TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on so ciology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response, you should do the following: express and support your personal opinion make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

In many countries, the standard workweek consists of eight hours of work each day for five days per week. Now, though, some people advocate a shorter workweek: a four-day workweek with no decrease in workers' pay. There are advantages and disadvantages to this of course. What is your opinion about instituting a shorter, four-day workweek, and why.

Andrew

I like that idea, but on one condition: that the workday is no longer than eight hours. have heard some plans require ten hours a day for a four-day week. Most employees would find that exhausting, and it could actually be counterproductive to tire out your workers. Yes to four-day weeks, but no to ten-hour days!

Claire

In my country, the workweek is Monday to Friday plus halt a day on Saturday, so moving to a four-day workweek would be too drastic a change! Workers might struggle to complete their tasks in a four-day workweek. It seems less stressful to spread workout over more days rather than trying to condense it all into a shorter week.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational fo...

スコア
26

ユーザーサンプル

While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational four-day week, consisting of less than teem-hour per day, helps workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying interpersonal communication, which eventually enables recharge their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount working projects all the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from Andrew's perspective, I would like to add that a short workweek can boost working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; on the contrary, tasks and projects may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,你的文章回答了问题并表达了观点。然而,为了更好地完成任务,你可以尝试以下几点改进:首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更具体的例子或数据来支持你的论点。其次,在引用其他人的观点时,尽量使用自己的话进行阐述,以展示你对讨论内容的理解。

Example 1: Instead of "workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff," you could write "workers can use their extra time off to pursue hobbies, spend time with family, or engage in self-improvement activities, which ultimately contributes to their overall well-being."

Example 2: Instead of "with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks," you could write "with a shorter workweek, workers are more likely to prioritize their tasks effectively and focus on the most important projects, leading to increased productivity."

4. 文章结构与组织

在文章结构和组织方面,你已经有了一个明确的结构,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑组织和段落过渡方面还有改进空间。建议在段落之间使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。此外,可以尝试将每个段落的主题句放在段落开头,以便读者更容易理解每个段落的主要观点。

Example 1: Add a transition phrase at the beginning of a paragraph: "In addition to Andrew's perspective, I would like to emphasize that a shorter workweek can also boost working efficiency."

Example 2: Place the topic sentence at the beginning of the paragraph: "A rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers, such as increased productivity and improved mental well-being."

5. 语法批改

While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational four-day week, consisting of less than teem-hour per day, helps workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying interpersonal communication, which eventually enables rechargeto recharge(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount workingof working(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'of' is missing in a sentence.) projects all the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from Andrew's perspective, I would like to add that a short workweek can boost working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; on the contrary, tasks and projects may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Andrew's view that a well-structured four-day workweek, consisting of no more than eight hours per day, can be beneficial for employees by allowing them to relax and alleviate stress. This arrangement provides workers with additional days to disconnect from monotonous tasks, demanding work environments, and challenging interpersonal interactions, ultimately enabling them to recharge both mentally and physically. However, I also recognize Claire's concern regarding the potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule.

Beyond Andrew's argument, I propose that a shorter workweek can actually enhance overall productivity. With a reduced number of working days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively, adhere to project timelines more strictly, and make better use of their available time. In contrast, longer workweeks may lead to procrastination and missed deadlines. Thus, a thoughtfully designed four-day workweek can undoubtedly yield positive outcomes for both workers and organizations. (159 words)

While In response to the professor's question, I can understand Claire’s point concur with Andrew's view that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational well-structured four-day week, workweek, consisting of less no more than teem-hour eight hours per day, helps day (revised for clarity and accuracy), can be beneficial for employees by allowing them to relax and alleviate stress (rephrased for better flow). This arrangement provides workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more with additional days a week to get distracted to disconnect from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying monotonous tasks, demanding work environments, and challenging interpersonal communication, which eventually enables interactions (revised for improved readability), ultimately enabling them to recharge their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount working projects all both mentally and physically. However, I also recognize Claire's concern regarding the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule (addressed Claire's point).

Beyond Andrew's perspective, argument, I would like to add propose that a short shorter workweek can boost actually enhance overall productivity (introduced new point). With a reduced number of working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively, adhere to project timelines more strictly, and make better use of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; available time (expanded on the contrary, tasks and projects new point). In contrast, longer workweeks may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short lead to procrastination and missed deadlines (provided counterargument). Thus, a thoughtfully designed four-day week, without doubt, workweek can bring benefits to workers.undoubtedly yield positive outcomes for both workers and organizations (concluded paragraph with a strong statement).

Display title: 8 思维导图

Mindmap:

1. Four-day workweek
   1.1. Benefits for employees
       1.1.1. Relaxation
       1.1.2. Alleviate stress
   1.2. Disconnect from work
       1.2.1 Monotonous tasks
       1.2.2 Demanding environments
       1.2.3 Challenging interactions
   1.3 Recharge mentally and physically
   1.4 Addressing concerns (Claire's)
       1.4.1 Workload pressure
       1.4.2 Condensed schedule


### 2. Enhance overall productivity

   2.1 Prioritize tasks effectively
   2.2 Adhere to project timelines strictly 
   2-3 Make better use of available time


### 3. Longer workweeks drawbacks 

    3-1 Procrastination 
    3-2 Missed deadlines 


### 4. Positive outcomes 

    - For workers 
    - For organizations 

Display title:9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbto agree or have the same opinion同意,一致意见I concur with Andrew's view that a well-structured four-day workweek can be beneficial for employees
alleviate/əˈli:vieit/verbto make something less severe减轻,缓解This arrangement can alleviate stress for employees.
monotonous/məˈnɒtənəs/adjectivelacking in variety and interest单调的,无聊的Disconnect from monotonous tasks during the extra days off.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrɪtaɪz/verbto treat something as more important than other things优先处理,按优先级排序With a reduced number of working days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively.
adhere/ədˈhɪr/verbto stick firmly to a particular practice or plan坚持,遵守Employees will adhere to project timelines more strictly.
procrastinate/prəˈkræstɪneit/verbto delay doing something that you should do, usually because you do not want to do it拖延,耽误Longer workweeks may lead to procrastination and missed deadlines.
condensed/kənˈdɛnst/adjectivemade shorter or smaller浓缩的,压缩的Claire's concern regarding the potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule.
productivity/prɒdʌkˈtɪvəti/nounthe effectiveness of productive effort, especially in industry, as measured in terms of output per unit of input生产率,生产能力A shorter workweek can actually enhance overall productivity.
outcomes/ˈaʊtkʌmz/nounthe way a thing turns out; a consequence结果,成果A thoughtfully designed four-day workweek can undoubtedly yield positive outcomes.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now