TOEFLIELTS
한국어
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: is a good idea

AI 기반 평가와 피드백이 포함된 실제 사용자 제출 답안

사용자 제출 예시 1개 이용 가능

무료 연습 시작하기

과제 개요

Professor

On the day of outdoor classes, students will be transported to local parks or nature preserves, and teachers can help students explore nature and learn about the enviroment. Do you think is a good idea?

Student A

I do not think these classes would be a worthwhile use of insrtuctional time and of school resuorces. These classes could put susbstantial pressure on schools' financial resources and on teachers, who may have to redesign their lesson plans.

Student B

Outdoor classes can increase students' motivation for learning about interconnectedness in natural world.

사용자 예시 및 평가 결과

1

사용자 예시 #1

While II can understand Kelly’s point that taking these classed is not a good idea for students and professors since these classes make professors hav...

점수
22

사용자 예시

While II can understand Kelly’s point that taking these classed is not a good idea for students and professors since these classes make professors have more stress and pressure, I agree with Paul’s perspective that taking these classes help students become a high-achiever in their academic learning. As mentioned by Paul, when taking these classes, students are encouraged to interact with natural world, in which process students are able to know different types of plants and animals, thus obtaining and gaining more knowledge about ecology; however, without such classes, students could merely absorb knowledge from books. Apart from what Paul has raised, I add that it is well-known that such classes could help students to lower levels of stress. By taking these classes, students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world, distracting themselves form daily worries and concerns, thereby helping themselves to relax; on the contrary, when these classed absent and unavailable, students might be occupied by their schoolwork. Therefore, taking these classes, without doubt, places all students as beneficiaries.

평가 결과

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

22. 3 任务完成度

虽然文章在一定程度上回答了问题,但仍有改进的空间。首先,文章中出现了一些拼写和语法错误,例如 "II" 和 "classed"。其次,在表达观点时,可以更具体地提供支持细节和例子。例如,在讨论户外课程如何帮助学生降低压力时,可以提供具体的研究或数据来支持这一观点。

改进建议示例1(英文): Instead of saying "students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world," you could say, "students can engage in hands-on activities, such as observing plants and animals up close, which can enhance their understanding of the natural world."

改进建议示例2(英文): To support the point about stress reduction, you could include a specific study or data, such as "According to a study conducted by XYZ University, students who participated in outdoor classes reported a 20% decrease in stress levels compared to those who did not."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面需要改进。首先,缺少一个明确的引言部分来介绍主题和作者的立场。其次,正文段落应更加专注于特定观点,并提供详细的支持细节。最后,结论部分应总结文章的主要观点,并对讨论作出简要评价。

改进建议示例1(英文): Add an introduction: "In the debate over whether outdoor classes are beneficial for students, there are arguments both for and against their implementation. While some believe that they may put unnecessary pressure on schools and teachers, others argue that they can enhance students' motivation and well-being. In this essay, I will argue in favor of outdoor classes for their potential to improve students' academic performance and reduce stress."

改进建议示例2(英文): Improve body paragraphs: "One major advantage of outdoor classes is their ability to foster a deeper understanding of the natural world. For example, instead of merely reading about different types of plants and animals in textbooks, students can observe them up close in their natural habitats. This hands-on experience can lead to a more profound appreciation for the interconnectedness of ecosystems and inspire curiosity about environmental issues."

5. 语法批改

While II can understand Kelly’s point that taking these classed is not a good idea for students and professors since these classes make professors have more stress and pressure, I agree with Paul’s (Two consecutive spaces)perspective that taking these classes help students become a high-achiever in their academic learning. As mentioned by Paul, when taking these classes, students are encouraged to interact with naturalthe natural(This rule identifies whether the article 'the' is missing in a sentence.) world, in which process students are able to know different types of plants and animals, thus obtaining and gaining more knowledge about ecology; however, without such classes, students could merely absorb knowledge from books. Apart from what Paul has raised, I add that it is well-known that such classes could help students to lower levels of stress. By taking these classes, students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world, distracting themselves formfrom(Detects potentially wrong usage of "form") daily worries and concerns, thereby helping themselves to relax; on the contrary, when these classed absent and unavailable, students might be occupied by their schoolwork. Therefore, taking these classes, without doubt, places all students as beneficiaries.

Display title: 6 文章修订

Although I can understand Kelly's concern that outdoor classes may not be the most efficient use of instructional time and resources, potentially causing additional stress for educators, I concur with Paul's viewpoint that these classes can significantly enhance students' academic performance. As Paul mentioned, engaging with the natural world encourages students to learn about various plants and animals, thereby expanding their ecological knowledge beyond what they could glean from textbooks alone. In addition to Paul's argument, I would like to emphasize the well-documented benefits of outdoor classes in reducing stress levels among students. Immersing themselves in nature allows students to appreciate its beauty and temporarily escape their daily worries and concerns, promoting relaxation. Conversely, without access to such classes, students may become overwhelmed by their schoolwork. Thus, incorporating outdoor classes into the curriculum undeniably offers numerous advantages for all students involved. (145 words)

While II Although I can understand Kelly’s point Kelly's concern (revised for clarity and natural tone) that taking these classed is outdoor classes may not a good idea be the most efficient use of instructional time and resources (rephrased for students and professors since clarity), potentially causing additional stress for educators, I concur with Paul's viewpoint (revised for natural tone) that these classes make professors have more stress and pressure, I agree can significantly enhance students' academic performance. As Paul mentioned, engaging with Paul’s perspective that taking these classes help the natural world encourages students become a high-achiever in their academic learning. As mentioned by Paul, when taking these classes, students are encouraged to interact with natural world, in which process students are able to know different types of learn about various plants and animals, thus obtaining and gaining more thereby expanding their ecological knowledge about ecology; however, without such classes, beyond what they could glean from textbooks alone (rephrased for clarity). In addition to Paul's argument, I would like to emphasize the well-documented benefits of outdoor classes in reducing stress levels among students could merely absorb knowledge from books. Apart from what Paul has raised, I add that it is well-known that such classes could help (revised for clarity). Immersing themselves in nature allows students to lower levels of stress. By taking these classes, students are completely engaged to appreciate beautiful view in natural world, distracting themselves form its beauty and temporarily escape their daily worries and concerns, thereby helping themselves promoting relaxation (rephrased for clarity). Conversely, without access to relax; on the contrary, when these classed absent and unavailable, such classes, students might be occupied may become overwhelmed by their schoolwork. Therefore, taking these classes, without doubt, places schoolwork (rephrased for clarity). Thus, incorporating outdoor classes into the curriculum undeniably offers numerous advantages for all students as beneficiaries.involved (revised for natural tone).

Display title: 8 思维导图

Mindmap:

1. Introduction
   - Outdoor classes debate
   - Kelly's concerns
   - Paul's viewpoint

2. Ecological knowledge
   - Learning about plants and animals
   - Beyond textbooks

3. Reducing stress levels
   - Immersion in nature
   - Appreciating beauty

4. Benefits for students
   - Relaxation and escape from daily worries

5. Counterargument to concerns
   - Efficient use of resources and time?

6. Conclusion
   - Advantages of outdoor classes for all students involved

Display title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
instructional/ɪnˈstrʌkʃənəl/adjectiverelating to teaching or education教学的Outdoor classes may not be the most efficient use of instructional time and resources.
concur/kənˈkɜr/verbagree or have the same opinion同意I concur with Paul's viewpoint that these classes can significantly enhance students' performance.
ecological/ˌi:kə'lɒdʒɪkl/adjectiverelating to the relationships between organisms and their environment | 生态的     | Engaging with the natural world encourages students to learn about various plants and animals, thereby expanding their ecological knowledge beyond what they could glean from textbooks alone.
| immersing/ɪ'mɜrsɪŋ/verbinvolve oneself deeply in a particular activity or interest | 沉浸于         | Immersing themselves in nature allows students to appreciate its beauty and temporarily escape their daily worries and concerns.
| overwhelmed/ˌəʊvər'wɛlmd/adjectivefeeling unable to cope with something due to its size or intensity | 不堪重负的      | Without access to such classes, students may become overwhelmed by their schoolwork.
| curriculum/kə'rɪkjʊləm/nounthe subjects comprising a course of study in a school or college | 课程表      | Thus, incorporating outdoor classes into the curriculum undeniably offers numerous advantages for all students involved.

Academic Discussion 채점 방식

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 ETS 공식 채점 기준에 따라 평가됩니다. AI 평가는 여러 측면에서 각 답안을 분석합니다.

관련성 및 기여도

답안이 질문에 답하고 토론에 의미 있게 기여하는가?

언어 사용

문법 정확성, 어휘 범위, 문장 구조의 질.

전개 및 근거

구체적인 예시와 명확한 논리로 아이디어가 잘 전개되었는가?

답안에서 나타나는 공통 패턴

이 과제에 대한 사용자 제출 답안을 분석한 결과, 학생 답안에서 관찰된 공통 패턴은 다음과 같습니다.

많은 학생이 명확한 의견을 제시하지만 구체적인 뒷받침 예시가 부족합니다.

높은 점수를 받은 답안은 리딩 지문과 다른 참여자의 의견을 직접 인용합니다.

점수가 높은 답안은 다양한 문장 구조와 학술적 어휘를 사용합니다.

시간 관리는 핵심 요소입니다 — 서두른 느낌을 주는 답안은 전개 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받는 경향이 있습니다.

학습 팁

1

글을 쓰기 전에 프롬프트를 꼼꼼히 읽고 질문의 모든 부분을 파악하세요.

2

답안에서 리딩 지문과 다른 학생들의 의견을 언급하세요.

3

핵심 주장을 뒷받침할 구체적인 예시를 사용하고, 일반적인 진술은 피하세요.

4

120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 답안이 길다고 항상 좋은 것은 아니며, 명료함과 초점이 더 중요합니다.

5

시험 조건에서 유창하게 답하기 위해 시간을 정해(10분) 연습하세요.

자주 묻는 질문

TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제란 무엇인가요?
TOEFL Academic Discussion 과제는 온라인 수업 토론에 참여하는 것을 요구합니다. 교수의 질문과 다른 학생들의 답변을 읽은 후, 약 10분 안에 자신의 의견을 표현하고 뒷받침하는 글을 작성하게 됩니다.
Academic Discussion 과제는 어떻게 채점되나요?
이 과제는 토론과의 관련성, 언어 사용의 질(문법, 어휘, 문장 구조), 그리고 구체적인 예시와 근거를 통해 아이디어를 얼마나 잘 전개하고 뒷받침하는지를 기준으로 0~5점 척도로 채점됩니다.
이 페이지의 사용자 샘플은 무엇인가요?
LingoLeap에서 이 문제를 연습한 실제 TOEFL 응시자들이 제출한 답변입니다. 각 샘플은 저희 AI 채점 엔진에 의해 평가되었으며, 점수와 함께 강점 및 개선이 필요한 부분에 대한 상세한 피드백을 제공합니다.
AI 평가는 얼마나 정확한가요?
LingoLeap의 AI 평가 엔진은 공식 ETS 채점 기준으로 학습되었으며, 실제 채점자의 점수와 비교하여 보정되었습니다. 완벽한 자동 채점 시스템은 없지만, 연습 목적으로 신뢰할 수 있는 피드백을 제공하며 구체적인 개선 영역을 파악하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
이 Academic Discussion 과제를 어떻게 연습할 수 있나요?
무료 LingoLeap 계정에 가입하여 연습할 수 있습니다. 바로 이 질문에 대한 답변을 직접 작성하여 제출하면, 글쓰기에 대한 상세한 피드백과 함께 즉시 AI 평가를 받을 수 있습니다.
Academic Discussion 답변은 얼마나 길게 써야 하나요?
120~150단어를 목표로 하세요. 이 과제는 답변을 작성할 10분의 시간을 제공합니다. 더 긴 답변을 쓰기보다는 명확성, 구체적인 예시로 의견을 뒷받침하는 것, 토론 맥락을 참조하는 것에 집중하세요.

Rooting for Your Goal Score Today!

With LingoLeap, an expert in English exams

Get to Your Dream Score Faster

Try for free now