TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor' s question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

Today we' re going to discuss whether the government should tax unhealthy products, such as sugary drinks and junk food. On one hand, taxing these products could discourage people from consuming them and reduce health problems. On the other hand, some argue that such taxes unfairly target lower-income families who may rely on these products as affordable sources of food. If you had to choose, would you support or oppose taxing unhealthy products? Why?

Sam

I support the idea of taxing unhealthy products. These products are often high in sugar, salt, and fat, which can lead to serious health problems such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. As you said, by taxing these products, the government can discourage people from consuming them and resolve some of these health issues. Moreover, the revenue generated can be used to fund advertising campaigns that promote healthy eating habits.

Tanya

I believe that such taxes are unfair to families that don' it have a lot of money. Wealthy people will not care about the taxes and their habits won' t change. Additionally, when prices go up, people usually try to save money by purchasing lower-quality products that are cheaper to begin with. If people start buying low-quality food they could suffer even more health problems. There are better solutions to this problem than taxes.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, health...

점수
25

사용자 예시

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income. For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude of money that the family cannot afford it. If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章基本上满足了任务要求,表达了作者对政府征收不健康产品税的支持,并给出了一些理由。但是,文章在语言和语法方面还有一些不足,需要改进。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)使用更准确的词汇和表达;2)注意语法错误和拼写错误;3)尝试使用更多的句型和词汇,使文章更丰富。

Example 1: Original: "Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income." Improved: "Although it may have some impact on low-income families, health is the most crucial concern for everyone, including those with low incomes."

Example 2: Original: "If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them." Improved: "If the government wants to support these impoverished families, they can initiate charitable programs and provide free food and public services for them."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑性和段落之间的过渡方面还有待提高。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)在段落之间添加过渡词或短语,使文章更连贯;2)确保每个段落都有一个明确的主题句,以便读者更容易理解文章的结构。

Example 1: Original: "For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food." Improved: "For instance, when a financially struggling family purchases unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in managing health issues resulting from consuming such low-quality products."

Example 2: Original: "All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products." Improved: "In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is essential for the government to impose taxes on unhealthy products to promote public health and create a more equitable society."

5. 语法批改

I concuragree with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthyhealth is the most essential issue for everyoneeveryone, including people whothose in low-income.low-income brackets. For example, if a family that do notdoesn't have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to caredifficulties in caring for their unhealthy body causedbodies, which may be weakened by eating the badunhealthy food. Also,Additionally, the healing time will spendprocess may require a multitudesignificant amount of money that the family cannot afford it.afford. If the government wantwants to support these poorlow-income families, they can initiative someinitiate charities and offer some free food and public service for them.services. That willwould be more fair for the society. All in all,In conclusion, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products. Although this may impact low-income families, health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources. For instance, if a family with limited means consumes unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices. Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I firmly believe that taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take. (131 words)

I concur agree with Sam's viewpoint perspective (changed "concur" to "agree" for a more natural tone) that the government should tax impose taxes (changed "tax" to "impose taxes" for clarity) on unhealthy products. Although it will this may impact (changed "will have some effects on the on" to "may impact" for conciseness and a more natural tone) low-income families, healthy health is a paramount concern (changed "healthy is the most essential issue for everyone issue" to "health is a paramount concern" for better word choice and grammar) for everyone, including people those with limited financial resources (changed "people who in low-income. low-income" to "those with limited financial resources" for better grammar and clarity). For example, instance, if a family that with limited means (changed "that do not have a lot of money buys some money" to "with limited means" for conciseness and clarity) consumes unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude poor dietary choices (rephrased sentence for better grammar and clarity). Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of money that the family cannot afford it. If relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government want could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I support firmly believe that it is taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure (changed "it is necessary" to "a necessary measure" for better word choice) for the government to tax unhealthy products.take.

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Sam's perspective
   - Importance of health for everyone

2. Impact on low-income families
   - Unhealthy food consumption consequences
   - Costly treatments for health issues

3. Government actions
   - Establish charities
   - Provide free food and public services

4. Promoting fairness and prioritizing health

5. Conclusion
   - Taxing unhealthy products is necessary

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
perspective/pərˈspektɪv/nouna particular attitude or way of considering things观点I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products.
paramount/ˈpærəmaʊnt/adjectivemore important than anything else至关重要的Health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources.
consequences/ˈkɒnsɪkwəns/nouna result or effect of an action or condition后果They may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices.
unaffordable/ʌnəˈfɔːrdəbl/adjectivetoo expensive for people to be able to buy无法承受的- Treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families.
rely/rɪˈlaɪ/verbto depend on with full trust or confidence依赖Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could take action.
establish/ɪˈstæblɪʃ/verbto set up or create建立- The government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support families.
fairness/ˈfeərnəs/nounthe quality of treating people equally公平- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.
measure/ˈmeʒər/nounan action taken to achieve a particular purpose措施- Taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrətaɪz/verb-to decide which of a group of things are most important so that you can deal with them first.优先考虑- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now