TOEFLIELTS
Español
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: our professor is teaching a class on economy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

Envíos reales de usuarios con evaluación y retroalimentación impulsadas por IA

1 ejemplos enviados por usuarios disponibles

Comenzar Práctica Gratis

Resumen de la Tarea

ProfessorToday, we will examine what economists call incentives-the motivations that lead people to make certain choices. Cost is a major category of economic incentives. People tend to change their behavior when a particular choice gets more expensive. Let's discuss an example. Some economists argue that a good way to reduce air pollution is for governments to raise the cost(through taxes or other means) of fuel for cars. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?Why?

Student AI think it would be a good idea to raise fuel prices. Making it more expensive to drive cars would cause many people to choose public transportation or use bicycles instead. In my city, they've just added bicycle lanes to all of the major roads. So, it would be easy to give up driving.

Student BI disagree. Why should individuals be punished with such an added expense in their daily lives? The argument for a consumer fuel tax makes the assumption that cars are the biggest source of air pollution, and we need to question if that’s an accurate assumption.

Ejemplos de Usuarios y Resultados de Evaluación

1

Ejemplo de Usuario #1

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use...

Puntuación
25

Ejemplo de Usuario

Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Resultado de la Evaluación

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章在回应教授的问题方面做得很好。然而,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和细节来支持你的看法。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,有一些小错误需要注意。

英文改进示例:

  1. Instead of "it may do some good to the problem," consider writing "it may partially address the problem."

  2. Instead of "we cannot avoiding the problem," consider writing "we cannot avoid the problem."

4. 文章结构与组织

从文章结构和组织的角度来看,你的文章整体上是清晰易懂的。然而,有一些建议可以帮助你进一步改进文章。首先,在引言部分,可以更明确地表达自己的观点。其次,在正文段落中,尝试使用更多的过渡词汇和短语来连接不同观点。

英文改进示例:

  1. 在引言部分,可以写:“In my opinion, raising fuel prices might have some positive effects on reducing air pollution, but it could also lead to other issues in our daily lives.”

  2. 在正文段落中使用过渡词汇,例如:“Firstly, we are heavily reliant on private vehicles for work and travel. However, using public transportation can be time-consuming and inconvenient for some people.”

5. 语法批改

NowdaysNowadays(misspelling), the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controllcontrol(misspelling) the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out (Two consecutive spaces)in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoidingavoid(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) the problem of air pollution simply by rasingracing(misspelling) the price of (Two consecutive spaces)fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergencyregency(misspelling) and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.

Title: 6 文章修订

Nowadays, the issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe. Some individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage. While this approach may have some benefits, I believe it could lead to additional problems in our daily lives.

Firstly, many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel. Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules. Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.

Secondly, simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience. Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events. It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption. This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. (197 words)

Nowdays, the Nowadays, the issue of air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. becoming increasingly severe (changed "worse and worse" to "increasingly severe" for a more formal tone). Some people individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage (corrected "raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars" for clarity and grammar). While this approach may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, have some benefits, I believe it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more could lead to additional problems in our life. daily lives.

Firstly, we many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel (rephrased "we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using travel" for clarity). Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules (rephrased "Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in sometimes" for clarity). Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. despite the increased cost.

Secondly, we simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience (rephrased "we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. convenience" for clarity and grammar). Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.

Last but not least, we Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events (rephrased "we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it things" for clarity and grammar). It is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption (rephrased "So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.all" for clarity). This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Air pollution issue
   - Raising fuel prices proposal
   - Potential problems

2. Reliance on private vehicles
   - Work and travel
   - Inconvenience of public transportation
   - Time-consuming

3. Ineffectiveness of raising fuel prices
   - People still choose convenience
   - No guarantee of reduced car usage or emissions

4. Essential situations for private cars
   - Emergencies
   - Important events

5. Alternative solutions
   - Cleaner energy sources development
   - Promoting adoption

6. Conclusion
   - Comprehensive and long-lasting solution needed for air pollution problem 

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Severe/sɪˈvɪr/AdjectiveExtremely bad or serious严重的The issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe.
Feasible/ˈfiːzəbl/AdjectivePossible to do easily or conveniently可行的Public transportation may not be a feasible option for those with busy schedules.
Consequently/ˈkɒnsɪkwəntli/AdverbAs a result因此Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.
Guarantee/ˌɡærənˈti://Noun, Verb/A formal assurance; to ensure/保证;确保/This measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.
Essential/ɪˈsenʃəl/AdjectiveAbsolutely necessary必要的It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such essential circumstances.
Unrealistic/ˌʌnrɪəˈlɪstɪk//Adjective/Not compatible with reality/不切实际的/It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances.
Solely/ˈsəʊlli/AdverbOnly, exclusively仅仅Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources.
Comprehensive/ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv//Adjective/Including all or nearly all elements/全面的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.
Long-lasting/lɒŋ ˈlæstɪŋ//Adjective/Continuing for a long period of time/持久的/This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.

Cómo se Evalúa la Academic Discussion

La tarea TOEFL Academic Discussion se evalúa según la rúbrica oficial de ETS. La evaluación con IA analiza cada respuesta en varias dimensiones.

Relevancia y Contribución

¿La respuesta aborda la pregunta y aporta de manera significativa a la discusión?

Uso del Idioma

Precisión gramatical, variedad de vocabulario y calidad de la estructura de las oraciones.

Desarrollo y Fundamentación

¿Las ideas están bien desarrolladas con ejemplos específicos y un razonamiento claro?

Patrones Comunes en las Respuestas

Según el análisis de los envíos de usuarios para esta tarea, estos son los patrones comunes observados en las respuestas de los estudiantes.

Muchos estudiantes expresan opiniones claras, pero carecen de ejemplos específicos que las respalden.

Las respuestas sólidas hacen referencia directa al texto de lectura y a los puntos de vista de los demás participantes.

Las respuestas con mejor puntuación usan estructuras de oraciones variadas y vocabulario académico.

La gestión del tiempo es un factor clave — las respuestas que parecen apresuradas tienden a puntuar más bajo en desarrollo.

Consejos de Aprendizaje

1

Lee el enunciado con atención e identifica todas las partes de la pregunta antes de escribir.

2

Haz referencia al texto de lectura y a las opiniones de los otros estudiantes en tu respuesta.

3

Usa ejemplos específicos para respaldar tu idea principal — evita afirmaciones genéricas.

4

Apunta a 120-150 palabras. Las respuestas más largas no siempre son mejores; la claridad y el enfoque importan más.

5

Practica respuestas cronometradas (10 minutos) para ganar fluidez en condiciones de examen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Qué es la tarea de Discusión Académica del TOEFL?
La tarea de Discusión Académica del TOEFL requiere que participes en un debate de clase en línea. Leerás la pregunta de un profesor y las respuestas de otros estudiantes, y luego escribirás tu propia publicación expresando y respaldando tu opinión en aproximadamente 10 minutos.
¿Cómo se califica la tarea de Discusión Académica?
La tarea se califica en una escala de 0 a 5 según la relevancia con respecto a la discusión, la calidad del uso del idioma (gramática, vocabulario, estructura de las oraciones) y qué tan bien desarrollas y respaldas tus ideas con ejemplos y razonamientos específicos.
¿Qué son las muestras de usuarios en esta página?
Son respuestas reales enviadas por candidatos del TOEFL que practicaron esta pregunta en LingoLeap. Cada muestra ha sido evaluada por nuestro motor de calificación con IA, que proporciona una puntuación y comentarios detallados sobre fortalezas y áreas de mejora.
¿Qué tan precisa es la evaluación con IA?
El motor de evaluación con IA de LingoLeap está entrenado con las rúbricas oficiales de calificación de ETS y calibrado con puntuaciones de evaluadores humanos. Aunque ningún sistema automatizado es perfecto, ofrece comentarios confiables para fines de práctica y ayuda a identificar áreas específicas de mejora.
¿Cómo puedo practicar esta tarea de Discusión Académica?
Puedes practicar registrándote para obtener una cuenta gratuita de LingoLeap. Escribe tu propia respuesta a esta pregunta exacta, envíala y recibe una evaluación instantánea con IA con comentarios detallados sobre tu redacción.
¿Qué extensión debe tener mi respuesta de Discusión Académica?
Apunta a 120-150 palabras. La tarea te da 10 minutos para escribir tu respuesta. Concéntrate en la claridad, respalda tu opinión con ejemplos específicos y haz referencia al contexto de la discusión en lugar de escribir una respuesta más larga.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now