TOEFLIELTS
繁體中文
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on public activity. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

真實考生作答範例,搭配 AI 評分與回饋

目前有 1 篇考生投稿範例

開始免費練習

題型概述

Doctor Achebe

As we have been discussing in class, deciding where to donate money is an important consideration when supporting charitable causes. Some prefer local charities where the impact may be more visible, while others favor international ones tackling issues on a broader scale. With this in mind, when donating money to charity, what factors do you take into account when choosing between local and international organizations?

Andrew

I prefer to give to local charities rather than international ones. Local organizations where I live allow me to witness firsthand the impact my contributions make. The visible difference - even a small amount - motivates me to keep supporting groups creating visible change close to home.

Claire

I believe supporting international charities is most impactful. Though local charities do good work, global issues like climate change and poverty affect millions more people. International groups have the scale and resources to drive systematic change on these pressing problems in ways smaller organizations simply can't. Donating to major international charities can thus create widespread, meaningful impact.

考生範例與評分結果

1

考生範例 #1

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities. Howev...

分數
25

考生範例

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities. However, the visible information is not always convincing, they may cheat the donators. Consequently, I find myself resonating more with Claire’s perspective. As Claire mentioned, international charities are more impactful and have more resources than local ones. With international influence, the charities are able to help about the global issues, such as climate change or nature disasters in the other countries. Besides, there are usually quite a few professionals in the members of international charities, who have the ability to carry out the charity plan systematically and efficiently without wasting. Therefore, donating to them makes this action more meaningful for me. Furthermore, the international charities are usually more convincing than the local charities. Usually, to attract more donations, international charities would public how they use the funds on the internet or the newspapers. However, the local charities seldom have such professional procedure of pubic their information, which make me worry that if they are truly helping people with my donation. For instance, about 10 yeas ago, I donated to a charity organized near the city I lived, wishing to offer my help to more people. However, just 3 months after donating, I found in news that the charity was just using their funds to their own investment, instead of helpful activities.

評分結果

1. 子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

总体来说,这篇文章较好地完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于捐赠给国际慈善机构的支持。但是,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在提到本地慈善机构可能存在欺诈行为时,可以给出更具体的例子或数据来支持观点。其次,在讨论国际慈善机构的优势时,可以提供更多详细的信息和实例来说明它们如何解决全球问题。

Example 1: Instead of "the visible information is not always convincing, they may cheat the donators.", you could write "There have been cases where local charities misused the funds they received, such as the XYZ Charity scandal in 2010, where a significant portion of donations was used for personal gains."

Example 2: Instead of "With international influence, the charities are able to help about the global issues, such as climate change or nature disasters in the other countries.", you could write "International charities like UNICEF or Oxfam have implemented large-scale projects addressing global issues like climate change by supporting renewable energy initiatives and providing disaster relief to affected countries."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章结构基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在组织上还有一些可以改进的地方。首先,引言部分可以更明确地表达作者的观点,以便读者一开始就能了解文章的主题。其次,在正文部分,可以使用更清晰的过渡词或短语来连接不同观点和段落。

Example 1: Instead of "In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities.", you could write "In response to Dr. Achebe's question, although I understand Andrew's preference for local charities due to their visible impact, I personally believe that international charities offer more significant benefits."

Example 2: Instead of "As Claire mentioned, international charities are more impactful and have more resources than local ones.", you could write "As Claire mentioned, one major advantage of international charities is their greater impact and resources. For instance, they can address global issues like climate change more effectively."

5. 语法批改

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion that the result of donations is more visible in the local charities. However, the visible information is not always convincing, they may cheat the donators. Consequently, I find myself resonating more with Claire’s perspective. As Claire mentioned, international charities are more impactful and have more resources than local ones. With international influence, the charities are able to help about the global issues, such as climate change or nature disasters in the other countries. Besides, there are usually quite a few professionals in the members of international charities, who have the ability to carry out the charity plan systematically and efficiently without wasting. Therefore, donating to them makes this action more meaningful for me. Furthermore, the international charities are usually more convincing than the local charities. Usually, to attract more donations, international charities would public how they use the funds on the internet or the newspapers. However, the local charities seldom have such professional procedure of pubicpublic(pubic (public) education etc.) their information, which make me worry that if they are truly helping people with my donation. For instance, about 10 yeas ago, I donated to a charity organized near the city I lived, wishing to offer my help to more people. However, just 3 months after donating, I found in news that the charity was just using their funds to their own investment, instead of helpful activities.

Title: 6 文章修订

In response to Dr. Achebe's thought-provoking question, I acknowledge Andrew's viewpoint that the impact of donations is more tangible in local charities. However, visibility alone does not guarantee the authenticity of a charity, as some may deceive donors. Consequently, I find myself aligning more with Claire's perspective.

As Claire highlighted, international charities tend to be more influential and resourceful than their local counterparts. Their global reach enables them to address pressing issues such as climate change or natural disasters in other countries. Moreover, international charities often consist of numerous professionals who can execute charitable plans systematically and efficiently, minimizing waste. Therefore, donating to these organizations holds greater significance for me.

Additionally, international charities generally appear more credible than local ones. To attract donations, they often disclose their fund usage through online platforms or newspapers. In contrast, local charities rarely follow such transparent procedures, raising concerns about the legitimacy of their operations and the proper allocation of donations. For example, about ten years ago, I contributed to a charity near my city with the intention of helping others. However, just three months later, I discovered through news reports that the organization had misused funds for personal investments rather than charitable endeavors. (203 words)

In response to Dr. Achebe’s intriguing query, I appreciate Andrew’s opinion Achebe's thought-provoking question (revised for a more natural tone), I acknowledge Andrew's viewpoint that the result impact of donations is more visible tangible (changed "visible" to "tangible" for better clarity) in the local charities. However, the visible information is visibility alone does not always convincing, they guarantee the authenticity of a charity, as some may cheat the donators. deceive donors (rephrased for clarity and smoother flow). Consequently, I find myself resonating aligning more with Claire’s Claire's perspective.

As Claire mentioned, highlighted (changed "mentioned" to "highlighted" for better emphasis), international charities are more impactful and have more resources tend to be more influential and resourceful (rephrased for better flow) than local ones. With international influence, the charities are able to help about the their local counterparts. Their global issues, reach enables them to address pressing issues such as climate change or nature natural disasters in the other countries. Besides, there are usually quite a few Moreover, international charities often consist of numerous professionals in the members of international charities, who have the ability to carry out the charity plan can execute charitable plans systematically and efficiently without wasting. efficiently, minimizing waste (rephrased for smoother flow). Therefore, donating to them makes this action more meaningful these organizations holds greater significance for me.

Furthermore, the Additionally, international charities are usually more convincing generally appear more credible than the local charities. Usually, to local ones (rephrased for clarity). To attract more donations, international charities would public how they use the funds on the internet often disclose their fund usage through online platforms or the newspapers. However, the local charities seldom have In contrast, local charities rarely follow such professional procedure of pubic transparent procedures, raising concerns about the legitimacy of their information, which make me worry that if they are truly helping people with my donation. operations and the proper allocation of donations (rephrased for better flow). For instance, example, about 10 yeas ten years ago, I donated contributed to a charity organized near the my city I lived, wishing to offer my help to more people. with the intention of helping others. However, just 3 three months after donating, I found in later, I discovered through news reports that the charity was just using their organization had misused funds to their own investment, instead of helpful activities.for personal investments rather than charitable endeavors (revised sentence structure for smoother flow).

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Dr. Achebe's question
   - Andrew's viewpoint: local charities
   - Claire's perspective: international charities

2. International Charities Advantages
   - Influence and resources
   - Global reach (climate change, natural disasters)
   - Professionalism and efficiency

3. Credibility of International Charities
   - Transparency in fund usage
   - Comparison with local charities

4. Personal Experience
   - Donation to a local charity
   - Misuse of funds

5. Conclusion
   - Aligning with Claire's perspective on international charities

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
tangibleˈtæn.dʒə.bəladjectiveclear enough or definite enough to be easily seen or noticed可触摸的,明确的The impact of donations is more tangible in local charities.
authenticityɔːˌθenˈtɪsətinounthe quality of being genuine or true真实性,可靠性Visibility alone does not guarantee the authenticity of a charity.
influentialˌɪn.fluˈenʃəladjectivehaving a lot of influence on someone or something有影响力的International charities tend to be more influential than their local counterparts.
resourceful-riˈsɔrsfəladjectiveskilled at solving problems and making decisions on your own足智多谋的International charities are often more resourceful than local ones.
systematicallysɪstəˈmætɪkliadverbaccording to an organized plan or method有系统地,有条理地Professionals in international charities can execute charitable plans systematically and efficiently.
credibility-krədəˈbɪlətinounthe quality that someone or something has that makes people believe or trust them可信度,信誉International charities generally appear more credible than local ones.
transparency-trænsˈpærənsinounthe characteristic of being easy to see through, understand, or recognize透明度,公开性To attract donations, international charities often disclose their fund usage with transparency.
legitimacy-lɪˈdʒɪtəməsi--------------------------------------------------------------------------

學術討論如何評分

TOEFL學術討論題型依據官方 ETS 評分標準進行評分,AI 評分系統會從多個面向分析每篇回答。

切題度與貢獻度

回答是否切合題目,並對討論做出有意義的貢獻?

語言運用

文法準確度、詞彙廣度,以及句子結構的品質。

論述發展與支持

論點是否透過具體例子和清楚的推理獲得充分發展?

回答中的常見模式

根據對本題考生投稿的分析,以下是考生回答中常見的模式。

許多考生提出了明確的觀點,卻缺乏具體的佐證例子。

高分回答通常會直接引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他發言者的觀點。

得分較高的回答會運用多樣的句型結構與學術詞彙。

時間管理是關鍵因素——顯得倉促完成的回答,在論述發展方面通常得分較低。

學習訣竅

1

動筆前仔細閱讀題目,確認問題的每個部分都已理解。

2

在回答中引用閱讀文章內容,並回應其他考生的觀點。

3

用具體例子支持你的主要論點——避免空泛籠統的說法。

4

字數以 120-150 字為目標。篇幅較長不代表較好,清晰與聚焦更為重要。

5

練習限時作答(10 分鐘),培養在考試情境下的流暢度。

常見問題

什麼是TOEFL學術討論任務?
TOEFL學術討論任務要求你參與線上課堂討論。你需要閱讀教授的問題和其他學生的回覆,然後在約10分鐘內寫出自己的貼文,表達並支持你的觀點。
學術討論任務如何評分?
此任務依0-5分評分,評分依據包括與討論的相關性、語言運用品質(文法、詞彙、句子結構),以及你如何用具體例子和推理來發展並支持自己的觀點。
此頁面上的用戶範例是什麼?
這些是TOEFL考生在LingoLeap上練習這道題目時提交的真實回答。每個範例都經過我們的AI評分引擎評估,提供分數以及關於優勢與待加強領域的詳細回饋。
AI評估的準確度如何?
LingoLeap的AI評估引擎以ETS官方評分標準訓練而成,並與人工評分員的評分校準。雖然沒有自動化系統是完美的,但它能為練習提供可靠的回饋,並協助找出具體的加強方向。
我要如何練習這道學術討論題目?
你可以註冊免費的LingoLeap帳號來練習。針對這道確切的題目寫出你自己的回答,送出後即可立即獲得附有詳細回饋的AI評估。
我的學術討論回答應該多長?
目標字數為120-150字。此任務給你10分鐘的時間撰寫回答。請專注於表達清晰、用具體例子支持你的觀點,並引用討論脈絡,而非一味追求更長的篇幅。

今天就為您的目標分數加油!

與 LingoLeap,英語考試專家一起

更快達到您的理想分數

立即免費試用