TOEFLIELTS
Italiano
☰

Simulazioni TOEFL 26

Esercitati con il nuovo formato TOEFL 2026

Simulazioni TOEFL 26 complete con Reading & Listening adattivi, tutti i tipi di task ufficiali e valutazione IA per Speaking e Writing.

100+ simulazioni TOEFL 26 complete, aggiornate ogni meseReading & Listening adattiviValutazione IA di Speaking & Writing
TOEFL 26 mock test estimated scores and best score reportScore Report
AI Speaking assessment with performance breakdownAI Speaking Score
AI Speaking feedback — specific mistakes analysisMistake Analysis
AI pronunciation suggestions with syllable breakdownPronunciation Feedback
AI speech analysis with pronunciation comparisonSpeech Analysis
AI Writing assessment score with rubric breakdownAI Writing Score
AI Writing feedback — email mind map structure analysisArticle Structure Feedback
Sentence variety analysis with rhythm chart and response breakdownSentence Variety
Sentence types and improvement suggestions for writingImprovement Suggestions
Vocabulary distribution by CEFR level with upgrade suggestionsVocabulary Feedback
Vocabulary analysis with color-coded CEFR word tagsVocabulary Analysis
TOEFL 26 Reading — Complete the Words task interfaceTOEFL 26 New: Reading
TOEFL 26 Listening — Listen and Choose a Response taskTOEFL 26 New: Listening
TOEFL 26 Writing — Build a Sentence task interfaceTOEFL 26 New: Writing
TOEFL 26 Speaking — Take an Interview with virtual interviewerTOEFL 26 New: Speaking

Every TOEFL 2026 mock test in Lingoleap

These are the full-length mock tests the Lingoleap practice app publishes today, listed exactly as they appear inside it. Each one runs all four TOEFL 2026 sections in a single timed sitting, and each name below opens that test in the app.

104 published full-length mock tests · three sets

  • Free with account16 tests
  • Plus or Premium15 tests
  • Premium73 tests

Access states are the app's own. It marks New TPO and Latest Questions Premium, and describes PQ26-16 to PQ26-30 as included with Plus and Premium; the rest of Practice Questions opens once you create a free account.

Practice Questions (PQ26)

Mixed access

31 full-length tests

PQ26-1 to PQ26-15 and PQ26-75 open with a free account. PQ26-16 to PQ26-30 are the range the app sells as part of Plus and Premium.

New TPO (TPO26)

Premium

8 full-length tests

The app describes this set as exam-grade practice built for the 2026 format.

Latest Questions (EQ26)

Premium

65 full-length tests

The app describes this set as its newest question sets, updated continuously.

Each link opens that exact test in the practice app. The app asks you to sign in first, and tests marked Plus or Premium need the matching plan.

What one mock test contains

The app records a task-type list for every mock test. All four sections appear in all of them:

Reading

  • Complete the Words
  • Read in Daily Life
  • Read an Academic Passage

Listening

  • Listen and Choose a Response
  • Conversation
  • Announcement
  • Academic Talk

Speaking

  • Listen and Repeat
  • Take an Interview

Writing

  • Build a Sentence
  • Write an Email
  • Write for an Academic Discussion

One exception, listed rather than rounded away: TPO26-6 carries no Build a Sentence task. The other 103 tests carry the full task-type list.

Test names, counts and access states read from the practice app's own question list, route table and gate on 18 September 2026. Nothing on this list is an estimate. Lingoleap reports a practice band, not an official ETS score.

Che cos'è una simulazione TOEFL 26?

Una simulazione TOEFL 26 è un test di pratica progettato per il formato TOEFL iBT completamente rinnovato, lanciato il 21 gennaio 2026.

Il nuovo TOEFL introduce 12 tipi di task completamente nuovi nelle sezioni Reading, Listening, Writing e Speaking, un sistema di testing adattivo multifase in Reading e Listening, e una nuova scala di punteggio da 1 a 6 allineata al CEFR.

Per prepararsi in modo efficace, i candidati al TOEFL hanno bisogno di simulazioni che riflettano la nuova struttura, tutti i 12 tipi di task e il sistema di valutazione aggiornato.

Lingoleap offre simulazioni TOEFL 26 progettate per riprodurre fedelmente l'esperienza dell'esame reale.

Nuovo formato TOEFL 2026

Il TOEFL 2026 è composto da 4 sezioni: Reading, Listening, Writing e Speaking. La durata stimata del test è inferiore a 2 ore. Il tempo del test non include le istruzioni. Poiché il test si adatta, la durata e il numero di domande possono variare.

Reading

~30 min

~50 domande

Adattivo multifase su due moduli

Listening

~29 min

~47 domande

Adattivo multifase su due moduli

Writing

~23 min

12 domande

Formato lineare — stessi task per tutti i candidati

Speaking

~8 min

11 domande

Formato lineare — stessi task per tutti i candidati

Tutti i tipi di task del TOEFL 2026

Reading

  • Complete the Words
  • Read in Daily Life
  • Read an Academic Passage

8 tipi di domande: Factual & Negative Factual, Vocabulary, Select the Sentence, Sentence Simplification, Reference, Inference, Rhetorical Purpose, Insert Text

Listening

  • Listen and Choose a Response
  • Listen to a Conversation
  • Listen to an Announcement
  • Listen to an Academic Talk

6 tipi di domande: Main Idea, Factual, Inference, Purpose, Method, Attitude

Writing

  • Build a Sentence
  • Write an Email
  • Write for an Academic Discussion

Formato lineare — valutato su scopo comunicativo, sintassi, scelta lessicale, convenzioni sociali e accuratezza

Speaking

  • Listen and Repeat
  • Take an Interview

Formato lineare — valutato su pronuncia (chiarezza, fluidità), uso della lingua (grammatica, vocabolario) ed elaborazione

Le sezioni Reading e Listening utilizzano un testing adattivo multifase — la tua prestazione nel Modulo 1 determina il livello di difficoltà del Modulo 2. Questo crea un'esperienza più personalizzata e misura le tue competenze in modo più efficiente e preciso.

Perché scegliere le simulazioni TOEFL 26 di Lingoleap

La maggior parte dei materiali di preparazione al TOEFL è ancora basata sul vecchio formato. Lingoleap è progettato specificamente per il formato TOEFL 2026.

  • Simulazioni complete che coprono tutti i 12 tipi di task ufficiali del TOEFL 2026
  • Reading e Listening adattivi multifase che riproducono il test reale
  • Valutazione IA per Speaking e Writing allineata alle griglie di valutazione ufficiali di ETS
  • Una delle più ampie raccolte di simulazioni TOEFL 26 disponibili

La maggior parte delle risorse ti prepara per il vecchio TOEFL. Lingoleap ti prepara per il nuovo.

Copertura completa dei tipi di task del TOEFL 2026

Ogni simulazione TOEFL 26 di Lingoleap copre tutti i 12 tipi di task ufficiali nelle quattro sezioni del test — esattamente come appaiono nell'esame reale.

Reading

  • Complete the Words

    Ricostruire le parti mancanti di parole in un breve paragrafo accademico

  • Read in Daily Life

    Leggere testi pratici come e-mail, avvisi o post sui social media

  • Read an Academic Passage

    Leggere un breve brano accademico (~200 parole) e rispondere a 5 domande

Listening

  • Listen and Choose a Response

    Ascoltare una breve domanda o affermazione e scegliere la risposta migliore tra 4 opzioni

  • Listen to a Conversation

    Rispondere a domande su brevi conversazioni della vita universitaria tra 2 interlocutori

  • Listen to an Announcement

    Rispondere a domande su annunci in aula o relativi a eventi del campus

  • Listen to an Academic Talk

    Rispondere a domande su brevi presentazioni accademiche su vari argomenti

Writing

  • Build a Sentence

    Riordinare parole ed espressioni per completare una frase in un breve dialogo

  • Write an Email

    Scrivere un'e-mail per uno scopo specifico, come raccomandare, invitare o proporre una soluzione

  • Write for an Academic Discussion

    Leggere il post di un professore e le risposte di 2 studenti, poi scrivere il proprio contributo (100+ parole)

Speaking

  • Listen and Repeat

    Ripetere 7 frasi pronunciate che aumentano progressivamente in lunghezza e complessità

  • Take an Interview

    Rispondere a 4 domande di colloquio in una conversazione accademica simulata (45s ciascuna)

Testing adattivo multifase — come il vero TOEFL 2026

Le simulazioni di Lingoleap riproducono la struttura adattiva multifase del vero TOEFL. La tua prestazione nel Modulo 1 determina la difficoltà del Modulo 2, proprio come nell'esame ufficiale.

1

Progressione realistica del test

Vivi lo stesso flusso adattivo del vero TOEFL 2026 — la prestazione nel Modulo 1 determina la difficoltà del Modulo 2

2

Pratica su più livelli

Esercitati su moduli più facili e più difficili per rafforzare la sicurezza e la precisione a ogni livello

3

Valutazione reale delle prestazioni

Comprendi il tuo reale potenziale di punteggio basato sulla logica di valutazione adattiva e sulla conversione dei punteggi grezzi in punteggi calibrati

Valutazione IA per Speaking & Writing

Ricevi un feedback istantaneo e dettagliato su ogni risposta di Speaking e Writing — allineato alle griglie di valutazione ufficiali di ETS. Ogni risposta viene valutata in modo olistico su una scala da 0 a 5.

Valutazione dello Speaking

Listen and Repeat

  • Accuratezza della ripetizione
  • Intelligibilità
  • Pronuncia

Take an Interview

  • Pronuncia (chiarezza, fluidità, intonazione)
  • Uso della lingua (ampiezza e accuratezza grammaticale e lessicale)
  • Elaborazione (idee pertinenti e ben argomentate)

Valutazione del Writing

Write an Email

  • Elaborazione a supporto dello scopo comunicativo
  • Varietà sintattica e scelta lessicale precisa e idiomatica
  • Rispetto delle convenzioni sociali (cortesia, registro, formalità)
  • Accuratezza lessicale e grammaticale

Write for an Academic Discussion

  • Spiegazioni ed esempi pertinenti e ben elaborati
  • Varietà di strutture sintattiche e scelta lessicale precisa e idiomatica
  • Accuratezza lessicale e grammaticale

Accuracy and transparency

How Accurate Is This TOEFL Practice Test Score?

Every practice-test site says its scores are accurate. Almost none says how the number is produced or what has actually been checked. Here is the full answer for Lingoleap — including what we have not verified yet.

What we know

  • Reading and Listening are scored against a fixed answer key, so those bands are as reliable as the question set is representative of the real test.
  • Writing and Speaking responses are scored 0–5 by a language model against the dimensions of the published ETS scoring guides — the same criteria the Speaking and Writing evaluation section above lists.
  • Every band on your report comes from one fixed rule set — the tables and formulas printed further down this page — so the same answers always produce the same band.

What we have not verified

  • We have not yet published a comparison of Lingoleap bands against learners' official ETS score reports. Until that verified sample exists and is large enough, we do not quote a correlation, an accuracy percentage or a margin of error — any such number would be invented.
  • ETS has not released a raw-to-band conversion for the 2026 test. Our Reading and Listening table is a Lingoleap estimate and is labelled as one below.
  • The real test equates scores across forms and adaptive paths with Item Response Theory; our engine uses a simpler lookup table. The two can disagree, most likely at band boundaries.

What to do with the estimate

  • Treat one mock band as a range, not a point. Read the section bands and the task-type accuracy under them — those move first and are what you can practise.
  • Track direction across three to five mocks spaced two to three weeks apart, rather than certifying a single sitting.
  • For admissions, only an ETS score counts. Check your target school's published minimum with the Score Calculator, and treat the last mock as a dress rehearsal, not a prediction.

The method we will use to publish calibration figures — who counts, which mock counts, what gets excluded — is already written down on the how-it-works page. The figures will appear there, with their sample size, once the verified sample exists.

See the calibration method →

Wondering whose AI to trust on the 2026 test in general? The AI tutor guide explains how ETS's own SpeechRater and e-rater engines grade Speaking and Writing first, and how to rehearse against an AI scorer.

How the 2026 TOEFL is graded by AI →

How Our Adaptive Practice Works

Reading and Listening in a Lingoleap mock run as a two-stage test, the structure ETS describes for the real exam. Here is exactly what our engine does — and, separately, what ETS has and has not said.

In a Lingoleap mock test

  1. 1

    Router module

    Every test-taker starts with the same router module in each section.

  2. 2

    Routing

    Your router performance sends you to a lower or an upper Stage 2 module. The two modules are built differently, which is why the number of items you see varies from mock to mock. The routing threshold is an engine setting we do not publish on this page.

  3. 3

    One band table, defined for the upper module

    Correct answers across both stages are counted, normalised to a 35-point basis, and looked up in the section's band table. The table is defined for the upper module.

  4. 4

    Lower-module adjustment

    A sitting routed to the lower module is placed one step down that table for the same normalised count. So in our engine the lower path cannot reach the top band — that is a Lingoleap simplification, not an ETS rule, and it is the one place our scoring is deliberately more conservative than the real test.

Adaptive routing: what ETS has published vs what prep sites assert

QuestionWhat ETS has publishedWhat prep sites assert
StructureReading and Listening are “designed as two-stage adaptive tests”; Writing and Speaking are linear, with every test-taker on a form getting the same tasks (2026 Test Blueprint, note 5).The same. This part is not in dispute.
Routing“Based on their performance on the first module, test takers will get a second module where the difficulty of the test tasks matches their ability level.” No routing threshold is published (Teacher FAQ, Q9).Specific thresholds — “get the first ten questions wrong and you are routed down” — none of which cites an ETS source.
How the score is producedThe section score “takes into consideration the total number of questions answered correctly across the two stages or modules as well as the difficulty level of questions”, converted by IRT equating so that a reported score “reflects the same level of language ability, regardless of which second stage was taken” (Teacher FAQ).A fixed raw-to-band table applied to both paths, or a flat penalty for the easier path.
The “ceiling”ETS states no maximum band for the lower module. It says “the final score is based on both stages” and that item difficulty is accounted for — which means an easier item is worth less, not that a particular band is forbidden. Whether the easier module can reach 6.0 in practice is not something ETS has published either way.“A perfect score on the easier Stage 2 caps you at 4.0”, or “below 5.0” — the figure differs from site to site and none cites ETS.
Unscored itemsReading and Listening item counts “include non-scored items” used to gather data for future forms (Blueprint, note 1).Rarely mentioned; item counts are usually quoted as if every item scored.

ETS sources: TOEFL iBT 2026 Test Blueprint and Specifications (PDF) · Teacher FAQ for TOEFL iBT Enhancements (PDF)

Quotations are from those two ETS documents as read on 16 September 2026. Where this page says ETS has not published something, we mean we could not find it in either document or on ets.org — not that no such rule exists internally.

How the Band Is Produced, Section by Section

The whole path from your answers to the 1–6 band, with nothing hidden. These are the rules our score report runs on.

Reading

Scored by: Answer key
  1. 1Every item is compared with the reference answer: right or wrong, no partial credit.
  2. 2Correct answers across the router and your Stage 2 module are summed and scaled to a 35-point basis: points = round(correct ÷ items × 35).
  3. 3The points are looked up in the Reading band table below. Lower-module sittings drop one step.

Listening

Scored by: Answer key
  1. 1The same answer-key grading and 35-point scaling as Reading.
  2. 2The Listening table has its own boundaries: 80% accuracy is a 5.0 in Reading, but 71% is a 4.5 in Listening. That is why two sections at similar accuracy can show different bands.

Writing

Scored by: Answer key + AI
  1. 1Build a Sentence: each item is scored right or wrong against the accepted word orderings. No model is involved.
  2. 2Write an Email and Write for an Academic Discussion: each response is scored 0–5 by a language model against the dimensions of the ETS scoring guide for that task.
  3. 3Section band = (points earned ÷ points available) × 5 + 1, rounded to the nearest 0.5.

Speaking

Scored by: AI
  1. 1Listen and Repeat (7 items) and Take an Interview (4 items): your recording is transcribed and measured for pronunciation and fluency, then a model scores each response 0–5 against the rubric dimensions.
  2. 2Section band = (points earned ÷ points available) × 5 + 1, rounded to the nearest 0.5.

Overall band = the plain average of the four section bands, rounded to the nearest 0.5. The 0–120 “traditional” figure on the report is each section's accuracy scaled to 0–30 and summed; it exists only for comparing against university pages that still quote the old scale.

Raw Correct to Band: Reading and Listening

Lingoleap estimate — not an ETS table

Basis: these are the exact lookup tables our score report uses, defined on a 35-point normalised scale (points = round(correct ÷ items × 35)). ETS has published no raw-to-band conversion for the 2026 test, and real scores are IRT-equated for form and module difficulty, so treat every band here as a practice estimate. The approximate-accuracy column is the points range divided by 35.

Reading

BandPoints (of 35)Approx. accuracy
6.034–35≈ 97–100%
5.532–33≈ 91–94%
5.028–31≈ 80–89%
4.525–27≈ 71–77%
4.018–24≈ 51–69%
3.512–17≈ 34–49%
3.08–11≈ 23–31%
2.57≈ 20%
2.06≈ 17%
1.00–5≈ 0–14%

Listening

BandPoints (of 35)Approx. accuracy
6.034–35≈ 97–100%
5.532–33≈ 91–94%
5.029–31≈ 83–89%
4.525–28≈ 71–80%
4.023–24≈ 66–69%
3.518–22≈ 51–63%
3.013–17≈ 37–49%
2.511–12≈ 31–34%
2.08–10≈ 23–29%
1.56–7≈ 17–20%
1.00–5≈ 0–14%

Worked example from our sample report: 28 of 35 Reading items correct → 28 points → Band 5.0. 32 of 45 Listening items correct → 24.9, rounded to 25 points → Band 4.5.

Lower-module sittings: one step down the table for the same points.

Try TOEFL Practice Test Questions Now

Warm up with these free sample questions modeled on the 2026 TOEFL iBT — one from each section. Reveal the answer and explanation, then start a full-length practice test when you are ready.

ReadingRead an Academic Passage

Read the short academic passage, then answer the question.

Bioluminescence — the production of light by living organisms — is common in the deep ocean, where sunlight never reaches. Many creatures use it to attract prey, confuse predators, or signal to potential mates. The light is produced by a chemical reaction between a molecule called luciferin and the enzyme luciferase. Because the reaction gives off almost no heat, scientists describe the light as "cold light."

According to the passage, why is bioluminescent light described as "cold light"?

  • AIt is only found in cold, deep water.
  • BThe chemical reaction releases very little heat.
  • CIt appears blue rather than red or orange.
  • DIt is produced only at night.
▸Show answer & explanation

Answer: B — The chemical reaction releases very little heat.

The final sentence states the reaction "gives off almost no heat," which is why it is called cold light. Option A confuses where the organisms live with why the light is cold; C and D add details the passage never mentions. Factual questions like this reward locating the exact supporting sentence rather than relying on outside knowledge.

ReadingComplete the Words

Type the missing letters to complete the word so the sentence makes sense.

Regular exercise can signi______ reduce the risk of heart disease.

▸Show answer & explanation

Answer: significantly

"Complete the Words" gives you the first letters and the length of a word and asks you to finish it from context. Here the sentence needs an adverb describing how much exercise reduces risk — "significantly." Read the whole sentence first, decide the part of speech, then fit a word that starts with the letters shown.

ListeningListen to an Academic Talk

On the real test you would hear this talk once. Read the transcript excerpt, then answer.

Professor: "So when we talk about the 'urban heat island' effect, we mean that cities tend to be several degrees warmer than the countryside around them. The main reason is surface material. Asphalt and concrete absorb heat during the day and release it slowly at night — unlike soil and vegetation, which cool down much faster. That's why a city can still feel warm hours after sunset."

What is the main cause of the urban heat island effect, according to the professor?

  • ACities are located in naturally warmer regions.
  • BBuildings block cooling wind from reaching streets.
  • CPaved surfaces absorb and slowly release heat.
  • DThere are more people generating body heat.
▸Show answer & explanation

Answer: C — Paved surfaces absorb and slowly release heat.

The professor names surface material — asphalt and concrete absorbing heat and releasing it slowly — as "the main reason." The other options are plausible-sounding distractors the talk never states. In the Listening section, note the speaker's signal phrases ("the main reason is…") to catch the point being tested.

WritingBuild a Sentence

Put the words and phrases in the correct order to form a grammatical sentence.

[ the deadline / because / the library / she / was approaching / stayed late at ]

▸Show answer & explanation

Answer: She stayed late at the library because the deadline was approaching.

"Build a Sentence" tests control of English word order and clause structure. Start with the subject ("She"), add the main verb phrase ("stayed late at the library"), then attach the reason clause introduced by "because." Checking that subject, verb, and connector line up is usually enough to place every chunk.

SpeakingTake an Interview

You have 45 seconds to answer. There is no single correct response — a strong answer is clear, on-topic, and supported with a reason or example.

Some students prefer to study in the morning, while others prefer the evening. Which do you prefer, and why?

▸Show answer & explanation

Answer: Sample strong response (outline)

Take a clear position, give one reason, and support it with a specific example: "I prefer studying in the morning because my mind is freshest right after I wake up. For instance, I can read a difficult chapter in thirty minutes in the morning, but the same chapter takes me an hour at night when I'm tired." Scoring rewards delivery (clear, fluent speech), language use (accurate grammar and vocabulary), and elaboration (a developed, on-topic idea) — so commit to one answer and develop it rather than listing both options.

These are original Lingoleap practice items built to mirror the 2026 TOEFL iBT task types. They are for practice only and are not real ETS test questions; Lingoleap is independent of and not endorsed by ETS.

Practice TOEFL by Section

A full-length mock test measures readiness, but targeted section practice is how you fix specific weaknesses. Drill any of the four sections and all 12 task types below.

Reading

Adaptive passages and the three 2026 reading task types.

Listening

Conversations, announcements, and academic talks with adaptive difficulty.

Speaking

Listen and Repeat plus the academic interview, with AI delivery feedback.

Writing

Build a Sentence, Write an Email, and Write for an Academic Discussion.

100+ simulazioni TOEFL 26 complete — aggiornate ogni mese

Accedi a una delle più ampie raccolte di simulazioni TOEFL 2026 disponibili. Nuovi test vengono aggiunti ogni mese, permettendoti di esercitarti continuamente con materiale aggiornato.

  • 100+ simulazioni TOEFL 26 complete
  • Tutti i test sono allineati all'ultimo formato e ai tipi di task del TOEFL 2026
  • Nuovi test aggiunti ogni mese
  • Copertura di tutte le 4 sezioni e dei 12 tipi di task
  • Covers all 4 sections and 12 task types

Come iniziare la tua simulazione TOEFL 26

1

Crea il tuo account

Registrati gratuitamente su Lingoleap

2

Scegli una simulazione

Seleziona tra 100+ simulazioni TOEFL 26 complete

3

Inizia a esercitarti

Sostieni il test nelle condizioni reali d'esame

4

Ricevi il tuo punteggio e feedback

Ottieni una valutazione basata sull'IA e un'analisi dettagliata delle tue prestazioni

Inizia la tua simulazione TOEFL 26

Esercitati con il nuovo formato TOEFL 2026 con testing adattivo multifase, tutti i 12 tipi di task e valutazione IA.

Inizia a esercitarti oraProva prima un test

Domande frequenti

Tutto quello che devi sapere sulle simulazioni TOEFL 26

Cosa cambia nel formato TOEFL 2026?

Il TOEFL 2026, lanciato il 21 gennaio 2026, è un esame completamente riprogettato. Introduce il testing adattivo multifase nelle sezioni Reading e Listening, dove la prestazione nel Modulo 1 determina la difficoltà del Modulo 2. Writing e Speaking utilizzano un formato lineare (stessi task per tutti). Presenta 12 tipi di task completamente nuovi e una nuova scala di punteggio da 1 a 6 allineata al CEFR. Il test dura meno di 2 ore.

Quanti tipi di task ci sono nel nuovo TOEFL 2026?

Il nuovo TOEFL 2026 ha 12 tipi di task distribuiti in 4 sezioni: 3 in Reading (Complete the Words, Read in Daily Life, Read an Academic Passage), 4 in Listening (Listen and Choose a Response, Listen to a Conversation, Listen to an Announcement, Listen to an Academic Talk), 3 in Writing (Build a Sentence, Write an Email, Write for an Academic Discussion) e 2 in Speaking (Listen and Repeat, Take an Interview).

Quante simulazioni TOEFL 26 offre Lingoleap?

Lingoleap offre attualmente più di 100 simulazioni TOEFL 26 complete, con nuovi test aggiunti ogni mese. Ogni test copre tutte e quattro le sezioni e include ogni tipo di task ufficiale del formato TOEFL 2026.

Lingoleap simula il testing adattivo multifase?

Sì. Lingoleap è una delle poche piattaforme che simula la struttura di testing adattivo multifase utilizzata nelle sezioni Reading e Listening del TOEFL 2026. La tua prestazione nel Modulo 1 influenza la difficoltà del Modulo 2, proprio come nell'esame reale.

Come funziona la valutazione IA per Speaking e Writing?

L'IA di Lingoleap valuta le tue risposte utilizzando criteri allineati alle griglie di valutazione ufficiali di ETS (valutazione olistica 0–5 per domanda). Per lo Speaking, Listen and Repeat viene valutato su accuratezza della ripetizione, intelligibilità e pronuncia. Take an Interview viene valutato su pronuncia (chiarezza, fluidità, ritmo), uso della lingua (grammatica, vocabolario) ed elaborazione (pertinenza, idee argomentate). Per il Writing, Write an Email viene valutato su scopo comunicativo, varietà sintattica e scelta lessicale idiomatica, convenzioni sociali (cortesia, registro) e accuratezza lessicale/grammaticale. Write for an Academic Discussion viene valutato su pertinenza ed elaborazione, strutture sintattiche e scelta lessicale, e accuratezza lessicale/grammaticale.

Le simulazioni di Lingoleap sono identiche al vero TOEFL?

Le simulazioni di Lingoleap sono progettate per riprodurre fedelmente l'esperienza del vero TOEFL 2026, inclusi i nuovi tipi di task, il testing adattivo multifase e le tempistiche dell'esame. Sebbene nessun test di pratica sia identico all'esame ufficiale, Lingoleap offre una delle esperienze di preparazione al TOEFL 2026 più realistiche disponibili.

Posso esercitarmi su singole sezioni invece del test completo?

Sì. Oltre alle simulazioni complete, Lingoleap ti permette di esercitarti su singole sezioni — Reading, Listening, Speaking o Writing — così puoi concentrarti sulle aree in cui hai più bisogno di migliorare.

How accurate are Lingoleap's mock test score estimates?

Reading and Listening are scored against an answer key, so their bands depend on how representative the question set is. Writing and Speaking bands come from a language model scoring each response 0–5 against the dimensions of the published ETS scoring guides. We have not yet published a comparison of Lingoleap bands with learners' official ETS score reports, so we do not quote an accuracy figure — the section “How accurate is this score?” on this page shows exactly how each band is produced and what has and has not been verified. These are practice estimates only: official TOEFL scores are issued exclusively by ETS, and Lingoleap is independent of and not endorsed by ETS.

If I am routed to the easier module, is my band capped?

In a Lingoleap mock, yes, slightly: the band table is defined for the upper module and a lower-module sitting is placed one step down it, so the lower path cannot reach the top band. That is our simplification. On the real test, ETS says the score is based on both stages and accounts for item difficulty through IRT equating; it has published no maximum band for the lower module. The specific caps quoted on prep sites (“4.0”, “below 5.0”) do not come from ETS.

How many correct answers do I need for a Band 5 in Reading or Listening?

On Lingoleap's practice table, Reading Band 5.0 needs 28–31 of 35 normalised points (roughly 80–89% correct) and Listening Band 5.0 needs 29–31 (roughly 83–89%). Points are your correct answers scaled to a 35-point basis. This is Lingoleap's estimate: ETS has published no raw-to-band table for the 2026 test and equates real scores for difficulty, so the official conversion can differ.

How much does a full mock test cost?

A full mock test costs 800 credits and includes AI scoring for Reading, Listening, Speaking, and Writing with a complete score report. New accounts start with 200 free AI-feedback credits, and Reading and Listening practice never costs credits.