TOEFLIELTS
繁體中文
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor' s question.

真實考生作答範例,搭配 AI 評分與回饋

目前有 1 篇考生投稿範例

開始免費練習

題型概述

Professor

Today we' re going to discuss whether the government should tax unhealthy products, such as sugary drinks and junk food. On one hand, taxing these products could discourage people from consuming them and reduce health problems. On the other hand, some argue that such taxes unfairly target lower-income families who may rely on these products as affordable sources of food. If you had to choose, would you support or oppose taxing unhealthy products? Why?

Sam

I support the idea of taxing unhealthy products. These products are often high in sugar, salt, and fat, which can lead to serious health problems such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. As you said, by taxing these products, the government can discourage people from consuming them and resolve some of these health issues. Moreover, the revenue generated can be used to fund advertising campaigns that promote healthy eating habits.

Tanya

I believe that such taxes are unfair to families that don' it have a lot of money. Wealthy people will not care about the taxes and their habits won' t change. Additionally, when prices go up, people usually try to save money by purchasing lower-quality products that are cheaper to begin with. If people start buying low-quality food they could suffer even more health problems. There are better solutions to this problem than taxes.

考生範例與評分結果

1

考生範例 #1

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, health...

分數
25

考生範例

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income. For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude of money that the family cannot afford it. If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

評分結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章基本上满足了任务要求,表达了作者对政府征收不健康产品税的支持,并给出了一些理由。但是,文章在语言和语法方面还有一些不足,需要改进。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)使用更准确的词汇和表达;2)注意语法错误和拼写错误;3)尝试使用更多的句型和词汇,使文章更丰富。

Example 1: Original: "Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income." Improved: "Although it may have some impact on low-income families, health is the most crucial concern for everyone, including those with low incomes."

Example 2: Original: "If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them." Improved: "If the government wants to support these impoverished families, they can initiate charitable programs and provide free food and public services for them."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑性和段落之间的过渡方面还有待提高。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)在段落之间添加过渡词或短语,使文章更连贯;2)确保每个段落都有一个明确的主题句,以便读者更容易理解文章的结构。

Example 1: Original: "For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food." Improved: "For instance, when a financially struggling family purchases unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in managing health issues resulting from consuming such low-quality products."

Example 2: Original: "All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products." Improved: "In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is essential for the government to impose taxes on unhealthy products to promote public health and create a more equitable society."

5. 语法批改

I concuragree with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthyhealth is the most essential issue for everyoneeveryone, including people whothose in low-income.low-income brackets. For example, if a family that do notdoesn't have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to caredifficulties in caring for their unhealthy body causedbodies, which may be weakened by eating the badunhealthy food. Also,Additionally, the healing time will spendprocess may require a multitudesignificant amount of money that the family cannot afford it.afford. If the government wantwants to support these poorlow-income families, they can initiative someinitiate charities and offer some free food and public service for them.services. That willwould be more fair for the society. All in all,In conclusion, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products. Although this may impact low-income families, health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources. For instance, if a family with limited means consumes unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices. Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I firmly believe that taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take. (131 words)

I concur agree with Sam's viewpoint perspective (changed "concur" to "agree" for a more natural tone) that the government should tax impose taxes (changed "tax" to "impose taxes" for clarity) on unhealthy products. Although it will this may impact (changed "will have some effects on the on" to "may impact" for conciseness and a more natural tone) low-income families, healthy health is a paramount concern (changed "healthy is the most essential issue for everyone issue" to "health is a paramount concern" for better word choice and grammar) for everyone, including people those with limited financial resources (changed "people who in low-income. low-income" to "those with limited financial resources" for better grammar and clarity). For example, instance, if a family that with limited means (changed "that do not have a lot of money buys some money" to "with limited means" for conciseness and clarity) consumes unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude poor dietary choices (rephrased sentence for better grammar and clarity). Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of money that the family cannot afford it. If relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government want could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I support firmly believe that it is taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure (changed "it is necessary" to "a necessary measure" for better word choice) for the government to tax unhealthy products.take.

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Sam's perspective
   - Importance of health for everyone

2. Impact on low-income families
   - Unhealthy food consumption consequences
   - Costly treatments for health issues

3. Government actions
   - Establish charities
   - Provide free food and public services

4. Promoting fairness and prioritizing health

5. Conclusion
   - Taxing unhealthy products is necessary

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
perspective/pərˈspektɪv/nouna particular attitude or way of considering things观点I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products.
paramount/ˈpærəmaʊnt/adjectivemore important than anything else至关重要的Health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources.
consequences/ˈkɒnsɪkwəns/nouna result or effect of an action or condition后果They may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices.
unaffordable/ʌnəˈfɔːrdəbl/adjectivetoo expensive for people to be able to buy无法承受的- Treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families.
rely/rɪˈlaɪ/verbto depend on with full trust or confidence依赖Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could take action.
establish/ɪˈstæblɪʃ/verbto set up or create建立- The government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support families.
fairness/ˈfeərnəs/nounthe quality of treating people equally公平- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.
measure/ˈmeʒər/nounan action taken to achieve a particular purpose措施- Taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrətaɪz/verb-to decide which of a group of things are most important so that you can deal with them first.优先考虑- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.

學術討論如何評分

TOEFL學術討論題型依據官方 ETS 評分標準進行評分,AI 評分系統會從多個面向分析每篇回答。

切題度與貢獻度

回答是否切合題目,並對討論做出有意義的貢獻?

語言運用

文法準確度、詞彙廣度,以及句子結構的品質。

論述發展與支持

論點是否透過具體例子和清楚的推理獲得充分發展?

回答中的常見模式

根據對本題考生投稿的分析,以下是考生回答中常見的模式。

許多考生提出了明確的觀點,卻缺乏具體的佐證例子。

高分回答通常會直接引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他發言者的觀點。

得分較高的回答會運用多樣的句型結構與學術詞彙。

時間管理是關鍵因素——顯得倉促完成的回答,在論述發展方面通常得分較低。

學習訣竅

1

動筆前仔細閱讀題目,確認問題的每個部分都已理解。

2

在回答中引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他考生的觀點。

3

用具體例子支持你的主要論點——避免空泛籠統的說法。

4

字數以 120-150 字為目標。篇幅較長不代表較好,清晰與聚焦更為重要。

5

練習限時作答(10 分鐘),培養在考試情境下的流暢度。

常見問題

什麼是TOEFL學術討論任務?
TOEFL學術討論任務要求你參與線上課堂討論。你需要閱讀教授的問題和其他學生的回覆,然後在約10分鐘內寫出自己的貼文,表達並支持你的觀點。
學術討論任務如何評分?
此任務依0-5分評分,評分依據包括與討論的相關性、語言運用品質(文法、詞彙、句子結構),以及你如何用具體例子和推理來發展並支持自己的觀點。
此頁面上的用戶範例是什麼?
這些是TOEFL考生在LingoLeap上練習這道題目時提交的真實回答。每個範例都經過我們的AI評分引擎評估,提供分數以及關於優勢與待加強領域的詳細回饋。
AI評估的準確度如何?
LingoLeap的AI評估引擎以ETS官方評分標準訓練而成,並與人工評分員的評分校準。雖然沒有自動化系統是完美的,但它能為練習提供可靠的回饋,並協助找出具體的加強方向。
我要如何練習這道學術討論題目?
你可以註冊免費的LingoLeap帳號來練習。針對這道確切的題目寫出你自己的回答,送出後即可立即獲得附有詳細回饋的AI評估。
我的學術討論回答應該多長?
目標字數為120-150字。此任務給你10分鐘的時間撰寫回答。請專注於表達清晰、用具體例子支持你的觀點,並引用討論脈絡,而非一味追求更長的篇幅。

今天就為您的目標分數加油!

與 LingoLeap,英語考試專家一起

更快達到您的理想分數

立即免費試用