TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on marketing.Write apost responding to the professor's question.

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

Let's continue talking about consumer behavior. We have been discussing different ways people go about choosing what products to buy, and there are many potential sources of information and advice for consumers. In your opinion, which is the better strategy for making purchasing decisions, relying on advice from friends and family, or depending on information from online sources? Why?

Claire

Asking friends and family members for product recommendations might seem like an easier option, but it might take too much time to get all the information you need. An internet search would be much more efficient. There are many consumer magazines available online that compile lots of data to compare the advantages and disadvantages of one product versus another.

Paul

The last time I bought a computer, I just watched a few videos online to make a decision, and now I regret that. My friends could have advised me better because they know my preferences and the kind of features that Iam interested in. Consumers should get advice from the people around them to find the most suitable products.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint that making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more...

スコア
26

ユーザーサンプル

For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint that making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more specific, they have deeper understanding of my taste so they could give me more personal advice than others. For instance, when you are searching for a new cell phone, instead of trust on the online advertisements announcing their excellent big-screen product, your close friends know the priority of your choice is the portable ability of device and they would like to introduce you the phone they have used conveniently or the most suitable product they think for you. This is undoubtedly efficient and satisfying. At the same time, there is a voice claims that it might take too much time to gather useful information from individuals. Conversely, I think it save a lot of time to try something awkward. Furthermore, if the product’s function and quality is exaggerated by the online information, you must spend extra time dealing with it, which wastes time and bothers you a lot.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了自己的观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,你可以在文章中提供更多具体的例子来支持你的观点。此外,尝试在论述中加入对于在线信息来源的讨论,以便更全面地回答问题。

示例1:在讨论朋友和家人给予建议时,可以提到他们了解我们的需求和喜好,因此他们的建议通常比网上评论更贴切。 示例2:虽然在线信息来源可能会提供大量数据和评价,但它们可能不如朋友和家人对我们个人需求的了解深入。

4. 文章结构与组织

你的文章结构基本清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织方面还有改进空间。为了使文章逻辑更加严密,请确保每段落都集中讨论一个特定观点,并提供支持细节。同时,在段落之间使用明确的过渡词或短语。

建议1:在引言部分,可以简要介绍你将在文章中讨论的两种购买策略(朋友和家人的建议以及在线信息来源)。 示例:在这篇文章中,我将讨论依赖朋友和家人的建议与依赖在线信息来源之间的优劣。

建议2:在正文部分,可以使用过渡词或短语来引导读者从一个观点转向另一个观点。 示例:尽管在线信息来源提供了丰富的数据和评价,但我认为朋友和家人的建议对于做出购买决策更为关键。

5. 语法批改

For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint that making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more specific, they have deeper understanding of my tastetaste,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) so they could give me more personal advice than others. For instance, when you are searching for a new cell phone, instead of trust on the online advertisements announcing their excellent big-screen product, your close friends know the priority of your choice is the portable ability of device and, and(comma between independent clauses) they would like to introduce you the phone they have used conveniently or the most suitable product they think for you. This is undoubtedly efficient and satisfying. At the same time, there is a voice claims that it might take too much time to gather useful information from individuals. Conversely, I think it save a lot of time to try something awkward. Furthermore, if the product’s function and quality is exaggerated by the online information, you must spend extra time dealing with it, which wastes time and bothers you a lot.

Title: 6 Article Revision

In my opinion, I concur with Paul's perspective that seeking advice from friends and family is a more effective strategy for making purchasing decisions. The primary reason is that these individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences, enabling them to provide personalized recommendations.

For example, when searching for a new cell phone, one might be swayed by online advertisements promoting devices with large screens. However, close friends who are aware of your preference for portability would likely recommend phones they have found convenient or products they believe are most suitable for you. This approach not only proves efficient but also leads to greater satisfaction.

While some argue that gathering information from individuals may be time-consuming, I contend that it saves time in the long run by preventing the purchase of unsuitable products. Relying solely on online information may result in exaggerated claims about a product's functionality and quality. Consequently, consumers may spend additional time addressing issues arising from such purchases, ultimately wasting time and causing frustration. (171 words)

For In my opinion, I concur with Paul's perspective (Changed "For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint viewpoint" to "In my opinion, I concur with Paul's perspective" for a more natural tone and correct grammar) that seeking advice from friends and family is a more effective strategy for making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more specific, they decisions. The primary reason is that these individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences (Changed "they have deeper understanding of my taste so they could give me more personal advice than others. taste" to "these individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences" for clarity and consistency), enabling them to provide personalized recommendations.

For instance, example, when you are searching for a new cell phone, instead of trust on the one might be swayed by online advertisements announcing their excellent big-screen product, your promoting devices with large screens. However, close friends know who are aware of your preference for portability (Changed "know the priority of your choice is the portable ability of device and they device" to "are aware of your preference for portability" for clarity and conciseness) would like to introduce you the phone likely recommend phones they have used conveniently found convenient or the products they believe are most suitable product they think for you. This approach not only proves efficient but also leads to greater satisfaction (Changed "This is undoubtedly efficient and satisfying. satisfying." to make it flow better within the paragraph).

At the same time, there is a voice claims While some argue that gathering information from individuals may be time-consuming, I contend that it might take too much time to gather useful information from individuals. Conversely, I saves time in the long run by preventing the purchase of unsuitable products (Changed "I think it save a lot of time to try something awkward. Furthermore, if the product’s function and quality is awkward." to make it clearer and correct grammar). Relying solely on online information may result in exaggerated by the online information, you claims about a product's functionality and quality. Consequently, consumers may spend additional time addressing issues arising from such purchases (Changed "you must spend extra time dealing with it, which wastes time and bothers it" to maintain consistency in tone), ultimately wasting time and causing frustration (Changed "bothers you a lot.lot" to "causing frustration" for a more formal tone).

8 思维导图


- 主题: 朋友和家人的建议对购买决策的影响
  - 原因1: 深入了解我们的喜好
    - 例子: 购买手机时,朋友知道我们喜欢便携性,推荐合适的产品
  - 原因2: 提供个性化建议
    - 效率高且满意度更高
  - 反驳观点: 时间消耗大
    - 阐述: 长期来看,避免购买不合适产品,节省时间
  - 结论: 同意Paul的观点,从朋友和家人那里寻求建议更有效

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; coincide同意I concur with Paul's perspective that seeking advice from friends and family is a more effective strategy.
preferences/ˈprɛfərəns/nouna greater liking for one alternative over another偏好These individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences.
personalized/ˈpɝsənəˌlaɪzd/adjectivemade or done specially for a particular person个性化的They can provide personalized recommendations.
swayed/sweɪd/verbinfluenced or controlled by something受...影响One might be swayed by online advertisements promoting devices with large screens.
portability/pɔrtəˈbɪləti/nounthe quality of being light enough to be carried easily便携性Close friends who are aware of your preference for portability would likely recommend suitable phones.
efficient/ɪˈfɪʃənt/adjectiveworking well without wasting time, effort, or energy高效的This approach not only proves efficient but also leads to greater satisfaction.
time-consuming/taɪm kənˈsju mɪŋ/adjectivetaking up a lot of time耗时的Gathering information from individuals may be time-consuming.
unsuitable/ʌnˈsutəbəl/adjectivenot appropriate or fitting for a particular purpose不合适的It saves time in the long run by preventing the purchase of unsuitable products.
exaggerated/ɪgˈzædʒəreɪtəd/adjectivemade to seem larger, better, worse, etc., than it really is夸大的Relying solely on online information may result in exaggerated claims about a product's functionality and quality.
frustration/frʌˈstreɪʃən/nouna feeling of annoyance or anger because you cannot achieve what you want挫败感Consumers may spend additional time addressing issues arising from such purchases, ultimately causing frustration.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now