TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor' s question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

Today we' re going to discuss whether the government should tax unhealthy products, such as sugary drinks and junk food. On one hand, taxing these products could discourage people from consuming them and reduce health problems. On the other hand, some argue that such taxes unfairly target lower-income families who may rely on these products as affordable sources of food. If you had to choose, would you support or oppose taxing unhealthy products? Why?

Sam

I support the idea of taxing unhealthy products. These products are often high in sugar, salt, and fat, which can lead to serious health problems such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. As you said, by taxing these products, the government can discourage people from consuming them and resolve some of these health issues. Moreover, the revenue generated can be used to fund advertising campaigns that promote healthy eating habits.

Tanya

I believe that such taxes are unfair to families that don' it have a lot of money. Wealthy people will not care about the taxes and their habits won' t change. Additionally, when prices go up, people usually try to save money by purchasing lower-quality products that are cheaper to begin with. If people start buying low-quality food they could suffer even more health problems. There are better solutions to this problem than taxes.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, health...

スコア
25

ユーザーサンプル

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income. For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude of money that the family cannot afford it. If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章基本上满足了任务要求,表达了作者对政府征收不健康产品税的支持,并给出了一些理由。但是,文章在语言和语法方面还有一些不足,需要改进。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)使用更准确的词汇和表达;2)注意语法错误和拼写错误;3)尝试使用更多的句型和词汇,使文章更丰富。

Example 1: Original: "Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income." Improved: "Although it may have some impact on low-income families, health is the most crucial concern for everyone, including those with low incomes."

Example 2: Original: "If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them." Improved: "If the government wants to support these impoverished families, they can initiate charitable programs and provide free food and public services for them."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑性和段落之间的过渡方面还有待提高。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)在段落之间添加过渡词或短语,使文章更连贯;2)确保每个段落都有一个明确的主题句,以便读者更容易理解文章的结构。

Example 1: Original: "For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food." Improved: "For instance, when a financially struggling family purchases unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in managing health issues resulting from consuming such low-quality products."

Example 2: Original: "All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products." Improved: "In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is essential for the government to impose taxes on unhealthy products to promote public health and create a more equitable society."

5. 语法批改

I concuragree with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthyhealth is the most essential issue for everyoneeveryone, including people whothose in low-income.low-income brackets. For example, if a family that do notdoesn't have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to caredifficulties in caring for their unhealthy body causedbodies, which may be weakened by eating the badunhealthy food. Also,Additionally, the healing time will spendprocess may require a multitudesignificant amount of money that the family cannot afford it.afford. If the government wantwants to support these poorlow-income families, they can initiative someinitiate charities and offer some free food and public service for them.services. That willwould be more fair for the society. All in all,In conclusion, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products. Although this may impact low-income families, health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources. For instance, if a family with limited means consumes unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices. Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I firmly believe that taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take. (131 words)

I concur agree with Sam's viewpoint perspective (changed "concur" to "agree" for a more natural tone) that the government should tax impose taxes (changed "tax" to "impose taxes" for clarity) on unhealthy products. Although it will this may impact (changed "will have some effects on the on" to "may impact" for conciseness and a more natural tone) low-income families, healthy health is a paramount concern (changed "healthy is the most essential issue for everyone issue" to "health is a paramount concern" for better word choice and grammar) for everyone, including people those with limited financial resources (changed "people who in low-income. low-income" to "those with limited financial resources" for better grammar and clarity). For example, instance, if a family that with limited means (changed "that do not have a lot of money buys some money" to "with limited means" for conciseness and clarity) consumes unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude poor dietary choices (rephrased sentence for better grammar and clarity). Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of money that the family cannot afford it. If relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government want could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I support firmly believe that it is taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure (changed "it is necessary" to "a necessary measure" for better word choice) for the government to tax unhealthy products.take.

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Sam's perspective
   - Importance of health for everyone

2. Impact on low-income families
   - Unhealthy food consumption consequences
   - Costly treatments for health issues

3. Government actions
   - Establish charities
   - Provide free food and public services

4. Promoting fairness and prioritizing health

5. Conclusion
   - Taxing unhealthy products is necessary

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
perspective/pərˈspektɪv/nouna particular attitude or way of considering things观点I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products.
paramount/ˈpærəmaʊnt/adjectivemore important than anything else至关重要的Health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources.
consequences/ˈkɒnsɪkwəns/nouna result or effect of an action or condition后果They may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices.
unaffordable/ʌnəˈfɔːrdəbl/adjectivetoo expensive for people to be able to buy无法承受的- Treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families.
rely/rɪˈlaɪ/verbto depend on with full trust or confidence依赖Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could take action.
establish/ɪˈstæblɪʃ/verbto set up or create建立- The government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support families.
fairness/ˈfeərnəs/nounthe quality of treating people equally公平- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.
measure/ˈmeʒər/nounan action taken to achieve a particular purpose措施- Taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrətaɪz/verb-to decide which of a group of things are most important so that you can deal with them first.优先考虑- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now