TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on marketing. Write a post responding to theprofessor's question. ln your response, you should do the followingExpress and support your opinion. Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words. An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 2개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Dr.Gupta

We are looking this week at different ways businesses market their products and services, especially non-traditional methods. One thing that marketers pay close attention to is online reviews of their products. A business might include customer reviews on their website or carefully monitor the reviews on third-party sites. l would like you to discuss your own experiences with online reviews. Do you find them useful when deciding whether or not to buy aproduct or service? Why or why not?

Andrew

I think online reviews are a great source of information because they are written by ordinary customers who are like me. For instance, when I read a restaurant review by professional food critics, I'm not interested in some of the details that are included, like how the food is prepared. I'm more interested in aspects like the quality of the food and the service, which regular customers usually comment on.

Claire

To me, online reviews have some real problems. First people are more likely to post reviews after a bad experience than after a good one. As a result, what you read is often weighted toward the negative. Also, you have no way of knowing whether reviewers know what they are talking about or even if they actually bought and used the product they are reviewing.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

The ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of online reviews in guiding purchasing decisions is certainly multifaceted. I concur with Andrew's assertio...

점수
27

사용자 예시

The ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of online reviews in guiding purchasing decisions is certainly multifaceted. I concur with Andrew's assertion that online reviews can be unreliable, as customers often emphasize negative experiences. Furthermore, it is essential to consider that many companies place significant importance on their public reputation, leading to the proliferation of potentially biased reviews disguised as genuine customer feedback. Consequently, discerning the authenticity of these reviews becomes increasingly challenging for consumers. While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, she overlooks the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations. This lack of objectivity may stem from incentives offered by companies, such as discounts or rewards, in exchange for favorable comments.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章在任务完成方面表现较好,回答了教授的问题并提供了观点。然而,为了更好地支持观点,可以考虑增加一些具体的例子或详细说明。此外,在引用其他人的观点时,尽量避免使用相同的词汇和表达方式。

改进示例1: 原文:I concur with Andrew's assertion that online reviews can be unreliable... 改进:I agree with Andrew that online reviews might not always be a reliable source of information...

改进示例2: 原文:While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, she overlooks the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations. 改进:Although Claire points out the advantages of online reviews in offering valuable insights, she fails to consider the subjective nature of these assessments.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构清晰,包括引言、主体和结论。然而,在组织上有待提高。建议在段落之间使用更明确的过渡词或短语来引导读者理解各个观点之间的联系。此外,可以考虑将一些相关的想法合并到一个段落中,以便更有条理地展示观点。

改进示例1: 原文:I concur with Andrew's assertion that online reviews can be unreliable... Consequently, discerning the authenticity of these reviews becomes increasingly challenging for consumers. 改进:I agree with Andrew that online reviews might not always be a reliable source of information, making it difficult for consumers to determine their authenticity.

改进示例2: 原文:While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, she overlooks the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations. 改进:Although Claire points out the advantages of online reviews in offering valuable insights, she fails to consider the subjective nature of these assessments, which may stem from various factors.

5. 语法批改

The ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of online reviews in guiding purchasing decisions is certainly multifaceted. I concur with Andrew's assertion that online reviews can be unreliable, as customers often emphasize negative experiences. Furthermore, it is essential to consider that many companies place significant importance on their public reputation, leading to the proliferation of potentially biased reviews disguised as genuine customer feedback. Consequently, discerning the authenticity of these reviews becomes increasingly challenging for consumers. While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, she overlooks the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations. This lack of objectivity may stem from incentives offered by companies, such as discounts or rewards, in exchange for favorable comments.

Section Title: 6. Article Revision

The complexity of the online review landscape presents both advantages and challenges for consumers seeking guidance in their purchasing decisions. While Andrew acknowledges the relatability of opinions expressed by fellow customers, it is crucial to recognize, as Claire points out, the potential skew towards negative experiences in these reviews. Moreover, companies' vested interest in maintaining a positive public image may lead to an influx of biased or even fabricated feedback. As a result, determining the authenticity of online reviews can be a daunting task for potential buyers. Although Claire emphasizes the value of customer insights into products or services, she fails to address the inherent subjectivity that may arise from company-driven incentives such as discounts or rewards offered in exchange for favorable reviews. (128 words)

The ongoing debate regarding complexity of the efficacy of online reviews review landscape presents both advantages and challenges for consumers seeking guidance in guiding their purchasing decisions (rephrased to emphasize the multifaceted nature of the issue). While Andrew acknowledges the relatability of opinions expressed by fellow customers (clarified to better convey Andrew's position), it is certainly multifaceted. I concur with Andrew's assertion that crucial to recognize, as Claire points out, the potential skew towards negative experiences in these reviews (added "as Claire points out" to attribute this idea to her). Moreover, companies' vested interest in maintaining a positive public image may lead to an influx of biased or even fabricated feedback (rephrased for clarity and conciseness). As a result, determining the authenticity of online reviews can be unreliable, as customers often emphasize negative experiences. Furthermore, it is essential to consider that many companies place significant importance on their public reputation, leading to a daunting task for potential buyers (used "daunting task" instead of "increasingly challenging" for better flow). Although Claire emphasizes the proliferation value of potentially biased reviews disguised as genuine customer feedback. Consequently, discerning the authenticity of these reviews becomes increasingly challenging for consumers. While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, services (simplified phrasing), she overlooks fails to address the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations. This lack of objectivity that may stem arise from company-driven incentives offered by companies, such as discounts or rewards, rewards offered in exchange for favorable comments.reviews (rephrased and condensed last sentence for clarity and brevity).

8 思维导图


- Online Review Landscape
  - Advantages
    - Relatability of opinions
  - Challenges
    - Skew towards negative experiences
    - Biased or fabricated feedback

- Determining Authenticity
  - Daunting task for potential buyers

- Company-driven Incentives
  - Discounts or rewards for favorable reviews
  - Inherent subjectivity in customer insights

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
complexity/kəmˈplɛksəti/nounThe state or quality of being intricate or complicated.复杂性The complexity of the online review landscape presents both advantages and challenges.
relatability/rɪˈleɪtəbɪlɪti/nounThe quality of being easy to understand and feel sympathy for.可关联性Andrew acknowledges the relatability of opinions expressed by fellow customers.
skew/skjuː/verbTo distort or bias in a particular direction.偏斜There is a potential skew towards negative experiences in these reviews.
influx/ˈɪnflʌks/nounThe arrival or entry of many people or things at the same time.大量涌入An influx of biased or even fabricated feedback may occur.
authenticity/ɔːθənˈtɪsəti/nounThe quality of being genuine or true.真实性Determining the authenticity of online reviews can be a daunting task.
daunting/ˈdɔːntɪŋ/adjectiveSeeming difficult to deal with in anticipation; intimidating.令人生畏的Daunting task for potential buyers to determine the authenticity of online reviews.
subjectivity/səbˌdʒɛktɪˈvɪti/nounThe quality of being based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.主观性Inherent subjectivity may arise from company-driven incentives.
incentives/ɪnˈsɛntɪvz/nounA thing that motivates or encourages someone to do something.激励_Discounts or rewards offered in exchange for favorable reviews are company-driven incentives.
favorable/ˈfeɪvərəbəl/adjectiveExpressing approval; advantageous; giving a benefit.有利的Companies offer discounts or rewards in exchange for favorable reviews.
2

사용자 예시 #2

An intense debate has been unfolding upon the versatility of online reviews to assist purchase decisions. I firmly endorse Andrew's point that online ...

점수
27

사용자 예시

An intense debate has been unfolding upon the versatility of online reviews to assist purchase decisions. I firmly endorse Andrew's point that online reviews are useless because customers often lift negative comments about a bad experience.Another perspective that deserves attention is that numerous companies have been attaching increasing significance towards public reputation, and as a consequence.some seemingly reliable comments are indeed the advertisement of the companies. That said, the line between actual customer reviews and company ads is so blurred that it is hard for customers to figure out whether those reviews are telling the truth. While Clarie makes a pertinent point that online reviews can help customers get a better picture of their favored item, she fails to point out that those reviews tend to be less objective. The primary justification for this assertion lies in the fact that a customer may agree to write a positive remark if she is offered a 20% discount on the reward.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • 27

3. 任务完成度

虽然这篇文章在回应问题方面做得很好,但仍有一些改进的空间。首先,你需要更清楚地表达自己的观点,例如,在开头部分明确表明你支持哪个观点。其次,在论证过程中,可以尝试提供更多具体的例子来支持你的观点。最后,请注意避免使用重复的词汇和表达。

示例1:在开头部分,可以写:“我认为在线评论在购买决策中起到了积极作用。”以明确表达自己的观点。 示例2:在论证过程中,可以添加一个具体的例子:“例如,在购买一款新手机时,我会参考其他消费者对手机性能、电池续航和拍照效果等方面的评价。”

4. 文章结构与组织

这篇文章整体结构不错,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织上还有一些改进空间。首先,在引言部分需要更清晰地阐述自己的立场;其次,在正文部分,可以使用更明确的过渡词汇来引导读者理解你的观点和论证。最后,在结论部分,可以总结自己的观点并提出建议。

示例1:在引言部分,可以写:“在这个问题上,我倾向于支持在线评论对购买决策有积极影响的观点。”以清晰地表达自己的立场。 示例2:在正文部分,可以使用过渡词汇如“然而”、“此外”等来引导读者理解你的观点和论证。例如:“然而,在阅读在线评论时,我们也需要注意一些潜在问题。”

5. 语法批改

An intense debate has been unfolding upon the versatility of online reviews to assist purchase decisions. I firmly endorse Andrew's point that online reviews are useless because customers often lift negative comments about a bad experience.Another Another(Missing space between sentences) perspective that deserves attention is that numerous companies have been attaching increasing significance towards public reputation, and as a consequence.some Some(Lowercase word after word and no space in between) seemingly reliable comments are indeed the advertisement ofadvertisement for(Collocation: advertisement of/for) the companies. That said, the line between actual customer reviews and company ads is so blurred that it is hard for customers to figure out whether those reviews are telling the truth. While ClarieClaire(misspelling) makes a pertinent point that online reviews can help customers get a better picture of their favored item, she fails to point out that those reviews tend to be less objective. The primary justification for this assertion lies in the fact that a customer may agree to write a positive remark if she is offered a 20% discount on the reward.

Title: 6 文章修订

The ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of online reviews in guiding purchasing decisions is certainly multifaceted. I concur with Andrew's assertion that online reviews can be unreliable, as customers often emphasize negative experiences. Furthermore, it is essential to consider that many companies place significant importance on their public reputation, leading to the proliferation of potentially biased reviews disguised as genuine customer feedback. Consequently, discerning the authenticity of these reviews becomes increasingly challenging for consumers. While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, she overlooks the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations. This lack of objectivity may stem from incentives offered by companies, such as discounts or rewards, in exchange for favorable comments. (123 words)

An intense The ongoing debate has been unfolding upon regarding the versatility efficacy of online reviews to assist purchase decisions. in guiding purchasing decisions is certainly multifaceted (revised for clarity and conciseness). I firmly endorse concur with Andrew's point that online reviews are useless because customers often lift negative comments about a bad experience.Another perspective that deserves attention is that numerous companies have been attaching increasing significance towards public reputation, and as a consequence.some seemingly reliable comments are indeed the advertisement of the companies. That said, the line between actual customer reviews and company ads is so blurred that it is hard for customers to figure out whether those reviews are telling the truth. While Clarie makes a pertinent point assertion that online reviews can help be unreliable, as customers get a often emphasize negative experiences (rephrased for better picture flow). Furthermore, it is essential to consider that many companies place significant importance on their public reputation, leading to the proliferation of their favored item, potentially biased reviews disguised as genuine customer feedback (restructured for clarity). Consequently, discerning the authenticity of these reviews becomes increasingly challenging for consumers (simplified sentence structure). While Claire highlights the potential benefits of online reviews in providing insights into desired products or services, she fails to point out that those reviews tend to be less objective. The primary justification overlooks the inherent subjectivity of such evaluations (rephrased for this assertion lies better flow). This lack of objectivity may stem from incentives offered by companies, such as discounts or rewards, in the fact that a customer may agree to write a positive remark if she is offered a 20% discount on the reward.exchange for favorable comments (clarified meaning and improved sentence structure).

Title: 8 思维导图


- Online Reviews
    - Unreliability
        - Negative experiences emphasized
        - Biased reviews disguised as genuine feedback
    - Benefits
        - Insights into products/services
    - Challenges
        - Discerning authenticity
        - Inherent subjectivity
            - Incentives offered by companies

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
efficacy/ˈɛfɪkəsi/nounthe ability to produce a desired result效力The efficacy of online reviews is a subject of debate.
multifaceted/ˌmʌltiˈfæsɪtɪd/adjectivehaving many aspects or phases多方面的The debate about online reviews is certainly multifaceted.
proliferation/prəˌlɪfəˈreɪʃ(ə)n/nounrapid increase in numbers激增The proliferation of biased reviews makes it difficult for consumers.
discerning/dɪˈsɜrnɪŋ/adjective- showing good judgment, especially about style or quality- 有识别能力的- Discerning the authenticity of online reviews is challenging for consumers.
subjectivity/səbˌdʒektɪvəti/- noun- the quality of being based on personal feelings, tastes, or opinions- 主观性- The inherent subjectivity of online reviews can lead to unreliable information.
incentives/ɪnˈsɛntɪvz/nounsomething that encourages a person to do something激励Companies offer incentives for favorable comments.
authenticity/ɔːˌθentɪsəti/nounthe quality of being genuine or true真实性Consumers struggle with discerning the authenticity of online reviews.
evaluations/ɪˌvæljʊˈeɪʃ(ə)n/nounan assessment or judgment评估Online reviews provide evaluations of products and services.
unfavorable/ʌnˈfeɪv(ə)rəb(ə)l/- adjective- not expressing approval; not advantageous or helpful- 不利的- Unfavorable comments may be hidden due to incentives offered by companies.
reliability/rɪˌlaɪəˈbɪləti/- noun- the quality of being trustworthy or performing consistently well- 可靠性- The reliability of online reviews is often questioned by consumers.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now