TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social science, Write a post responding to the professor's question, in your response, you should *express and support your personal opinion*make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

Parents give their children weekly money to buy whateverthey want, Some people think this can cause bad habitsand ideas about money in children, Others think the opposite,What's your opinion? Piease use the discussionboard to share your thoughts.

Ella

Giving children pocket money every week can help them developfinancial awareness, Handling money is crucial to a person's growthand we will be dealing with money throughout our lives. As long as theamount of pocket money is controlled and conforms to the family'seconomic situation,it will not have a bad effect on children.

Stefen

I agree with Ella. Parents can guide their children if they are worried about their spending, For example, prepare a book for children to record their income and expenditure. Get them into the habit of keeping track of everyday purchases, At the same time, parents can analyze with their children whether the consumption in the account book is reasonable and help them develop good consumption habits.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insi...

점수
22

사용자 예시

I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, as children are too young to fight against the lure. To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childen may have more opptunities to access some harmful things. For instance, a classsmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

虽然你的文章回答了教授的问题并表达了你的观点,但是在论证方面还有待加强。建议你在论述观点时,提供更多具体的例子和详细的解释来支持你的观点。此外,注意避免使用过于复杂或冗长的句子,以免影响文章的可读性。

Example 1: Instead of: "Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childen may have more opptunities to access some harmful things." Try: "With the rapid development of the internet, children are more likely to be exposed to harmful content."

Example 2: Instead of: "For instance, a classsmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid." Try: "For example, my younger brother's primary school classmate secretly purchased violent video tapes which negatively influenced his mindset – a serious issue for young children."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章整体结构尚可,但在段落划分和过渡方面还有改进空间。建议将不同观点或论证分成独立段落,并使用恰当的过渡词汇连接各个段落,使文章更加流畅。

Example 1: Instead of: "I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights." Try: "I disagree with Ella and Stefen's view that giving weekly money to children has positive effects. I would like to present some counterarguments."

Example 2: Instead of: "To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not." Try: "One reason for my disagreement is that children receiving weekly money may face numerous risks when encountering tempting items, regardless of whether they are harmful or not."

5. 语法批改

I oppose Ella and StefenStephen(misspelling)'s perspective that giving weekly money to children can leadslead(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, as children are too young to fight against the lure. To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childenchildren(misspelling) may have more opptunitiesopportunities(misspelling) to access some harmful things. For instance, a classsmateclassmate(misspelling) of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapesvideotapes(video tape (videotape)) himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatlyultimately(misspelling) lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid.

Title: 6 文章修订

I respectfully disagree with Ella and Stefen's view that providing children with weekly pocket money leads to positive outcomes, and I would like to offer some alternative perspectives. In my opinion, the potential drawbacks of this practice outweigh the benefits, as children may not possess the maturity to resist temptation.

To elaborate, children who receive a weekly allowance from their parents may be exposed to numerous risks associated with enticing yet potentially harmful items or activities. With the rapid development of global networks and the internet, children have increased access to potentially damaging content.

For example, a classmate of my younger brother, who is currently in primary school, secretly purchased violent video tapes without informing his parents. This ultimately had a negative impact on his mental well-being, which could pose serious problems for a child at such a young age. (143 words)

Revised essay: Title: 7 文章批改

I oppose respectfully disagree (changed "oppose" to "respectfully disagree" for a more polite tone) with Ella and Stefen's perspective (changed "view" to "perspective" for variety) that giving weekly money to children can leads lead (corrected grammar by changing "leads" to "lead") to positive effects, and would like to give offer some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, advantages (rephrased for clarity), as children are too young to fight against the lure. lure (rephrased for a more natural tone).

To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have face many risks (changed "have so much risks facing those facing" to "face many risks") associated with attractive things, no matter regardless of whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the with the rapid development of global network networks and internet developing rapidly, childen the internet, children may have more opptunities opportunities (corrected spelling) to access some potentially harmful things. content.

For instance, a classsmate classmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad parents. This ultimately led (corrected grammar by changing "lead" to "led") to a negative influence on his mind, and that which could be a serious problem for a kid.child at such a young age (rephrased for clarity).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Disagree with Ella and Stefen's view
   - Potential drawbacks outweigh benefits

2. Lack of maturity in children
   - Temptation and misuse of pocket money

3. Exposure to risks
   - Harmful items or activities
   - Influence of global networks and the internet

4. Real-life example
   - Younger brother's classmate
   - Purchased violent video tapes without informing parents

5. Negative impact on mental well-being

6. Conclusion 
   - Importance of considering potential dangers before providing pocket money to children

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Drawbacks/ˈdrɔːbæk/NounA disadvantage or problem that makes something a less attractive option.缺点The potential drawbacks of this practice outweigh the benefits.
Maturity/məˈtʃʊrɪti/NounThe state, fact, or period of being mature; full development成熟Children may not possess the maturity to resist temptation.
Enticing/ɪnˈtaɪsɪŋ/AdjectiveAttractive or tempting; alluring诱人的Enticing yet potentially harmful items or activities
Potentially/pəˈtɛnʃəli/AdverbHaving or showing the capacity to develop into something in the future潜在地Potentially damaging content
Global networks/ˈɡloʊbəl ˈnɛtˌwɜrks/NounWorldwide interconnected systems or groups全球网络With the rapid development of global networks and the internet
Primary school/ˈpraɪməri skuːl/NounA school for children between the ages of about five and eleven years old小学A classmate of my younger brother, who is currently in primary school
Secretly/ˈsiːkrɪtli/Adverb_In a way that is kept hidden from others; privately, covertly _秘密地Secretly purchased violent video tapes without informing his parents
Mental well-being/ˈmɛntl wɛl bi ɪŋ/Noun_A state of mental health and happiness _心理健康This ultimately had a negative impact on his mental well-being.
Pose/poʊz/Verb_To present or constitute (a problem, danger, or difficulty) _构成Which could pose serious problems for a child at such a young age.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now