TOEFLIELTS
Nederlands
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: our professor is teaching a class on economy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Echte inzendingen van gebruikers met AI-gestuurde beoordeling en feedback

1 door gebruikers ingediende voorbeelden beschikbaar

Start Gratis Oefenen

Overzicht van de Taak

ProfessorToday, we will examine what economists call incentives-the motivations that lead people to make certain choices. Cost is a major category of economic incentives. People tend to change their behavior when a particular choice gets more expensive. Let's discuss an example. Some economists argue that a good way to reduce air pollution is for governments to raise the cost(through taxes or other means) of fuel for cars. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?Why?

Student AI think it would be a good idea to raise fuel prices. Making it more expensive to drive cars would cause many people to choose public transportation or use bicycles instead. In my city, they've just added bicycle lanes to all of the major roads. So, it would be easy to give up driving.

Student BI disagree. Why should individuals be punished with such an added expense in their daily lives? The argument for a consumer fuel tax makes the assumption that cars are the biggest source of air pollution, and we need to question if that’s an accurate assumption.

Gebruikersvoorbeelden & Beoordelingsresultaten

1

Gebruikersvoorbeeld #1

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use...

Score
25

Gebruikersvoorbeeld

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Beoordelingsresultaat

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章在回应教授的问题方面做得很好。然而,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和细节来支持你的看法。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,有一些小错误需要注意。

英文改进示例:

  1. Instead of "it may do some good to the problem," consider writing "it may partially address the problem."

  2. Instead of "we cannot avoiding the problem," consider writing "we cannot avoid the problem."

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织的角度来看,你的文章整体上是清晰易懂的。然而,有一些建议可以帮助你进一步改进文章。首先,在引言部分,可以更明确地表达自己的观点。其次,在正文段落中,尝试使用更多的过渡词汇和短语来连接不同观点。

英文改进示例:

  1. 在引言部分,可以写:“In my opinion, raising fuel prices might have some positive effects on reducing air pollution, but it could also lead to other issues in our daily lives.”

  2. 在正文段落中使用过渡词汇,例如:“Firstly, we are heavily reliant on private vehicles for work and travel. However, using public transportation can be time-consuming and inconvenient for some people.”

5. 语法批改

NowdaysNowadays(misspelling), the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controllcontrol(misspelling) the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out (Two consecutive spaces)in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoidingavoid(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) the problem of air pollution simply by rasingracing(misspelling) the price of (Two consecutive spaces)fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergencyregency(misspelling) and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Title: 6 文章修订

Nowadays, the issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe. Some individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage. While this approach may have some benefits, I believe it could lead to additional problems in our daily lives.

Firstly, many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel. Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules. Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.

Secondly, simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience. Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events. It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption. This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. (197 words)

Nowdays, the Nowadays, the issue of air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. becoming increasingly severe (changed "worse and worse" to "increasingly severe" for a more formal tone). Some people individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage (corrected "raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars" for clarity and grammar). While this approach may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, have some benefits, I believe it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more could lead to additional problems in our life. daily lives.

Firstly, we many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel (rephrased "we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using travel" for clarity). Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules (rephrased "Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in sometimes" for clarity). Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. despite the increased cost.

Secondly, we simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience (rephrased "we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. convenience" for clarity and grammar). Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Last but not least, we Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events (rephrased "we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it things" for clarity and grammar). It is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption (rephrased "So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.all" for clarity). This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Air pollution issue
   - Raising fuel prices proposal
   - Potential problems

2. Reliance on private vehicles
   - Work and travel
   - Inconvenience of public transportation
   - Time-consuming

3. Ineffectiveness of raising fuel prices
   - People still choose convenience
   - No guarantee of reduced car usage or emissions

4. Essential situations for private cars
   - Emergencies
   - Important events

5. Alternative solutions
   - Cleaner energy sources development
   - Promoting adoption

6. Conclusion
   - Comprehensive and long-lasting solution needed for air pollution problem 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Severe/sɪˈvɪr/AdjectiveExtremely bad or serious严重的The issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe.
Feasible/ˈfiːzəbl/AdjectivePossible to do easily or conveniently可行的Public transportation may not be a feasible option for those with busy schedules.
Consequently/ˈkɒnsɪkwəntli/AdverbAs a result因此Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.
Guarantee/ˌɡærənˈti://Noun, Verb/A formal assurance; to ensure/保证;确保/This measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.
Essential/ɪˈsenʃəl/AdjectiveAbsolutely necessary必要的It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such essential circumstances.
Unrealistic/ˌʌnrɪəˈlɪstɪk//Adjective/Not compatible with reality/不切实际的/It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances.
Solely/ˈsəʊlli/AdverbOnly, exclusively仅仅Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources.
Comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv//Adjective/Including all or nearly all elements/全面的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.
Long-lasting/lɒŋ ˈlæstɪŋ//Adjective/Continuing for a long period of time/持久的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Hoe Academic Discussion Wordt Beoordeeld

De TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak wordt beoordeeld aan de hand van de officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubriek. AI-beoordeling analyseert elk antwoord op meerdere dimensies.

Relevantie & Bijdrage

Gaat het antwoord in op de vraag en levert het een zinvolle bijdrage aan de discussie?

Taalgebruik

Grammaticale nauwkeurigheid, woordenschat en kwaliteit van de zinsbouw.

Uitwerking & Onderbouwing

Zijn de ideeën goed uitgewerkt met specifieke voorbeelden en duidelijke redenering?

Veelvoorkomende Patronen in Antwoorden

Op basis van analyse van gebruikersinzendingen voor deze taak, hier zijn veelvoorkomende patronen die zijn waargenomen in antwoorden van studenten.

Veel studenten geven een duidelijke mening, maar missen specifieke onderbouwende voorbeelden.

Sterke antwoorden verwijzen direct naar de leestekst en de standpunten van andere deelnemers.

Hoger scorende antwoorden gebruiken gevarieerde zinsstructuren en academisch vocabulaire.

Timemanagement is een belangrijke factor — antwoorden die gehaast aanvoelen scoren doorgaans lager op uitwerking.

Leertips

1

Lees de opdracht zorgvuldig en identificeer alle onderdelen van de vraag voordat je begint te schrijven.

2

Verwijs in je antwoord naar de leestekst en de meningen van de andere studenten.

3

Gebruik specifieke voorbeelden om je hoofdpunt te onderbouwen — vermijd algemene uitspraken.

4

Streef naar 120-150 woorden. Langere antwoorden zijn niet altijd beter; duidelijkheid en focus zijn belangrijker.

5

Oefen met getimede antwoorden (10 minuten) om vlotheid op te bouwen onder examenomstandigheden.

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat is de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak?
Bij de TOEFL Academic Discussion-taak moet je bijdragen aan een online klassikale discussie. Je leest de vraag van een professor en de reacties van andere studenten, en schrijft vervolgens binnen ongeveer 10 minuten je eigen bijdrage waarin je jouw mening verwoordt en onderbouwt.
Hoe wordt de Academic Discussion-taak beoordeeld?
De taak wordt beoordeeld op een schaal van 0-5, gebaseerd op de relevantie voor de discussie, de kwaliteit van het taalgebruik (grammatica, woordenschat, zinsbouw) en hoe goed je jouw ideeën ontwikkelt en onderbouwt met concrete voorbeelden en redenering.
Wat zijn de gebruikersvoorbeelden op deze pagina?
Dit zijn echte antwoorden die zijn ingediend door TOEFL-kandidaten die deze vraag hebben geoefend op LingoLeap. Elk voorbeeld is beoordeeld door onze AI-beoordelingsengine, die een score geeft en gedetailleerde feedback over sterke punten en verbeterpunten.
Hoe nauwkeurig is de AI-beoordeling?
De AI-beoordelingsengine van LingoLeap is getraind op officiële ETS-beoordelingsrubrieken en gekalibreerd aan de hand van scores van menselijke beoordelaars. Hoewel geen enkel geautomatiseerd systeem perfect is, biedt het betrouwbare feedback voor oefendoeleinden en helpt het specifieke verbeterpunten te identificeren.
Hoe kan ik deze Academic Discussion-taak oefenen?
Je kunt oefenen door je aan te melden voor een gratis LingoLeap-account. Schrijf je eigen antwoord op precies deze vraag, dien het in en ontvang direct AI-feedback met gedetailleerd commentaar op je tekst.
Hoe lang moet mijn Academic Discussion-antwoord zijn?
Streef naar 120-150 woorden. De taak geeft je 10 minuten om je antwoord te schrijven. Focus op duidelijkheid, onderbouw je mening met concrete voorbeelden en verwijs naar de discussiecontext in plaats van een langer antwoord te schrijven.

Behaal vandaag nog je doelscore!

Met LingoLeap, dé expert in Engelse taalexamens

Bereik je droombeoordeling sneller

Probeer nu gratis