TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social science. Write a post responding to the professor's question. In your response, you should • express and support your personal opinion • make a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words. Dr. Gupta Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? Please use the discussion board to share your thoughts.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

Student A

Ella Giving children pocket money every week can help them develop financial awareness. Handling money is crucial to a person's growth and we will be dealing with money throughout our lives. As long as the amount of pocket money is controlled and conforms to the family's economic situation, it will not have a bad effect on children.

Student B

Stefen I agree with Ella. Parents can guide their children if they are worried about their spending. For example, prepare a book for children to record their income and expenditure. Get them into the habit of keeping track of everyday purchases. At the same time, parents can analyze with their children whether the consumption in the account book is reasonable and help them develop good consumption habits.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

From my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just as what A and B claim. For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fos...

점수
26

사용자 예시

From my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just as what A and B claim. For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fostered/cultivated in this way. To be specific, due to immaturity, children may purchase things out of curiosity instead of utility. For example, when seeing advertising of toys or snacks, they may get attracted and make a purchase irrationally with no regard of price. However, weekly money from parents can effectively impede this behavior. With limited budget every week, children have to think twice before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste. Also, parents’ guidance can also make a difference/contribution. For example, with parents’ instruction, children will learn how to establish a bank account and save deposits to earn bank interest, which allows them to buy things they are eager to for a long time. For another thing, by offering pocket money to children on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. Giving pocket money, to some extent, means a grant of autonomy. With the trust from parents, an intimate relationship is easier to be built between parents and kids.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

整体而言,这篇文章很好地回答了问题,观点清晰且有充分的论证。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:1) 文章中的一些句子略显生硬,可以尝试使用更自然的表达方式;2) 在语法和词汇方面还有一些小错误,需要加以修正。

示例1(改进前):With limited budget every week, children have to think twice before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste. 示例1(改进后):With a limited budget each week, children will need to carefully consider their purchases, which helps prevent unnecessary spending.

示例2(改进前):For another thing, by offering pocket money to children on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. 示例2(改进后):Furthermore, by providing children with weekly pocket money, parents can foster a strong bond and trust between themselves and their kids.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织基本合理,包括引言、主体和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定的观点,并提供支持细节。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:1) 在段落之间增加过渡性词语或短语,使文章更连贯;2) 在引言部分简要概述文章的主要观点,使读者更容易理解。

示例1(改进前):For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fostered/cultivated in this way. 示例1(改进后):Firstly, providing children with weekly pocket money can help foster their ability to manage money.

示例2(改进前):Also, parents’ guidance can also make a difference/contribution. 示例2(改进后):In addition, parents' guidance plays a crucial role in teaching children about responsible spending and saving habits.

5. 语法批改

From my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just as what A and B claim. For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fostered/cultivated in this way. To be specific, due to immaturity, children may purchase things out of curiosity instead of utility. For example, when seeing advertising of toys or snacks, they may get attracted and make a purchase irrationally with no regard of price. However, weekly money from parents can effectively impede this behavior. With limited budget every week, children have to think twice before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste. Also, parents’ guidance can also make a difference/contribution. For example, with parents’ instruction, children will learn how to establish a bank account and save deposits to earn bank interest, which allows them to buy things they are eager to for a long time. For another thing, by offering pocket money to children on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. Giving pocket money, to some extent, means a grant of autonomy. With the trust from parents, an intimate relationship is easier to be built between parents and kids.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, providing children with weekly pocket money, as mentioned by Ella and Stefen, can indeed be beneficial. Firstly, it helps cultivate their financial management skills. Children may initially make impulsive purchases due to their curiosity rather than practicality. For instance, they might be drawn to advertisements for toys or snacks and buy them without considering the cost. However, a limited weekly budget can effectively curb such behavior, as children will need to think carefully before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste.

Furthermore, parental guidance can significantly contribute to their financial education. With proper instruction from parents, children can learn essential financial skills such as opening a bank account and saving money to earn interest. This knowledge will enable them to save up for items they genuinely desire over time.

Lastly, providing pocket money on a weekly basis can foster a healthy parent-child relationship. Granting autonomy through pocket money demonstrates trust from parents towards their children. This trust paves the way for a stronger bond between parents and kids.

In conclusion, offering children weekly pocket money has several advantages including the development of financial management skills and fostering closer parent-child relationships. (196 words)

From In my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just opinion, providing children with weekly pocket money, as what mentioned by Ella and Stefen (clarified names for A and B claim. B), can indeed be beneficial. Firstly, it helps cultivate (replaced "fostered" with "cultivate" for better word choice) their financial management skills. Children may initially make impulsive purchases due to their curiosity rather than practicality (rephrased for clarity). For one thing, the ability to manage money can instance, they might be fostered/cultivated in this way. ¶ To be specific, due to immaturity, children may purchase things out of curiosity instead of utility. For example, when seeing advertising of drawn to advertisements for toys or snacks, they may get attracted and make a purchase irrationally with no regard of price. snacks and buy them without considering the cost. However, weekly money from parents a limited weekly budget can effectively impede this behavior. With limited budget every week, children have curb (changed "impede" to "curb" for better word choice) such behavior, as children will need to think twice carefully before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste.

Also, parents’ Furthermore, parental guidance can also make a difference/contribution. ¶ For example, significantly contribute (replaced "make a difference/contribution" with parents’ instruction, children will "contribute" for conciseness) to their financial education. With proper instruction from parents, children can learn how to establish essential financial skills such as opening a bank account and saving money to earn interest. This knowledge will enable them to save deposits to earn bank interest, which allows them to buy things up for items they are eager to for a long genuinely desire over time.

For another thing, by offering pocket money to children Lastly, providing pocket money on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. Giving pocket money, to some extent, means a grant weekly basis can foster (used "foster" here instead of autonomy. With the repeating "cultivate") a healthy parent-child relationship. Granting autonomy through pocket money demonstrates trust from parents, an intimate relationship is easier to be built parents towards their children (rephrased for clarity). This trust paves the way for a stronger bond between parents and kids.kids.

In conclusion, offering children weekly pocket money has several advantages including the development of financial management skills and fostering closer parent-child relationships (summarized main points in conclusion).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Benefits of weekly pocket money

2. Financial management skills
   - Impulsive purchases
   - Limited weekly budget

3. Parental guidance
   - Financial education
   - Opening a bank account and saving money

4. Healthy parent-child relationship
   - Autonomy and trust

5. Conclusion
   - Advantages of weekly pocket money

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
beneficial/ˌbenəˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveproducing good results or helpful effects有益的Providing children with weekly pocket money can be beneficial.
impulsive/ɪmˈpʌlsɪv/adjectiveacting suddenly without thinking carefully冲动的Children may initially make impulsive purchases due to their curiosity.
practicality/prækˈtɪkələti/nounthe quality of being suitable for a particular use |实用性 |They might buy toys or snacks without considering the practicality.
curb/kɜrb/ |verb |to control or limit something that is not wanted |限制,抑制 |A limited weekly budget can effectively curb such behavior.
parental/pəˈrentl/ |adjective |connected with parents or with being a parent |父母的,亲代的 |Parental guidance can significantly contribute to their financial education.
instruction/ɪnˈstrʌkʃən/ |noun |detailed information telling how something should be done |指导,说明 |With proper instruction from parents, children can learn essential financial skills.
autonomy/ɔːˈtɒnəmi/ |noun |the right of a group of people to govern itself or control its own affairs |自主权,自治权 |Granting autonomy through pocket money demonstrates trust from parents.
bond/bɒnd/ |noun |a close connection joining two or more people |纽带,联系 |This trust paves the way for a stronger bond between parents and kids.
foster/ˈfɒstər/ |verb |to encourage the development of something |促进,培养 |Offering children weekly pocket money fosters closer parent-child relationships.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now