TOEFLIELTS
繁體中文
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: our professor is teaching a class on economy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

真實考生作答範例,搭配 AI 評分與回饋

目前有 1 篇考生投稿範例

開始免費練習

題型概述

ProfessorToday, we will examine what economists call incentives-the motivations that lead people to make certain choices. Cost is a major category of economic incentives. People tend to change their behavior when a particular choice gets more expensive. Let's discuss an example. Some economists argue that a good way to reduce air pollution is for governments to raise the cost(through taxes or other means) of fuel for cars. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?Why?

Student AI think it would be a good idea to raise fuel prices. Making it more expensive to drive cars would cause many people to choose public transportation or use bicycles instead. In my city, they've just added bicycle lanes to all of the major roads. So, it would be easy to give up driving.

Student BI disagree. Why should individuals be punished with such an added expense in their daily lives? The argument for a consumer fuel tax makes the assumption that cars are the biggest source of air pollution, and we need to question if that’s an accurate assumption.

考生範例與評分結果

1

考生範例 #1

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use...

分數
25

考生範例

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

評分結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章在回应教授的问题方面做得很好。然而,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和细节来支持你的看法。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,有一些小错误需要注意。

英文改进示例:

  1. Instead of "it may do some good to the problem," consider writing "it may partially address the problem."

  2. Instead of "we cannot avoiding the problem," consider writing "we cannot avoid the problem."

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织的角度来看,你的文章整体上是清晰易懂的。然而,有一些建议可以帮助你进一步改进文章。首先,在引言部分,可以更明确地表达自己的观点。其次,在正文段落中,尝试使用更多的过渡词汇和短语来连接不同观点。

英文改进示例:

  1. 在引言部分,可以写:“In my opinion, raising fuel prices might have some positive effects on reducing air pollution, but it could also lead to other issues in our daily lives.”

  2. 在正文段落中使用过渡词汇,例如:“Firstly, we are heavily reliant on private vehicles for work and travel. However, using public transportation can be time-consuming and inconvenient for some people.”

5. 语法批改

NowdaysNowadays(misspelling), the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controllcontrol(misspelling) the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out (Two consecutive spaces)in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoidingavoid(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) the problem of air pollution simply by rasingracing(misspelling) the price of (Two consecutive spaces)fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergencyregency(misspelling) and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Title: 6 文章修订

Nowadays, the issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe. Some individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage. While this approach may have some benefits, I believe it could lead to additional problems in our daily lives.

Firstly, many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel. Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules. Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.

Secondly, simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience. Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events. It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption. This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. (197 words)

Nowdays, the Nowadays, the issue of air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. becoming increasingly severe (changed "worse and worse" to "increasingly severe" for a more formal tone). Some people individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage (corrected "raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars" for clarity and grammar). While this approach may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, have some benefits, I believe it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more could lead to additional problems in our life. daily lives.

Firstly, we many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel (rephrased "we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using travel" for clarity). Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules (rephrased "Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in sometimes" for clarity). Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. despite the increased cost.

Secondly, we simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience (rephrased "we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. convenience" for clarity and grammar). Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Last but not least, we Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events (rephrased "we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it things" for clarity and grammar). It is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption (rephrased "So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.all" for clarity). This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Air pollution issue
   - Raising fuel prices proposal
   - Potential problems

2. Reliance on private vehicles
   - Work and travel
   - Inconvenience of public transportation
   - Time-consuming

3. Ineffectiveness of raising fuel prices
   - People still choose convenience
   - No guarantee of reduced car usage or emissions

4. Essential situations for private cars
   - Emergencies
   - Important events

5. Alternative solutions
   - Cleaner energy sources development
   - Promoting adoption

6. Conclusion
   - Comprehensive and long-lasting solution needed for air pollution problem 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Severe/sɪˈvɪr/AdjectiveExtremely bad or serious严重的The issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe.
Feasible/ˈfiːzəbl/AdjectivePossible to do easily or conveniently可行的Public transportation may not be a feasible option for those with busy schedules.
Consequently/ˈkɒnsɪkwəntli/AdverbAs a result因此Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.
Guarantee/ˌɡærənˈti://Noun, Verb/A formal assurance; to ensure/保证;确保/This measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.
Essential/ɪˈsenʃəl/AdjectiveAbsolutely necessary必要的It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such essential circumstances.
Unrealistic/ˌʌnrɪəˈlɪstɪk//Adjective/Not compatible with reality/不切实际的/It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances.
Solely/ˈsəʊlli/AdverbOnly, exclusively仅仅Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources.
Comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv//Adjective/Including all or nearly all elements/全面的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.
Long-lasting/lɒŋ ˈlæstɪŋ//Adjective/Continuing for a long period of time/持久的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

學術討論如何評分

TOEFL學術討論題型依據官方 ETS 評分標準進行評分,AI 評分系統會從多個面向分析每篇回答。

切題度與貢獻度

回答是否切合題目,並對討論做出有意義的貢獻?

語言運用

文法準確度、詞彙廣度,以及句子結構的品質。

論述發展與支持

論點是否透過具體例子和清楚的推理獲得充分發展?

回答中的常見模式

根據對本題考生投稿的分析,以下是考生回答中常見的模式。

許多考生提出了明確的觀點,卻缺乏具體的佐證例子。

高分回答通常會直接引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他發言者的觀點。

得分較高的回答會運用多樣的句型結構與學術詞彙。

時間管理是關鍵因素——顯得倉促完成的回答,在論述發展方面通常得分較低。

學習訣竅

1

動筆前仔細閱讀題目,確認問題的每個部分都已理解。

2

在回答中引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他考生的觀點。

3

用具體例子支持你的主要論點——避免空泛籠統的說法。

4

字數以 120-150 字為目標。篇幅較長不代表較好,清晰與聚焦更為重要。

5

練習限時作答(10 分鐘),培養在考試情境下的流暢度。

常見問題

什麼是TOEFL學術討論任務?
TOEFL學術討論任務要求你參與線上課堂討論。你需要閱讀教授的問題和其他學生的回覆,然後在約10分鐘內寫出自己的貼文,表達並支持你的觀點。
學術討論任務如何評分?
此任務依0-5分評分,評分依據包括與討論的相關性、語言運用品質(文法、詞彙、句子結構),以及你如何用具體例子和推理來發展並支持自己的觀點。
此頁面上的用戶範例是什麼?
這些是TOEFL考生在LingoLeap上練習這道題目時提交的真實回答。每個範例都經過我們的AI評分引擎評估,提供分數以及關於優勢與待加強領域的詳細回饋。
AI評估的準確度如何?
LingoLeap的AI評估引擎以ETS官方評分標準訓練而成,並與人工評分員的評分校準。雖然沒有自動化系統是完美的,但它能為練習提供可靠的回饋,並協助找出具體的加強方向。
我要如何練習這道學術討論題目?
你可以註冊免費的LingoLeap帳號來練習。針對這道確切的題目寫出你自己的回答,送出後即可立即獲得附有詳細回饋的AI評估。
我的學術討論回答應該多長?
目標字數為120-150字。此任務給你10分鐘的時間撰寫回答。請專注於表達清晰、用具體例子支持你的觀點,並引用討論脈絡,而非一味追求更長的篇幅。

今天就為您的目標分數加油!

與 LingoLeap,英語考試專家一起

更快達到您的理想分數

立即免費試用