TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor's question. In your response, you should • express and support your personal opinion • make a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

In class this week, we are looking at how markets work, particularly in regard to energy costs. Petroleum, also known simply as oil, is one of the most important international commodities. When the global market price of oil goes up, fuels such as gasoline (petrol) also become more expensive. Many people think governments should step in to protect consumers from increases in fuel prices. What is your view? Do you think governments should actively keep fuel prices low for consumers?

Kelly

I think it's a good government policy. Most people have to drive or use public transportation, like a bus, to get to work. When the price of gasoline goes up, it costs them more to get to work. People don't have a choice about whether to go to work or not, so they should be protected from price increases.

Andrew

I think the government keeping gas prices low is a bad policy. The biggest problem we face now is global climate change. The more expensive gasoline is, the less people will drive, and thus they will contribute fewer greenhouse gases to the air. Lowering the cost of gas just makes the problem worse.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

From my perspective, I agree with Kelly’s idea that keeping fuel prices low for consumers will benefit people who heavily rely on vehicles such as bus...

スコア
27

ユーザーサンプル

From my perspective, I agree with Kelly’s idea that keeping fuel prices low for consumers will benefit people who heavily rely on vehicles such as buses or cars for their daily work life, because it can alleviate their financial burden. Another point I want to add is that low fuel prices can promote social welfare and equity. Since the global economic trend is not ideally perfect, poverty is a severe problem for all citizens, and there is an increased number of individuals and families with low incomes. If the fuel prices rise to a relatively high level, these people will be forced to bear the burden of increased fuel costs, which will eventually lead to inequalities and also hinder their access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Adversely, governments can provide relief to vulnerable populations, ensuring that essential transportation remains affordable and accessible to all. Furthermore, economic stability and consumer purchasing power can be achieved by low fuel prices. When fuel prices rise, it often leads to increased costs for various industries, such as transportation and manufacturing. These increased costs are typically passed on to consumers through higher prices for goods and services. By actively keeping fuel prices low, governments can help control inflationary pressures, ensuring stable prices for essential commodities and preventing an erosion of purchasing power for consumers. Therefore, keeping fuel prices low for consumers not only benefits individuals by providing ethical considerations, but also contributes to business practices, thus eventually providing advantages to the whole society.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.5

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.5

2. 预估分数

27. 3 任务完成度

整体来说,你的文章回答了教授的问题,并且提供了有力的论据支持你的观点。但是,为了进一步提高文章质量,你可以尝试以下几点:

  1. 在表达观点时,可以适当引用对方观点进行对比和讨论,这样可以使文章更具说服力。

  2. 在论述过程中,可以加入更多具体的例子和数据来支持自己的观点。

示例1(在表达观点时引用对方观点): 虽然Andrew认为高油价有助于减少碳排放,但我认为政府应该保持低油价以确保弱势群体能够负担得起基本交通需求。

示例2(加入具体例子和数据): 例如,在某国家实施低油价政策后,低收入家庭能够节省每月10%的交通费用,从而增加他们在教育和医疗方面的投资。

4. 文章结构与组织

你的文章结构清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。每个段落都集中讨论了一个具体的观点,并提供了支持细节。然而,为了使文章更加流畅,你可以尝试以下几点:

  1. 在段落之间使用更明确的过渡词或短语,以帮助读者更好地理解你的观点。

  2. 在引言部分简要概括文章的主要观点,使读者对文章内容有一个整体的把握。

示例1(使用过渡词或短语): 首先,低油价有助于缓解低收入家庭的经济负担。其次,这一政策还可以促进社会福利和公平。

示例2(在引言部分概括主要观点): 在本文中,我将阐述为什么我认为政府应该保持低油价政策,并分析其对个人、企业和整个社会产生的积极影响。

5. 语法批改

From my perspective, I agree with Kelly’s idea that keeping fuel prices low for consumers will benefit people who heavily rely on vehicles such as buses or cars for their daily work life, because it can alleviate their financial burden. Another point I want to add is that low fuel prices can promote social welfare and equity. Since the global economic trend is not ideally perfect, poverty is a severe problem for all citizens, and there is an increased number of individuals and families with low incomes. If the fuel prices rise to a relatively high level, these people will be forced to bear the burden of increased fuel costs, which will eventually lead to inequalities and also hinder their access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Adversely, governments can provide relief to vulnerable populations, ensuring that essential transportation remains affordable and accessible to all. Furthermore, economic stability and consumer purchasing power can be achieved by low fuel prices. When fuel prices rise, it often leads to increased costs for various industries, such as transportation and manufacturing. These increased costs are typically passed on to consumers through higher prices for goods and services. By actively keeping fuel prices low, governments can help control inflationary pressures, ensuring stable prices for essential commodities and preventing an erosion of purchasing power for consumers. Therefore, keeping fuel prices low for consumers not only benefits individuals by providing ethical considerations, but also contributes to business practices, thus eventually providing advantages to the whole society.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

In my opinion, I concur with Kelly's argument that maintaining low fuel prices for consumers is advantageous, particularly for those who depend on transportation like buses or cars in their daily lives, as it helps ease their financial strain. Additionally, I would like to emphasize that low fuel prices can foster social welfare and equity. Given the current global economic climate, poverty remains a pressing issue affecting many individuals and families with limited income. High fuel prices would disproportionately burden these vulnerable groups, potentially restricting their access to essential services such as education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Conversely, by ensuring affordable and accessible transportation for all citizens, governments can effectively support marginalized populations.

Moreover, economic stability and consumer purchasing power can be bolstered by maintaining low fuel prices. When fuel costs rise, various industries such as transportation and manufacturing often experience increased expenses which are then passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services. By proactively keeping fuel prices low, governments can mitigate inflationary pressures and maintain stable pricing for essential commodities while preserving consumer purchasing power. Consequently, sustaining low fuel prices not only benefits individuals through ethical considerations but also promotes responsible business practices – ultimately yielding advantages for society as a whole. (215 words)

From In my perspective, opinion, I agree concur with Kelly’s idea Kelly's argument (Changed "agree" to "concur" for better word choice) that keeping fuel prices low maintaining low fuel prices for consumers will benefit people is advantageous, particularly for those who heavily rely depend on vehicles such as transportation like buses or cars for in their daily work life, because lives (Rephrased to improve clarity and readability), as it can alleviate helps ease their financial burden. Another point strain. Additionally, I want to add is would like to emphasize that low fuel prices can promote foster social welfare and equity. Since Given the current global economic trend is not ideally perfect, climate (Changed "trend" to "climate" for better word choice), poverty is remains a severe problem pressing issue affecting many individuals and families with limited income. High fuel prices would disproportionately burden these vulnerable groups, potentially restricting their access to essential services such as education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Conversely, by ensuring affordable and accessible transportation for all citizens, and there is an increased number of individuals and families with low incomes. If the fuel prices rise to a relatively high level, these people will be forced to bear the burden of increased fuel costs, which will eventually lead to inequalities and also hinder their access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Adversely, governments can provide relief to vulnerable populations, ensuring that essential transportation remains affordable and accessible to all. Furthermore, effectively support marginalized populations.

Moreover, economic stability and consumer purchasing power can be achieved bolstered by maintaining low fuel prices. When fuel prices costs rise, it various industries such as transportation and manufacturing often leads to experience increased costs for various industries, such as transportation and manufacturing. These increased costs expenses which are typically then passed on to consumers through in the form of higher prices for goods and services. By actively proactively keeping fuel prices low, low (Changed "actively" to "proactively" for better word choice), governments can help control mitigate inflationary pressures, ensuring pressures and maintain stable prices pricing for essential commodities and preventing an erosion of while preserving consumer purchasing power for consumers. Therefore, keeping fuel prices low for consumers power. Consequently, sustaining low fuel prices not only benefits individuals by providing through ethical considerations, considerations but also contributes to promotes responsible business practices, thus eventually providing practices – ultimately yielding advantages to the whole society.for society as a whole.

8 思维导图


1. 低油价优势
   ├── 1.1 减轻财务压力
   ├── 1.2 促进社会福利与公平
   │    ├── 1.2.1 缓解贫困问题
   │    └── 1.2.2 提高弱势群体生活水平
   └── 1.3 支持边缘化人口

2. 经济稳定与购买力
   ├── 2.1 减轻通货膨胀压力
   ├── 2.2 维持基本商品价格稳定
   └── 2.3 提高消费者购买力

3. 负责任的商业实践

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
advantageous/ˌæd.vənˈteɪ.dʒəs/adjectivegiving an advantage or likely to bring success有利的Maintaining low fuel prices is advantageous for consumers, especially those who rely on transportation in their daily lives.
financial strain/faɪˈnænʃəl streɪn/nouna situation in which someone has difficulty managing their money and paying their bills due to limited income or unexpected expenses财务压力Low fuel prices can help ease the financial strain on individuals and families.
social welfare/ˈsoʊ.ʃəl ˈwel.feɚ/nouna system that provides assistance to people in need社会福利Low fuel prices can foster social welfare and equity.
marginalized/ˈmɑr.dʒɪ.nəl.aɪzd/adjectivetreated as if they are not important or not part of the main group边缘化的Governments can effectively support marginalized populations by ensuring affordable transportation.
purchasing power/ˈpɝː.tʃə.sɪŋ ˌpaʊ.ɚ/nounthe amount of goods or services that can be bought with a particular amount of money购买力Maintaining low fuel prices can bolster consumer purchasing power.
inflationary/ɪnˈfleɪ.ʃən.er.i/adjective/relating to or causing an increase in the general level of prices/通货膨胀的/By keeping fuel prices low, governments can mitigate inflationary pressures.
commodities/kəˈmɑd·ə·tiz//noun/goods that are bought and sold, especially those used in industry/基本商品/Governments can maintain stable pricing for essential commodities by proactively keeping fuel prices low.
ethical/ˈeθ·ɪ·kəl//adjective/relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong/道德的/Sustaining low fuel prices benefits individuals through ethical considerations.
responsible/rɪˈspɑn·sə·bəl//adjective/having good judgment and the ability to act correctly and make decisions that are based on generally accepted moral principles负责任的Low fuel prices promote responsible business practices, ultimately yielding advantages for society as a whole.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now