TOEFLIELTS
Français
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: our professor is teaching a class on economy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Vraies réponses d'utilisateurs avec évaluation et retour propulsés par l'IA

1 exemples soumis par des utilisateurs disponibles

Commencer l'Entraînement Gratuit

Aperçu de la Tâche

ProfessorToday, we will examine what economists call incentives-the motivations that lead people to make certain choices. Cost is a major category of economic incentives. People tend to change their behavior when a particular choice gets more expensive. Let's discuss an example. Some economists argue that a good way to reduce air pollution is for governments to raise the cost(through taxes or other means) of fuel for cars. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?Why?

Student AI think it would be a good idea to raise fuel prices. Making it more expensive to drive cars would cause many people to choose public transportation or use bicycles instead. In my city, they've just added bicycle lanes to all of the major roads. So, it would be easy to give up driving.

Student BI disagree. Why should individuals be punished with such an added expense in their daily lives? The argument for a consumer fuel tax makes the assumption that cars are the biggest source of air pollution, and we need to question if that’s an accurate assumption.

Exemples d'Utilisateurs et Résultats d'Évaluation

1

Exemple d'Utilisateur #1

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use...

Score
25

Exemple d'Utilisateur

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Résultat de l'Évaluation

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章在回应教授的问题方面做得很好。然而,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和细节来支持你的看法。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,有一些小错误需要注意。

英文改进示例:

  1. Instead of "it may do some good to the problem," consider writing "it may partially address the problem."

  2. Instead of "we cannot avoiding the problem," consider writing "we cannot avoid the problem."

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织的角度来看,你的文章整体上是清晰易懂的。然而,有一些建议可以帮助你进一步改进文章。首先,在引言部分,可以更明确地表达自己的观点。其次,在正文段落中,尝试使用更多的过渡词汇和短语来连接不同观点。

英文改进示例:

  1. 在引言部分,可以写:“In my opinion, raising fuel prices might have some positive effects on reducing air pollution, but it could also lead to other issues in our daily lives.”

  2. 在正文段落中使用过渡词汇,例如:“Firstly, we are heavily reliant on private vehicles for work and travel. However, using public transportation can be time-consuming and inconvenient for some people.”

5. 语法批改

NowdaysNowadays(misspelling), the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controllcontrol(misspelling) the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out (Two consecutive spaces)in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoidingavoid(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) the problem of air pollution simply by rasingracing(misspelling) the price of (Two consecutive spaces)fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergencyregency(misspelling) and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Title: 6 文章修订

Nowadays, the issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe. Some individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage. While this approach may have some benefits, I believe it could lead to additional problems in our daily lives.

Firstly, many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel. Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules. Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.

Secondly, simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience. Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events. It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption. This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. (197 words)

Nowdays, the Nowadays, the issue of air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. becoming increasingly severe (changed "worse and worse" to "increasingly severe" for a more formal tone). Some people individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage (corrected "raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars" for clarity and grammar). While this approach may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, have some benefits, I believe it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more could lead to additional problems in our life. daily lives.

Firstly, we many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel (rephrased "we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using travel" for clarity). Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules (rephrased "Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in sometimes" for clarity). Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. despite the increased cost.

Secondly, we simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience (rephrased "we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. convenience" for clarity and grammar). Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Last but not least, we Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events (rephrased "we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it things" for clarity and grammar). It is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption (rephrased "So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.all" for clarity). This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Air pollution issue
   - Raising fuel prices proposal
   - Potential problems

2. Reliance on private vehicles
   - Work and travel
   - Inconvenience of public transportation
   - Time-consuming

3. Ineffectiveness of raising fuel prices
   - People still choose convenience
   - No guarantee of reduced car usage or emissions

4. Essential situations for private cars
   - Emergencies
   - Important events

5. Alternative solutions
   - Cleaner energy sources development
   - Promoting adoption

6. Conclusion
   - Comprehensive and long-lasting solution needed for air pollution problem 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Severe/sɪˈvɪr/AdjectiveExtremely bad or serious严重的The issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe.
Feasible/ˈfiːzəbl/AdjectivePossible to do easily or conveniently可行的Public transportation may not be a feasible option for those with busy schedules.
Consequently/ˈkɒnsɪkwəntli/AdverbAs a result因此Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.
Guarantee/ˌɡærənˈti://Noun, Verb/A formal assurance; to ensure/保证;确保/This measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.
Essential/ɪˈsenʃəl/AdjectiveAbsolutely necessary必要的It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such essential circumstances.
Unrealistic/ˌʌnrɪəˈlɪstɪk//Adjective/Not compatible with reality/不切实际的/It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances.
Solely/ˈsəʊlli/AdverbOnly, exclusively仅仅Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources.
Comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv//Adjective/Including all or nearly all elements/全面的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.
Long-lasting/lɒŋ ˈlæstɪŋ//Adjective/Continuing for a long period of time/持久的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Comment la Discussion Académique est Évaluée

La tâche TOEFL Discussion Académique est évaluée selon le barème officiel de l'ETS. L'évaluation par IA analyse chaque réponse selon plusieurs dimensions.

Pertinence et Contribution

La réponse traite-t-elle la question et contribue-t-elle de façon pertinente à la discussion ?

Utilisation de la Langue

Précision grammaticale, richesse du vocabulaire et qualité de la structure des phrases.

Développement et Argumentation

Les idées sont-elles bien développées avec des exemples précis et un raisonnement clair ?

Tendances Communes dans les Réponses

D'après l'analyse des réponses soumises par les utilisateurs pour cette tâche, voici les tendances courantes observées dans les réponses des étudiants.

De nombreux étudiants expriment des opinions claires mais manquent d'exemples précis à l'appui.

Les réponses solides font directement référence au texte de lecture et aux points de vue des autres participants.

Les réponses les mieux notées utilisent des structures de phrases variées et un vocabulaire académique.

La gestion du temps est un facteur clé — les réponses qui semblent précipitées ont tendance à obtenir un score plus faible en développement.

Conseils d'Apprentissage

1

Lisez attentivement la consigne et identifiez toutes les parties de la question avant d'écrire.

2

Faites référence au texte de lecture et aux opinions des autres étudiants dans votre réponse.

3

Utilisez des exemples précis pour appuyer votre idée principale — évitez les affirmations génériques.

4

Visez 120 à 150 mots. Une réponse plus longue n'est pas toujours meilleure ; la clarté et la précision comptent davantage.

5

Entraînez-vous à répondre en temps limité (10 minutes) pour gagner en aisance dans les conditions de l'examen.

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que la tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion ?
La tâche TOEFL Academic Discussion vous demande de contribuer à une discussion de classe en ligne. Vous lirez la question d'un professeur ainsi que les réponses d'autres étudiants, puis vous rédigerez votre propre contribution exprimant et justifiant votre opinion en environ 10 minutes.
Comment la tâche Academic Discussion est-elle notée ?
La tâche est notée sur une échelle de 0 à 5 en fonction de la pertinence par rapport à la discussion, de la qualité de l'usage de la langue (grammaire, vocabulaire, structure des phrases), et de la manière dont vous développez et étayez vos idées à l'aide d'exemples précis et d'un raisonnement solide.
Que sont les exemples d'utilisateurs sur cette page ?
Il s'agit de véritables réponses soumises par des candidats au TOEFL qui se sont entraînés sur cette question sur LingoLeap. Chaque exemple a été évalué par notre moteur de notation par IA, qui fournit une note ainsi qu'un retour détaillé sur les points forts et les axes d'amélioration.
Quelle est la fiabilité de l'évaluation par IA ?
Le moteur d'évaluation par IA de LingoLeap est entraîné sur les grilles de notation officielles de l'ETS et calibré par rapport aux notes attribuées par des correcteurs humains. Bien qu'aucun système automatisé ne soit parfait, il fournit un retour fiable à des fins d'entraînement et aide à identifier des axes d'amélioration précis.
Comment puis-je m'entraîner à cette tâche Academic Discussion ?
Vous pouvez vous entraîner en créant un compte LingoLeap gratuit. Rédigez votre propre réponse à cette question précise, soumettez-la, et recevez une évaluation par IA instantanée accompagnée d'un retour détaillé sur votre rédaction.
Quelle longueur ma réponse Academic Discussion doit-elle avoir ?
Visez 120 à 150 mots. La tâche vous laisse 10 minutes pour rédiger votre réponse. Concentrez-vous sur la clarté, appuyez votre opinion avec des exemples précis, et faites référence au contexte de la discussion plutôt que d'écrire une réponse plus longue.

Atteignez votre score cible dès aujourd'hui !

Avec LingoLeap, l'expert en préparation aux examens d'anglais

Préparez-vous efficacement et atteignez votre score idéal au TOEFL plus rapidement

Essayez gratuitement maintenant