TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on marketing.Write apost responding to the professor's question.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

Let's continue talking about consumer behavior. We have been discussing different ways people go about choosing what products to buy, and there are many potential sources of information and advice for consumers. In your opinion, which is the better strategy for making purchasing decisions, relying on advice from friends and family, or depending on information from online sources? Why?

Claire

Asking friends and family members for product recommendations might seem like an easier option, but it might take too much time to get all the information you need. An internet search would be much more efficient. There are many consumer magazines available online that compile lots of data to compare the advantages and disadvantages of one product versus another.

Paul

The last time I bought a computer, I just watched a few videos online to make a decision, and now I regret that. My friends could have advised me better because they know my preferences and the kind of features that Iam interested in. Consumers should get advice from the people around them to find the most suitable products.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint that making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more...

점수
26

사용자 예시

For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint that making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more specific, they have deeper understanding of my taste so they could give me more personal advice than others. For instance, when you are searching for a new cell phone, instead of trust on the online advertisements announcing their excellent big-screen product, your close friends know the priority of your choice is the portable ability of device and they would like to introduce you the phone they have used conveniently or the most suitable product they think for you. This is undoubtedly efficient and satisfying. At the same time, there is a voice claims that it might take too much time to gather useful information from individuals. Conversely, I think it save a lot of time to try something awkward. Furthermore, if the product’s function and quality is exaggerated by the online information, you must spend extra time dealing with it, which wastes time and bothers you a lot.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

26. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了教授的问题,并表达了自己的观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,你可以在文章中提供更多具体的例子来支持你的观点。此外,尝试在论述中加入对于在线信息来源的讨论,以便更全面地回答问题。

示例1:在讨论朋友和家人给予建议时,可以提到他们了解我们的需求和喜好,因此他们的建议通常比网上评论更贴切。 示例2:虽然在线信息来源可能会提供大量数据和评价,但它们可能不如朋友和家人对我们个人需求的了解深入。

4. 文章结构与组织

你的文章结构基本清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织方面还有改进空间。为了使文章逻辑更加严密,请确保每段落都集中讨论一个特定观点,并提供支持细节。同时,在段落之间使用明确的过渡词或短语。

建议1:在引言部分,可以简要介绍你将在文章中讨论的两种购买策略(朋友和家人的建议以及在线信息来源)。 示例:在这篇文章中,我将讨论依赖朋友和家人的建议与依赖在线信息来源之间的优劣。

建议2:在正文部分,可以使用过渡词或短语来引导读者从一个观点转向另一个观点。 示例:尽管在线信息来源提供了丰富的数据和评价,但我认为朋友和家人的建议对于做出购买决策更为关键。

5. 语法批改

For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint that making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more specific, they have deeper understanding of my tastetaste,(This rule identifies whether commas are missing in a sentence.) so they could give me more personal advice than others. For instance, when you are searching for a new cell phone, instead of trust on the online advertisements announcing their excellent big-screen product, your close friends know the priority of your choice is the portable ability of device and, and(comma between independent clauses) they would like to introduce you the phone they have used conveniently or the most suitable product they think for you. This is undoubtedly efficient and satisfying. At the same time, there is a voice claims that it might take too much time to gather useful information from individuals. Conversely, I think it save a lot of time to try something awkward. Furthermore, if the product’s function and quality is exaggerated by the online information, you must spend extra time dealing with it, which wastes time and bothers you a lot.

Title: 6 Article Revision

In my opinion, I concur with Paul's perspective that seeking advice from friends and family is a more effective strategy for making purchasing decisions. The primary reason is that these individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences, enabling them to provide personalized recommendations.

For example, when searching for a new cell phone, one might be swayed by online advertisements promoting devices with large screens. However, close friends who are aware of your preference for portability would likely recommend phones they have found convenient or products they believe are most suitable for you. This approach not only proves efficient but also leads to greater satisfaction.

While some argue that gathering information from individuals may be time-consuming, I contend that it saves time in the long run by preventing the purchase of unsuitable products. Relying solely on online information may result in exaggerated claims about a product's functionality and quality. Consequently, consumers may spend additional time addressing issues arising from such purchases, ultimately wasting time and causing frustration. (171 words)

For In my opinion, I concur with Paul's perspective (Changed "For my perspective, I totally agree with the Paul’s viewpoint viewpoint" to "In my opinion, I concur with Paul's perspective" for a more natural tone and correct grammar) that seeking advice from friends and family is a more effective strategy for making purchasing decisions after asking my friends and family for help. To be more specific, they decisions. The primary reason is that these individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences (Changed "they have deeper understanding of my taste so they could give me more personal advice than others. taste" to "these individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences" for clarity and consistency), enabling them to provide personalized recommendations.

For instance, example, when you are searching for a new cell phone, instead of trust on the one might be swayed by online advertisements announcing their excellent big-screen product, your promoting devices with large screens. However, close friends know who are aware of your preference for portability (Changed "know the priority of your choice is the portable ability of device and they device" to "are aware of your preference for portability" for clarity and conciseness) would like to introduce you the phone likely recommend phones they have used conveniently found convenient or the products they believe are most suitable product they think for you. This approach not only proves efficient but also leads to greater satisfaction (Changed "This is undoubtedly efficient and satisfying. satisfying." to make it flow better within the paragraph).

At the same time, there is a voice claims While some argue that gathering information from individuals may be time-consuming, I contend that it might take too much time to gather useful information from individuals. Conversely, I saves time in the long run by preventing the purchase of unsuitable products (Changed "I think it save a lot of time to try something awkward. Furthermore, if the product’s function and quality is awkward." to make it clearer and correct grammar). Relying solely on online information may result in exaggerated by the online information, you claims about a product's functionality and quality. Consequently, consumers may spend additional time addressing issues arising from such purchases (Changed "you must spend extra time dealing with it, which wastes time and bothers it" to maintain consistency in tone), ultimately wasting time and causing frustration (Changed "bothers you a lot.lot" to "causing frustration" for a more formal tone).

8 思维导图


- 主题: 朋友和家人的建议对购买决策的影响
  - 原因1: 深入了解我们的喜好
    - 例子: 购买手机时,朋友知道我们喜欢便携性,推荐合适的产品
  - 原因2: 提供个性化建议
    - 效率高且满意度更高
  - 反驳观点: 时间消耗大
    - 阐述: 长期来看,避免购买不合适产品,节省时间
  - 结论: 同意Paul的观点,从朋友和家人那里寻求建议更有效

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree; coincide同意I concur with Paul's perspective that seeking advice from friends and family is a more effective strategy.
preferences/ˈprɛfərəns/nouna greater liking for one alternative over another偏好These individuals possess a deeper understanding of our preferences.
personalized/ˈpɝsənəˌlaɪzd/adjectivemade or done specially for a particular person个性化的They can provide personalized recommendations.
swayed/sweɪd/verbinfluenced or controlled by something受...影响One might be swayed by online advertisements promoting devices with large screens.
portability/pɔrtəˈbɪləti/nounthe quality of being light enough to be carried easily便携性Close friends who are aware of your preference for portability would likely recommend suitable phones.
efficient/ɪˈfɪʃənt/adjectiveworking well without wasting time, effort, or energy高效的This approach not only proves efficient but also leads to greater satisfaction.
time-consuming/taɪm kənˈsju mɪŋ/adjectivetaking up a lot of time耗时的Gathering information from individuals may be time-consuming.
unsuitable/ʌnˈsutəbəl/adjectivenot appropriate or fitting for a particular purpose不合适的It saves time in the long run by preventing the purchase of unsuitable products.
exaggerated/ɪgˈzædʒəreɪtəd/adjectivemade to seem larger, better, worse, etc., than it really is夸大的Relying solely on online information may result in exaggerated claims about a product's functionality and quality.
frustration/frʌˈstreɪʃən/nouna feeling of annoyance or anger because you cannot achieve what you want挫败感Consumers may spend additional time addressing issues arising from such purchases, ultimately causing frustration.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now