TOEFLIELTS
Deutsch
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on public administration. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Echte Nutzereinsendungen mit KI-gestützter Bewertung und Feedback

1 nutzereingereichte Beispiele verfügbar

Kostenlos üben starten

Aufgabenübersicht

Professor

As environmental protection develops, more people have come to realize that everybody should play a part in preserving the planet we live on. These years, many people want to protect and improve the natural environment. In terms of what individuals in their daily lives could do if they want to protect the environment, some put forward walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school, while others recommend buying locally grown organic foods grown without pesticides, and which one do you think would work better?

Lila

I think walking or cycling instead of driving works better in reducing carbon emissions. Everybody needs to commute, and a lot of people drive every day. If they can switch to walking or riding bicycles, the outcome of such a collective effort would be considerable.

Paul

Buying locally grown organic foods is more effective, I think. Growing crops organically means giving up pesticides to get rid of pests, which significantly reduces pollutants that pose great threats to soil and water. Therefore, the food chain could be less contaminated.

Nutzerbeispiele & Bewertungsergebnisse

1

Nutzerbeispiel #1

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful inf...

Punktzahl
24

Nutzerbeispiel

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining the Greenhouse effect. I would add that it also have positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributes to the improvement of the natural environment. In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p

Bewertungsergebnis

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

24. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成方面做得相当不错,但仍有改进的空间。首先,尽管你提到了两个观点,并表示支持其中一个,但你可以更详细地解释为什么选择这个观点。此外,在文章结尾部分,建议你能够总结一下你的观点和论据,以使文章更具说服力。

例子1(改进前):In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p 例子1(改进后):In addition, while there is no denying that organic foods reduce the use of harmful pesticides, it's important to note that they may require more advanced technology and resources for their production.

例子2(改进前):I would add that it also have positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributes to the improvement of the natural environment. 例子2(改进后):Moreover, promoting walking or cycling can also encourage people to use public transportation, further contributing to a cleaner and healthier environment.

4. 文章结构与组织

从组织结构上看,这篇文章还有待加强。虽然你的文章包括了引言、正文和结论,但是段落划分不够明确,有些观点和论据混在一起。建议你将每个观点和相关论据放在一个单独的段落中,并使用恰当的过渡词汇连接各个段落。

例子1(改进前):In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining the Greenhouse effect. 例子1(改进后):In my opinion, I believe that walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school has a greater impact on environmental protection. As Lila mentioned, this approach plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions and consequently mitigating the greenhouse effect.

例子2(改进前):In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p 例子2(改进后):On the other hand, while organic foods do reduce the use of harmful pesticides, it's important to note that they may require more advanced technology and resources for their production.

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling inteadinstead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declininga decline in the Greenhouse effect. I would add that it also havehas positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributescontributing to the improvement of the natural environment. In addition, there is no denying that organic foods meansmean that people give uo pesticidesup pesticides, which are harmful forto the environment,environment; the thing to be noted is that it also needneeds more technology to develop the pbe developed.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, I concur with the notion that opting for walking or bicycling instead of driving to work or school has a more significant impact on environmental protection. As Lila mentioned, this approach plays a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions, which subsequently mitigates the greenhouse effect. Furthermore, it encourages people to utilize public transportation, thereby contributing to the improvement of the natural environment.

While it is true that organic foods involve abstaining from harmful pesticides, which benefits the environment, it is important to note that this method requires advanced technology for development and production. Consequently, the widespread adoption of organic farming practices may be hindered by technological and financial constraints. In contrast, walking or cycling as alternative modes of transportation are accessible and cost-effective options for individuals seeking to make a positive change in their daily lives. (142 words)

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of concur (revised for a more natural tone) with the argument notion that opting for (revised for clarity) walking or bicycling intead instead of driving a car to work or school can exert has a more powerful influence significant impact (revised for a more natural tone) on environmental protection. Just as As Lila has said, it mentioned, this approach plays a vital crucial role (revised for a more natural tone) in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining which subsequently mitigates (revised for clarity) the Greenhouse greenhouse effect. I would add that Furthermore, it also have positive impacts on appealing encourages people to take utilize public transportation, contributes thereby contributing to the improvement of the natural environment.

In addition, there While it is no denying true that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides involve abstaining from (revised for clarity) harmful pesticides, which are harmful for benefits the environment, it is important to note that this method requires advanced technology (revised for clarity) for development and production. Consequently, the thing widespread adoption of organic farming practices may be hindered by technological and financial constraints. In contrast, walking or cycling as alternative modes of transportation are accessible and cost-effective options (revised for clarity and a more natural tone) for individuals seeking to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the pmake a positive change in their daily lives.

8 思维导图


1. 环保措施
   1.1. 步行或骑自行车
       1.1.1. 减少碳排放
       1.1.2. 减缓温室效应
       1.1.3. 鼓励使用公共交通
   1.2. 有机食品
       1.2.1 节省资源
       1.2.2 避免有害农药使用
       1.2.3 技术和财务限制

2.比较分析
   2.1 步行或骑自行车的优势
        2.1.1 易于实施和经济实惠
        2.1.2 对环境的积极影响更大

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
environmental/ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmɛntəl/adjectiverelating to the natural world and its problems环境的Environmental protection is a crucial issue that needs to be addressed by everyone in society today.
carbon emissions/ˈkɑrbən/ /ɪˈmɪʃənz/nounthe release of carbon dioxide into the air碳排放Reducing carbon emissions is essential for mitigating the greenhouse effect and combating climate change.
greenhouse effect/ˈɡrinhaʊs/ /ɪˈfɛkt/nounthe warming of Earth's atmosphere温室效应The greenhouse effect is caused by an increase in greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane.
public transportation/ˈpʌblɪk/ /trænsˌpɔrˈteɪʃən/nounbuses, trains, etc., that are available to the public公共交通Public transportation is an efficient and eco-friendly alternative to driving a personal vehicle.
organic food/ɔrˈgænɪk/ /fud/nounfood produced without chemicals有机食品Organic food is becoming increasingly popular due to its health benefits and environmental advantages.
pesticides/ˈpɛstəsaɪdz/nounchemicals used to kill pests农药Pesticides can be harmful to both humans and the environment when used excessively in agriculture.
technology/tɛkˈnɑlədʒi/nounthe application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes技术Advanced technology plays a vital role in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
financial constraints/faɪˈnænʃəl/ /kənˈstreɪnts/nounlimitations due to lack of money财务限制Financial constraints often hinder the widespread adoption of environmentally friendly practices.
accessible/əkˈsɛsəbəl/adjectiveeasy to approach or use易于使用的Walking and cycling are accessible and cost-effective options for individuals seeking to reduce their carbon footprint.
cost-effective/kɔst/ /ɪˈfɛktɪv/adjectiveproviding good value for the amount of money spent经济实惠的Opting for public transportation is a cost-effective way to minimize one's impact on the environment.

Wie die Academic Discussion bewertet wird

Die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe wird anhand des offiziellen ETS-Bewertungsrasters bewertet. Die KI-Bewertung analysiert jede Antwort anhand mehrerer Dimensionen.

Relevanz & Beitrag

Geht die Antwort auf die Frage ein und leistet sie einen sinnvollen Beitrag zur Diskussion?

Sprachgebrauch

Grammatikalische Genauigkeit, Wortschatzbreite und Qualität des Satzbaus.

Ausarbeitung & Begründung

Sind die Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und klarer Argumentation gut ausgearbeitet?

Häufige Muster in den Antworten

Basierend auf der Analyse von Nutzereinsendungen zu dieser Aufgabe sind hier häufige Muster in den Antworten der Lernenden.

Viele Lernende äußern eine klare Meinung, liefern aber keine konkreten Beispiele zur Unterstützung.

Starke Antworten beziehen sich direkt auf den Lesetext und die Standpunkte der anderen Sprecher.

Höher bewertete Antworten nutzen abwechslungsreiche Satzstrukturen und akademischen Wortschatz.

Zeitmanagement ist entscheidend – wirkt eine Antwort gehetzt, fällt die Bewertung der Ausarbeitung meist niedriger aus.

Lerntipps

1

Lies die Aufgabenstellung sorgfältig und erfasse alle Teile der Frage, bevor du zu schreiben beginnst.

2

Beziehe dich in deiner Antwort auf den Lesetext und die Meinungen der anderen Studierenden.

3

Nutze konkrete Beispiele, um deinen Hauptpunkt zu untermauern – vermeide allgemeine Aussagen.

4

Ziele auf 120–150 Wörter. Längere Antworten sind nicht automatisch besser; Klarheit und Fokus zählen mehr.

5

Übe zeitlich begrenzte Antworten (10 Minuten), um unter Prüfungsbedingungen Sicherheit zu gewinnen.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe?
Bei der TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe musst du dich an einer Online-Klassendiskussion beteiligen. Du liest die Frage eines Professors sowie die Antworten anderer Studierender und schreibst dann in etwa 10 Minuten deinen eigenen Beitrag, in dem du deine Meinung äußerst und begründest.
Wie wird die Academic Discussion-Aufgabe bewertet?
Die Aufgabe wird auf einer Skala von 0 bis 5 bewertet, basierend auf der Relevanz für die Diskussion, der Qualität der Sprachverwendung (Grammatik, Wortschatz, Satzbau) und wie gut du deine Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und Argumenten entwickelst und stützt.
Was sind die Nutzerbeispiele auf dieser Seite?
Dies sind echte Antworten, die von TOEFL-Prüflingen eingereicht wurden, die diese Frage auf LingoLeap geübt haben. Jedes Beispiel wurde von unserer KI-Bewertungs-Engine ausgewertet, die eine Punktzahl sowie detailliertes Feedback zu Stärken und Verbesserungsbereichen liefert.
Wie genau ist die KI-Bewertung?
Die KI-Bewertungs-Engine von LingoLeap wurde anhand offizieller ETS-Bewertungskriterien trainiert und anhand menschlicher Prüferbewertungen kalibriert. Kein automatisiertes System ist perfekt, aber sie liefert zuverlässiges Feedback zu Übungszwecken und hilft dabei, konkrete Verbesserungsbereiche zu erkennen.
Wie kann ich diese Academic Discussion-Aufgabe üben?
Du kannst üben, indem du dich für ein kostenloses LingoLeap-Konto anmeldest. Schreibe deine eigene Antwort auf genau diese Frage, reiche sie ein und erhalte sofortiges KI-Feedback mit detaillierten Anmerkungen zu deinem Text.
Wie lang sollte meine Academic Discussion-Antwort sein?
Strebe 120–150 Wörter an. Für die Aufgabe hast du 10 Minuten Zeit. Konzentriere dich auf Klarheit, stütze deine Meinung mit konkreten Beispielen und beziehe dich auf den Diskussionskontext, anstatt eine längere Antwort zu schreiben.

Erreich deinen Wunsch-Score – wir sind an deiner Seite!

Mit LingoLeap, deinem Experten für TOEFL und andere Englischprüfungen

Schneller zu deinem Traumscore

Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren