TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor 's question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

In our discussion about the significance of personal efforts towards charitable donations, which approach do you believe is more effective: donating to local charities or international organizations? Share your opinion and provide reasons for your choice.

Student A

In my view, donating to local charities is a more effective way to make a positive impact. Local charities often have a deep understanding of the specific needs and challenges within their communities. When we donate to them, our contributions can be targeted towards addressing immediate and pressing issues, such as hunger, homelessness, or education.

Student B

I believe that donating to international organizations is a more effective approach. While local charities are essential for addressing immediate community needs, international organizations have the capacity to tackle global challenges on a larger scale. They can address issues like climate change, global health crises, and poverty alleviation in a more comprehensive manner. Moreover, international organizations often have the resources and expertise to coordinate efforts across borders, making it possible to address systemic issues that affect people worldwide.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

I concur with student A’s opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating money to international communities sure can solve some s...

점수
26

사용자 예시

I concur with student A’s opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating money to international communities sure can solve some systemic problems, such as environmental issues, while its long-term effectiveness can not be seen from the distant way and in a short time. Firstly, donation to local charities can address the impending problems by providing with exactly what local people need. Because people involved in their social activities have more comprehensive and deep insights of their social problems and the solutions. Furthermore, it is easier to control and testify the usage of donation and observe the effective in the easily-reached distance. People may visit in person rather than through e-mails and phones which may present some fake information. Thus, it is more beneficial to donating to local charity.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

你的文章在任务完成度方面表现良好,但仍有改进的空间。首先,在支持观点时,可以提供更具体的例子和详细信息。此外,尝试使用更多的连接词和短语来使文章更连贯。

英文示例1:为了支持捐赠给本地慈善机构的观点,你可以提到一个具体的本地慈善项目及其成功案例。 英文示例2:使用连接词,如“此外”、“然而”或“因此”,可以使文章在逻辑上更加连贯。

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织方面来看,你的文章整体表现不错。但是,在引言部分可以更明确地陈述自己的观点,并在结论部分进行总结。同时,确保每个段落都有明确的主题句,并在段落内使用恰当的过渡词。

建议1(简体中文):在引言部分明确陈述自己支持捐赠给本地慈善机构,并简要介绍论据。 建议2(简体中文):在结论部分总结观点和论据,强调捐赠给本地慈善机构的优势。

英文示例1:在引言中,可以这样表达:“我认为捐赠给本地慈善机构更有效,因为它们能够解决当地紧迫的问题,并利用资源更加精确。” 英文示例2:在结论中,可以这样表达:“综上所述,捐赠给本地慈善机构不仅能够解决当地紧迫的问题,而且能够确保捐款的透明度和有效性。”

5. 语法批改

I concur with student A’s opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating money to international communities sure can solve some systemic problems, such as environmental issues, while its long-term effectiveness can not be seen from the distant way and in a short time. Firstly, donation to local charities can address the impending problems by providing with exactly what local people need. Because people involved in their social activities have more comprehensive and deep insights of their social problems and the solutions. Furthermore, it is easier to control and testify the usage of donation and observe the effective in the easily-reached distance. People may visit in person rather than through e-mails and phonesphones,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) which may present some fake information. Thus, it is more beneficial to donating to local charity.

Title: 6 文章修订

In agreement with Student A, I believe that donating to local charities yields greater benefits. While international organizations undoubtedly address systemic issues such as environmental concerns, their long-term effectiveness may not be immediately discernible. Local charities, on the other hand, can promptly tackle pressing problems by providing precisely what their communities require. Individuals engaged in these organizations possess a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the challenges faced and potential solutions. Moreover, monitoring and verifying the allocation of donations is more feasible within a local context, as individuals can personally assess the impact rather than relying on potentially misleading digital communication. Consequently, supporting local charities proves to be a more advantageous approach. (115 words)

In agreement with Student A, I believe that donating to local charities yields greater benefits (changed "I concur with student A’s A's opinion that donation to local charities can benefit more. Donating more" for a more natural tone). While international organizations undoubtedly address systemic issues such as environmental concerns (rephrased "Donating money to international communities sure can solve some systemic problems, such as environmental issues, while its issues" for clarity), their long-term effectiveness can may not be immediately discernible (replaced "can not be seen from the distant way and in a short time. Firstly, time" for a clearer expression). Local charities, on the other hand, can promptly tackle pressing problems by providing precisely what their communities require (rephrased "Firstly, donation to local charities can address the impending problems by providing with exactly what local people need. Because need" for better flow and clarity). Individuals engaged in these organizations possess a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the challenges faced and potential solutions (rephrased "Because people involved in their social activities have more comprehensive and deep insights of their social problems and the solutions. Furthermore, solutions" for better flow). Moreover, monitoring and verifying the allocation of donations is more feasible within a local context (rephrased "Furthermore, it is easier to control and testify the usage of donation and donation" for clarity), as individuals can personally assess the impact rather than relying on potentially misleading digital communication (rephrased "and observe the effective in the easily-reached distance. People may visit in person rather than through e-mails and phones which may present some fake information. Thus, information" for better flow and conciseness). Consequently, supporting local charities proves to be a more advantageous approach (rephrased "Thus, it is more beneficial to donating to local charity.charity" for better flow and grammar).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Local charities vs international organizations

2. Effectiveness
   - Long-term vs immediate impact

3. Community needs
   - Precise support and understanding of challenges

4. Knowledge of local issues
   - Comprehensive and profound understanding

5. Monitoring and verification
   - Allocation of donations and personal assessment

6. Digital communication drawbacks
   - Misleading information and reliability issues

7. Advantages of local charities
   - More beneficial approach overall 

8. Conclusion 
   - Supporting local charities is advantageous 

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
discernible/dɪˈsɜrnəbəl/adjectiveable to be seen or understood可辨认的The long-term effectiveness may not be immediately discernible.
pressing/ˈprɛsɪŋ/adjectiveurgent or important紧迫的Local charities can promptly tackle pressing problems by providing precisely what their communities require.
comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhɛnsɪv/adjectiveincluding all or nearly all elements or aspects全面的Individuals engaged in these organizations possess a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced.
profound/prəˈfaʊnd/adjective- very great or intense; showing great knowledge or insight- 深刻的;渊博的They have a profound understanding of potential solutions.
allocation/ˌæləˈkeɪʃən/nounthe process of distributing something分配Monitoring and verifying the allocation of donations is more feasible within a local context.
feasible/ˈfiːzəbəl/adjectivepossible to do easily or conveniently可行的It is more feasible to personally assess the impact rather than relying on potentially misleading digital communication.
misleading/mɪsˈliːdɪŋ/adjective- giving the wrong idea or impression- 误导的Digital communication can be potentially misleading.
advantageous/ˌædvənˈteɪdʒəs/adjective- involving or creating favorable circumstances that increase chances of success or effectiveness- 有利的Consequently, supporting local charities proves to be a more advantageous approach.
systemic/sɪˈstɛmɪk/adjective- relating to a system, especially as opposed to a particular part- 系统性的International organizations undoubtedly address systemic issues such as environmental concerns.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now