TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on so ciology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response, you should do the following: express and support your personal opinion make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

Professor

In many countries, the standard workweek consists of eight hours of work each day for five days per week. Now, though, some people advocate a shorter workweek: a four-day workweek with no decrease in workers' pay. There are advantages and disadvantages to this of course. What is your opinion about instituting a shorter, four-day workweek, and why.

Andrew

I like that idea, but on one condition: that the workday is no longer than eight hours. have heard some plans require ten hours a day for a four-day week. Most employees would find that exhausting, and it could actually be counterproductive to tire out your workers. Yes to four-day weeks, but no to ten-hour days!

Claire

In my country, the workweek is Monday to Friday plus halt a day on Saturday, so moving to a four-day workweek would be too drastic a change! Workers might struggle to complete their tasks in a four-day workweek. It seems less stressful to spread workout over more days rather than trying to condense it all into a shorter week.

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational fo...

Score
26

Exemple d'Utilisateur

While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational four-day week, consisting of less than teem-hour per day, helps workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying interpersonal communication, which eventually enables recharge their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount working projects all the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from Andrew's perspective, I would like to add that a short workweek can boost working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; on the contrary, tasks and projects may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers.

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,你的文章回答了问题并表达了观点。然而,为了更好地完成任务,你可以尝试以下几点改进:首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更具体的例子或数据来支持你的论点。其次,在引用其他人的观点时,尽量使用自己的话进行阐述,以展示你对讨论内容的理解。

Example 1: Instead of "workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff," you could write "workers can use their extra time off to pursue hobbies, spend time with family, or engage in self-improvement activities, which ultimately contributes to their overall well-being."

Example 2: Instead of "with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks," you could write "with a shorter workweek, workers are more likely to prioritize their tasks effectively and focus on the most important projects, leading to increased productivity."

4. 文章结构与组织

在文章结构和组织方面,你已经有了一个明确的结构,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑组织和段落过渡方面还有改进空间。建议在段落之间使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来连接不同的观点。此外,可以尝试将每个段落的主题句放在段落开头,以便读者更容易理解每个段落的主要观点。

Example 1: Add a transition phrase at the beginning of a paragraph: "In addition to Andrew's perspective, I would like to emphasize that a shorter workweek can also boost working efficiency."

Example 2: Place the topic sentence at the beginning of the paragraph: "A rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers, such as increased productivity and improved mental well-being."

5. 语法批改

While I can understand Claire’s point that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational four-day week, consisting of less than teem-hour per day, helps workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more days a week to get distracted from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying interpersonal communication, which eventually enables rechargeto recharge(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'to' is missing in a sentence.) their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount workingof working(This rule identifies whether the preposition 'of' is missing in a sentence.) projects all the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from Andrew's perspective, I would like to add that a short workweek can boost working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; on the contrary, tasks and projects may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short four-day week, without doubt, can bring benefits to workers.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Andrew's view that a well-structured four-day workweek, consisting of no more than eight hours per day, can be beneficial for employees by allowing them to relax and alleviate stress. This arrangement provides workers with additional days to disconnect from monotonous tasks, demanding work environments, and challenging interpersonal interactions, ultimately enabling them to recharge both mentally and physically. However, I also recognize Claire's concern regarding the potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule.

Beyond Andrew's argument, I propose that a shorter workweek can actually enhance overall productivity. With a reduced number of working days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively, adhere to project timelines more strictly, and make better use of their available time. In contrast, longer workweeks may lead to procrastination and missed deadlines. Thus, a thoughtfully designed four-day workweek can undoubtedly yield positive outcomes for both workers and organizations. (159 words)

While In response to the professor's question, I can understand Claire’s point concur with Andrew's view that a shorter week might increase workers’ working stress, I agree with Andrew’s perspective that a rational well-structured four-day week, workweek, consisting of less no more than teem-hour eight hours per day, helps day (revised for clarity and accuracy), can be beneficial for employees by allowing them to relax and alleviate stress (rephrased for better flow). This arrangement provides workers to relax and relieve their pressure. In this way, workers can have more with additional days a week to get distracted to disconnect from tedious job stuff, stressful working environment, and annoying monotonous tasks, demanding work environments, and challenging interpersonal communication, which eventually enables interactions (revised for improved readability), ultimately enabling them to recharge their minds and bodies; however, pressured by a large amount working projects all both mentally and physically. However, I also recognize Claire's concern regarding the time, workers will endure much pressure. Apart from potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule (addressed Claire's point).

Beyond Andrew's perspective, argument, I would like to add propose that a short shorter workweek can boost actually enhance overall productivity (introduced new point). With a reduced number of working efficiency. Specifically, with a short workweek, worker give priority to working tasks, save a large quantity days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively, adhere to project timelines more strictly, and make better use of spare time, and adhere to timetable of projects, which definitely enhance their working productivity; available time (expanded on the contrary, tasks and projects new point). In contrast, longer workweeks may not be completed in time. Therefore, a rational short lead to procrastination and missed deadlines (provided counterargument). Thus, a thoughtfully designed four-day week, without doubt, workweek can bring benefits to workers.undoubtedly yield positive outcomes for both workers and organizations (concluded paragraph with a strong statement).

Display title: 8 思维导图

Mindmap:

1. Four-day workweek
   1.1. Benefits for employees
       1.1.1. Relaxation
       1.1.2. Alleviate stress
   1.2. Disconnect from work
       1.2.1 Monotonous tasks
       1.2.2 Demanding environments
       1.2.3 Challenging interactions
   1.3 Recharge mentally and physically
   1.4 Addressing concerns (Claire's)
       1.4.1 Workload pressure
       1.4.2 Condensed schedule


### 2. Enhance overall productivity

   2.1 Prioritize tasks effectively
   2.2 Adhere to project timelines strictly 
   2-3 Make better use of available time


### 3. Longer workweeks drawbacks 

    3-1 Procrastination 
    3-2 Missed deadlines 


### 4. Positive outcomes 

    - For workers 
    - For organizations 

Display title:9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbto agree or have the same opinion同意,一致意见I concur with Andrew's view that a well-structured four-day workweek can be beneficial for employees
alleviate/əˈli:vieit/verbto make something less severe减轻,缓解This arrangement can alleviate stress for employees.
monotonous/məˈnɒtənəs/adjectivelacking in variety and interest单调的,无聊的Disconnect from monotonous tasks during the extra days off.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrɪtaɪz/verbto treat something as more important than other things优先处理,按优先级排序With a reduced number of working days, employees are likely to prioritize tasks more effectively.
adhere/ədˈhɪr/verbto stick firmly to a particular practice or plan坚持,遵守Employees will adhere to project timelines more strictly.
procrastinate/prəˈkræstɪneit/verbto delay doing something that you should do, usually because you do not want to do it拖延,耽误Longer workweeks may lead to procrastination and missed deadlines.
condensed/kənˈdɛnst/adjectivemade shorter or smaller浓缩的,压缩的Claire's concern regarding the potential increase in workload pressure due to a condensed schedule.
productivity/prɒdʌkˈtɪvəti/nounthe effectiveness of productive effort, especially in industry, as measured in terms of output per unit of input生产率,生产能力A shorter workweek can actually enhance overall productivity.
outcomes/ˈaʊtkʌmz/nounthe way a thing turns out; a consequence结果,成果A thoughtfully designed four-day workweek can undoubtedly yield positive outcomes.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant