TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on public administration. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

As environmental protection develops, more people have come to realize that everybody should play a part in preserving the planet we live on. These years, many people want to protect and improve the natural environment. In terms of what individuals in their daily lives could do if they want to protect the environment, some put forward walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school, while others recommend buying locally grown organic foods grown without pesticides, and which one do you think would work better?

Lila

I think walking or cycling instead of driving works better in reducing carbon emissions. Everybody needs to commute, and a lot of people drive every day. If they can switch to walking or riding bicycles, the outcome of such a collective effort would be considerable.

Paul

Buying locally grown organic foods is more effective, I think. Growing crops organically means giving up pesticides to get rid of pests, which significantly reduces pollutants that pose great threats to soil and water. Therefore, the food chain could be less contaminated.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful inf...

スコア
24

ユーザーサンプル

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining the Greenhouse effect. I would add that it also have positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributes to the improvement of the natural environment. In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p

評価結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

24. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成方面做得相当不错,但仍有改进的空间。首先,尽管你提到了两个观点,并表示支持其中一个,但你可以更详细地解释为什么选择这个观点。此外,在文章结尾部分,建议你能够总结一下你的观点和论据,以使文章更具说服力。

例子1(改进前):In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p 例子1(改进后):In addition, while there is no denying that organic foods reduce the use of harmful pesticides, it's important to note that they may require more advanced technology and resources for their production.

例子2(改进前):I would add that it also have positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributes to the improvement of the natural environment. 例子2(改进后):Moreover, promoting walking or cycling can also encourage people to use public transportation, further contributing to a cleaner and healthier environment.

4. 文章结构与组织

从组织结构上看,这篇文章还有待加强。虽然你的文章包括了引言、正文和结论,但是段落划分不够明确,有些观点和论据混在一起。建议你将每个观点和相关论据放在一个单独的段落中,并使用恰当的过渡词汇连接各个段落。

例子1(改进前):In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining the Greenhouse effect. 例子1(改进后):In my opinion, I believe that walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school has a greater impact on environmental protection. As Lila mentioned, this approach plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions and consequently mitigating the greenhouse effect.

例子2(改进前):In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p 例子2(改进后):On the other hand, while organic foods do reduce the use of harmful pesticides, it's important to note that they may require more advanced technology and resources for their production.

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling inteadinstead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declininga decline in the Greenhouse effect. I would add that it also havehas positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributescontributing to the improvement of the natural environment. In addition, there is no denying that organic foods meansmean that people give uo pesticidesup pesticides, which are harmful forto the environment,environment; the thing to be noted is that it also needneeds more technology to develop the pbe developed.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, I concur with the notion that opting for walking or bicycling instead of driving to work or school has a more significant impact on environmental protection. As Lila mentioned, this approach plays a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions, which subsequently mitigates the greenhouse effect. Furthermore, it encourages people to utilize public transportation, thereby contributing to the improvement of the natural environment.

While it is true that organic foods involve abstaining from harmful pesticides, which benefits the environment, it is important to note that this method requires advanced technology for development and production. Consequently, the widespread adoption of organic farming practices may be hindered by technological and financial constraints. In contrast, walking or cycling as alternative modes of transportation are accessible and cost-effective options for individuals seeking to make a positive change in their daily lives. (142 words)

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of concur (revised for a more natural tone) with the argument notion that opting for (revised for clarity) walking or bicycling intead instead of driving a car to work or school can exert has a more powerful influence significant impact (revised for a more natural tone) on environmental protection. Just as As Lila has said, it mentioned, this approach plays a vital crucial role (revised for a more natural tone) in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining which subsequently mitigates (revised for clarity) the Greenhouse greenhouse effect. I would add that Furthermore, it also have positive impacts on appealing encourages people to take utilize public transportation, contributes thereby contributing to the improvement of the natural environment.

In addition, there While it is no denying true that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides involve abstaining from (revised for clarity) harmful pesticides, which are harmful for benefits the environment, it is important to note that this method requires advanced technology (revised for clarity) for development and production. Consequently, the thing widespread adoption of organic farming practices may be hindered by technological and financial constraints. In contrast, walking or cycling as alternative modes of transportation are accessible and cost-effective options (revised for clarity and a more natural tone) for individuals seeking to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the pmake a positive change in their daily lives.

8 思维导图


1. 环保措施
   1.1. 步行或骑自行车
       1.1.1. 减少碳排放
       1.1.2. 减缓温室效应
       1.1.3. 鼓励使用公共交通
   1.2. 有机食品
       1.2.1 节省资源
       1.2.2 避免有害农药使用
       1.2.3 技术和财务限制

2.比较分析
   2.1 步行或骑自行车的优势
        2.1.1 易于实施和经济实惠
        2.1.2 对环境的积极影响更大

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
environmental/ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmɛntəl/adjectiverelating to the natural world and its problems环境的Environmental protection is a crucial issue that needs to be addressed by everyone in society today.
carbon emissions/ˈkɑrbən/ /ɪˈmɪʃənz/nounthe release of carbon dioxide into the air碳排放Reducing carbon emissions is essential for mitigating the greenhouse effect and combating climate change.
greenhouse effect/ˈɡrinhaʊs/ /ɪˈfɛkt/nounthe warming of Earth's atmosphere温室效应The greenhouse effect is caused by an increase in greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane.
public transportation/ˈpʌblɪk/ /trænsˌpɔrˈteɪʃən/nounbuses, trains, etc., that are available to the public公共交通Public transportation is an efficient and eco-friendly alternative to driving a personal vehicle.
organic food/ɔrˈgænɪk/ /fud/nounfood produced without chemicals有机食品Organic food is becoming increasingly popular due to its health benefits and environmental advantages.
pesticides/ˈpɛstəsaɪdz/nounchemicals used to kill pests农药Pesticides can be harmful to both humans and the environment when used excessively in agriculture.
technology/tɛkˈnɑlədʒi/nounthe application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes技术Advanced technology plays a vital role in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
financial constraints/faɪˈnænʃəl/ /kənˈstreɪnts/nounlimitations due to lack of money财务限制Financial constraints often hinder the widespread adoption of environmentally friendly practices.
accessible/əkˈsɛsəbəl/adjectiveeasy to approach or use易于使用的Walking and cycling are accessible and cost-effective options for individuals seeking to reduce their carbon footprint.
cost-effective/kɔst/ /ɪˈfɛktɪv/adjectiveproviding good value for the amount of money spent经济实惠的Opting for public transportation is a cost-effective way to minimize one's impact on the environment.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now