TOEFLIELTS
日本語
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: is a good idea

AIによる評価とフィードバック付きの実際のユーザー投稿

1件のユーザー投稿サンプルがあります

無料練習を始める

タスク概要

Professor

On the day of outdoor classes, students will be transported to local parks or nature preserves, and teachers can help students explore nature and learn about the enviroment. Do you think is a good idea?

Student A

I do not think these classes would be a worthwhile use of insrtuctional time and of school resuorces. These classes could put susbstantial pressure on schools' financial resources and on teachers, who may have to redesign their lesson plans.

Student B

Outdoor classes can increase students' motivation for learning about interconnectedness in natural world.

ユーザーサンプルと評価結果

1

ユーザーサンプル #1

While II can understand Kelly’s point that taking these classed is not a good idea for students and professors since these classes make professors hav...

スコア
22

ユーザーサンプル

While II can understand Kelly’s point that taking these classed is not a good idea for students and professors since these classes make professors have more stress and pressure, I agree with Paul’s perspective that taking these classes help students become a high-achiever in their academic learning. As mentioned by Paul, when taking these classes, students are encouraged to interact with natural world, in which process students are able to know different types of plants and animals, thus obtaining and gaining more knowledge about ecology; however, without such classes, students could merely absorb knowledge from books. Apart from what Paul has raised, I add that it is well-known that such classes could help students to lower levels of stress. By taking these classes, students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world, distracting themselves form daily worries and concerns, thereby helping themselves to relax; on the contrary, when these classed absent and unavailable, students might be occupied by their schoolwork. Therefore, taking these classes, without doubt, places all students as beneficiaries.

評価結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

虽然文章在一定程度上回答了问题,但仍有改进的空间。首先,文章中出现了一些拼写和语法错误,例如 "II" 和 "classed"。其次,在表达观点时,可以更具体地提供支持细节和例子。例如,在讨论户外课程如何帮助学生降低压力时,可以提供具体的研究或数据来支持这一观点。

改进建议示例1(英文): Instead of saying "students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world," you could say, "students can engage in hands-on activities, such as observing plants and animals up close, which can enhance their understanding of the natural world."

改进建议示例2(英文): To support the point about stress reduction, you could include a specific study or data, such as "According to a study conducted by XYZ University, students who participated in outdoor classes reported a 20% decrease in stress levels compared to those who did not."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面需要改进。首先,缺少一个明确的引言部分来介绍主题和作者的立场。其次,正文段落应更加专注于特定观点,并提供详细的支持细节。最后,结论部分应总结文章的主要观点,并对讨论作出简要评价。

改进建议示例1(英文): Add an introduction: "In the debate over whether outdoor classes are beneficial for students, there are arguments both for and against their implementation. While some believe that they may put unnecessary pressure on schools and teachers, others argue that they can enhance students' motivation and well-being. In this essay, I will argue in favor of outdoor classes for their potential to improve students' academic performance and reduce stress."

改进建议示例2(英文): Improve body paragraphs: "One major advantage of outdoor classes is their ability to foster a deeper understanding of the natural world. For example, instead of merely reading about different types of plants and animals in textbooks, students can observe them up close in their natural habitats. This hands-on experience can lead to a more profound appreciation for the interconnectedness of ecosystems and inspire curiosity about environmental issues."

5. 语法批改

While II can understand Kelly’s point that taking these classed is not a good idea for students and professors since these classes make professors have more stress and pressure, I agree with Paul’s (Two consecutive spaces)perspective that taking these classes help students become a high-achiever in their academic learning. As mentioned by Paul, when taking these classes, students are encouraged to interact with naturalthe natural(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) world, in which process students are able to know different types of plants and animals, thus obtaining and gaining more knowledge about ecology; however, without such classes, students could merely absorb knowledge from books. Apart from what Paul has raised, I add that it is well-known that such classes could help students to lower levels of stress. By taking these classes, students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world, distracting themselves formfrom(Detects potentially wrong usage of "form") daily worries and concerns, thereby helping themselves to relax; on the contrary, when these classed absent and unavailable, students might be occupied by their schoolwork. Therefore, taking these classes, without doubt, places all students as beneficiaries.

Display title: 6 文章修订

Although I can understand Kelly's concern that outdoor classes may not be the most efficient use of instructional time and resources, potentially causing additional stress for educators, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that these classes can significantly enhance students' academic performance. As Paul mentioned, engaging with the natural world encourages students to learn about various plants and animals, thereby expanding their ecological knowledge beyond what they could glean from textbooks alone. In addition to Paul's argument, I would like to emphasize the well-documented benefits of outdoor classes in reducing stress levels among students. Immersing themselves in nature allows students to appreciate its beauty and temporarily escape their daily worries and concerns, promoting relaxation. Conversely, without access to such classes, students may become overwhelmed by their schoolwork. Thus, incorporating outdoor classes into the curriculum undeniably offers numerous advantages for all students involved. (145 words)

While II Although I can understand Kelly’s point Kelly's concern (revised for clarity and natural tone) that taking these classed is outdoor classes may not a good idea be the most efficient use of instructional time and resources (rephrased for students and professors since clarity), potentially causing additional stress for educators, I concur with Paul's viewpoint (revised for natural tone) that these classes make professors have more stress and pressure, I agree can significantly enhance students' academic performance. As Paul mentioned, engaging with Paul’s perspective that taking these classes help the natural world encourages students become a high-achiever in their academic learning. As mentioned by Paul, when taking these classes, students are encouraged to interact with natural world, in which process students are able to know different types of learn about various plants and animals, thus obtaining and gaining more thereby expanding their ecological knowledge about ecology; however, without such classes, beyond what they could glean from textbooks alone (rephrased for clarity). In addition to Paul's argument, I would like to emphasize the well-documented benefits of outdoor classes in reducing stress levels among students could merely absorb knowledge from books. Apart from what Paul has raised, I add that it is well-known that such classes could help (revised for clarity). Immersing themselves in nature allows students to lower levels of stress. By taking these classes, students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world, distracting themselves form its beauty and temporarily escape their daily worries and concerns, thereby helping themselves promoting relaxation (rephrased for clarity). Conversely, without access to relax; on the contrary, when these classed absent and unavailable, such classes, students might be occupied may become overwhelmed by their schoolwork. Therefore, taking these classes, without doubt, places schoolwork (rephrased for clarity). Thus, incorporating outdoor classes into the curriculum undeniably offers numerous advantages for all students as beneficiaries.involved (revised for natural tone).

Display title: 8 思维导图

Mindmap:

1. Introduction
   - Outdoor classes debate
   - Kelly's concerns
   - Paul's viewpoint

2. Ecological knowledge
   - Learning about plants and animals
   - Beyond textbooks

3. Reducing stress levels
   - Immersion in nature
   - Appreciating beauty

4. Benefits for students
   - Relaxation and escape from daily worries

5. Counterargument to concerns
   - Efficient use of resources and time?

6. Conclusion
   - Advantages of outdoor classes for all students involved

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
instructional/ɪnˈstrʌkʃənəl/adjectiverelating to teaching or education教学的Outdoor classes may not be the most efficient use of instructional time and resources.
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree or have the same opinion同意I concur with Paul's viewpoint that these classes can significantly enhance students' performance.
ecological/ˌi:kə'lɒdʒɪkl/adjectiverelating to the relationships between organisms and their environment | 生态的     | Engaging with the natural world encourages students to learn about various plants and animals, thereby expanding their ecological knowledge beyond what they could glean from textbooks alone.
| immersing/ɪ'mɜrsɪŋ/verbinvolve oneself deeply in a particular activity or interest | 沉浸于         | Immersing themselves in nature allows students to appreciate its beauty and temporarily escape their daily worries and concerns.
| overwhelmed/ˌəʊvər'wɛlmd/adjectivefeeling unable to cope with something due to its size or intensity | 不堪重负的      | Without access to such classes, students may become overwhelmed by their schoolwork.
| curriculum/kə'rɪkjʊləm/nounthe subjects comprising a course of study in a school or college | 课程表      | Thus, incorporating outdoor classes into the curriculum undeniably offers numerous advantages for all students involved.

アカデミック・ディスカッションの採点方法

TOEFLアカデミック・ディスカッションのタスクは、ETS公式の採点基準に基づいて評価されます。AI評価は各回答を複数の観点から分析します。

関連性と貢献度

設問に的確に答え、ディスカッションに意味のある貢献をしているか?

言語使用

文法の正確さ、語彙の幅、文構造の質。

展開と裏付け

具体例と明確な論理によってアイデアが十分に展開されているか?

回答に見られる共通パターン

このタスクに寄せられたユーザー投稿の分析に基づき、受験者の回答に見られる共通パターンを紹介します。

多くの受験者は明確な意見を述べるものの、具体的な裏付け例が不足している。

高評価の回答は、リーディングパッセージや他の参加者の意見に直接言及している。

高得点の回答は、多様な文構造とアカデミックな語彙を使用している。

時間配分は重要な要素であり、急いで書かれた印象の回答は展開の評価が低くなる傾向がある。

学習のヒント

1

書き始める前に設問文を注意深く読み、質問のすべての要素を把握する。

2

回答の中でリーディングパッセージや他の受験者の意見に言及する。

3

主張を裏付けるために具体例を使い、一般論は避ける。

4

120~150語を目安にする。長い回答が必ずしも良いわけではなく、明確さと焦点の方が重要。

5

本番同様の条件で流暢さを養うため、時間を計って(10分間)回答する練習をする。

よくある質問

TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクとは何ですか?
TOEFLのAcademic Discussionタスクでは、オンラインの授業ディスカッションに参加することが求められます。教授の質問と他の学生の回答を読んだ上で、約10分以内に自分の意見を述べ、それを裏付ける投稿を作成します。
Academic Discussionタスクはどのように採点されますか?
このタスクは0〜5点の尺度で採点され、ディスカッションとの関連性、言語使用の質(文法、語彙、文構造)、そして具体的な例と論理的な根拠を用いてどれだけ考えを展開・裏付けできているかが評価基準となります。
このページに表示されているユーザーサンプルとは何ですか?
これらは、LingoLeap上でこの問題を練習した実際のTOEFL受験者から提出された回答です。各サンプルは当社のAI採点エンジンによって評価されており、スコアと、強みや改善点に関する詳細なフィードバックが提供されます。
AI評価の精度はどの程度ですか?
LingoLeapのAI評価エンジンは、ETSの公式採点基準をもとにトレーニングされ、人間の採点者のスコアと照合して調整されています。自動採点システムに完璧なものはありませんが、練習用として信頼できるフィードバックを提供し、具体的な改善点を特定するのに役立ちます。
このAcademic Discussionタスクをどうやって練習できますか?
無料のLingoLeapアカウントに登録することで練習できます。まさにこの質問に対する自分の回答を書いて提出すると、文章に関する詳細なフィードバック付きのAI評価をすぐに受け取ることができます。
Academic Discussionの回答はどのくらいの長さにすべきですか?
120〜150語を目安にしてください。このタスクでは回答を書くための時間が10分与えられます。より長い回答を書くことよりも、明確さ、具体的な例による意見の裏付け、ディスカッションの文脈への言及を重視してください。

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now