TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on public administration. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

As environmental protection develops, more people have come to realize that everybody should play a part in preserving the planet we live on. These years, many people want to protect and improve the natural environment. In terms of what individuals in their daily lives could do if they want to protect the environment, some put forward walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school, while others recommend buying locally grown organic foods grown without pesticides, and which one do you think would work better?

Lila

I think walking or cycling instead of driving works better in reducing carbon emissions. Everybody needs to commute, and a lot of people drive every day. If they can switch to walking or riding bicycles, the outcome of such a collective effort would be considerable.

Paul

Buying locally grown organic foods is more effective, I think. Growing crops organically means giving up pesticides to get rid of pests, which significantly reduces pollutants that pose great threats to soil and water. Therefore, the food chain could be less contaminated.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful inf...

점수
24

사용자 예시

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining the Greenhouse effect. I would add that it also have positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributes to the improvement of the natural environment. In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

24. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成方面做得相当不错,但仍有改进的空间。首先,尽管你提到了两个观点,并表示支持其中一个,但你可以更详细地解释为什么选择这个观点。此外,在文章结尾部分,建议你能够总结一下你的观点和论据,以使文章更具说服力。

例子1(改进前):In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p 例子1(改进后):In addition, while there is no denying that organic foods reduce the use of harmful pesticides, it's important to note that they may require more advanced technology and resources for their production.

例子2(改进前):I would add that it also have positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributes to the improvement of the natural environment. 例子2(改进后):Moreover, promoting walking or cycling can also encourage people to use public transportation, further contributing to a cleaner and healthier environment.

4. 文章结构与组织

从组织结构上看,这篇文章还有待加强。虽然你的文章包括了引言、正文和结论,但是段落划分不够明确,有些观点和论据混在一起。建议你将每个观点和相关论据放在一个单独的段落中,并使用恰当的过渡词汇连接各个段落。

例子1(改进前):In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling intead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining the Greenhouse effect. 例子1(改进后):In my opinion, I believe that walking or bicycling instead of driving a car to work or school has a greater impact on environmental protection. As Lila mentioned, this approach plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions and consequently mitigating the greenhouse effect.

例子2(改进前):In addition, there is no denying that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides which are harmful for the environment, the thing to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the p 例子2(改进后):On the other hand, while organic foods do reduce the use of harmful pesticides, it's important to note that they may require more advanced technology and resources for their production.

5. 语法批改

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of the argument that walking or bicycling inteadinstead of driving a car to work or school can exert a more powerful influence on environmental protection. Just as Lila has said, it plays a vital role in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declininga decline in the Greenhouse effect. I would add that it also havehas positive impacts on appealing people to take public transportation, contributescontributing to the improvement of the natural environment. In addition, there is no denying that organic foods meansmean that people give uo pesticidesup pesticides, which are harmful forto the environment,environment; the thing to be noted is that it also needneeds more technology to develop the pbe developed.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, I concur with the notion that opting for walking or bicycling instead of driving to work or school has a more significant impact on environmental protection. As Lila mentioned, this approach plays a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions, which subsequently mitigates the greenhouse effect. Furthermore, it encourages people to utilize public transportation, thereby contributing to the improvement of the natural environment.

While it is true that organic foods involve abstaining from harmful pesticides, which benefits the environment, it is important to note that this method requires advanced technology for development and production. Consequently, the widespread adoption of organic farming practices may be hindered by technological and financial constraints. In contrast, walking or cycling as alternative modes of transportation are accessible and cost-effective options for individuals seeking to make a positive change in their daily lives. (142 words)

In my opinion, I tend to be in favor of concur (revised for a more natural tone) with the argument notion that opting for (revised for clarity) walking or bicycling intead instead of driving a car to work or school can exert has a more powerful influence significant impact (revised for a more natural tone) on environmental protection. Just as As Lila has said, it mentioned, this approach plays a vital crucial role (revised for a more natural tone) in reducing carbon emissions, leading to declining which subsequently mitigates (revised for clarity) the Greenhouse greenhouse effect. I would add that Furthermore, it also have positive impacts on appealing encourages people to take utilize public transportation, contributes thereby contributing to the improvement of the natural environment.

In addition, there While it is no denying true that organic foods means that people give uo pesticides involve abstaining from (revised for clarity) harmful pesticides, which are harmful for benefits the environment, it is important to note that this method requires advanced technology (revised for clarity) for development and production. Consequently, the thing widespread adoption of organic farming practices may be hindered by technological and financial constraints. In contrast, walking or cycling as alternative modes of transportation are accessible and cost-effective options (revised for clarity and a more natural tone) for individuals seeking to be noted is that it also need more technology to develop the pmake a positive change in their daily lives.

8 思维导图


1. 环保措施
   1.1. 步行或骑自行车
       1.1.1. 减少碳排放
       1.1.2. 减缓温室效应
       1.1.3. 鼓励使用公共交通
   1.2. 有机食品
       1.2.1 节省资源
       1.2.2 避免有害农药使用
       1.2.3 技术和财务限制

2.比较分析
   2.1 步行或骑自行车的优势
        2.1.1 易于实施和经济实惠
        2.1.2 对环境的积极影响更大

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
environmental/ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmɛntəl/adjectiverelating to the natural world and its problems环境的Environmental protection is a crucial issue that needs to be addressed by everyone in society today.
carbon emissions/ˈkɑrbən/ /ɪˈmɪʃənz/nounthe release of carbon dioxide into the air碳排放Reducing carbon emissions is essential for mitigating the greenhouse effect and combating climate change.
greenhouse effect/ˈɡrinhaʊs/ /ɪˈfɛkt/nounthe warming of Earth's atmosphere温室效应The greenhouse effect is caused by an increase in greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane.
public transportation/ˈpʌblɪk/ /trænsˌpɔrˈteɪʃən/nounbuses, trains, etc., that are available to the public公共交通Public transportation is an efficient and eco-friendly alternative to driving a personal vehicle.
organic food/ɔrˈgænɪk/ /fud/nounfood produced without chemicals有机食品Organic food is becoming increasingly popular due to its health benefits and environmental advantages.
pesticides/ˈpɛstəsaɪdz/nounchemicals used to kill pests农药Pesticides can be harmful to both humans and the environment when used excessively in agriculture.
technology/tɛkˈnɑlədʒi/nounthe application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes技术Advanced technology plays a vital role in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
financial constraints/faɪˈnænʃəl/ /kənˈstreɪnts/nounlimitations due to lack of money财务限制Financial constraints often hinder the widespread adoption of environmentally friendly practices.
accessible/əkˈsɛsəbəl/adjectiveeasy to approach or use易于使用的Walking and cycling are accessible and cost-effective options for individuals seeking to reduce their carbon footprint.
cost-effective/kɔst/ /ɪˈfɛktɪv/adjectiveproviding good value for the amount of money spent经济实惠的Opting for public transportation is a cost-effective way to minimize one's impact on the environment.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now