TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on so ciology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response, you should do the following: express and support your personal opinion make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안
사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능
무료 연습 시작하기과제 개요
Professor
In many countries, the standard workweek consists of eight hours of work each day for five days per week. Now, though, some people advocate a shorter workweek: a four-day workweek with no decrease in workers' pay. There are advantages and disadvantages to this of course. What is your opinion about instituting a shorter, four-day workweek, and why.
Andrew
I like that idea, but on one condition: that the workday is no longer than eight hours. have heard some plans require ten hours a day for a four-day week. Most employees would find that exhausting, and it could actually be counterproductive to tire out your workers. Yes to four-day weeks, but no to ten-hour days!
Claire
In my country, the workweek is Monday to Friday plus halt a day on Saturday, so moving to a four-day workweek would be too drastic a change! Workers might struggle to complete their tasks in a four-day workweek. It seems less stressful to spread workout over more days rather than trying to condense it all into a shorter week.
사용자 예시 및 평가 결과
Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.
1사용자 예시 #1
While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational fo...
점수26
사용자 예시 #1
While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational fo...
사용자 예시
While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational four-day week, consisting of less than teem-hour per day, helps workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying interpersonal communication, which eventually enables recharge their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount working projects all the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from Andrew's perspective, I would like to add that a short workweek can boost working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; on the contrary, tasks and projects may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers.
평가 결과
1. 子项得分
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0
2. 预估分数
26. 3 任务完成度
总体来说,你的文章回答了问题并表达了观点。然而,为了更好地完成任务,你可以尝试以下几点改进:首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更具体的例子或数据来支持你的论点。其次,在引用其他人的观点时,尽量使用自己的话进行阐述,以展示你对讨论内容的理解。
Example 1: Instead of "workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff," you could write "workers can use their extra time off to pursue hobbies, spend time with family, or engage in self-improvement activities, which ultimately contributes to their overall well-being."
Example 2: Instead of "with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks," you could write "with a shorter workweek, workers are more likely to prioritize their tasks effectively and focus on the most important projects, leading to increased productivity."
4. 文章结构与组织
在文章结构和组织方面,你已经有了一个明确的结构,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑组织和段落过渡方面还有改进空间。建议在段落之间使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。此外,可以尝试将每个段落的主题句放在段落开头,以便读者更容易理解每个段落的主要观点。
Example 1: Add a transition phrase at the beginning of a paragraph: "In addition to Andrew's perspective, I would like to emphasize that a shorter workweek can also boost working efficiency."
Example 2: Place the topic sentence at the beginning of the paragraph: "A rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers, such as increased productivity and improved mental well-being."
5. 语法批改
While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational four-day week, consisting of less than teem-hour per day, helps workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying interpersonal communication, which eventually enables rechargeto recharge(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount workingof working(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'of' is missing in a sentence.) projects all the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from Andrew's perspective, I would like to add that a short workweek can boost working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; on the contrary, tasks and projects may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers.
Section Title: 6 Article Revision
In response to the professor's question, I concur with Andrew's view that a well-structured four-day workweek, consisting of no more than eight hours per day, can be beneficial for employees by allowing them to relax and alleviate stress. This arrangement provides workers with additional days to disconnect from monotonous tasks, demanding work environments, and challenging interpersonal interactions, ultimately enabling them to recharge both mentally and physically. However, I also recognize Claire's concern regarding the potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule.
Beyond Andrew's argument, I propose that a shorter workweek can actually enhance overall productivity. With a reduced number of working days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively, adhere to project timelines more strictly, and make better use of their available time. In contrast, longer workweeks may lead to procrastination and missed deadlines. Thus, a thoughtfully designed four-day workweek can undoubtedly yield positive outcomes for both workers and organizations. (159 words)
While In response to the professor's question, I can understand Claire’s point concur with Andrew's view that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational well-structured four-day week, workweek, consisting of less no more than teem-hour eight hours per day, helps day (revised for clarity and accuracy), can be beneficial for employees by allowing them to relax and alleviate stress (rephrased for better flow). This arrangement provides workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more with additional days a week to get distracted to disconnect from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying monotonous tasks, demanding work environments, and challenging interpersonal communication, which eventually enables interactions (revised for improved readability), ultimately enabling them to recharge their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount working projects all both mentally and physically. However, I also recognize Claire's concern regarding the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule (addressed Claire's point).
Beyond Andrew's perspective, argument, I would like to add propose that a short shorter workweek can boost actually enhance overall productivity (introduced new point). With a reduced number of working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively, adhere to project timelines more strictly, and make better use of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; available time (expanded on the contrary, tasks and projects new point). In contrast, longer workweeks may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short lead to procrastination and missed deadlines (provided counterargument). Thus, a thoughtfully designed four-day week, without doubt, workweek can bring benefits to workers.undoubtedly yield positive outcomes for both workers and organizations (concluded paragraph with a strong statement).
Display title: 8 思维导图
Mindmap:
1. Four-day workweek
1.1. Benefits for employees
1.1.1. Relaxation
1.1.2. Alleviate stress
1.2. Disconnect from work
1.2.1 Monotonous tasks
1.2.2 Demanding environments
1.2.3 Challenging interactions
1.3 Recharge mentally and physically
1.4 Addressing concerns (Claire's)
1.4.1 Workload pressure
1.4.2 Condensed schedule
### 2. Enhance overall productivity
2.1 Prioritize tasks effectively
2.2 Adhere to project timelines strictly
2-3 Make better use of available time
### 3. Longer workweeks drawbacks
3-1 Procrastination
3-2 Missed deadlines
### 4. Positive outcomes
- For workers
- For organizations
Display title:9 关键词
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | Simplified Chinese Translation | Sample Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| concur | /kənˈkɜr/ | verb | to agree or have the same opinion | 同意,一致意见 | I concur with Andrew's view that a well-structured four-day workweek can be beneficial for employees |
| alleviate | /əˈli:vieit/ | verb | to make something less severe | 减轻,缓解 | This arrangement can alleviate stress for employees. |
| monotonous | /məˈnɒtənəs/ | adjective | lacking in variety and interest | 单调的,无聊的 | Disconnect from monotonous tasks during the extra days off. |
| prioritize | /praɪˈɒrɪtaɪz/ | verb | to treat something as more important than other things | 优先处理,按优先级排序 | With a reduced number of working days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively. |
| adhere | /ədˈhɪr/ | verb | to stick firmly to a particular practice or plan | 坚持,遵守 | Employees will adhere to project timelines more strictly. |
| procrastinate | /prəˈkræstɪneit/ | verb | to delay doing something that you should do, usually because you do not want to do it | 拖延,耽误 | Longer workweeks may lead to procrastination and missed deadlines. |
| condensed | /kənˈdɛnst/ | adjective | made shorter or smaller | 浓缩的,压缩的 | Claire's concern regarding the potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule. |
| productivity | /prɒdʌkˈtɪvəti/ | noun | the effectiveness of productive effort, especially in industry, as measured in terms of output per unit of input | 生产率,生产能力 | A shorter workweek can actually enhance overall productivity. |
| outcomes | /ˈaʊtkʌmz/ | noun | the way a thing turns out; a consequence | 结果,成果 | A thoughtfully designed four-day workweek can undoubtedly yield positive outcomes. |
Opens the writing question list in the LingoLeap app, not this exact question. Practising needs a free account. AI scoring uses credits, except 3 free scores a day on Practice Test 1 (PQ26-1) questions.
Academic Discussion 채점 방식
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.
관련성 및 기여도
답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?
언어 사용
문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.
전개 및 근거
구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?
답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴
이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.
많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.
높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.
점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.
시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.
학습 팁
글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.
답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.
핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.
시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.
자주 묻는 질문
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
관련 TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension
관련 TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제
Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!
With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams
Get to Your Dream Score Faster