TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor 's question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

In our discussion about the significance of personal efforts towards charitable donations, which approach do you believe is more effective: donating to local charities or international organizations? Share your opinion and provide reasons for your choice.

Student A

In my view, donating to local charities is a more effective way to make a positive impact. Local charities often have a deep understanding of the specific needs and challenges within their communities. When we donate to them, our contributions can be targeted towards addressing immediate and pressing issues, such as hunger, homelessness, or education.

Student B

I believe that donating to international organizations is a more effective approach. While local charities are essential for addressing immediate community needs, international organizations have the capacity to tackle global challenges on a larger scale. They can address issues like climate change, global health crises, and poverty alleviation in a more comprehensive manner. Moreover, international organizations often have the resources and expertise to coordinate efforts across borders, making it possible to address systemic issues that affect people worldwide.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

I concur with student A’s opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating money to international communities sure can solve some s...

スコア
26

ユーザーサンプル

I concur with student A’s opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating money to international communities sure can solve some systemic problems, such as environmental issues, while its long-term effectiveness can not be seen from the distant way and in a short time. Firstly, donation to local charities can address the impending problems by providing with exactly what local people need. Because people involved in their social activities have more comprehensive and deep insights of their social problems and the solutions. Furthermore, it is easier to control and testify the usage of donation and observe the effective in the easily-reached distance. People may visit in person rather than through e-mails and phones which may present some fake information. Thus, it is more beneficial to donating to local charity.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

你的文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在支持观点时,可以提供更具体的例子和详细信息。此外,尝试使用更多的连接词和短语来使文章更连贯。

英文示例1:为了支持捐赠给本地慈善机构的观点,你可以提到一个具体的本地慈善项目及其成功案例。 英文示例2:使用连接词,如“此外”、“然而”或“因此”,可以使文章在逻辑上更加连贯。

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织方面来看,你的文章整体表现不错。但是,在引言部分可以更明确地陈述自己的观点,并在结论部分进行总结。同时,确保每个段落都有明确的主题句,并在段落内使用恰当的过渡词。

建议1(简体中文):在引言部分明确陈述自己支持捐赠给本地慈善机构,并简要介绍论据。 建议2(简体中文):在结论部分总结观点和论据,强调捐赠给本地慈善机构的优势。

英文示例1:在引言中,可以这样表达:“我认为捐赠给本地慈善机构更有效,因为它们能够解决当地紧迫的问题,并利用资源更加精确。” 英文示例2:在结论中,可以这样表达:“综上所述,捐赠给本地慈善机构不仅能够解决当地紧迫的问题,而且能够确保捐款的透明度和有效性。”

5. 语法批改

I concur with student A’s opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating money to international communities sure can solve some systemic problems, such as environmental issues, while its long-term effectiveness can not be seen from the distant way and in a short time. Firstly, donation to local charities can address the impending problems by providing with exactly what local people need. Because people involved in their social activities have more comprehensive and deep insights of their social problems and the solutions. Furthermore, it is easier to control and testify the usage of donation and observe the effective in the easily-reached distance. People may visit in person rather than through e-mails and phonesphones,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) which may present some fake information. Thus, it is more beneficial to donating to local charity.

Title: 6 文章修订

In agreement with Student A, I believe that donating to local charities yields greater benefits. While international organizations undoubtedly address systemic issues such as environmental concerns, their long-term effectiveness may not be immediately discernible. Local charities, on the other hand, can promptly tackle pressing problems by providing precisely what their communities require. Individuals engaged in these organizations possess a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the challenges faced and potential solutions. Moreover, monitoring and verifying the allocation of donations is more feasible within a local context, as individuals can personally assess the impact rather than relying on potentially misleading digital communication. Consequently, supporting local charities proves to be a more advantageous approach. (115 words)

In agreement with Student A, I believe that donating to local charities yields greater benefits (changed "I concur with student A’s A's opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating more" for a more natural tone). While international organizations undoubtedly address systemic issues such as environmental concerns (rephrased "Donating money to international communities sure can solve some systemic problems, such as environmental issues, while its issues" for clarity), their long-term effectiveness can may not be immediately discernible (replaced "can not be seen from the distant way and in a short time. Firstly, time" for a clearer expression). Local charities, on the other hand, can promptly tackle pressing problems by providing precisely what their communities require (rephrased "Firstly, donation to local charities can address the impending problems by providing with exactly what local people need. Because need" for better flow and clarity). Individuals engaged in these organizations possess a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the challenges faced and potential solutions (rephrased "Because people involved in their social activities have more comprehensive and deep insights of their social problems and the solutions. Furthermore, solutions" for better flow). Moreover, monitoring and verifying the allocation of donations is more feasible within a local context (rephrased "Furthermore, it is easier to control and testify the usage of donation and donation" for clarity), as individuals can personally assess the impact rather than relying on potentially misleading digital communication (rephrased "and observe the effective in the easily-reached distance. People may visit in person rather than through e-mails and phones which may present some fake information. Thus, information" for better flow and conciseness). Consequently, supporting local charities proves to be a more advantageous approach (rephrased "Thus, it is more beneficial to donating to local charity.charity" for better flow and grammar).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Local charities vs international organizations

2. Effectiveness
   - Long-term vs immediate impact

3. Community needs
   - Precise support and understanding of challenges

4. Knowledge of local issues
   - Comprehensive and profound understanding

5. Monitoring and verification
   - Allocation of donations and personal assessment

6. Digital communication drawbacks
   - Misleading information and reliability issues

7. Advantages of local charities
   - More beneficial approach overall 

8. Conclusion 
   - Supporting local charities is advantageous 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
discernible/dɪˈsɜrnəbəl/adjectiveable to be seen or understood可辨认的The long-term effectiveness may not be immediately discernible.
pressing/ˈprɛsɪŋ/adjectiveurgent or important紧迫的Local charities can promptly tackle pressing problems by providing precisely what their communities require.
comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhɛnsɪv/adjectiveincluding all or nearly all elements or aspects全面的Individuals engaged in these organizations possess a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced.
profound/prəˈfaʊnd/adjective- very great or intense; showing great knowledge or insight- 深刻的;渊博的They have a profound understanding of potential solutions.
allocation/ˌæləˈkeɪʃən/nounthe process of distributing something分配Monitoring and verifying the allocation of donations is more feasible within a local context.
feasible/ˈfiːzəbəl/adjectivepossible to do easily or conveniently可行的It is more feasible to personally assess the impact rather than relying on potentially misleading digital communication.
misleading/mɪsˈliːdɪŋ/adjective- giving the wrong idea or impression- 误导的Digital communication can be potentially misleading.
advantageous/ˌædvənˈteɪdʒəs/adjective- involving or creating favorable circumstances that increase chances of success or effectiveness- 有利的Consequently, supporting local charities proves to be a more advantageous approach.
systemic/sɪˈstɛmɪk/adjective- relating to a system, especially as opposed to a particular part- 系统性的International organizations undoubtedly address systemic issues such as environmental concerns.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now