TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on business management. Write a postresponding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following.Express and support your opinionMake a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

This week, we will be discussing leadership; more specifically, we will beexamining the various qualities found in all successful business leaders. To getyou thinking about this topic, I'd like you to consider the following question:What is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellentcommunication skills or a strong technical background in a particular industry?

Amy

The best leaders are the ones who are good communicators. Ifemployees clearly understand what is expected of them-if theirleader can articulate clearly and concisely what they need todo to achieve their goals-they will be more productive andefficient in their work.

Rory

It doesn't matter how well a company's leader communicates ifthey don't have a deep understanding of the business itselfEmployees aren't going to be motivated by a companypresident who gives a great speech if it's evident that thepresident doesn't know what they do in their day-to-day work

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a busi...

スコア
27

ユーザーサンプル

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

評価結果

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 27

3.任务完成度

此篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于领导技能和沟通能力的看法。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在论述观点时,可以加入更多具体的例子和细节,使观点更加有说服力。

  2. 文章中存在一些语法错误和不太自然的表达,需要进行修改。

示例1:将 "being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent" 改为 "having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader."

示例2:将 "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques" 改为 "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry."

4.文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面较为清晰,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:

  1. 在段落之间增加过渡性词汇或短语,使文章更加流畅。

  2. 对于正文部分的论述,可以尝试使用对比法来强调自己的观点。

示例1:在第二段开头添加过渡性词汇:“首先,在技术背景方面,如果领导具备强大的技术背景,他可以为员工的日常工作制定具体计划。”

示例2:在正文部分加入对比论述:“虽然良好的沟通能力对于激发员工积极性有一定作用,但是在实际操作中,技术背景更能够帮助领导制定切实可行的计划和目标。”

  1. 语法批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

6.文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I agree with Rory that having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader. There are two primary reasons for my stance.

Firstly, a leader with a strong technical background can create specific plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. Therefore, technical skills should be considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, it can often be superficial and not translate into tangible results. For instance, my mother frequently complains that her boss praises them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts.

Overall, I believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (147 words)

7.文章批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur agree with Rory's viewpoint Rory that being practical having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. business leader. (Changed "being practical" to "having a strong technical background" for clarity) There are two primary reasons for my instance. stance.

Firstly, if the a leader has a strong technical background, he with a strong technical background can make a create specific plan for his plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. (Rephrased "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. techniques" to "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry" for more natural language use) As a leader, the important function it is to teach his employees, crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. So, to some extent, Therefore, technical skills can should be addressed as considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, but it is all can often be superficial and cannot be turned not translate into reality. tangible results. (Revised sentence structure for better flow) For example, instance, my mother often frequently complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts. ¶ In conclusion, (Reworded this sentence for clarity)

Overall, I think believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (Minor edits for improved language use)

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Agree with Rory
    • Strong technical background importance
  • Reason 1

    • Specific plans for employees
    • Expertise and proficiency in the industry
  • Reason 2

    • Good communication can be superficial
    • Lack of tangible results
  • Example

    • Mother's experience with her boss
  • Conclusion

    • Technical background takes precedence over communication skills

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
precedence/ˈprɛsɪdəns/nounThe condition of being considered more important than someone or something else.优先地位A strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.
expertise/ˌɛkspərˈtiːz/nounSpecial skill or knowledge in a particular field.专业知识A leader with expertise in the industry can create specific plans for their employees.
proficiency/prəˈfɪʃənsi/nounA high degree of competence or skill; expertise.熟练程度Proficiency in the industry is crucial for a leader to guide employees effectively.
superficial/suːpərˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveAppearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.表面的Good communication may be inspiring, but it can often be superficial and not translate into results.
tangible/ˈtan(d)ʒəb(ə)l/adjectivePerceptible by touch; clear and definite; real.有形的The leader's technical background led to tangible improvements in the company's performance.
implement/ˈɪmplɪmənt/verbPut (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into effect.实施The boss praised them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance.
guidance/ˈɡʌɪdəns/nounAdvice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.指导Employees need clear guidance on the direction and content of their efforts.
evaluate/ɪˈvaljueɪt/verbForm an idea of the amount, number, or value of; assess.评估It is important to evaluate a leader's technical background and communication skills.
crucial/ˈkruːʃ(ə)l/adjectiveDecisive or critical, especially in the success or failure of something.至关重要As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively.
industry/ˈɪndəstri/nounEconomic activity concerned with the processing of raw materials and manufacture of goods in factories.行业A strong technical background in a particular industry is essential for an effective business leader.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now