TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on business management. Write a postresponding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following.Express and support your opinionMake a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

This week, we will be discussing leadership; more specifically, we will beexamining the various qualities found in all successful business leaders. To getyou thinking about this topic, I'd like you to consider the following question:What is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellentcommunication skills or a strong technical background in a particular industry?

Amy

The best leaders are the ones who are good communicators. Ifemployees clearly understand what is expected of them-if theirleader can articulate clearly and concisely what they need todo to achieve their goals-they will be more productive andefficient in their work.

Rory

It doesn't matter how well a company's leader communicates ifthey don't have a deep understanding of the business itselfEmployees aren't going to be motivated by a companypresident who gives a great speech if it's evident that thepresident doesn't know what they do in their day-to-day work

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a busi...

점수
27

사용자 예시

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

평가 결과

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 27

3.任务完成度

此篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于领导技能和沟通能力的看法。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在论述观点时,可以加入更多具体的例子和细节,使观点更加有说服力。

  2. 文章中存在一些语法错误和不太自然的表达,需要进行修改。

示例1:将 "being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent" 改为 "having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader."

示例2:将 "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques" 改为 "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry."

4.文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面较为清晰,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:

  1. 在段落之间增加过渡性词汇或短语,使文章更加流畅。

  2. 对于正文部分的论述,可以尝试使用对比法来强调自己的观点。

示例1:在第二段开头添加过渡性词汇:“首先,在技术背景方面,如果领导具备强大的技术背景,他可以为员工的日常工作制定具体计划。”

示例2:在正文部分加入对比论述:“虽然良好的沟通能力对于激发员工积极性有一定作用,但是在实际操作中,技术背景更能够帮助领导制定切实可行的计划和目标。”

  1. 语法批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

6.文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I agree with Rory that having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader. There are two primary reasons for my stance.

Firstly, a leader with a strong technical background can create specific plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. Therefore, technical skills should be considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, it can often be superficial and not translate into tangible results. For instance, my mother frequently complains that her boss praises them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts.

Overall, I believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (147 words)

7.文章批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur agree with Rory's viewpoint Rory that being practical having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. business leader. (Changed "being practical" to "having a strong technical background" for clarity) There are two primary reasons for my instance. stance.

Firstly, if the a leader has a strong technical background, he with a strong technical background can make a create specific plan for his plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. (Rephrased "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. techniques" to "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry" for more natural language use) As a leader, the important function it is to teach his employees, crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. So, to some extent, Therefore, technical skills can should be addressed as considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, but it is all can often be superficial and cannot be turned not translate into reality. tangible results. (Revised sentence structure for better flow) For example, instance, my mother often frequently complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts. ¶ In conclusion, (Reworded this sentence for clarity)

Overall, I think believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (Minor edits for improved language use)

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Agree with Rory
    • Strong technical background importance
  • Reason 1

    • Specific plans for employees
    • Expertise and proficiency in the industry
  • Reason 2

    • Good communication can be superficial
    • Lack of tangible results
  • Example

    • Mother's experience with her boss
  • Conclusion

    • Technical background takes precedence over communication skills

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
precedence/ˈprɛsɪdəns/nounThe condition of being considered more important than someone or something else.优先地位A strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.
expertise/ˌɛkspərˈtiːz/nounSpecial skill or knowledge in a particular field.专业知识A leader with expertise in the industry can create specific plans for their employees.
proficiency/prəˈfɪʃənsi/nounA high degree of competence or skill; expertise.熟练程度Proficiency in the industry is crucial for a leader to guide employees effectively.
superficial/suːpərˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveAppearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.表面的Good communication may be inspiring, but it can often be superficial and not translate into results.
tangible/ˈtan(d)ʒəb(ə)l/adjectivePerceptible by touch; clear and definite; real.有形的The leader's technical background led to tangible improvements in the company's performance.
implement/ˈɪmplɪmənt/verbPut (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into effect.实施The boss praised them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance.
guidance/ˈɡʌɪdəns/nounAdvice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.指导Employees need clear guidance on the direction and content of their efforts.
evaluate/ɪˈvaljueɪt/verbForm an idea of the amount, number, or value of; assess.评估It is important to evaluate a leader's technical background and communication skills.
crucial/ˈkruːʃ(ə)l/adjectiveDecisive or critical, especially in the success or failure of something.至关重要As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively.
industry/ˈɪndəstri/nounEconomic activity concerned with the processing of raw materials and manufacture of goods in factories.行业A strong technical background in a particular industry is essential for an effective business leader.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now