TOEFLIELTS
Filipino
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on business management. Write a postresponding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following.Express and support your opinionMake a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Aktwal na mga isinumite ng user na may ebalwasyon at feedback gamit ang AI

1 isinumiteng sample ng user ang available

Simulan ang Libreng Practice

Pangkalahatang-ideya ng Gawain

Professor

This week, we will be discussing leadership; more specifically, we will beexamining the various qualities found in all successful business leaders. To getyou thinking about this topic, I'd like you to consider the following question:What is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellentcommunication skills or a strong technical background in a particular industry?

Amy

The best leaders are the ones who are good communicators. Ifemployees clearly understand what is expected of them-if theirleader can articulate clearly and concisely what they need todo to achieve their goals-they will be more productive andefficient in their work.

Rory

It doesn't matter how well a company's leader communicates ifthey don't have a deep understanding of the business itselfEmployees aren't going to be motivated by a companypresident who gives a great speech if it's evident that thepresident doesn't know what they do in their day-to-day work

Mga Sample ng User at Resulta ng Ebalwasyon

1

Sample ng User #1

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a busi...

Puntos
27

Sample ng User

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

Resulta ng Ebalwasyon

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 27

3.任务完成度

此篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于领导技能和沟通能力的看法。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在论述观点时,可以加入更多具体的例子和细节,使观点更加有说服力。

  2. 文章中存在一些语法错误和不太自然的表达,需要进行修改。

示例1:将 "being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent" 改为 "having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader."

示例2:将 "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques" 改为 "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry."

4.文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面较为清晰,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:

  1. 在段落之间增加过渡性词汇或短语,使文章更加流畅。

  2. 对于正文部分的论述,可以尝试使用对比法来强调自己的观点。

示例1:在第二段开头添加过渡性词汇:“首先,在技术背景方面,如果领导具备强大的技术背景,他可以为员工的日常工作制定具体计划。”

示例2:在正文部分加入对比论述:“虽然良好的沟通能力对于激发员工积极性有一定作用,但是在实际操作中,技术背景更能够帮助领导制定切实可行的计划和目标。”

  1. 语法批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

6.文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I agree with Rory that having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader. There are two primary reasons for my stance.

Firstly, a leader with a strong technical background can create specific plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. Therefore, technical skills should be considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, it can often be superficial and not translate into tangible results. For instance, my mother frequently complains that her boss praises them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts.

Overall, I believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (147 words)

7.文章批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur agree with Rory's viewpoint Rory that being practical having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. business leader. (Changed "being practical" to "having a strong technical background" for clarity) There are two primary reasons for my instance. stance.

Firstly, if the a leader has a strong technical background, he with a strong technical background can make a create specific plan for his plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. (Rephrased "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. techniques" to "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry" for more natural language use) As a leader, the important function it is to teach his employees, crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. So, to some extent, Therefore, technical skills can should be addressed as considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, but it is all can often be superficial and cannot be turned not translate into reality. tangible results. (Revised sentence structure for better flow) For example, instance, my mother often frequently complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts. ¶ In conclusion, (Reworded this sentence for clarity)

Overall, I think believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (Minor edits for improved language use)

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Agree with Rory
    • Strong technical background importance
  • Reason 1

    • Specific plans for employees
    • Expertise and proficiency in the industry
  • Reason 2

    • Good communication can be superficial
    • Lack of tangible results
  • Example

    • Mother's experience with her boss
  • Conclusion

    • Technical background takes precedence over communication skills

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
precedence/ˈprɛsɪdəns/nounThe condition of being considered more important than someone or something else.优先地位A strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.
expertise/ˌɛkspərˈtiːz/nounSpecial skill or knowledge in a particular field.专业知识A leader with expertise in the industry can create specific plans for their employees.
proficiency/prəˈfɪʃənsi/nounA high degree of competence or skill; expertise.熟练程度Proficiency in the industry is crucial for a leader to guide employees effectively.
superficial/suːpərˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveAppearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.表面的Good communication may be inspiring, but it can often be superficial and not translate into results.
tangible/ˈtan(d)ʒəb(ə)l/adjectivePerceptible by touch; clear and definite; real.有形的The leader's technical background led to tangible improvements in the company's performance.
implement/ˈɪmplɪmənt/verbPut (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into effect.实施The boss praised them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance.
guidance/ˈɡʌɪdəns/nounAdvice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.指导Employees need clear guidance on the direction and content of their efforts.
evaluate/ɪˈvaljueɪt/verbForm an idea of the amount, number, or value of; assess.评估It is important to evaluate a leader's technical background and communication skills.
crucial/ˈkruːʃ(ə)l/adjectiveDecisive or critical, especially in the success or failure of something.至关重要As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively.
industry/ˈɪndəstri/nounEconomic activity concerned with the processing of raw materials and manufacture of goods in factories.行业A strong technical background in a particular industry is essential for an effective business leader.

Paano Sinusukat ang Academic Discussion

Sinusukat ang gawaing TOEFL Academic Discussion batay sa opisyal na scoring rubric ng ETS. Sinusuri ng AI evaluation ang bawat sagot sa maraming dimensyon.

Kaugnayan at Kontribusyon

Tinutugunan ba ng sagot ang tanong at nagbibigay ba ito ng makabuluhang kontribusyon sa diskusyon?

Paggamit ng Wika

Kawastuhan ng gramatika, saklaw ng bokabularyo, at kalidad ng istruktura ng pangungusap.

Pagpapalawak at Suporta

Malinaw bang naipaliwanag ang mga ideya gamit ang tiyak na halimbawa at malinaw na pangangatwiran?

Karaniwang Pattern sa mga Sagot

Batay sa pagsusuri ng mga isinumiteng sagot ng user para sa gawaing ito, narito ang mga karaniwang pattern na napansin sa mga sagot ng estudyante.

Maraming estudyante ang naglalahad ng malinaw na opinyon ngunit kulang sa tiyak na sumusuportang halimbawa.

Ang mga matitibay na sagot ay direktang tumutukoy sa reading passage at sa pananaw ng ibang kalahok.

Ang mga sagot na mas mataas ang iskor ay gumagamit ng iba't ibang istruktura ng pangungusap at akademikong bokabularyo.

Mahalaga ang pamamahala ng oras — ang mga sagot na parang nagmamadali ay may posibilidad na mababa ang iskor sa pagpapalawak.

Mga Tip sa Pag-aaral

1

Basahing mabuti ang prompt at tukuyin ang lahat ng bahagi ng tanong bago sumulat.

2

Isangguni ang reading passage at ang opinyon ng ibang estudyante sa iyong sagot.

3

Gumamit ng tiyak na halimbawa para suportahan ang iyong pangunahing punto — iwasan ang mga heneral na pahayag.

4

Layunin ang 120-150 salita. Hindi laging mas maganda ang mas mahabang sagot; mas mahalaga ang linaw at focus.

5

Mag-practice ng mga sagot na may takdang oras (10 minuto) para makabuo ng fluency sa ilalim ng kondisyon ng eksam.

Mga Madalas Itanong

Ano ang TOEFL Academic Discussion task?
Hinihiling sa TOEFL Academic Discussion task na mag-ambag ka sa isang online na talakayan sa klase. Babasahin mo ang tanong ng propesor at ang mga sagot ng ibang estudyante, pagkatapos ay isusulat mo ang sarili mong post na nagpapahayag at sumusuporta sa iyong opinyon sa loob ng humigit-kumulang 10 minuto.
Paano sinusukat ang marka sa Academic Discussion task?
Ang gawain ay minamarkahan sa iskala na 0-5 batay sa kaugnayan sa talakayan, kalidad ng paggamit ng wika (gramatika, bokabularyo, istruktura ng pangungusap), at kung gaano kahusay mong nabubuo at sinusuportahan ang iyong mga ideya gamit ang tiyak na halimbawa at pangangatwiran.
Ano ang mga user sample sa pahinang ito?
Ito ay mga tunay na sagot na isinumite ng mga TOEFL test-taker na nagsanay sa tanong na ito sa LingoLeap. Sinuri ang bawat sample ng aming AI scoring engine, na nagbibigay ng marka at detalyadong feedback tungkol sa mga lakas at mga bahaging dapat pagbutihin.
Gaano kawasto ang pagsusuri ng AI?
Ang AI evaluation engine ng LingoLeap ay sinanay gamit ang opisyal na scoring rubric ng ETS at kinalibrate laban sa mga marka ng human rater. Bagama't walang automated system na perpekto, nagbibigay ito ng maaasahang feedback para sa layuning pagsasanay at tumutulong tukuyin ang mga tiyak na bahaging dapat pagbutihin.
Paano ko masasanay ang Academic Discussion task na ito?
Maaari kang magsanay sa pamamagitan ng pagpaparehistro para sa isang libreng LingoLeap account. Isulat ang iyong sariling sagot sa eksaktong tanong na ito, isumite ito, at tumanggap ng agarang AI evaluation na may detalyadong feedback tungkol sa iyong pagsusulat.
Gaano dapat kahaba ang aking sagot sa Academic Discussion?
Layunin ang 120-150 na salita. Binibigyan ka ng gawain ng 10 minuto para isulat ang iyong sagot. Tumuon sa kalinawan, suportahan ang iyong opinyon gamit ang tiyak na halimbawa, at mag-reference sa konteksto ng talakayan sa halip na sumulat ng mas mahabang sagot.

Abutin ang Iyong Target na Score Ngayon!

Kasama ang LingoLeap, eksperto sa mga pagsusulit sa Ingles

Maabot ang Iyong Pangarap na Score nang Mas Mabilis

Subukan nang libre ngayon