TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social science, Write a post responding to the professor's question, in your response, you should *express and support your personal opinion*make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

Parents give their children weekly money to buy whateverthey want, Some people think this can cause bad habitsand ideas about money in children, Others think the opposite,What's your opinion? Piease use the discussionboard to share your thoughts.

Ella

Giving children pocket money every week can help them developfinancial awareness, Handling money is crucial to a person's growthand we will be dealing with money throughout our lives. As long as theamount of pocket money is controlled and conforms to the family'seconomic situation,it will not have a bad effect on children.

Stefen

I agree with Ella. Parents can guide their children if they are worried about their spending, For example, prepare a book for children to record their income and expenditure. Get them into the habit of keeping track of everyday purchases, At the same time, parents can analyze with their children whether the consumption in the account book is reasonable and help them develop good consumption habits.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insi...

スコア
22

ユーザーサンプル

I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, as children are too young to fight against the lure. To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childen may have more opptunities to access some harmful things. For instance, a classsmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

虽然你的文章回答了教授的问题并表达了你的观点,但是在论证方面还有待加强。建议你在论述观点时,提供更多具体的例子和详细的解释来支持你的观点。此外,注意避免使用过于复杂或冗长的句子,以免影响文章的可读性。

Example 1: Instead of: "Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childen may have more opptunities to access some harmful things." Try: "With the rapid development of the internet, children are more likely to be exposed to harmful content."

Example 2: Instead of: "For instance, a classsmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid." Try: "For example, my younger brother's primary school classmate secretly purchased violent video tapes which negatively influenced his mindset – a serious issue for young children."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章整体结构尚可,但在段落划分和过渡方面还有改进空间。建议将不同观点或论证分成独立段落,并使用恰当的过渡词汇连接各个段落,使文章更加流畅。

Example 1: Instead of: "I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights." Try: "I disagree with Ella and Stefen's view that giving weekly money to children has positive effects. I would like to present some counterarguments."

Example 2: Instead of: "To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not." Try: "One reason for my disagreement is that children receiving weekly money may face numerous risks when encountering tempting items, regardless of whether they are harmful or not."

5. 语法批改

I oppose Ella and StefenStephen(misspelling)'s perspective that giving weekly money to children can leadslead(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, as children are too young to fight against the lure. To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childenchildren(misspelling) may have more opptunitiesopportunities(misspelling) to access some harmful things. For instance, a classsmateclassmate(misspelling) of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapesvideotapes(video tape (videotape)) himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatlyultimately(misspelling) lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid.

Title: 6 文章修订

I respectfully disagree with Ella and Stefen's view that providing children with weekly pocket money leads to positive outcomes, and I would like to offer some alternative perspectives. In my opinion, the potential drawbacks of this practice outweigh the benefits, as children may not possess the maturity to resist temptation.

To elaborate, children who receive a weekly allowance from their parents may be exposed to numerous risks associated with enticing yet potentially harmful items or activities. With the rapid development of global networks and the internet, children have increased access to potentially damaging content.

For example, a classmate of my younger brother, who is currently in primary school, secretly purchased violent video tapes without informing his parents. This ultimately had a negative impact on his mental well-being, which could pose serious problems for a child at such a young age. (143 words)

Revised essay: Title: 7 文章批改

I oppose respectfully disagree (changed "oppose" to "respectfully disagree" for a more polite tone) with Ella and Stefen's perspective (changed "view" to "perspective" for variety) that giving weekly money to children can leads lead (corrected grammar by changing "leads" to "lead") to positive effects, and would like to give offer some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, advantages (rephrased for clarity), as children are too young to fight against the lure. lure (rephrased for a more natural tone).

To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have face many risks (changed "have so much risks facing those facing" to "face many risks") associated with attractive things, no matter regardless of whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the with the rapid development of global network networks and internet developing rapidly, childen the internet, children may have more opptunities opportunities (corrected spelling) to access some potentially harmful things. content.

For instance, a classsmate classmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad parents. This ultimately led (corrected grammar by changing "lead" to "led") to a negative influence on his mind, and that which could be a serious problem for a kid.child at such a young age (rephrased for clarity).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Disagree with Ella and Stefen's view
   - Potential drawbacks outweigh benefits

2. Lack of maturity in children
   - Temptation and misuse of pocket money

3. Exposure to risks
   - Harmful items or activities
   - Influence of global networks and the internet

4. Real-life example
   - Younger brother's classmate
   - Purchased violent video tapes without informing parents

5. Negative impact on mental well-being

6. Conclusion 
   - Importance of considering potential dangers before providing pocket money to children

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Drawbacks/ˈdrɔːbæk/NounA disadvantage or problem that makes something a less attractive option.缺点The potential drawbacks of this practice outweigh the benefits.
Maturity/məˈtʃʊrɪti/NounThe state, fact, or period of being mature; full development成熟Children may not possess the maturity to resist temptation.
Enticing/ɪnˈtaɪsɪŋ/AdjectiveAttractive or tempting; alluring诱人的Enticing yet potentially harmful items or activities
Potentially/pəˈtɛnʃəli/AdverbHaving or showing the capacity to develop into something in the future潜在地Potentially damaging content
Global networks/ˈɡloʊbəl ˈnɛtˌwɜrks/NounWorldwide interconnected systems or groups全球网络With the rapid development of global networks and the internet
Primary school/ˈpraɪməri skuːl/NounA school for children between the ages of about five and eleven years old小学A classmate of my younger brother, who is currently in primary school
Secretly/ˈsiːkrɪtli/Adverb_In a way that is kept hidden from others; privately, covertly _秘密地Secretly purchased violent video tapes without informing his parents
Mental well-being/ˈmɛntl wɛl bi ɪŋ/Noun_A state of mental health and happiness _心理健康This ultimately had a negative impact on his mental well-being.
Pose/poʊz/Verb_To present or constitute (a problem, danger, or difficulty) _构成Which could pose serious problems for a child at such a young age.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now