TOEFLIELTS
Deutsch
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social science. Write a post responding to the professor's question. In your response, you should • express and support your personal opinion • make a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words. Dr. Gupta Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? Please use the discussion board to share your thoughts.

Echte Nutzereinsendungen mit KI-gestützter Bewertung und Feedback

1 nutzereingereichte Beispiele verfügbar

Kostenlos üben starten

Aufgabenübersicht

Professor

Student A

Ella Giving children pocket money every week can help them develop financial awareness. Handling money is crucial to a person's growth and we will be dealing with money throughout our lives. As long as the amount of pocket money is controlled and conforms to the family's economic situation, it will not have a bad effect on children.

Student B

Stefen I agree with Ella. Parents can guide their children if they are worried about their spending. For example, prepare a book for children to record their income and expenditure. Get them into the habit of keeping track of everyday purchases. At the same time, parents can analyze with their children whether the consumption in the account book is reasonable and help them develop good consumption habits.

Nutzerbeispiele & Bewertungsergebnisse

1

Nutzerbeispiel #1

From my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just as what A and B claim. For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fos...

Punktzahl
26

Nutzerbeispiel

From my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just as what A and B claim. For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fostered/cultivated in this way. To be specific, due to immaturity, children may purchase things out of curiosity instead of utility. For example, when seeing advertising of toys or snacks, they may get attracted and make a purchase irrationally with no regard of price. However, weekly money from parents can effectively impede this behavior. With limited budget every week, children have to think twice before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste. Also, parents’ guidance can also make a difference/contribution. For example, with parents’ instruction, children will learn how to establish a bank account and save deposits to earn bank interest, which allows them to buy things they are eager to for a long time. For another thing, by offering pocket money to children on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. Giving pocket money, to some extent, means a grant of autonomy. With the trust from parents, an intimate relationship is easier to be built between parents and kids.

Bewertungsergebnis

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5.0

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

整体而言,这篇文章很好地回答了问题,观点清晰且有充分的论证。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:1) 文章中的一些句子略显生硬,可以尝试使用更自然的表达方式;2) 在语法和词汇方面还有一些小错误,需要加以修正。

示例1(改进前):With limited budget every week, children have to think twice before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste. 示例1(改进后):With a limited budget each week, children will need to carefully consider their purchases, which helps prevent unnecessary spending.

示例2(改进前):For another thing, by offering pocket money to children on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. 示例2(改进后):Furthermore, by providing children with weekly pocket money, parents can foster a strong bond and trust between themselves and their kids.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织基本合理,包括引言、主体和结论。每段都集中讨论一个特定的观点,并提供支持细节。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:1) 在段落之间增加过渡性词语或短语,使文章更连贯;2) 在引言部分简要概述文章的主要观点,使读者更容易理解。

示例1(改进前):For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fostered/cultivated in this way. 示例1(改进后):Firstly, providing children with weekly pocket money can help foster their ability to manage money.

示例2(改进前):Also, parents’ guidance can also make a difference/contribution. 示例2(改进后):In addition, parents' guidance plays a crucial role in teaching children about responsible spending and saving habits.

5. 语法批改

From my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just as what A and B claim. For one thing, the ability to manage money can be fostered/cultivated in this way. To be specific, due to immaturity, children may purchase things out of curiosity instead of utility. For example, when seeing advertising of toys or snacks, they may get attracted and make a purchase irrationally with no regard of price. However, weekly money from parents can effectively impede this behavior. With limited budget every week, children have to think twice before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste. Also, parents’ guidance can also make a difference/contribution. For example, with parents’ instruction, children will learn how to establish a bank account and save deposits to earn bank interest, which allows them to buy things they are eager to for a long time. For another thing, by offering pocket money to children on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. Giving pocket money, to some extent, means a grant of autonomy. With the trust from parents, an intimate relationship is easier to be built between parents and kids.

Title: 6 文章修订

In my opinion, providing children with weekly pocket money, as mentioned by Ella and Stefen, can indeed be beneficial. Firstly, it helps cultivate their financial management skills. Children may initially make impulsive purchases due to their curiosity rather than practicality. For instance, they might be drawn to advertisements for toys or snacks and buy them without considering the cost. However, a limited weekly budget can effectively curb such behavior, as children will need to think carefully before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste.

Furthermore, parental guidance can significantly contribute to their financial education. With proper instruction from parents, children can learn essential financial skills such as opening a bank account and saving money to earn interest. This knowledge will enable them to save up for items they genuinely desire over time.

Lastly, providing pocket money on a weekly basis can foster a healthy parent-child relationship. Granting autonomy through pocket money demonstrates trust from parents towards their children. This trust paves the way for a stronger bond between parents and kids.

In conclusion, offering children weekly pocket money has several advantages including the development of financial management skills and fostering closer parent-child relationships. (196 words)

From In my perspective, offering children weekly money brings benefits, just opinion, providing children with weekly pocket money, as what mentioned by Ella and Stefen (clarified names for A and B claim. B), can indeed be beneficial. Firstly, it helps cultivate (replaced "fostered" with "cultivate" for better word choice) their financial management skills. Children may initially make impulsive purchases due to their curiosity rather than practicality (rephrased for clarity). For one thing, the ability to manage money can instance, they might be fostered/cultivated in this way. ¶ To be specific, due to immaturity, children may purchase things out of curiosity instead of utility. For example, when seeing advertising of drawn to advertisements for toys or snacks, they may get attracted and make a purchase irrationally with no regard of price. snacks and buy them without considering the cost. However, weekly money from parents a limited weekly budget can effectively impede this behavior. With limited budget every week, children have curb (changed "impede" to "curb" for better word choice) such behavior, as children will need to think twice carefully before making a purchase, thus preventing unnecessary waste.

Also, parents’ Furthermore, parental guidance can also make a difference/contribution. ¶ For example, significantly contribute (replaced "make a difference/contribution" with parents’ instruction, children will "contribute" for conciseness) to their financial education. With proper instruction from parents, children can learn how to establish essential financial skills such as opening a bank account and saving money to earn interest. This knowledge will enable them to save deposits to earn bank interest, which allows them to buy things up for items they are eager to for a long genuinely desire over time.

For another thing, by offering pocket money to children Lastly, providing pocket money on a week basis, parent-kid rapport can be well established. Giving pocket money, to some extent, means a grant weekly basis can foster (used "foster" here instead of autonomy. With the repeating "cultivate") a healthy parent-child relationship. Granting autonomy through pocket money demonstrates trust from parents, an intimate relationship is easier to be built parents towards their children (rephrased for clarity). This trust paves the way for a stronger bond between parents and kids.kids.

In conclusion, offering children weekly pocket money has several advantages including the development of financial management skills and fostering closer parent-child relationships (summarized main points in conclusion).

Display title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Benefits of weekly pocket money

2. Financial management skills
   - Impulsive purchases
   - Limited weekly budget

3. Parental guidance
   - Financial education
   - Opening a bank account and saving money

4. Healthy parent-child relationship
   - Autonomy and trust

5. Conclusion
   - Advantages of weekly pocket money

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
beneficial/ˌbenəˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveproducing good results or helpful effects有益的Providing children with weekly pocket money can be beneficial.
impulsive/ɪmˈpʌlsɪv/adjectiveacting suddenly without thinking carefully冲动的Children may initially make impulsive purchases due to their curiosity.
practicality/prækˈtɪkələti/nounthe quality of being suitable for a particular use |实用性 |They might buy toys or snacks without considering the practicality.
curb/kɜrb/ |verb |to control or limit something that is not wanted |限制,抑制 |A limited weekly budget can effectively curb such behavior.
parental/pəˈrentl/ |adjective |connected with parents or with being a parent |父母的,亲代的 |Parental guidance can significantly contribute to their financial education.
instruction/ɪnˈstrʌkʃən/ |noun |detailed information telling how something should be done |指导,说明 |With proper instruction from parents, children can learn essential financial skills.
autonomy/ɔːˈtɒnəmi/ |noun |the right of a group of people to govern itself or control its own affairs |自主权,自治权 |Granting autonomy through pocket money demonstrates trust from parents.
bond/bɒnd/ |noun |a close connection joining two or more people |纽带,联系 |This trust paves the way for a stronger bond between parents and kids.
foster/ˈfɒstər/ |verb |to encourage the development of something |促进,培养 |Offering children weekly pocket money fosters closer parent-child relationships.

Wie die Academic Discussion bewertet wird

Die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe wird anhand des offiziellen ETS-Bewertungsrasters bewertet. Die KI-Bewertung analysiert jede Antwort anhand mehrerer Dimensionen.

Relevanz & Beitrag

Geht die Antwort auf die Frage ein und leistet sie einen sinnvollen Beitrag zur Diskussion?

Sprachgebrauch

Grammatikalische Genauigkeit, Wortschatzbreite und Qualität des Satzbaus.

Ausarbeitung & Begründung

Sind die Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und klarer Argumentation gut ausgearbeitet?

Häufige Muster in den Antworten

Basierend auf der Analyse von Nutzereinsendungen zu dieser Aufgabe sind hier häufige Muster in den Antworten der Lernenden.

Viele Lernende äußern eine klare Meinung, liefern aber keine konkreten Beispiele zur Unterstützung.

Starke Antworten beziehen sich direkt auf den Lesetext und die Standpunkte der anderen Sprecher.

Höher bewertete Antworten nutzen abwechslungsreiche Satzstrukturen und akademischen Wortschatz.

Zeitmanagement ist entscheidend – wirkt eine Antwort gehetzt, fällt die Bewertung der Ausarbeitung meist niedriger aus.

Lerntipps

1

Lies die Aufgabenstellung sorgfältig und erfasse alle Teile der Frage, bevor du zu schreiben beginnst.

2

Beziehe dich in deiner Antwort auf den Lesetext und die Meinungen der anderen Studierenden.

3

Nutze konkrete Beispiele, um deinen Hauptpunkt zu untermauern – vermeide allgemeine Aussagen.

4

Ziele auf 120–150 Wörter. Längere Antworten sind nicht automatisch besser; Klarheit und Fokus zählen mehr.

5

Übe zeitlich begrenzte Antworten (10 Minuten), um unter Prüfungsbedingungen Sicherheit zu gewinnen.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist die TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe?
Bei der TOEFL Academic Discussion-Aufgabe musst du dich an einer Online-Klassendiskussion beteiligen. Du liest die Frage eines Professors sowie die Antworten anderer Studierender und schreibst dann in etwa 10 Minuten deinen eigenen Beitrag, in dem du deine Meinung äußerst und begründest.
Wie wird die Academic Discussion-Aufgabe bewertet?
Die Aufgabe wird auf einer Skala von 0 bis 5 bewertet, basierend auf der Relevanz für die Diskussion, der Qualität der Sprachverwendung (Grammatik, Wortschatz, Satzbau) und wie gut du deine Ideen mit konkreten Beispielen und Argumenten entwickelst und stützt.
Was sind die Nutzerbeispiele auf dieser Seite?
Dies sind echte Antworten, die von TOEFL-Prüflingen eingereicht wurden, die diese Frage auf LingoLeap geübt haben. Jedes Beispiel wurde von unserer KI-Bewertungs-Engine ausgewertet, die eine Punktzahl sowie detailliertes Feedback zu Stärken und Verbesserungsbereichen liefert.
Wie genau ist die KI-Bewertung?
Die KI-Bewertungs-Engine von LingoLeap wurde anhand offizieller ETS-Bewertungskriterien trainiert und anhand menschlicher Prüferbewertungen kalibriert. Kein automatisiertes System ist perfekt, aber sie liefert zuverlässiges Feedback zu Übungszwecken und hilft dabei, konkrete Verbesserungsbereiche zu erkennen.
Wie kann ich diese Academic Discussion-Aufgabe üben?
Du kannst üben, indem du dich für ein kostenloses LingoLeap-Konto anmeldest. Schreibe deine eigene Antwort auf genau diese Frage, reiche sie ein und erhalte sofortiges KI-Feedback mit detaillierten Anmerkungen zu deinem Text.
Wie lang sollte meine Academic Discussion-Antwort sein?
Strebe 120–150 Wörter an. Für die Aufgabe hast du 10 Minuten Zeit. Konzentriere dich auf Klarheit, stütze deine Meinung mit konkreten Beispielen und beziehe dich auf den Diskussionskontext, anstatt eine längere Antwort zu schreiben.

Erreich deinen Wunsch-Score – wir sind an deiner Seite!

Mit LingoLeap, deinem Experten für TOEFL und andere Englischprüfungen

Schneller zu deinem Traumscore

Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren