻게 개선해야 할지 구체적으로 알려주는 AI 기반 채점 기준 피드백을 받아보세요.

TOEFL 라이팅 연습 시작하기

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL 라이팅 예시는 어디서 찾을 수 있나요?
ETS 공식 TOEFL 연습 교재에 샘플 답변이 포함되어 있습니다. 또한 이 페이지에서는 이메일 작성과 학문적 토론 유형의 예시를 제공하며, 각 예시가 효과적인 이유에 대한 분석도 함께 확인하실 수 있습니다.
TOEFL 라이팅 샘플 답변을 암기해야 하나요?
아닙니다. 샘플 답변을 암기하면 오히려 점수에 불리합니다. 채점관은 독창적인 표현을 평가하기 때문입니다. 대신, 예시를 통해 효과적인 구성, 구체적인 근거 제시 방식, 어조 등을 이해하고 자신의 언어로 그 원칙을 적용하는 것이 중요합니다.
좋은 TOEFL 라이팅 예시의 조건은 무엇인가요?
좋은 예시는 프롬프트의 모든 요소를 다루고, 명확한 구성을 갖추며, 구체적인 근거를 제시하고, 적절한 어조를 유지하면서 일관된 언어 구사력을 보여줍니다. 지나치게 다듬어진 에세이가 아니라 실감 나는 초안처럼 읽혀야 합니다.
이 예시들은 실제 TOEFL 시험 문제인가요?
아닙니다. 이 페이지의 예시들은 효과적인 라이팅 전략을 보여주기 위해 만들어진 모범 답안입니다. 2026년 TOEFL 형식과 기대 수준을 반영하여 작성되었지만, 실제 시험 문항에서 가져온 것은 아닙니다.
예시 답변을 활용해 어떻게 실력을 향상시킬 수 있나요?
예시를 읽은 후 채점 기준에 따라 왜 효과적인지 분석하세요. 예시를 보기 전에 먼저 같은 프롬프트로 직접 써보는 것이 좋습니다. 그런 다음 내 답변과 비교하여 구성, 내용 전개, 언어 사용에서 부족한 부분을 파악하세요.
고득점 답변은 완벽해야 하나요?
아닙니다. TOEFL 공식 자료에서도 이메일과 학문적 토론 답변은 초안으로 간주됩니다. 문법이나 단어 선택에서 사소한 오류는 예상되며 허용됩니다. 중요한 것은 명확한 의사 전달, 적절한 내용, 효과적인 구성입니다.

관련 TOEFL 라이팅 가이드

토플 라이팅 가이드 더 보기