TOEFLIELTS
Bahasa Indonesia
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on business management. Write a postresponding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following.Express and support your opinionMake a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Kiriman pengguna asli dengan evaluasi dan umpan balik bertenaga AI

1 contoh kiriman pengguna tersedia

Mulai Latihan Gratis

Ringkasan Tugas

Professor

This week, we will be discussing leadership; more specifically, we will beexamining the various qualities found in all successful business leaders. To getyou thinking about this topic, I'd like you to consider the following question:What is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellentcommunication skills or a strong technical background in a particular industry?

Amy

The best leaders are the ones who are good communicators. Ifemployees clearly understand what is expected of them-if theirleader can articulate clearly and concisely what they need todo to achieve their goals-they will be more productive andefficient in their work.

Rory

It doesn't matter how well a company's leader communicates ifthey don't have a deep understanding of the business itselfEmployees aren't going to be motivated by a companypresident who gives a great speech if it's evident that thepresident doesn't know what they do in their day-to-day work

Contoh Pengguna & Hasil Evaluasi

1

Contoh Pengguna #1

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a busi...

Nilai
27

Contoh Pengguna

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

Hasil Evaluasi

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 27

3.任务完成度

此篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于领导技能和沟通能力的看法。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在论述观点时,可以加入更多具体的例子和细节,使观点更加有说服力。

  2. 文章中存在一些语法错误和不太自然的表达,需要进行修改。

示例1:将 "being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent" 改为 "having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader."

示例2:将 "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques" 改为 "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry."

4.文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面较为清晰,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:

  1. 在段落之间增加过渡性词汇或短语,使文章更加流畅。

  2. 对于正文部分的论述,可以尝试使用对比法来强调自己的观点。

示例1:在第二段开头添加过渡性词汇:“首先,在技术背景方面,如果领导具备强大的技术背景,他可以为员工的日常工作制定具体计划。”

示例2:在正文部分加入对比论述:“虽然良好的沟通能力对于激发员工积极性有一定作用,但是在实际操作中,技术背景更能够帮助领导制定切实可行的计划和目标。”

  1. 语法批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

6.文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I agree with Rory that having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader. There are two primary reasons for my stance.

Firstly, a leader with a strong technical background can create specific plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. Therefore, technical skills should be considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, it can often be superficial and not translate into tangible results. For instance, my mother frequently complains that her boss praises them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts.

Overall, I believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (147 words)

7.文章批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur agree with Rory's viewpoint Rory that being practical having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. business leader. (Changed "being practical" to "having a strong technical background" for clarity) There are two primary reasons for my instance. stance.

Firstly, if the a leader has a strong technical background, he with a strong technical background can make a create specific plan for his plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. (Rephrased "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. techniques" to "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry" for more natural language use) As a leader, the important function it is to teach his employees, crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. So, to some extent, Therefore, technical skills can should be addressed as considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, but it is all can often be superficial and cannot be turned not translate into reality. tangible results. (Revised sentence structure for better flow) For example, instance, my mother often frequently complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts. ¶ In conclusion, (Reworded this sentence for clarity)

Overall, I think believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (Minor edits for improved language use)

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Agree with Rory
    • Strong technical background importance
  • Reason 1

    • Specific plans for employees
    • Expertise and proficiency in the industry
  • Reason 2

    • Good communication can be superficial
    • Lack of tangible results
  • Example

    • Mother's experience with her boss
  • Conclusion

    • Technical background takes precedence over communication skills

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
precedence/ˈprɛsɪdəns/nounThe condition of being considered more important than someone or something else.优先地位A strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.
expertise/ˌɛkspərˈtiːz/nounSpecial skill or knowledge in a particular field.专业知识A leader with expertise in the industry can create specific plans for their employees.
proficiency/prəˈfɪʃənsi/nounA high degree of competence or skill; expertise.熟练程度Proficiency in the industry is crucial for a leader to guide employees effectively.
superficial/suːpərˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveAppearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.表面的Good communication may be inspiring, but it can often be superficial and not translate into results.
tangible/ˈtan(d)ʒəb(ə)l/adjectivePerceptible by touch; clear and definite; real.有形的The leader's technical background led to tangible improvements in the company's performance.
implement/ˈɪmplɪmənt/verbPut (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into effect.实施The boss praised them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance.
guidance/ˈɡʌɪdəns/nounAdvice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.指导Employees need clear guidance on the direction and content of their efforts.
evaluate/ɪˈvaljueɪt/verbForm an idea of the amount, number, or value of; assess.评估It is important to evaluate a leader's technical background and communication skills.
crucial/ˈkruːʃ(ə)l/adjectiveDecisive or critical, especially in the success or failure of something.至关重要As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively.
industry/ˈɪndəstri/nounEconomic activity concerned with the processing of raw materials and manufacture of goods in factories.行业A strong technical background in a particular industry is essential for an effective business leader.

Cara Penilaian Academic Discussion

Tugas TOEFL Academic Discussion dinilai berdasarkan rubrik penilaian resmi ETS. Evaluasi AI menganalisis setiap jawaban dari berbagai dimensi.

Relevansi & Kontribusi

Apakah jawaban menjawab pertanyaan dan memberikan kontribusi yang bermakna terhadap diskusi?

Penggunaan Bahasa

Ketepatan tata bahasa, keragaman kosakata, dan kualitas struktur kalimat.

Pengembangan & Dukungan

Apakah ide-ide dikembangkan dengan baik menggunakan contoh spesifik dan penalaran yang jelas?

Pola Umum pada Jawaban

Berdasarkan analisis kiriman pengguna untuk tugas ini, berikut pola umum yang ditemukan dalam jawaban siswa.

Banyak siswa memberikan opini yang jelas tetapi kurang contoh pendukung yang spesifik.

Jawaban yang kuat secara langsung merujuk pada reading passage dan sudut pandang peserta lain.

Jawaban dengan nilai lebih tinggi menggunakan struktur kalimat yang bervariasi dan kosakata akademik.

Manajemen waktu adalah faktor penting — jawaban yang terasa terburu-buru cenderung mendapat nilai lebih rendah pada aspek pengembangan.

Tips Belajar

1

Baca prompt dengan saksama dan identifikasi semua bagian pertanyaan sebelum menulis.

2

Rujuk reading passage dan pendapat siswa lain dalam jawaban kamu.

3

Gunakan contoh spesifik untuk mendukung poin utama kamu — hindari pernyataan yang terlalu umum.

4

Usahakan sekitar 120-150 kata. Jawaban yang lebih panjang tidak selalu lebih baik; kejelasan dan fokus lebih penting.

5

Latih jawaban dengan waktu terbatas (10 menit) untuk membangun kelancaran dalam kondisi ujian sesungguhnya.

Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan

Apa itu tugas TOEFL Academic Discussion?
Tugas TOEFL Academic Discussion mengharuskan kamu untuk berkontribusi dalam diskusi kelas daring. Kamu akan membaca pertanyaan dari seorang profesor dan tanggapan siswa lain, lalu menulis postinganmu sendiri yang menyampaikan dan mendukung pendapatmu dalam waktu sekitar 10 menit.
Bagaimana tugas Academic Discussion dinilai?
Tugas ini dinilai dengan skala 0-5 berdasarkan relevansi terhadap diskusi, kualitas penggunaan bahasa (tata bahasa, kosakata, struktur kalimat), dan seberapa baik kamu mengembangkan serta mendukung idemu dengan contoh spesifik dan penalaran.
Apa itu contoh jawaban pengguna di halaman ini?
Ini adalah jawaban asli yang dikirimkan oleh peserta tes TOEFL yang berlatih soal ini di LingoLeap. Setiap contoh telah dinilai oleh mesin penilaian AI kami, yang memberikan skor dan umpan balik terperinci tentang kekuatan dan area yang perlu ditingkatkan.
Seberapa akurat penilaian AI ini?
Mesin penilaian AI LingoLeap dilatih berdasarkan rubrik penilaian resmi ETS dan dikalibrasi terhadap skor penilai manusia. Meskipun tidak ada sistem otomatis yang sempurna, sistem ini memberikan umpan balik yang andal untuk keperluan latihan dan membantu mengidentifikasi area spesifik yang perlu ditingkatkan.
Bagaimana cara saya berlatih tugas Academic Discussion ini?
Kamu bisa berlatih dengan mendaftar akun LingoLeap gratis. Tulis jawabanmu sendiri untuk pertanyaan yang sama persis ini, kirimkan, dan terima penilaian AI instan dengan umpan balik terperinci tentang tulisanmu.
Seberapa panjang jawaban Academic Discussion saya sebaiknya?
Targetkan 120-150 kata. Tugas ini memberimu waktu 10 menit untuk menulis jawaban. Fokuslah pada kejelasan, dukung pendapatmu dengan contoh spesifik, dan rujuk konteks diskusi daripada menulis jawaban yang lebih panjang.

Raih Skor TOEFL Impianmu Sekarang!

Bersama LingoLeap, ahlinya persiapan ujian bahasa Inggris

Capai Skor Targetmu Lebih Cepat

Coba Gratis Sekarang