TOEFLIELTS
繁體中文
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on social science, Write a post responding to the professor's question, in your response, you should *express and support your personal opinion*make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

真實考生作答範例,搭配 AI 評分與回饋

目前有 1 篇考生投稿範例

開始免費練習

題型概述

Professor

Parents give their children weekly money to buy whateverthey want, Some people think this can cause bad habitsand ideas about money in children, Others think the opposite,What's your opinion? Piease use the discussionboard to share your thoughts.

Ella

Giving children pocket money every week can help them developfinancial awareness, Handling money is crucial to a person's growthand we will be dealing with money throughout our lives. As long as theamount of pocket money is controlled and conforms to the family'seconomic situation,it will not have a bad effect on children.

Stefen

I agree with Ella. Parents can guide their children if they are worried about their spending, For example, prepare a book for children to record their income and expenditure. Get them into the habit of keeping track of everyday purchases, At the same time, parents can analyze with their children whether the consumption in the account book is reasonable and help them develop good consumption habits.

考生範例與評分結果

1

考生範例 #1

I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insi...

分數
22

考生範例

I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, as children are too young to fight against the lure. To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childen may have more opptunities to access some harmful things. For instance, a classsmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid.

評分結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

虽然你的文章回答了教授的问题并表达了你的观点,但是在论证方面还有待加强。建议你在论述观点时,提供更多具体的例子和详细的解释来支持你的观点。此外,注意避免使用过于复杂或冗长的句子,以免影响文章的可读性。

Example 1: Instead of: "Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childen may have more opptunities to access some harmful things." Try: "With the rapid development of the internet, children are more likely to be exposed to harmful content."

Example 2: Instead of: "For instance, a classsmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid." Try: "For example, my younger brother's primary school classmate secretly purchased violent video tapes which negatively influenced his mindset – a serious issue for young children."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章整体结构尚可,但在段落划分和过渡方面还有改进空间。建议将不同观点或论证分成独立段落,并使用恰当的过渡词汇连接各个段落,使文章更加流畅。

Example 1: Instead of: "I oppose Ella and Stefen's perspective that giving weekly money to children can leads to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights." Try: "I disagree with Ella and Stefen's view that giving weekly money to children has positive effects. I would like to present some counterarguments."

Example 2: Instead of: "To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not." Try: "One reason for my disagreement is that children receiving weekly money may face numerous risks when encountering tempting items, regardless of whether they are harmful or not."

5. 语法批改

I oppose Ella and StefenStephen(misspelling)'s perspective that giving weekly money to children can leadslead(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) to positive effects, and would like to give some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, as children are too young to fight against the lure. To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have so much risks facing those attractive things, no matter whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the global network and internet developing rapidly, childenchildren(misspelling) may have more opptunitiesopportunities(misspelling) to access some harmful things. For instance, a classsmateclassmate(misspelling) of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapesvideotapes(video tape (videotape)) himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatlyultimately(misspelling) lead to a bad influence on his mind, and that could be a serious problem for a kid.

Title: 6 文章修订

I respectfully disagree with Ella and Stefen's view that providing children with weekly pocket money leads to positive outcomes, and I would like to offer some alternative perspectives. In my opinion, the potential drawbacks of this practice outweigh the benefits, as children may not possess the maturity to resist temptation.

To elaborate, children who receive a weekly allowance from their parents may be exposed to numerous risks associated with enticing yet potentially harmful items or activities. With the rapid development of global networks and the internet, children have increased access to potentially damaging content.

For example, a classmate of my younger brother, who is currently in primary school, secretly purchased violent video tapes without informing his parents. This ultimately had a negative impact on his mental well-being, which could pose serious problems for a child at such a young age. (143 words)

Revised essay: Title: 7 文章批改

I oppose respectfully disagree (changed "oppose" to "respectfully disagree" for a more polite tone) with Ella and Stefen's perspective (changed "view" to "perspective" for variety) that giving weekly money to children can leads lead (corrected grammar by changing "leads" to "lead") to positive effects, and would like to give offer some additional insights. I believe that the disadvantages of doing this show a greater importance against those advantages, advantages (rephrased for clarity), as children are too young to fight against the lure. lure (rephrased for a more natural tone).

To elaborate, children who receive weekly money from their parents may have face many risks (changed "have so much risks facing those facing" to "face many risks") associated with attractive things, no matter regardless of whether they are harmful or not. Nowadays, as the with the rapid development of global network networks and internet developing rapidly, childen the internet, children may have more opptunities opportunities (corrected spelling) to access some potentially harmful things. content.

For instance, a classsmate classmate of my little brother, who is in the primary school now, bought some violent video tapes himself without telling his parent, and it ultimatly lead to a bad parents. This ultimately led (corrected grammar by changing "lead" to "led") to a negative influence on his mind, and that which could be a serious problem for a kid.child at such a young age (rephrased for clarity).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Disagree with Ella and Stefen's view
   - Potential drawbacks outweigh benefits

2. Lack of maturity in children
   - Temptation and misuse of pocket money

3. Exposure to risks
   - Harmful items or activities
   - Influence of global networks and the internet

4. Real-life example
   - Younger brother's classmate
   - Purchased violent video tapes without informing parents

5. Negative impact on mental well-being

6. Conclusion 
   - Importance of considering potential dangers before providing pocket money to children

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
Drawbacks/ˈdrɔːbæk/NounA disadvantage or problem that makes something a less attractive option.缺点The potential drawbacks of this practice outweigh the benefits.
Maturity/məˈtʃʊrɪti/NounThe state, fact, or period of being mature; full development成熟Children may not possess the maturity to resist temptation.
Enticing/ɪnˈtaɪsɪŋ/AdjectiveAttractive or tempting; alluring诱人的Enticing yet potentially harmful items or activities
Potentially/pəˈtɛnʃəli/AdverbHaving or showing the capacity to develop into something in the future潜在地Potentially damaging content
Global networks/ˈɡloʊbəl ˈnɛtˌwɜrks/NounWorldwide interconnected systems or groups全球网络With the rapid development of global networks and the internet
Primary school/ˈpraɪməri skuːl/NounA school for children between the ages of about five and eleven years old小学A classmate of my younger brother, who is currently in primary school
Secretly/ˈsiːkrɪtli/Adverb_In a way that is kept hidden from others; privately, covertly _秘密地Secretly purchased violent video tapes without informing his parents
Mental well-being/ˈmɛntl wɛl bi ɪŋ/Noun_A state of mental health and happiness _心理健康This ultimately had a negative impact on his mental well-being.
Pose/poʊz/Verb_To present or constitute (a problem, danger, or difficulty) _构成Which could pose serious problems for a child at such a young age.

學術討論如何評分

TOEFL學術討論題型依據官方 ETS 評分標準進行評分,AI 評分系統會從多個面向分析每篇回答。

切題度與貢獻度

回答是否切合題目,並對討論做出有意義的貢獻?

語言運用

文法準確度、詞彙廣度,以及句子結構的品質。

論述發展與支持

論點是否透過具體例子和清楚的推理獲得充分發展?

回答中的常見模式

根據對本題考生投稿的分析,以下是考生回答中常見的模式。

許多考生提出了明確的觀點,卻缺乏具體的佐證例子。

高分回答通常會直接引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他發言者的觀點。

得分較高的回答會運用多樣的句型結構與學術詞彙。

時間管理是關鍵因素——顯得倉促完成的回答,在論述發展方面通常得分較低。

學習訣竅

1

動筆前仔細閱讀題目,確認問題的每個部分都已理解。

2

在回答中引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他考生的觀點。

3

用具體例子支持你的主要論點——避免空泛籠統的說法。

4

字數以 120-150 字為目標。篇幅較長不代表較好,清晰與聚焦更為重要。

5

練習限時作答(10 分鐘),培養在考試情境下的流暢度。

常見問題

什麼是TOEFL學術討論任務?
TOEFL學術討論任務要求你參與線上課堂討論。你需要閱讀教授的問題和其他學生的回覆,然後在約10分鐘內寫出自己的貼文,表達並支持你的觀點。
學術討論任務如何評分?
此任務依0-5分評分,評分依據包括與討論的相關性、語言運用品質(文法、詞彙、句子結構),以及你如何用具體例子和推理來發展並支持自己的觀點。
此頁面上的用戶範例是什麼?
這些是TOEFL考生在LingoLeap上練習這道題目時提交的真實回答。每個範例都經過我們的AI評分引擎評估,提供分數以及關於優勢與待加強領域的詳細回饋。
AI評估的準確度如何?
LingoLeap的AI評估引擎以ETS官方評分標準訓練而成,並與人工評分員的評分校準。雖然沒有自動化系統是完美的,但它能為練習提供可靠的回饋,並協助找出具體的加強方向。
我要如何練習這道學術討論題目?
你可以註冊免費的LingoLeap帳號來練習。針對這道確切的題目寫出你自己的回答,送出後即可立即獲得附有詳細回饋的AI評估。
我的學術討論回答應該多長?
目標字數為120-150字。此任務給你10分鐘的時間撰寫回答。請專注於表達清晰、用具體例子支持你的觀點,並引用討論脈絡,而非一味追求更長的篇幅。

今天就為您的目標分數加油!

與 LingoLeap,英語考試專家一起

更快達到您的理想分數

立即免費試用